title: [After-care of colorectal carcinoma: what has efficacy?].
abstract: The efficacy of standardized follow-up examinations after surgery for colorectal carcinoma has been repeatedly questioned. Although many studies have assessed the value of different diagnostic tools none of these procedures proved to have a predictive value high enough to accurately predict the recurrence of disease and to justify its regular use in these patients. Even a combined diagnostic approach provided a benefit only for a minority of these patients (3.5 to 4.5%). Considering the physical and psychological strain imposed by this approach risk-adapted follow-up schemes are urgently needed. Prognostic parameters indicating the individual risk for disease recurrence can be deduced from increasing CEA values as well as from classification and grading of the primary tumor. Colonoscopy is an effective procedure for early detection of intraluminal relapse or metachronous tumors with potential impact on survival of the patient. An abdominal ultrasound study appears to be the method of choice for detection of metastasis of the liver due to its high sensitivity and low invasiveness. Other imaging procedures are not indicated in routine follow-up for colorectal carcinoma. It remains to be demonstrated whether molecular biology or new scintigraphic techniques will be helpful in follow-up examinations of patients with colorectal carcinomas.
authors.affiliation: Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin, Klinikum der Universität Regensburg.
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Weitzel
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Holstege
mesh_terms: D000359:Aftercare / Q000379:methods*; D015179:Colorectal Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000401:mortality / Q000473:pathology; D006801:Humans; D009364:Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000401:mortality / Q000473:pathology; D009367:Neoplasm Staging; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D015996:Survival Rate; D016896:Treatment Outcome