Naturalistic action impairment in closed head injury.
The authors sought to determine whether errors of action committed by patients with closed head injury (CHI) would conform to predictions derived from frontal lobe theories. In Study 1, 30 CHI patients and 18 normal controls performed routine activities, such as wrapping a present, under conditions of graded complexity. CHI patients committed more errors even on the simplest condition; but, except for a higher proportion of omitted actions, their error profile was very similar to that of controls. Study 2 involved a subset of patients whose performance in Study 1 was within normal limits. When these high functioning patients were asked to perform the routine tasks under still more taxing conditions, they, too, committed errors in excess of the control group. Accounts based on frontal mechanisms have a difficult time explaining the overall pattern of findings. An alternative based on limited-capacity resources is suggested.
Schwartz
M F
MF
Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19141-3099, USA. mschwar@vm.temple.edu
Montgomery
M W
MW
Buxbaum
L J
LJ
Lee
S S
SS
Carew
T G
TG
Coslett
H B
HB
Ferraro
M
M
Fitzpatrick-DeSalme
E
E
Hart
T
T
Mayer
N
N
D000203:Activities of Daily Living; D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D016489:Head Injuries, Closed / Q000523:psychology*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*