Recall and treatment decisions of primary care providers in response to Pap smear reports.
BACKGROUND
Although the frequency of cervical cancer screening has been extensively studied, little is known about how clinicians decide to screen or recall patients for Pap smears. This study reports the management decisions made by office-based clinicians for 10 different Pap smear reports describing adequacy limitations and cytological diagnoses.


METHODS
We surveyed 186 clinicians using a commercial laboratory in the southeastern United States and analyzed results by frequency and comparison statistics.


RESULTS
Our respondents were 148 clinicians (79.6% response rate) from different specialties. There was variation in reported management of inflammation, atypia, and low-grade abnormalities (LGSIL), in regard to recall for repeat or routine testing as well as arranging colposcopy. In only 3 of 10 Pap smear results did more than 50% of respondents agree on a specific test recall interval.


CONCLUSIONS
The variation in responses from office-based clinicians suggests either uncertainty or different opinions in making recall and treatment decisions for smears of limited quality even when associated with cytologic abnormalities. These differences may have relevance to outcomes, clinician workload, and costs of care in cervical cancer screening.
Curtis
P
P
Department of Family Medicine, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 27514, USA. fmcurtis@med.unc.edu
Morrell
D
D
Hendrix
S
S
Mintzer
M
M
Resnick
J C
JC
Qaqish
B F
BF
D000328:Adult; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D003661:Decision Support Techniques; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D065006:Papanicolaou Test; D010821:Physicians, Family; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D002577:Uterine Cervical Diseases / Q000473:pathology* / Q000628:therapy*; D014626:Vaginal Smears / Q000145:classification*