[MR myelography in spinal canal stenosis].
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the clinical value of 3D-MR-myelography (3D-MRM) in comparison to myelography and intra-operative findings.


METHODS
25 patients with suspected lumbar spinal canal stenosis were studied via myelography and 3D-MRM (volume-data set, 3D-FISP sequence, TR 73 ms, TE 21 ms, flip angle 7 degrees, sagittal slices) besides the routinely acquired sagittal and axial T1- and T2-weighted images. Diagnoses were made by two radiologists and one neurosurgeon without knowing the clinical history and symptoms, in two separate sessions. Results were compared to intraoperative findings.


RESULTS
3D-MRM has the same diagnostic sensitivity (25/25 = 100%) as conventional X-ray myelography (25/25 = 100%) compared to intraoperative findings, but is not invasive and shows more diagnostic details than myelography. Especially in cases of high-grade spinal canal stenosis there is often a lack of intrathecal contrast medium distally of the stenosis.


CONCLUSIONS
3D-MRM is as good as conventional myelography in predicting intraoperative findings in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis. This new method is non-invasive and can be performed routinely on an outpatient basis.
Freund
M
M
Klinik für Radiologische Diagnostik, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel.
Hutzelmann
A
A
Steffens
J C
JC
Buhl
R
R
Heller
M
M
D000328:Adult; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008159:Lumbar Vertebrae / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D009192:Myelography / Q000379:methods*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D013130:Spinal Stenosis / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging