title: Is regularization determined by semantics, or grammar, or both? Comments on Kim, Marcus, Pinker, Hollander & Coppola (1994).
abstract: Kim, Marcus, Pinker, Hollander & Coppola (1994) argue that the preference children and adults show for regular inflection for verbs and nouns with novel meanings (e.g. The batter flew/flied out to centre field) should be attributed to their grammatically based sensitivity to the derivations of these verbs and nouns. However, it could also be that speakers avoid the use of irregular forms to avoid conveying the conventional meaning associated with the irregular form, such as literally flying to centre field. This paper, in reply to Kim et al. (1994), reinterprets their findings and argues for a semantic/functional account, without resorting to a grammatical account.
authors.affiliation: Department of Modern Languages, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-4701, USA.
authors.forename: Y
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Shirai
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D007804:Language Development; D012660:Semantics