[Significance of revision of the occupational illness legislation for evaluating intervertebral disk damage].
OBJECTIVE
Are there any radiological criterions which are able to indicate the profession related disease No. 2108?


METHODS
The medical documents and x-rays of the whole spine of 390 back pain patients who applied for a profession related disease of the spine were evaluated. Those patients who fulfilled the professional claims for acknowledgement of the profession related disease were compared to those who didn't fulfill these conditions.


RESULTS
Concerning the segmental alterations of the cervical and the lumbal spine specific allocation frequencies were found. The dominance of L3/4 in the comparison group was conspicuous. Looking at the allocation frequencies of the cervical and lumbal disc alterations in view of affection heaviness it was obvious, that the predominating slight alterations mainly were located in the central parts of the cervical and the lumbal spine whereas bad alterations mainly were found in the lower parts. Regarding this matter test and comparison groups behaved the same way. Looking at the allocation frequencies concerning single respectively multiple alterations it was found that in the comparison group single respectively bisegmentale alterations could be recognized even in duplicate than in the test group in which the multiple alterations were dominant. The comparison of the cervical and the lumbal spine regarding chondrotic? spondylotic, slight and bad alterations in all mentioned features the next deeper located segment was affected particularly in the test group. Therefore a distal shift of the chondrotic alterations could be recognized. In case of the spondylotic affections it was the other way round: a cranial shift was conspicuous.


CONCLUSIONS
After doing heavy labour for years only a few isolated multiple affections of the lumbal spine are found. On the strength of this fact the proof of exclusively in the lumbal spine located alterations doesn't allow the acknowledgement of a profession related disease. However, a distal shift of osteochondrotic alterations respectively a cranial shift of spondylotic affections in the lumbal spine is suspicous for being job-related. L3/4 takes a very special place in the differential diagnosis of profession related disease of the spine. In the test group this part of the lumbal spine showed bad alterations much more frequent. The affection of L3/4 pleads against a considerable participation of mechanical influences and therefore against a profession related disease. Singular or bisegmental disc affections are out of question for being a profession related disease because these alterations are seen much more frequent in the comparison than in the test group.
Weber
M
M
Orthopädische Abteilung der Chirurgischen Universitätsklinik Freiburg.
Morgenthaler
M
M
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002574:Cervical Vertebrae / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000601:surgery; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D004608:Eligibility Determination / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D005104:Expert Testimony / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D005260:Female; D005858:Germany; D006801:Humans; D007405:Intervertebral Disc Displacement / Q000145:classification / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000601:surgery; D017770:Lifting / Q000009:adverse effects*; D008159:Lumbar Vertebrae / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000601:surgery; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009784:Occupational Diseases / Q000145:classification / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000601:surgery; D011859:Radiography; D013128:Spinal Osteophytosis / Q000145:classification / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000601:surgery; D013167:Spondylitis, Ankylosing / Q000145:classification / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000601:surgery; D016474:Weight-Bearing; D014942:Workers' Compensation / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence