title: Delayed healing of rhytidectomy flap resurfaced with CO2 laser.
abstract: Combining facial rhytidectomy with laser resurfacing, theoretically, provides the best opportunity for achieving an optimal facial rejuvenation result. Previous studies have demonstrated the pernicious effect of a deep peel on a skin flap, but the safety of treating the rhytidectomy flap with laser has not been investigated. This study was conducted to investigate the safety of using these techniques concomitantly. Sixty sites were selected on three Yucatan minipigs, a species of swine chosen because of its hairless nature and opportunity to raise a true skin flap (without the panniculus carnosus). The healing time of 20 laser-treated sites without flap elevation was compared with that of 20 areas treated with laser following flap elevation, shortening (to emulate a more realistic rhytidectomy process), and repair. Twenty flaps were elevated and shortened without laser treatment to serve as a control. The CO2 laser parameters were set at 500 mJ, 50 watts, and a density of 5. Two passes were made to penetrate the upper dermis. The mean healing time for areas treated with laser alone was 12.05 days, ranging from 11 to 14 days. In comparison, the healing time for the laser-treated areas subsequent to flap elevation averaged 17.95 days, with a range of 14 to 24 days (p < 0.05). Two flaps treated with laser (10 percent) failed to heal completely in 24 days. At the time that all 20 of the areas treated solely with laser had re-epithelialized completely, only one of the flaps treated with laser had re-epithelialized completely (p < 0.001). A delay in healing, as well as return of pigment, was demonstrated in the distal portions of all flaps receiving laser treatment. The control flaps all healed normally except for a 5-percent superficial loss on a single flap. It was concluded from this study, and from clinical observation of delayed healing on six of seven patients who underwent concomitant rhytidectomy and laser resurfacing at a conservative laser setting, that laser resurfacing of the rhytidectomy flap is unsafe and results in delayed re-epithelialization. This combination should be avoided altogether or performed with extreme prudence on patients undergoing a deeper plane facial rhytidectomy or by using very low laser settings.
authors.affiliation: Meridia Health System and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Guyuron
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Michelow
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Schmelzer
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Thomas
authors.forename: M A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Ellison
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002245:Carbon Dioxide; D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D004848:Epithelium / Q000473:pathology; D006801:Humans; D053685:Laser Therapy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods; D015361:Rhytidoplasty / Q000379:methods; D012449:Safety; D012880:Skin Pigmentation; D013524:Surgical Flaps / Q000473:pathology*; D013552:Swine; D013556:Swine, Miniature; D013997:Time Factors; D014945:Wound Healing
chemical_list: D002245:Carbon Dioxide