Defendants are clueless--the 30-day psychiatric observation.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the understanding and expectations of defendants referred to Valkenberg Hospital for 30-day observation.


METHODS
Defendants referred for 30 days of psychiatric assessment were surveyed by means of a semi-structured interview within 3 days of admission.


METHODS
One hundred consecutive referrals from the Western, Northern and Eastern Cape were considered; 88 were eventually entered into the study.


RESULTS
All defendants were generally ignorant of the reasons for referral, but had a good understanding of court procedure and wrongfulness. Mentally ill subjects differed only in their not being able to distinguish between a guilty/not guilty plea. Most did not have legal representation, did not personally request the assessment and denied guilt of the alleged offence.


CONCLUSIONS
Mental illness affects triability but not necessarily criminal responsibility. Disturbingly, most defendants were without legal representation and were unaware of the purpose, implications and possible outcomes of psychiatric observation. It is imperative that the legislation governing these aspects be reviewed.
Kaliski
S Z
SZ
Department of Psychiatry, University of Cape Town.
Borcherds
M
M
Williams
F
F
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003416:Criminal Law; D005104:Expert Testimony; D005555:Forensic Psychiatry; D006801:Humans; D007298:Insanity Defense; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D008297:Male; D016743:Mental Competency / Q000523:psychology; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology; D008875:Middle Aged; D011329:Prisoners / Q000523:psychology*; D011446:Prospective Studies