Electroconvulsive therapy vs. paroxetine in treatment-resistant depression -- a randomized study.
Failure to respond to adequate pharmacological treatment for major depression is now the most common indication for the use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). The advantages of ECT with respect to both speed and quality of response are clinically important issues, but surprisingly few studies have examined the efficacy of ECT in relation to newer antidepressant agents such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). A total of 39 subjects with major depression and with at least two failed antidepressant trials (mean 4.9 trials) were randomized to either paroxetine treatment (n=18) or right unilateral (RUL) ECT (n=21). Up to the end of the study treatment we found a reduction in the HAMD score of 59% for the ECT group and of 29% for the paroxetine group (P<0.001 paired t-test). In the ECT group, 71% of subjects fulfilled the response criteria (at least a 50% decrease in total HAMD score). The present study found ECT to be superior to paroxetine in medication-resistant major depression, in terms of both degree and speed of response.
Folkerts
H W
HW
Department of Psychiatry, University of Münster, Germany.
Michael
N
N
Tölle
R
R
Schonauer
K
K
Mücke
S
S
Schulze-Mönking
H
H
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D018687:Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D001714:Bipolar Disorder / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology / Q000628:therapy*; D003865:Major Depressive Disorder / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology / Q000628:therapy*; D004565:Electroconvulsive Therapy; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D017374:Paroxetine / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D010555:Personality Inventory; D019233:Retreatment; D017211:Treatment Failure; D016896:Treatment Outcome
D018687:Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; D017374:Paroxetine