Mesenteric angiography for lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage: are there predictors for a positive study?
OBJECTIVE
Selective mesenteric angiography is an expensive, invasive, diagnostic, and therapeutic tool for lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Some institutions have required a positive nuclear medicine bleeding scan before angiography. We have attempted to determine if this is a valid screening test for mesenteric angiography. Are there any other factors to predict which patients are actively bleeding and who will benefit from angiography?


METHODS
All cases of mesenteric angiography for hemorrhage performed during a 12-year period were reviewed.


RESULTS
A total of 131 angiograms were performed during a 12-year period with 45 patients demonstrating active bleeding; 54 patients had a bleeding scan before angiography. A positive bleeding scan did not increase the percentage of positive angiograms. A history of prior gastrointestinal bleeding, transfusions, orthostatic hypotension, or tachycardia were not predictors for a positive angiogram.


CONCLUSIONS
This study could not identify any single useful predictor that will increase the likelihood of obtaining a positive angiogram. Nuclear medicine scans should not be used routinely as a screening test for angiography.
Pennoyer
W P
WP
Department of Surgery, Hartford Hospital, Connecticut, USA.
Vignati
P V
PV
Cohen
J L
JL
D000368:Aged; D000792:Angiography; D006471:Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D006801:Humans; D008638:Mesenteric Arteries / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D011877:Radionuclide Imaging; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013152:Splanchnic Circulation