Do resources bolster coping and does coping buffer stress? An organizational study with longitudinal aspect and control for negative affectivity.
Psychiatric workers facing redeployment completed questionnaire measures of stressors, resources (locus of control and perceived social support), coping, well-being, and negative affectivity, at baseline (N = 109) and 1 year later (loss of 7 participants). Regression analyses of the baseline data suggested that as stressors increased, so did avoidance coping, but less so for those high in internality or perceived social support. Problem-focused coping was bolstered by internality and emotion-focused coping by perceived social support. Other regression analyses, with a longitudinal aspect, suggested that stressors had a deleterious effect on well-being. Problem- and emotion-focused coping had beneficial effects, whereas avoidance coping had a (delayed) deleterious effect. These effects of coping were predominantly main and not buffering effects.
Ingledew
D K
DK
Division of Health and Human Performance, University of Wales, Bangor, United Kingdom. d.k.ingledew@bangor.ac.uk
Hardy
L
L
Cooper
C L
CL
D000223:Adaptation, Psychological; D000328:Adult; D000342:Affective Symptoms / Q000523:psychology*; D003674:Defense Mechanisms; D005260:Female; D006271:Health Facility Closure; D006778:Hospitals, Psychiatric; D006780:Hospitals, Rural; D006801:Humans; D007389:Internal-External Control; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009784:Occupational Diseases / Q000523:psychology*; D011340:Problem Solving; D012307:Risk Factors; D012944:Social Support; D013315:Stress, Psychological / Q000150:complications*; D006113:United Kingdom