title: Prognosis of patients with advanced Hodgkin's disease: evaluation of four prognostic models using 344 patients included in the Group d'Etudes des Lymphomes de l'Adulte Study.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  To determine whether a high risk group could be identified within a group of patients with advanced stage Hodgkin's disease (HD), the authors applied several prognostic models to patients treated according to the H89 protocol.
  
  
  METHODS
  This study included 344 patients with Stage IIIB-IV HD who were treated with chemotherapy alone (8 cycles) or chemotherapy (6 cycles) plus radiation therapy. Four prognostic models were selected for this study: the numeric prognostic index of the Scotland and Newcastle Lymphoma Group, the Christie Hospital (Manchester)-St. Bartholomew's Hospital (London) model, the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) model, and the criteria used in the European Bone Marrow Transplant (EBMT)/Intergroup Trial.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Univariate analysis of H89 protocol patients showed that 5 variables included in the models had prognostic significance: age > 45 years (P = 0.0001), anemia (hemoglobin < 12 g/dL for males and < 10 g/dL for females) (P = 0.0001), number of extranodal sites > or = 2 (P = 0.0013), serum lactic acid dehydrogenase greater than the normal value (P = 0.0018), and lymphocyte count < 0.75 x 10(9) L(-1) (P = 0.0063). All four models divided patients into prognostic subgroups. Significant differences among the subgroups were found by log rank analysis (chi-square test = 11-48; P = 0.01-0.0001). The worst prognostic group defined by the MSKCC model (> or = 3 adverse factors) had an overall survival rate of 59% at 3 years and an estimated 3-year event free survival rate of 43%.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Patients with at least three adverse factors according to the MSKCC model or the EBMT criteria had a higher risk of failure with conventional treatment; however, based on survival rate, no very high risk group could be identified. Nonetheless, these prognostic models may be useful to recognize patients with good prognosis who can be cured with conventional therapy and for whom treatment morbidity and mortality can be minimized.
authors.affiliation: Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes de l'Adulte, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France.
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Fermé
authors.forename: Y
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Bastion
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Brice
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Lederlin
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Diviné
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Gabarre
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Assouline
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Ferrant
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Berger
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Lepage
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000971:Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / Q000627:therapeutic use; D005163:Factor Analysis, Statistical; D005260:Female; D006689:Hodgkin Disease / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000188:drug therapy; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011379:Prognosis; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012306:Risk; D012307:Risk Factors; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D016019:Survival Analysis; D016896:Treatment Outcome