title: Phylogeny of the orders of the Eucestoda (Cercomeromorphae) based on comparative morphology: historical perspectives and a new working hypothesis.
abstract: The phylogeny of the Eucestoda was evaluated based on a suite of 49 binary and multistate characters derived from comparative morphological and ontogenetic studies; attributes of adult and larval tapeworms were considered. A single most parsimonious tree (MPT) (consistency index = 0.872; retention index = 0.838; and homoplasy index = 0.527) was fully resolved and is specified by the following: (Gyrocotylidea, (Amphilinidea, ((Spathebothriidea, (Pseudophyllidea, ((Diphyllidea, (Trypanorhyncha, (Tetraphyllidea, (Lecanicephalidea, ((Nippotaeniidea, (Tetrabothriidea, Cyclophyllidea)), Proteocephalidea))))), Haplobothriidea))), Caryophyllidea))). Monophyly for the Eucestoda was firmly corroborated. Trees derived from the primary and bootstrap analyses were congruent, but low values, particularly for relationships among the tetrafossate tapeworms, indicated additional examination is warranted. The MPT was found to be the most efficient hypothesis for describing character evolution and in specifying relationships among the orders when compared to those concepts that had been developed for the tapeworms over the past century. Areas of congruence were shared among the current hypothesis and one or more of the prior hypotheses. Major conclusions include: (1) Caryophyllidea are basal and monozooy is ancestral; (2) difossate forms are primitive, and the Pseudophyllidea are the sister group of the strongly polyzoic tapeworms; (3) Nippotaeniidea are highly derived; (4) the higher tapeworms (Tetraphyllidea, Lecanicephalidea, Proteocephalidea, Nippotaeniidea, Tetrabothriidea, and Cyclophyllidea) are closely related or potentially coordinate groups: (5) Tetrabothriidea and the Cyclophyllidea are sister groups; and (6) Tetraphyllidea is paraphyletic, with the Onchobothriidae basal to the Phyllobothriidae. Character support for placement of the Tetrabothriidea continues to be contradictory, and this order may represent a key to understanding the phylogeny of the higher cestodes. The current study constitutes a complete historical review and poses a new and robust hypothesis for the phylogeny of the Eucestoda.
authors.affiliation: United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, Maryland 20705, USA.
authors.forename: E P
authors.initials: EP
authors.lastname: Hoberg
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Mariaux
authors.forename: J L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Justine
authors.forename: D R
authors.initials: DR
authors.lastname: Brooks
authors.forename: P J
authors.initials: PJ
authors.lastname: Weekes
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D005075:Biological Evolution; D002589:Cestoda / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000145:classification* / Q000254:growth & development; D005260:Female; D049672:History, 19th Century; D049673:History, 20th Century; D007814:Larva / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D008297:Male; D009132:Muscles / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D010053:Ovary / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D010063:Ovum / Q000166:cytology / Q000254:growth & development; D010274:Parasitology / Q000266:history*; D010802:Phylogeny; D013094:Spermatozoa / Q000166:cytology; D013737:Testis / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D014599:Uterus / Q000033:anatomy & histology