The road to developing standards for the diagnosis and treatment of venous leg ulcers.
In early 1996 the Venous Leg Ulcer Guideline was developed for the diagnosis and treatment of venous leg ulcers. In order to discuss the development of standards in general, and the Venous Leg Ulcer Guideline in particular, we first need to understand the difference between the following terms: Critical pathway, consensus statement, guideline, and standard. There are advantages and disadvantages to the use of guidelines. In the development of a guideline, endorsement by a respected colleague is important. Development of the Venous Leg Ulcer Guideline began with a consensus statement and then underwent review by a national advisory panel and national peer review through publication. A revised guideline has now been developed which will be tested in a pilot study for clinical efficacy, effect on cost, and impact on quality of life. Validation will require implementation in a prospective clinical trial. Diagnostic and Treatment Algorithm forms for the diagnosis and treatment of venous leg ulcers were developed as part of the preliminary testing of the guideline. Although guidelines do not substitute for good clinical judgement, they can encourage clinical judgement and help reduce fragmented care and the costs associated with inappropriate treatments.
McGuckin
M
M
School of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Stineman
M
M
Goin
J
J
Williams
S
S
D019091:Critical Pathways / Q000592:standards*; D004509:Education, Nursing, Continuing; D006801:Humans; D007871:Leg Ulcer / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000628:therapy*; D009732:Nursing Care / Q000592:standards; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D011787:Quality of Health Care