title: Imaging articular cartilage defects with 3D fat-suppressed echo planar imaging: comparison with conventional 3D fat-suppressed gradient echo sequence and correlation with histology.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Our goal was to shorten examination time in articular cartilage imaging by use of a recently developed 3D multishot echo planar imaging (EPI) sequence with fat suppression (FS). We performed comparisons with 3D FS GE sequence using histology as the standard of reference.
  
  
  METHODS
  Twenty patients with severe gonarthrosis who were scheduled for total knee replacement underwent MRI prior to surgery. Hyaline cartilage was imaged with a 3D FS EPI and a 3D FS GE sequence. Signal intensities of articular structures were measured, and contrast-to-noise (C/N) ratios were calculated. Each knee was subdivided into 10 cartilage surfaces. From a total of 188 (3D EPI sequence) and 198 (3D GE sequence) cartilage surfaces, 73 and 79 histologic specimens could be obtained and analyzed. MR grading of cartilage lesions on both sequences was based on a five grade classification scheme and compared with histologic grading.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The 3D FS EPI sequence provided a high C/N ratio between cartilage and subchondral bone similar to that of the 3D FS GE sequence. The C/N ratio between cartilage and effusion was significantly lower on the 3D EPI sequence due to higher signal intensity of fluid. MR grading of cartilage abnormalities using 3D FS EPI and 3D GE sequence correlated well with histologic grading. 3D FS EPI sequence agreed within one grade in 69 of 73 (94.5%) histologically proven cartilage lesions and 3D FS GE sequence agreed within one grade in 76 of 79 (96.2%) lesions. The gradings were identical in 38 of 73 (52.1%) and in 46 of 79 (58.3%) cases, respectively. The difference between the sensitivities was statistically not significant.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The 3D FS EPI sequence is comparable with the 3D FS GE sequence in the noninvasive evaluation of advanced cartilage abnormalities but reduces scan time by a factor of 4.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, University of Vienna, Austria.
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Trattnig
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Huber
authors.forename: M J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Breitenseher
authors.forename: H J
authors.initials: HJ
authors.lastname: Trnka
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Rand
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Kaider
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Helbich
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Imhof
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Resnick
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D002114:Calcinosis / Q000473:pathology; D002358:Cartilage, Articular / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000473:pathology*; D016001:Confidence Intervals; D017352:Echo-Planar Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006653:Histology; D006801:Humans; D006818:Hyalin / Q000166:cytology; D007719:Knee Joint / Q000166:cytology / Q000473:pathology*; D008297:Male; D008679:Metaplasia; D008875:Middle Aged; D015588:Observer Variation; D010003:Osteoarthritis / Q000473:pathology*; D012016:Reference Values; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013585:Synovitis / Q000473:pathology