Men's estimates of prostate cancer risk and self-reported rates of screening.
OBJECTIVE
To determine rates of prostate cancer screening and predictors of men's participation in this screening in the light of national recommendations against prostate cancer screening


METHODS
Community-based study (computer-assisted telephone survey).


METHODS
Central Sydney Area Health Service.


METHODS
Randomly selected men aged 40-80 years.


RESULTS
340 men participated (65% response rate). While the true lifetime (0-74 years) risk of developing or dying from prostate cancer is reported to be one in 18 (6%) and one in 65 (1.5%), respectively, 37% of respondents thought that at least one in five men (20%) would develop prostate cancer before the age of 75 years and 11% that one in five (20%) would die from it. Twenty-two per cent of men aged 50 years or over had been screened for prostate cancer within the previous 12 months. Ever worrying about prostate cancer and bothersome urinary symptoms independently predicted the probability of screening within the previous year. Sociodemographic characteristics such as age, occupation and country of birth were not associated with screening.


CONCLUSIONS
Public health initiatives to discourage prostate cancer screening should focus particularly on men with bothersome urinary symptoms and those who worry about prostate cancer. Accurate information about the low risks of dying from prostate cancer needs to be communicated, and the speculative nature of current evidence in support of screening as a means of reducing this risk should be emphasised.
Ward
J E
JE
Central Sydney Area Health Service, Needs Assessment & Health Outcomes Unit, Sydney, NSW. jward@nah.rpa.cs.nsw.gov.au
Hughes
A M
AM
Hirst
G H
GH
Winchester
L
L
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D008875:Middle Aged; D010358:Patient Participation; D011471:Prostatic Neoplasms / Q000517:prevention & control*; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors