[Measuring the economic impact of ambulatory dialysis: the case of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis].
BACKGROUND
As concerns the treatment of terminal renal failure (TRF), France is characterized by a minimal use of peritoneal dialysis, even though this technique is as effective and less expensive than others and that authorities precognize to switch patients to out-of-centre techniques, like peritoneal dialysis. The purpose of the article is to estimate benefits for the Social Security induced by an incitative program leading the current structure of TRF treatment to the existing government standards defined in 1984.


METHODS
We computed treatment cost differences, on the basis of an incident case of TRF followed during 7 years, between three different situations: the current French structure of TRF treatment (29.5% of patients treated by out-of-center techniques); two reference situations A and B (respectively 45% and 37% of patients treated by out-of-center techniques). We performed a sensitivity analysis on the rate of use of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). We made assumptions on the cost of techniques, the cost of complications and the rate of CAPD treatment failure.


RESULTS
Results stress the existence of benefits induced by increased use of out-of-centre techniques on the basis of a 7-year follow-up of an incident TRF patient: around 65,000 FF in situation A with a 20% rate of use of CAPD; around 5,000 FF in situation B with a 15% rate of use of CAPD. Assumptions concerning CAPD treatment lead to an underestimation of the true benefits.


CONCLUSIONS
The study highlights the therapeutic and economic interest to transfer some patients from hemodialysis to peritoneal dialysis.
Lebrun
T
T
Centre de Recherches Economiques, Sociologiques et de Gestion, Lille.
Marissal
J P
JP
Sailly
J C
JC
D000553:Ambulatory Care / Q000191:economics*; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D005602:France; D006801:Humans; D007676:Kidney Failure, Chronic / Q000628:therapy*; D018803:Models, Economic; D010531:Peritoneal Dialysis, Continuous Ambulatory / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000191:economics* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006435:Renal Dialysis / Q000191:economics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D012943:Social Security / Q000191:economics; D017211:Treatment Failure
Mesure de l'intérêt économique de la dialyse hors centre: le cas de la dialyse péritonéale continue ambulatoire.