Attitudes of family practice residency program directors toward mandatory preemployment drug testing.
OBJECTIVE
As health care institutions adopt policies on substance use and abuse and mandatory substance abuse testing in the workplace, applicants for house staff positions may become the subjects of testing as a requirement for acceptance into a residency program. This study attempted to learn what directors of family practice residency programs feel about mandatory preemployment drug testing and its effect on house staff recruitment.


METHODS
We surveyed the directors of 420 US family practice residency programs, as listed by the American Academy of Family Physicians, in November 1994. All programs (community based, university affiliated, university based, and military) were included in the survey.


RESULTS
A total of 308 (73%) program directors responded. Of these, almost half disagreed with mandatory substance abuse testing and felt it should not be a condition of acceptance for a house staff position. Eighty-eight percent believed that the existence of a policy did not hinder recruitment. None felt it was an enhancement.


CONCLUSIONS
Preemployment drug testing for potential house staff remains a controversial issue, and it is unlikely that it will be universally implemented in the near future.
Laufenburg
H F
HF
University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, USA. hlaufenb@fammed.wisc.edu
Barton
B A
BA
D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D005194:Family Practice / Q000193:education*; D006801:Humans; D007396:Internship and Residency; D018580:Mandatory Testing; D016272:Occupational Health; D008486:Physician Executives; D015813:Substance Abuse Detection