A comparison of group and individual remembering: does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies?
M. S. Weldon and K. D. Bellinger (1997) showed that people who collaborate on a recall test (collaborative group) perform much more poorly than the same number of people tested individually (nominal group). Four experiments tested the hypothesis that retrieval-strategy disruption underlies this collaborative inhibition when categorized lists are studied. Collaborative groups performed worse than nominal groups when categories were large (Experiment 1) and when category names were provided at recall (Experiment 2). However, collaborative- and nominal-group recall were equivalent when participants retrieved nonoverlapping parts of the list (Experiment 3) and when participants were forced to organize their recall by category (Experiment 4). Clearly, disorganized retrieval can account for collaborative inhibition with the materials and procedures used here.
Basden
B H
BH
Department of Psychology, California State University, Fresno 93740-8019, USA. barbb@zimmer.csufresno.edu
Basden
D R
DR
Bryner
S
S
Thomas
R L
RL
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D005260:Female; D006126:Group Processes; D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D008297:Male; D011939:Mental Recall; D014706:Verbal Learning