title: Speech perception results for children with implants with different levels of preoperative residual hearing.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Many reports have established that hearing-impaired children using the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant may show both significant benefits to lipreading and significant scores on open-set words and sentences using electrical stimulation only. These findings have raised questions about whether severely or severely-to-profoundly deaf children should be candidates for cochlear implants. To study this question, postoperative results for implanted children with different levels of preoperative residual hearing were evaluated in terms of speech perception benefits.
  
  
  METHODS
  A retrospective study of the first 117 children, sequentially, to undergo implantation in the Melbourne and Sydney Cochlear Implant Clinics was undertaken. All children had been assessed by and received their implants in a tertiary referral centre.
  
  
  METHODS
  To assess aided residual hearing, the children were grouped into four categories of hearing on the basis of their aided residual hearing thresholds measured preoperatively. To assess benefits, the scores of children on standard speech perception tests were reviewed. As different tests were used for children with different ages and language skills, children were grouped into categories according to the level of postoperative speech perception benefit.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The results showed that children in the higher categories of aided preoperative residual hearing showed significant scores on open-set word and sentence perception tests using the implant alone. For children in lower categories of aided residual hearing, results were variable within the groups. More than 90% of children with implants with aided residual hearing thresholds in the speech range above 1 kHz achieved open-set understanding of words and sentences.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  While the results of this preliminary study confirm previous findings of differential outcomes for children with different levels of preoperative residual hearing, they suggest that children with severe to profound hearing impairments should be considered for cochlear implantation.
authors.affiliation: Cooperative Research Centre for Cochlear Implant, Speech & Hearing Research, East Melbourne, Australia.
authors.forename: R S
authors.initials: RS
authors.lastname: Cowan
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: DelDot
authors.forename: E J
authors.initials: EJ
authors.lastname: Barker
authors.forename: J Z
authors.initials: JZ
authors.lastname: Sarant
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Pegg
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Dettman
authors.forename: K L
authors.initials: KL
authors.lastname: Galvin
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Rance
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Hollow
authors.forename: R C
authors.initials: RC
authors.lastname: Dowell
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Pyman
authors.forename: W P
authors.initials: WP
authors.lastname: Gibson
authors.forename: G M
authors.initials: GM
authors.lastname: Clark
mesh_terms: D001309:Auditory Threshold; D002648:Child; D019929:Cochlear Implantation; D003638:Deafness / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D013063:Speech Discrimination Tests; D013067:Speech Perception