title: "Big" versus "little" science: comparative analysis of program projects and individual research grants.
abstract: Controversy about the amount and nature of funding for mental retardation research has persisted since the creation of NICHD. An issue that has aroused considerable debate, within the mental retardation research community as well as beyond, is distribution of funds between large group research grants, such as the program project (PO1) and the individual grant (RO1). Currently within the Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Branch, more money is allocated to the PO1 mechanism than the RO1. We compared the two types of grants, focusing on success rates, productivity, costs, impact, publication practices, and outcome and conducted a comparative analysis of biomedical and behavioral research. Other related issues were considered, including review processes and cost-effectiveness.
authors.affiliation: Peabody College, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37204, USA. baumeiaa@ctrvax.vanderbilt.edu
authors.forename: A A
authors.initials: AA
authors.lastname: Baumeister
authors.forename: V R
authors.initials: VR
authors.lastname: Bacharach
authors.forename: A A
authors.initials: AA
authors.lastname: Baumeister
mesh_terms: D002648:Child; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D002658:Developmental Disabilities / Q000191:economics*; D004608:Eligibility Determination; D006801:Humans; D008607:Intellectual Disability / Q000191:economics*; D016730:Program Development / Q000191:economics; D011643:Publishing / Q000191:economics; D012107:Research Design; D012109:Research Support as Topic; D012586:Science; D014481:United States