title: Evaluation of the VALAB expert system.
abstract: The validation of a clinical laboratory report is a process that guarantees the results contained in the report have been obtained under satisfactory metrological conditions and that they are compatible with the information available on the patient. This validation is generally carried out manually by a clinical laboratory professional, but also may be done by an expert system properly programmed, such as the VALAB system. The evaluation presented in this article consists of comparing human and system decisions of validation for 500 randomly selected clinical laboratory reports from hospitalized patients. In this evaluation, 84.8% of the reports examined by the VALAB are accepted directly without any human aid, and only 15.2% require examination by clinical biochemists.
authors.affiliation: Servei de Bioquímica Clínica, Ciutat Sanitària i Universitària de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain. xfa@csub.scs.es
authors.forename: X
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Fuentes-Arderiu
authors.forename: M J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Castiñeiras-Lacambra
authors.forename: M T
authors.initials: MT
authors.lastname: Panadero-García
mesh_terms: D019963:Clinical Chemistry Tests; D002984:Clinical Laboratory Information Systems; D003658:Decision Making, Computer-Assisted; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005103:Expert Systems; D006801:Humans; D012984:Software; D012986:Software Validation