title: A randomized study comparing IV 3000 (transparent polyurethane dressing) to a dry gauze dressing for peripheral intravenous catheter sites.
abstract: Patients with an intravenous catheter on a cardiology unit were prospectively randomized to receive a transparent polyurethane dressing (N = 49) or sterile gauze (N = 31) dressing to compare security of fixation, dressing condition, skin condition, and rates of inflammation. The mean age of patients was 63 years of age (standard deviation, 12.57), and the average length of cannulation was 18 hours. The only significant difference between the two groups was the dressing condition in the transparent group was significantly better (P = 0.006) than that of the gauze group. The results suggest that gauze dressing may be a viable option to cover i.v. exit sites for patients requiring short-term cannulation.
authors.affiliation: Public Health Laboratory, Hull Royal Infirmary, England.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Madeo
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Martin
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Nobbs
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001458:Bandages; D002408:Catheters, Indwelling; D015400:Clinical Nursing Research; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D011140:Polyurethanes; D011446:Prospective Studies; D013784:Textiles; D013997:Time Factors
chemical_list: D011140:Polyurethanes