Displacement of leisure reinforcers by food during preference assessments.
Identification of reinforcers for individuals with developmental disabilities is often based on the outcome of preference assessments in which participants make selections from among a variety of items. We determined the extent to which individuals might show a general preference for food items over leisure items during such assessments and whether leisure items that are "displaced" by food items might nevertheless function as reinforcers. Arrays consisting of food items only and then nonfood items only were presented separately to 14 participants and then were ranked to determined preference. The top selections from these initial assessments were subsequently combined in a third assessment, and preferences were again established. All but 2 participants showed a general preference for food items, such that selection of nonfood items in the combined arrays was displaced downward relative to selection of nonfood in the nonfood-only arrays. Two of the participants were exposed to a condition in which a nonfood item was delivered contingent on the occurrence of an adaptive response, and increased rates of responding by both individuals were observed. Results are discussed in terms of limitations posed by using only food items as reinforcers and the resulting need to take precautionary measures when attempting to identify nonfood reinforcers.
DeLeon
I G
IG
University of Florida, Gainesville 32611, USA.
Iwata
B A
BA
Roscoe
E M
EM
D000328:Adult; D002755:Choice Behavior; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D005518:Food Preferences / Q000523:psychology*; D006801:Humans; D008607:Intellectual Disability / Q000523:psychology* / Q000628:therapy; D007899:Leisure Activities; D008297:Male; D009042:Motivation; D012055:Reinforcement Schedule; D016728:Self-Injurious Behavior / Q000517:prevention & control / Q000523:psychology; D014040:Token Economy