title: Comparative evaluation of two models for estimating sample sizes for tests on trends across repeated measurements.
abstract: Two equations for calculating sample sizes that are required for power in testing differences in rates of change in repeated measurement designs have been presented by different authors. One equation provides support for the conclusion that increased frequency of measurements across a treatment period of fixed duration enhances power of the tests. The other equation supports the counterintuitive conclusion that increased frequency of measurements actually tends to decrease power in the presence of realistic serial dependencies in the data. Monte Carlo methods confirm that the equation providing support for the latter conclusion is accurate, whereas the alternative equation tends to underestimate sample sizes required for power in testing differences in slopes of regression lines fitted to changes in the repeated measurements across time when symmetry is absent from the covariance structure.
authors.affiliation: University of Texas Medical School, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Houston 77225, USA.
authors.forename: J E
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Overall
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Shobaki
authors.forename: C B
authors.initials: CB
authors.lastname: Anderson
mesh_terms: D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D015233:Models, Statistical; D009010:Monte Carlo Method; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D018401:Sample Size