Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration of malignant pancreatic lesions.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the accuracy, safety, and clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) of pancreatic masses.


METHODS
Forty-seven patients were referred for EUS with a pancreatic mass and suspicion of pancreatic cancer based upon painless obstructive jaundice, epigastric abdominal pain plus weight loss/anorexia, or idiopathic pancreatitis. All patients underwent EUS with both radial (Olympus UM20) and linear array (Pentax FG32-UA) systems. After TNM staging by EUS, ultrasound directed FNA of the pancreatic mass was performed using a 23 gauge, 4 cm long needle.


RESULTS
EUS-guided FNA was performed in all 47 patients. Results: successful targeting = 100%, adequate cellularity = 100%,


RESULTS
adeno Ca = 25, squamous cell Ca = 1, lymphoma = 1, poorly differentiated Ca= 1, atypical cytology or suspicious for carcinoma = 9, no malignant cells = 10. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of EUS-guided pancreatic FNA for the diagnosis of malignancy was 64%, 100%, 100% and 16% respectively.


CONCLUSIONS
EUS with FNA is useful for detection of malignancy in a pancreatic mass. The procedure appears to have a complication rate of 2%. Impact of this technique on clinical management of patients needs further evaluation.
Bhutani
M S
MS
VA Medical Center, Dayton, Ohio, USA.
Hawes
R H
RH
Baron
P L
PL
Sanders-Cliette
A
A
van Velse
A
A
Osborne
J F
JF
Hoffman
B J
BJ
D000230:Adenocarcinoma / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology*; D001707:Biopsy, Needle / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D009366:Neoplasm Seeding; D010179:Pancreas / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology*; D010190:Pancreatic Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology*; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D018084:Ultrasonography, Interventional