title: Technology assessment--who is getting stuck, anyway?
abstract: Some 13% to 62% of all injuries reported to hospital occupational health workers are traceable to phlebotomy procedures. However, the selection of a needleless system is complex. The informed manager seeks answers to the following questions: (1) Do needleless systems reduce the risk of seroconversion to bloodborne pathogens? (Answer yes.) (2) Does the use of a needleless system affect patients' risk of catheter sepsis? (Answer no.) and (3) What about chemical compatibility with the newer materials used in needleless systems? (New variables require more studies.) The author lists references, manufacturers and some of the chemicals to which some manufacturers have exposed their devices.
authors.forename: C G
authors.initials: CG
authors.lastname: Bayne
mesh_terms: D001800:Blood Specimen Collection / Q000295:instrumentation*; D003428:Cross Infection; D015658:HIV Infections / Q000635:transmission*; D006801:Humans; D017758:Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional; D009339:Needles; D016602:Needlestick Injuries / Q000150:complications*; D009784:Occupational Diseases / Q000209:etiology