Further analysis of choice between cocaine and food using the unit price model of behavioral economics.
Behavioral economics defines unit price (UP) as the ratio of the response requirement to magnitude of reinforcer. When applied to drug self-administration, the UP model defines UP as the ratio of the response requirement to the unit dose of drug. This model makes two predictions about drug self-administration: increasing UP decreases consumption and consumption at a given UP will be constant regardless of the response requirement and dose that make up the UP. In previous experiments conducted in rhesus monkeys allowed to choose between an i.v. injection of cocaine and food, the UP model has failed to adequately predict drug consumption in that consumption varied (increased with dose) at a given UP. However, previous experiments have allowed a fixed number of choice trials/day, thereby imposing a procedural ceiling on consumption that may have influenced conformity to the UP model. In the present experiment, the number of choice trials available was varied in such a way that constant drug consumption was possible over the range of UPs tested. The response requirement for cocaine was varied between 15 and 1200 lever presses/injection and the dose of cocaine was varied between 0.05 and 0.2 mg/kg/inj, yielding UPs from 300 to 5600 responses/mg/kg. The response requirement for food was always 30. As predicted by the UP model, cocaine consumption decreased as UP increased. Moreover, in contrast to previous experiments, consumption did not vary significantly across the response requirement/dose combinations that made up a UP. A detailed analysis suggested that a decrease in magnitude of the alternative reinforcer (one rather than three food pellets), rather than the increase in trials, was responsible for the improved conformity to the UP model in the present experiment relative to previous experiments. Taken together with previous experiments, the present experiment suggests that conformity to the UP model of drug consumption in a choice situation is dependent upon the magnitude of alternative reinforcers that are available. Consumption was best predicted by the UP model when the magnitude of the alternative reinforcer was small.
Woolverton
W L
WL
Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson 39216, USA. woolvert@fiona.umsmed.edu
English
J A
JA
D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal / Q000187:drug effects; D002755:Choice Behavior / Q000187:drug effects*; D003042:Cocaine / Q000494:pharmacology*; D004305:Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; D005247:Feeding Behavior / Q000187:drug effects*; D005260:Female; D007275:Injections, Intravenous; D008253:Macaca mulatta; D008297:Male; D012054:Reinforcement, Psychology; D012646:Self Administration
D003042:Cocaine