title: Comparison of the efficacies of three fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agents, given as continuous or pulsed-water medication, against Escherichia coli infection in chickens.
abstract: This study compared the efficacy of continuous or pulsed-water medication with enrofloxacin, danofloxacin, and sarafloxacin in eight groups of 90 chicks each by using an infectious bronchitis virus-Escherichia coli model of colisepticemia. The model produced lesions of typical those occurring in birds with severe colisepticemia; for the infected, nonmedicated birds the mortality was 43.5% and the morbidity was 89%, 17.8% of birds had severe lesions, and the birds had a mean air sac lesion score of 2.58. This experiment showed that continuous dosing and pulsed dosing are clinically equivalent. However, for all fluoroquinolones studied, there was a trend for the continuously mediated birds to have lower mortality and less severe disease than birds receiving pulsed doses. Compared with infected, nonmedicated controls, only birds continuously medicated with enrofloxacin had a significantly lower morbidity (32%), and only birds medicated with enrofloxacin and danofloxacin (continuous and pulsed treatments) had significantly lower mortality (6.7 and 11.0% and 16.8 and 19.2% for continuous and pulsed treatments with enrofloxacin and danofloxacin, respectively). A significantly lower proportion of birds only in the groups medicated with enrofloxacin had severe lesions (for birds receiving continuous and pulsed treatments, 2.2 and 6.7%, respectively). Birds medicated with any of the three fluoroquinolones (continuous and pulsed treatments) except pulsed-water treatment with sarafloxacin had significantly reduced mean air sac lesion scores compared with the scores for nonmedicated birds (air sac lesion scores, 0.60 and 0.83, 1.38 and 1.63, and 1.80 and 2.05 for birds receiving continuous and pulsed treatments with enrofloxacin, danofloxacin, and sarafloxacin, respectively). The performance of the birds that survived the challenge or that recovered after receiving medication was not compromised compared to the performance of noninfected birds. Enrofloxacin was more efficacious than either danofloxacin or sarafloxacin for the treatment of colisepticemia in chickens by medication in drinking water. Similarly, danofloxacin appeared to be more effective than sarafloxacin in treating colisepticemia.
authors.affiliation: Institute for Animal Health, Compton, Newbury, Berkshire, United Kingdom. Bryan Charleston@bbsrc.ac.uk
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Charleston
authors.forename: J J
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Gate
authors.forename: I A
authors.initials: IA
authors.lastname: Aitken
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Stephan
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Froyman
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D000890:Anti-Infective Agents / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D002645:Chickens; D004927:Escherichia coli Infections / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000401:mortality / Q000662:veterinary*; D024841:Fluoroquinolones; D011201:Poultry Diseases / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000401:mortality; D016896:Treatment Outcome
chemical_list: D000890:Anti-Infective Agents; D024841:Fluoroquinolones