title: Benign versus malignant breast disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR imaging and Tc-99m tetrofosmin scintimammography.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare technetium-99m tetrofosmin scintimammography with contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the characterization of palpable breast masses.
  
  
  METHODS
  Forty-seven patients (mean age, 51 years) with a palpable breast mass were prospectively examined with scintimammography, MR imaging, and conventional mammography 2 weeks before fine-needle aspiration biopsy.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In three patients, MR imaging was aborted. Of the remaining 44 patients, 21 had biopsy-proved cancer and 23 had benign disease. The sensitivity of mammography was 81%; specificity, 82%; positive predictive value (PPV), 85%; and negative predictive value (NPV), 78%. The sensitivity of scintimammography was 95%; specificity, 91%; PPV, 91%; and NPV, 95%. The sensitivity of MR imaging was 90%; specificity, 91%; PPV, 90%; and NPV, 91%. In 11 patients with previous breast cancer, scintimammographic findings were positive in all four with tumor recurrence and negative in all seven with benign disease. Masses were correctly characterized with MR imaging in eight of these 11 patients.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Although both techniques accurately differentiate benign from malignant palpable breast masses, scintimammography is more accurate in the posttreatment breast. Because of lower cost, wider availability, and high patient acceptance, scintimammography may provide a valuable alternative to MR imaging for noninvasive characterization of palpable breast disease.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Radiological Sciences, Mater Misericordiae Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
authors.forename: H M
authors.initials: HM
authors.lastname: Fenlon
authors.forename: N C
authors.initials: NC
authors.lastname: Phelan
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: O'Sullivan
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Tierney
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Gorey
authors.forename: J T
authors.initials: JT
authors.lastname: Ennis
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001707:Biopsy, Needle; D001940:Breast / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology; D001941:Breast Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D003287:Contrast Media; D005260:Female; D005682:Gadolinium; D019786:Gadolinium DTPA; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008327:Mammography; D008875:Middle Aged; D009942:Organometallic Compounds; D009943:Organophosphorus Compounds; D015609:Organotechnetium Compounds; D010173:Palpation; D004369:Pentetic Acid / Q000031:analogs & derivatives; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011877:Radionuclide Imaging; D019275:Radiopharmaceuticals; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013382:Subtraction Technique
chemical_list: D003287:Contrast Media; D009942:Organometallic Compounds; D009943:Organophosphorus Compounds; D015609:Organotechnetium Compounds; D019275:Radiopharmaceuticals; C078700:technetium tc-99m tetrofosmin; D004369:Pentetic Acid; D005682:Gadolinium; D019786:Gadolinium DTPA