title: Retroconduction selective recognition in wide-dipole floating atrial sensing. The Multicenter Study Group.
abstract: Effective discrimination of retrogradely conducted P waves would allow distinguishing sinus tachycardia from supraventricular tachycardias due to AV or nodal reentry, and would prevent pacemaker-mediated tachycardia in AV sequential pacing. This might be especially relevant in VDD implants, where retroconduction could be induced by escape ventricular stimulation. In order to analyze the respective waveform properties, anterograde and retrograde atrial signals were recorded by a wide floating electrode dipole, on the implantation of a permanent single-pass lead for VDD pacing. Generally, bipolar recording did not allow reliable discrimination, while the signal nature could be readily diagnosed from the main features of the unipolar atrial electrograms. The unipolar waveform recorded under sinus rhythm in high right atrium, close to the superior vena cava opening (proximal EGM), started with a negative deflection in 88% of the patients. In 7% of the patients, the first deflection of the signal was positive in some cardiac cycles only, and, on the average, the amplitude of the positive phase was not higher than 5% of the signal peak-to-peak amplitude. Conversely, under retroconduction, the starting deflection attained higher positive values in 98% of the patients, being stably over 15% of the peak-to-peak amplitude in 86% of the Furthermore, in 69% of the cases, the lag time between the onset of the negative deflection of proximal and distal (mid-low atrium) unipolar EGM changed unambiguously when retroconduction occurred, exceeding the range of variation observed in each patient during sinus activity. The combined evaluation of unipolar EGM shape and lag time allowed specific retroconduction recognition in 95% of the patients. We suggest that this approach may yield useful information for the discrimination of retrograde atrial signals, provided that the recording dipole is sufficiently long and the proximal electrode is properly positioned in the high right atrium.
authors.affiliation: MEDICO S.p.A., Rubano, Padova, Italy.
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Di Gregorio
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: al-Bunni
authors.forename: V
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Bulla
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Croce
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Moracchini
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Occhetta
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Orlandi
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Vincenti
mesh_terms: D002304:Cardiac Pacing, Artificial / Q000379:methods*; D017147:Defibrillators, Implantable / Q000009:adverse effects; D004562:Electrocardiography; D004567:Electrodes, Implanted; D006325:Heart Atria / Q000503:physiopathology*; D006327:Heart Block / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000628:therapy*; D006329:Heart Conduction System / Q000503:physiopathology; D006801:Humans; D013617:Tachycardia, Supraventricular / Q000209:etiology / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000517:prevention & control*