title: Effects of food and sucralfate on a single oral dose of 500 milligrams of levofloxacin in healthy subjects.
abstract: The effects of food and sucralfate on the pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin following the administration of a single 500-mg oral dose were investigated in a randomized, three-way crossover study with young healthy subjects (12 males and 12 females). Levofloxacin was administered under three conditions: fasting, fed (immediately after a standardized high-fat breakfast), and fasting with sucralfate given 2 h following the administration of levofloxacin. The concentrations of levofloxacin in plasma and urine were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography. By noncompartmental methods, the maximum concentration of drug in serum (Cmax), the time to Cmax (Tmax), the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), half-life (t1/2), clearance (CL/F), renal clearance (CLR), and cumulative amount of levofloxacin in urine (Ae) were estimated. The individual profiles of the drug concentration in plasma showed little difference among the three treatments. The only consistent effect of the coadministration of levofloxacin with a high-fat meal for most subjects was that levofloxacin absorption was delayed and Cmax was slightly reduced (Tmax, 1.0 and 2.0 h for fasting and fed conditions, respectively [P = 0.002]; Cmax, 5.9 +/- 1.3 and 5.1 +/- 0.9 microg/ml [90% confidence interval = 0.79 to 0.94] for fasting and fed conditions, respectively). Sucralfate, which was administered 2 h after the administration of levofloxacin, appeared to have no effect on levofloxacin's disposition compared with that under the fasting condition. Mean values of Cmax and AUC from time zero to infinity were 6.7 +/- 3.2 microg/ml and 47.9 +/- 8.4 microg x h/ml, respectively, following the administration of sucralfate compared to values of 5.9 +/- 1.3 microg/ml and 50.5 +/- 8.1 microg x h/ml, respectively, under fasting conditions. The mean t1/2, CL/F, CLR, and Ae values were similar among all three treatment groups. In conclusion, the absorption of levofloxacin was slightly delayed by food, although the overall bioavailability of levofloxacin following a high-fat meal was not altered. Finally, sucralfate did not alter the disposition of levofloxacin when sucralfate was given 2 h after the administration of the antibacterial agent, thus preventing a potential drug-drug interaction.
authors.affiliation: Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807-0800, USA.
authors.forename: L J
authors.initials: LJ
authors.lastname: Lee
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Hafkin
authors.forename: I D
authors.initials: ID
authors.lastname: Lee
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Hoh
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Dix
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000890:Anti-Infective Agents / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000493:pharmacokinetics*; D000897:Anti-Ulcer Agents / Q000494:pharmacology*; D019540:Area Under Curve; D018592:Cross-Over Studies; D004347:Drug Interactions; D005260:Female; D018565:Food-Drug Interactions; D006207:Half-Life; D006801:Humans; D064704:Levofloxacin; D008297:Male; D015242:Ofloxacin / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000493:pharmacokinetics*; D012016:Reference Values; D013056:Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet; D013392:Sucralfate / Q000494:pharmacology*
chemical_list: D000890:Anti-Infective Agents; D000897:Anti-Ulcer Agents; D013392:Sucralfate; D064704:Levofloxacin; D015242:Ofloxacin