title: Contrast-enhanced magnetization transfer MR of the brain: importance of precontrast images.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To determine the importance of obtaining precontrast T1-weighted magnetization transfer (MT) MR images for better interpretation contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MT images.
  
  
  METHODS
  One hundred fifty-five patients referred for MR imaging of the brain were examined prospectively with noncontrast T1-weighted imaging, noncontrast T1-weighted imaging with MT, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging with MT. In the patients who had abnormally increased signal intensity on postcontrast images (with or without MT), the four imaging sequences were evaluated with regard to number of lesions and lesional signal intensity. For each of the sequences, two experienced neuroradiologists subjectively graded the lesions on a scale of 1 to 4 (4 being the most conspicuous) with regard to abnormally increased signal intensity.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Twenty-two of the 155 patients had increased signal intensity on one or more of the postcontrast sequences. Eight of these 22 patients had increased signal intensity of one or more lesions on images without MT. All these lesions were seen better on images obtained with MT. An additional six of the 22 patients had increased signal intensity of one or more lesions on images obtained with MT that was not detected on images obtained without MT. Eight of the 22 patients had no high signal intensity on noncontrast images with or without MT. One of the eight had increased number and conspicuity of lesions on postcontrast MT images.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  A significant number of patients had increased signal intensity on noncontrast T1-weighted images with MT that was not seen on noncontrast T1-weighted images without MT. This high signal intensity was also visible on postcontrast MT images, and would have been mistaken for pathologic enhancement if noncontrast MT images had not been available for comparison.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Ill, USA.
authors.forename: J R
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Meyer
authors.forename: R W
authors.initials: RW
authors.lastname: Androux
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Salamon
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Rabin
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Callahan
authors.forename: T B
authors.initials: TB
authors.lastname: Parrish
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Prager
authors.forename: E J
authors.initials: EJ
authors.lastname: Russell
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D016477:Artifacts; D001927:Brain Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000601:surgery; D001932:Brain Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000601:surgery; D003287:Contrast Media; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D004867:Equipment Design; D005260:Female; D019786:Gadolinium DTPA; D006801:Humans; D007089:Image Enhancement; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000295:instrumentation; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000175:diagnosis; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity
chemical_list: D003287:Contrast Media; D019786:Gadolinium DTPA