title: Wound cleaning versus wound disinfection: a challenging dilemma.
abstract: Our experience with this resident has had a significant impact on our approach to wound management. We no longer accept normal saline as the only option for wound cleansing. Instead, we approach wound cleansing systematically using the wound cleansing model outlined in Figure 1. If healing is not apparent, we critically review the situation and consider the bacterial status of the wound, the phase of wound healing, and the effects of wound cleansing versus wound disinfection on both the bacteria and the cells responsible for wound repair. In infected wounds or those colonized with a high bacterial count, careful attention is given to eradicating bacterial contamination. We carefully weigh the benefits of wound disinfection (eradication of bacterial contamination) against wound cleansing and the potential harm to the resident (delayed wound healing and unnecessary discomfort). If the benefits of wound disinfection outweigh the potential harm to the resident, we choose wound disinfection and monitor its effectiveness on a daily basis. When bacterial contamination has been eradicated and the wound is clean, we resume wound cleansing with normal saline.
authors.affiliation: CAPITAL CARE Group, Edmonton, Alberta.
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Phillips
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Davey
mesh_terms: D019342:Acetic Acid / Q000008:administration & dosage; D000368:Aged; D003646:Debridement; D004203:Disinfection / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D003668:Pressure Ulcer / Q000628:therapy*; D007507:Therapeutic Irrigation / Q000379:methods; D014945:Wound Healing; D014946:Wound Infection / Q000628:therapy*
chemical_list: D019342:Acetic Acid