title: Protein catabolic rate over lean body mass ratio: a more rational approach to normalize the protein catabolic rate in dialysis patients.
abstract: Protein catabolic rate (PCR), equivalent to dietary protein intake in "stable" dialysis patients, is widely accepted as a marker of their protein nutritional status. PCR is usually established from urea generation rate using urea kinetic modeling (UKM), but the normalizing factor is still a matter of controversy. By convention, PCR is expressed in grams of protein degraded daily divided by the dry body weight (BW) (nPCRBW). To be valid, this implies that dry BW is close to ideal BW and that body composition is preserved with a lean body mass (LBM) over BW ratio near 0.73. Such conditions being infrequently found in dialysis patients, it has been proposed to normalize PCR to ideal BW or to total body water, but these correction factors are not really appropriate. A more rational approach would be to express PCR as the ratio of protein degraded to the kilograms of LBM (nPCRLBM), thus offering the main advantage of directly coupling PCR to changes in protein or nitrogen reserve. In this study, we developed a combined kinetic model of urea and creatinine applied to the midweek dialysis cycle in 66 end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. UKM provided Kt/V and PCR, whereas creatinine kinetic modeling (CKM) was used to calculate LBM. Thirty-four patients with a preserved LBM (LBM/dry BW ratio equal to or greater than 0.70; mean ratio, 0.81 +/- 0.11) and with a dry/ideal BW ratio of 1.01 +/- 0.16 had a mean PCR of 1.14 +/- 0.30 g/kg/24 h when normalized to BW (nPCRBW) and of 1.40 +/- 0.30 g/kg/24 h when normalized to LBM (nPCRLBM). In the 32 patients with a reduced LBM (LBM/dry BW ratio, below 0.70; mean ratio, 0.60 +/- 0.09) and dry/ideal BW ratio of 1.11 +/- 0.23, the mean nPCRBW was 0.99 +/- 0.31 g/kg/24 h, whereas nPCRLBM was 1.62 +/- 0.32 g/kg/24 h. For both subgroups, Kt/V was similar, with mean values of 1.76 +/- 0.34 and 1.69 +/- 0.27. Normalizing PCR to LBM offers a double benefit: it compensates for the error induced by abnormal body composition (eg, obese patients) and permits PCR to be adjusted for the decrease in LBM that occurs with age. We propose nPCRLBM as a more rational index to express PCR in dialysis patients.
authors.affiliation: Department of Nephrology, Lapeyronie University Hospital, Montpellier, France. b.canaud@sc.univ-montpl.fr
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Canaud
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Leblanc
authors.forename: L J
authors.initials: LJ
authors.lastname: Garred
authors.forename: J Y
authors.initials: JY
authors.lastname: Bosc
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Argilés
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Mion
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D015992:Body Mass Index; D003404:Creatinine / Q000097:blood; D004044:Dietary Proteins / Q000493:pharmacokinetics*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007676:Kidney Failure, Chronic / Q000097:blood / Q000628:therapy; D007700:Kinetics; D016018:Least-Squares Analysis; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D008954:Models, Biological; D006435:Renal Dialysis / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D013997:Time Factors; D014508:Urea / Q000097:blood
chemical_list: D004044:Dietary Proteins; D014508:Urea; D003404:Creatinine