Optical densities of dental resin composites: a comparison of CCD, storage phosphor, and Ektaspeed plus radiographic film.
Density versus exposure was determined for digital and film radiographic images of various thicknesses of six dental resin composites. The curves were relatively parallel; saturation at the black end of the contrast scale occurred at lower exposures with Computed Dental Radiography (CDR, Schick Industries, Long Island City, NY) than with the Sens-A-Ray (Regam AB, Sundsvall, Sweden). Ektaspeed Plus film (Kodak Dental Products, Rochester, NY) was the least sensitive modality tested. The DIGORA storage phosphor system (Soredex-Orion, Helsinki) had a wide exposure latitude with significantly less steep characteristic slopes than for images from the charge-coupled devices (CCDs). Slopes generated for the Sens-A-Ray and the CDR were not significantly different. Slopes generated for each resin composite were not significantly different for each of the modalities. Relative radiopacities of the resin materials with respect to each other were constant across all modalities; hence, in these systems, sensor type is unlikely to affect differentiation between resin composites and dental enamel or recurrent caries.
Farman
T T
TT
Division of Radiology and Imaging Science, University of Louisville School of Dentistry, KY 40292, USA.
Farman
A G
AG
Scarfe
W C
WC
Goldsmith
L J
LJ
D015502:Absorptiometry, Photon; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D003188:Composite Resins; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D011856:Radiographic Image Enhancement / Q000295:instrumentation; D011861:Radiography, Dental / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D019252:Radiography, Dental, Digital / Q000295:instrumentation; D012815:Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted / Q000295:instrumentation; D014962:X-Ray Film
D003188:Composite Resins