title: The cement mantle in femoral impaction allografting. A comparison of three systems from four centres.
abstract: An analysis of the cement mantle obtained with the Exeter impaction allografting system at one centre showed that it was either deficient or absent in almost 47% of Gruen zones. We therefore examined the mantle obtained using this system at another hospital and compared the results with those from the CPT and Harris Precoat Systems at other centres. The surgical indications for the procedure and the patient details were broadly similar in all four hospitals. There was some variation in the frequency of use of cortical strut allografts, cerclage wires and wire mesh to supplement the impaction allograft. Analysis of the cement mantles showed that when uncertain Gruen zones were excluded, the incidence of zones with areas of absence or deficiency of the cement was 47% and 50%, respectively, for the two centres using the Exeter system, 21% for the CPT system and 18% for the Harris Precoat system. We measured the difference in size between the proximal allograft impactors and the definitive prosthesis for each system. The Exeter system impactors are shorter than the definitive prosthesis and taper sharply so that the cavity created is inadequate, especially distally. The CPT proximal impactors are considerably longer than the definitive prosthesis and are designed to give a mantle of approximately 2 mm medially and laterally and 1.5 mm anteriorly and posteriorly. The Harris Precoat proximal impactors allow for a mantle with a circumference of 0.75 mm in the smaller sizes and 1 mm in the larger. Many reports link the longevity of a cemented implant to the adequacy of the cement mantle. For this reason, femoral impaction systems require careful design to achieve a cement mantle which is uninterrupted in its length and adequate in its thickness. Our results suggest that some current systems require modification.
authors.affiliation: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
authors.forename: E L
authors.initials: EL
authors.lastname: Masterson
authors.forename: B A
authors.initials: BA
authors.lastname: Masri
authors.forename: C P
authors.initials: CP
authors.lastname: Duncan
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Rosenberg
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Cabanela
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Gross
mesh_terms: D000077:Acetabulum / Q000601:surgery; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; D001843:Bone Cements / Q000737:chemistry*; D016025:Bone Transplantation / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods; D001864:Bone Wires; D002484:Cementation / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D004867:Equipment Design; D005260:Female; D005269:Femur / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000601:surgery*; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006622:Hip Prosthesis; D006801:Humans; D015994:Incidence; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D011859:Radiography; D012086:Reoperation; D013499:Surface Properties; D013526:Surgical Mesh; D013997:Time Factors
chemical_list: D001843:Bone Cements