Paclitaxel, carboplatin, and extended-schedule etoposide in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer: comparison of sequential phase II trials using different dose-intensities.
OBJECTIVE
In two sequential phase II studies, we evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of adding paclitaxel to a standard platinum/etoposide regimen in the first-line treatment of small-cell lung cancer.


METHODS
One hundred seventeen patients with small-cell lung cancer were treated between June 1993 and July 1996. The first 38 patients received a lower-dose regimen: paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 by 1-hour infusion, carboplatin at an area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 5.0, and etoposide 50 mg alternating with 100 mg orally on days 1 to 10. When only mild myelosuppression was observed, doses of paclitaxel and carboplatin were increased in the subsequent 79 patients (paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 by 1-hour infusion and carboplatin at an AUC of 6.0). All patients received four courses of treatment, administered at 21-day intervals. Patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer also received thoracic radiation therapy (1.8 Gy/d; total dose, 45 Gy) administered concurrently with courses 3 and 4 of chemotherapy.


RESULTS
Seventy-two of 79 patients (91%) who receive the higher-dose regimen had major responses. Thirty-two of 38 (84%) with extensive-stage disease responded (21% complete response rate); median survival was 10 months for this group. With limited-stage disease, the overall response rate was 98%, with 71% complete responses; the median survival time has not been reached at 16 months. Median survival in extensive-stage patients was longer in patients who received the higher-dose regimen (10 months) than in the previous group treated with lower doses (7 months; P = .008). The higher-dose regimen was well tolerated, with myelosuppression being the major toxicity. Compared with the lower-dose regimen, grade 3/4 neutropenia increased from 8% to 38% of courses, but the incidence of hospitalization for neutropenia and fever did not increase. Other nonhematologic toxicities were uncommon, and did not increase substantially with the higher-dose regimen.


CONCLUSIONS
Paclitaxel can be added at full dose (200 mg/m2) to a carboplatin/etoposide combination while maintaining a tolerable toxicity profile. Median survival times in both extensive- and limited-stage patients compare favorably with other reported regimens. This regimen merits further investigation, and a randomized trial to compare this regimen with a standard carboplatin/etoposide combination is underway.
Hainsworth
J D
JD
Sarah Cannon Cancer Center and The Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
Gray
J R
JR
Stroup
S L
SL
Kalman
L A
LA
Patten
J E
JE
Hopkins
L G
LG
Thomas
M
M
Greco
F A
FA
D000368:Aged; D000740:Anemia / Q000139:chemically induced; D000971:Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D016190:Carboplatin / Q000008:administration & dosage; D018288:Carcinoma, Small Cell / Q000188:drug therapy*; D004334:Drug Administration Schedule; D005047:Etoposide / Q000008:administration & dosage; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007970:Leukopenia / Q000139:chemically induced; D008175:Lung Neoplasms / Q000188:drug therapy*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D017239:Paclitaxel / Q000008:administration & dosage; D016019:Survival Analysis; D013921:Thrombocytopenia / Q000139:chemically induced
D005047:Etoposide; D016190:Carboplatin; D017239:Paclitaxel