title: Comparison of radiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and surgical findings in dogs with elbow dysplasia.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To describe the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) appearance of medial coronoid process and humeral condyle lesions in dysplastic cubital joints and to compare survey radiography and MRI for evaluation of fragmented medial coronoid process (FMCP) and lesions of the medial aspect of the humeral condyle (MAHC).
  
  
  METHODS
  18 dogs with elbow dysplasia.
  
  
  METHODS
  Radiography of 22 cubital joints was performed. The 22 joints then underwent MRI. The scans were evaluated with regard to the shape and signal of the coronoid process; articular cartilage change, subchondral bone disruption of the MAHC. Surgical findings were used as the standard to calculate accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive- and negative-predictive values for specific diagnosis of FMCP (free fragment) and lesions of the MAHC.
  
  
  RESULTS
  At surgery, 31.8% of the joints had FMCP (free), 36.4% had nondisplaced unmineralized coronoid process, and 27.2% had nondisplaced mineralized coronoid process. Eleven joints had lesions of the MAHC, and wear lesions were observed in 41% of the joints. On radiography, FMCP (free) was visualized in 9% of the joints and lesions of the MAHC were observed in 23%. MRI had the highest accuracy (95.5%), sensitivity (100%), and negative-predictive value (100%) for detection of FMCP (free), and had accuracy (91%), sensitivity (87.5%), specificity (92.5%), and positive (87.5%)- and negative (92.5%)-predictive values for detection of nondisplaced unmineralized coronoid process.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Compared with radiography, MRI was useful for detection of nondisplaced unmineralized coronoid process; images consistently correlated with surgical findings. The technique is accurate and especially useful when radiographic findings are inconclusive.
authors.affiliation: Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Sart-Tilman, Belgium.
authors.forename: F R
authors.initials: FR
authors.lastname: Snaps
authors.forename: M H
authors.initials: MH
authors.lastname: Balligand
authors.forename: J H
authors.initials: JH
authors.lastname: Saunders
authors.forename: R D
authors.initials: RD
authors.lastname: Park
authors.forename: R F
authors.initials: RF
authors.lastname: Dondelinger
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001175:Arthrography / Q000592:standards / Q000662:veterinary*; D001182:Arthroscopy / Q000662:veterinary; D002358:Cartilage, Articular / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery; D004283:Dog Diseases / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery; D004285:Dogs; D005260:Female; D005552:Forelimb / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery; D007592:Joint Diseases / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery / Q000662:veterinary*; D007596:Joints / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards / Q000662:veterinary*; D008297:Male; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity