A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation compared with conventional ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome receiving surfactant.
OBJECTIVE
To compare high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) and intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) as a primary ventilation mode in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Primary end points were survival and maintenance of the randomized ventilation mode.


METHODS
Prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial.


METHODS
Level III neonatal intensive care units at three university children's hospitals.


METHODS
Ninety-six premature infants (gestational age < 32 weeks) randomly assigned to HFOV or IPPV within the first 2 hours of life. All patients received a natural surfactant. No differences were found between the study groups with respect to the demographic data or the severity of respiratory distress syndrome. Infants were stratified at randomization, by birth weight, into two groups: 750 to 1000 gm (n = 32) and 1001 to 1500 gm (n = 64). The centers involved complied with a study protocol that planned a reduction in respiratory pressures when the infant's oxygen requirement had reached a fractional concentration of inspired oxygen of 0.6.


RESULTS
Five patients in the HFOV group died, and eight patients did not respond to the randomized ventilation mode; whereas four patients in the IPPV group died, and nine were switched to HFOV. No differences were found in gas exchange or ventilator support over the first 72 hours. Premature infants with a birth weight < 1000 gm had a significantly shorter course to reach fractional concentration of inspired oxygen of 0.21 while receiving IPPV than those receiving HFOV (9.3+/-4.5 days vs 27.5+/-10.2 days, p = 0.01). No differences were found between the groups in extraalveolar air (HFOV seven; IPPV, seven) and intracranial bleeding (HFOV, nine; IPPV, eight).


CONCLUSIONS
After surfactant treatment, HFOV, as a primary ventilation mode in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome, is as safe and efficacious as conventional ventilation.
Rettwitz-Volk
W
W
Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Frankfurt a. Main, Federal Republic of Germany.
Veldman
A
A
Roth
B
B
Vierzig
A
A
Kachel
W
W
Varnholt
V
V
Schlösser
R
R
von Loewenich
V
V
D005260:Female; D006612:High-Frequency Ventilation; D006801:Humans; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D007234:Infant, Premature; D008297:Male; D011175:Positive-Pressure Respiration; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011663:Pulmonary Surfactants / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D012127:Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn / Q000628:therapy*; D016896:Treatment Outcome
D011663:Pulmonary Surfactants