title: Imaging of the liver with helical CT: a survey of scanning techniques.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  We conducted a survey of the members of the Society of Computed Body Tomography/Magnetic Resonance to assess current techniques in liver imaging using helical CT.
  
  
  METHODS
  The survey, which was designed to update earlier surveys from 1987 and 1993, included a questionnaire distributed to 77 members of the Society of Computed Body Tomography/Magnetic Resonance.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Forty-nine members responded, representing 28 institutions. In 1993, 19% (5/26) of institutions used helical scanners, compared with 82% (23/28) in 1996. The group of institutions with helical CT served as the focus of this survey. In 1993, 58% of institutions used 1-cm collimation: in 1996, 78% (18/23) used thinner, 7- to 8-mm collimation. In 1987, 41% used power injectors compared with 85% in 1993 and 100% in 1996. In 1996, monophasic injections were used by 96% (22/23) of institutions. In 1993, most institutions used a contrast material injection rate of 1.5-2.0 ml/sec; in 1996, most used a 2.5-3.0 ml/sec injection rate. In 1993, 96% of institutions used 125-150 ml of contrast material; in 1996, 57% (13/23) of institutions used 125-150 ml and 30% of institutions used less than 125 ml of contrast material. A delay time of 21-45 see was used by 83% of institutions in 1993, whereas in 1996, 83% (19/23) of institutions used a longer delay time of 50-80 sec. In 1996, 13% of institutions used an individual scan delay technology and all institutions performed multiphasic scanning of hypervascular lesions.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The availability of helical CT has changed radiologists' approach to liver imaging. The greatest effects of which are a more widespread use of power injectors, longer delay times, thinner collimation, increased contrast material injection rates, decreased contrast material volumes, and multiphasic scanning.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
authors.forename: P M
authors.initials: PM
authors.lastname: Silverman
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Kohan
authors.forename: I
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Ducic
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Javadi
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Meyer
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Sharma
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Cooper
authors.forename: R K
authors.initials: RK
authors.lastname: Zeman
mesh_terms: D003287:Contrast Media; D003625:Data Collection; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D008099:Liver / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D008107:Liver Diseases / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D012955:Societies, Medical; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data
chemical_list: D003287:Contrast Media