Classics from the spine literature revisited: a randomized trial of 2 versus 7 days of recommended bed rest for acute low back pain.
METHODS
Review of a trial of bed rest for patients with acute low back pain.


OBJECTIVE
To assess the validity and results of the study, and their applicability to and influence on current clinical practice and recommendations.


BACKGROUND
Although bed rest has been a cornerstone of treatment for acute low back pain, historically this recommendation was largely based on "expert opinion." In 1986, Deyo et al. published a randomized study of 2 versus 7 days of recommended bed rest for acute low back pain. Despite results from this and other studies, current clinical practice and treatment recommendations continue to overemphasize bed rest.


METHODS
The study was reviewed using structured criteria adopted from the medical literature that focus on the validity of the study design, the results of the treatment, and the relevance of the findings to clinical practice.


RESULTS
Two hundred and three patients were randomized to 2 versus 7 days of recommended bed rest. Groups were similar at baseline evaluation. Outcomes assessed at 3 and 12 weeks were similar between groups, except that patients receiving a recommendation for 2 days of bed rest had significantly fewer days of work absence than those recommended 7 days. Limitations of the study included poor compliance with recommended bed rest, especially in the 7-day group, a marginal sample size without information on relevant confidence intervals, and patient characteristics that may have affected the generalizability of these findings to others with acute low back pain.


CONCLUSIONS
Despite limitations, this study provided strong evidence that less bed rest was associated with similar outcomes for acute low back pain along with quicker return to work. Results from this and other studies support a shift away from bed rest as a primary recommendation in the initial management of low back pain. In spite of this, bed rest recommendations for episodes of low back pain remain common. Additional efforts are needed to change clinical practice.
Atlas
S J
SJ
Medical Practices Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Volinn
E
E
D000041:Absenteeism; D000203:Activities of Daily Living; D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001510:Bed Rest; D006801:Humans; D017116:Low Back Pain / Q000628:therapy*; D008875:Middle Aged; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D016896:Treatment Outcome