[Magnetic resonance imaging vs. three-dimensional scintigraphy in the diagnosis and monitoring of mandibular osteomyelitis].
Bone scintigraphy is routinely used in the diagnosis of lower jaw osteomyelitis; however, the radiation dosage of 3.5 mSv is quite high. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) gives information about soft tissue and bone marrow alterations. This study compares the sensitivity of the two imaging modalities in the diagnosis of lower jaw osteomyelitis. Thirteen patients with clinical signs of the disease were examined and followed up using both methods, three-phase bone scintigraphy and MRI. Compared to three-phase bone scintigraphy, MRI has the same diagnostic sensitivity. However in one case of active osteomyelitis bone scintigraphy showed a false-negative result. MRI once indicated a higher activity rate but never failed to provide the diagnosis. In addition, it gives exact information about the location, size and involvement of the soft tissue. A STIR sequence should be performed in addition to the native and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted spin echo sequence. The metal artifacts of the antibiotic chain on the MRI can be eliminated by replacing the wire by nonresorbent suture material. In the diagnosis of lower jaw osteomyelitis, three-phase bone scintigraphy can be replaced by the MRI.
Körner
T
T
Klinik für Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel.
Kreusch
T
T
Bohuslavizki
K H
KH
Brinkmann
G
G
Köhnlein
S
S
D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008336:Mandibular Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D010019:Osteomyelitis / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D011877:Radionuclide Imaging
Magnetresonanztomographie (MRT) vs. 3-Phasen-Skelettszintigraphie bei der Diagnostik und Verlaufskontrolle der Unterkieferosteomyelitis.