[4-Log leukocyte depletion of erythrocyte concentrates--a comparison with 3 other filters].
Whole blood (WB) and SAGM-resuspended red cell concentrates (RCC) were leucocyte-depleted 1 h after donation by filtration using BF 4 (PALL), Sepacell RS 200 (Asahi Med.) and Bio R01 Plus (Biotrans). We compared the handling of the filter system, focusing routine blood bank practice, filtration efficiency [residual white cell count; flow cytometry (Ortho Cytoron) and Nageotte chamber] and the loss of red cells. Spontaneous filling was found to be an advantage of the Bio R01 Plus system, whereas the BPF 4 and the RS 200 have to be filled by pressure. The filtrations were of similar duration, even those of WB and resuspended RCC. Red cell loss was found to be 10-15% on RCC higher than on WB (7-10%) and varied between the filters used: BPF 4 < Bio R01 Plus < RS 200. The residual white cell count on WB was 1.2-5.8 x 10(6) (RS 200 < Bio R01 Plus < BPF 4) and on RCC was 0.5-3.0 x 10(5) (RS 200 < BPF 4 < Bio R01 Plus). The filters used are highly effective (4-log depletion on RCC) even on fresh WB and are therefore potential in-line filters.
Richter
E
E
Institut für Transfusionsmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät (Charité), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
Matthes
G
G
Tofoté
U
U
Rath
E
E
Takahashi
T A
TA
Hosoda
M
M
Sekiguchi
S
S
D001782:Blood Donors; D016238:Cytapheresis / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D017707:Erythrocyte Transfusion; D004912:Erythrocytes; D005374:Filtration / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D005434:Flow Cytometry; D006801:Humans; D007962:Leukocytes
4-Log-Leukozytendepletion von Erythrozytenkonzentraten--ein Vergleich von 3 verschiedenen Filtern.