title: Why are there eccentricity effects in visual search? Visual and attentional hypotheses.
abstract: In standard visual search experiments, observers search for a target item among distracting items. The locations of target items are generally random within the display and ignored as a factor in data analysis. Previous work has shown that targets presented near fixation are, in fact, found more efficiently than are targets presented at more peripheral locations. This paper proposes that the primary cause of this "eccentricity effect" (Carrasco, Evert, Chang, & Katz, 1995) is an attentional bias that allocates attention preferentially to central items. The first four experiments dealt with the possibility that visual, and not attentional, factors underlie the eccentricity effect. They showed that the eccentricity effect cannot be accounted for by the peripheral reduction in visual sensitivity, peripheral crowding, or cortical magnification. Experiment 5 tested the attention allocation model and also showed that RT x set size effects can be independent of eccentricity effects. Experiment 6 showed that the effective set size in a search task depends, in part, on the eccentricity of the target because observers search from fixation outward.
authors.affiliation: Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Boston, MA 02115, USA. wolfe@search.bwh.harvard.edu
authors.forename: J M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Wolfe
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: O'Neill
authors.forename: S C
authors.initials: SC
authors.lastname: Bennett
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D003118:Color Perception; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009949:Orientation; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D011601:Psychophysics; D011930:Reaction Time; D014794:Visual Fields