Continuing dilemmas concerning aortic valve replacement in patients with advanced left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
Aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis or aortic regurgitation who have severe left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction continues to be associated with a high mortality risk despite surgical, cardiological and anesthetic improvements over time. As a result of earlier surgical referral, however, fewer patients with aortic regurgitation (AR) and advanced LV failure present for operation today. Favorable operative and long-term results, and data demonstrating recovery of LV systolic function if patients are referred prior to the onset of systolic dysfunction have largely solved this problem in the context of AR. On the other hand, patients with critical aortic stenosis (AS) and severe LV systolic dysfunction constitute a more heterogeneous and even more challenging group. On one side of the continuum, patients with truly critical AS and low ejection fraction due to LV 'afterload mismatch' (depressed ejection performance resulting from excessively high systolic LV wall stress secondary to a very tight valve) generally respond well to aortic valve replacement, which immediately normalizes LV afterload. Conversely, patients with 'critical' aortic stenosis and advanced LV systolic dysfunction who present with a low transvalvular gradient and cardiac output constitute a subgroup at high operative risk, which also has a suboptimal prognosis after aortic valve replacement. This clinical situation has been termed the 'Gorlin Conundrum', and is punctuated by a low mean transvalvular gradient and low flow. The reason for the low transvalvular gradient is not always known, but can be secondary to some type of coexistent cardiomyopathy. Patients with only mild pathologic aortic valve sclerosis/stenosis and markedly depressed LV systolic function are frequently judged to have 'critical' aortic stenosis (AVA < 0.8 cm2 or AVAI < 0.4 cm2/m2) due to inherent flaws in the Gorlin equation and limitations of the Doppler continuity equation. Although alternative diagnostic techniques have been proposed, e.g. aortic valve resistance, stroke work loss, none has yet proven to be totally reliable. The suboptimal results of aortic valve replacement in low-gradient AS patients underscore our difficulty in currently predicting which patients will benefit from valve replacement. Newer diagnostic techniques, including dobutamine echocardiography, and novel new findings regarding the basic molecular mechanisms responsible for contractile dysfunction in pressure overload hypertrophy may ultimately improve the results of surgical treatment in these patients.
Green
G R
GR
Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, California 94305-5247, USA.
Miller
D C
DC
D001022:Aortic Valve Insufficiency / Q000150:complications / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000601:surgery*; D001024:Aortic Valve Stenosis / Q000150:complications / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000601:surgery*; D003657:Decision Making; D015150:Echocardiography, Doppler; D019918:Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; D006801:Humans; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013599:Systole; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D018487:Ventricular Dysfunction, Left / Q000150:complications / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000601:surgery*