title: Wellness programs: a review of the evidence.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To review studies that have examined an association between wellness programs and improvements in quality of life and to assess the strength of the scientific evidence.
  
  
  METHODS
  A MEDLINE search was constructed with the following medical subject headings: "psychoneuroimmunology," "chronic disease" and "health promotion," "chronic disease" and "health behaviour," "relaxation techniques," "music therapy," "laughter," "anger," "mediation" and "behavioural medicine." Searches using the text words "wellness" and "wellness program" were also carried out. References from the primary articles identified in the search and contemporary writing on wellness were also considered.
  
  
  METHODS
  Selection was limited to randomized controlled trials or prospective studies published in English that involved human subjects and that took place between 1980 and 1996. All studies with an intervention aimed at promoting wellness and measuring outcomes were included, except studies of patients with cancer and HIV and studies of health promotion programs in the workplace. Of the 1082 references initially identified, 11 met the criteria for inclusion in the critical appraisal.
  
  
  METHODS
  The following information was extracted from the 11 studies: characteristics of the study population, number of participants (and number followed to completion), length of follow-up, type of intervention, outcome measures and results. All 11 studies were assessed for the quality of their evidence.
  
  
  RESULTS
  All studies reported some positive outcomes following the intervention in question, although many had limitations precluding applicability of the results to a wider population.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Despite the suggested benefit associated with wellness programs, the evidence was inconclusive. Whether the composition of the target group or the type of intervention has a role in determining outcomes is unknown. Although trends suggest that wellness programs may be cost-effective, further research is needed for confirmation.
authors.affiliation: Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Watt
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Verma
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Flynn
mesh_terms: D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine / Q000592:standards*; D006293:Health Promotion / Q000592:standards*; D006304:Health Status; D006801:Humans; D015397:Program Evaluation; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011788:Quality of Life; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Q000592:standards; D012107:Research Design / Q000592:standards*