title: Two-, four-, and six-strand zone II flexor tendon repairs: an in situ biomechanical comparison using a cadaver model.
abstract: A dynamic in vitro model of zone II flexor tendon repair was used to compare gliding resistance, gap formation, and ultimate strength of the 2-, 4-, and 6-strand repair techniques. Each of 12 hands was mounted to a loading frame with 3 flexor tendons attached to individual pneumatic cylinders. A spring attached to a pin through the distal end of each digit provided a 1.25-kg resistance force. The force required to flex each proximal interphalangeal joint to 90 degrees was determined. Following this, the tendons were sectioned and each was repaired using a different technique so that each specimen acted as its own control. The 2- and 4-strand core sutures were placed using a suture interlock technique with radial and ulnar grasping purchase of the tendon on each side of the transverse part of the repair. Each repair was accomplished using a single core stitch with the knot buried between the tendon ends. The 4-strand repair involved an additional horizontal mattress suture with the knot buried. Repair of the dorsal side of the tendon was performed followed by core suture placement. The palmar portion of the peripheral locking suture was completed after core suture placement. Following repair, each hand was remounted on the frame and cycled 1,000 times. After cyclic loading, the resulting gap between the repaired ends of each tendon was measured, the tendons were removed from the hand, and each was loaded to failure in tension. All tendon repairs showed a small, but not statistically significant, increase in gliding resistance after reconstruction. The 2-strand repair had significantly greater gap formation after cyclic loading (mean gap, 2.75 mm) than either the 4-strand (0.30 mm) or 6-strand (0.31 mm) repair. The tensile strength of the 6-strand repair (mean, 78.7 N) was significantly greater than either the 4-strand (means, 43.0 N) or 2-strand (mean, 33.9 N) repair.
authors.affiliation: Department of Plastic Surgery, Wilford Hall Medical Center, Lackland Air Force Base, TX, USA.
authors.forename: R T
authors.initials: RT
authors.lastname: Thurman
authors.forename: T E
authors.initials: TE
authors.lastname: Trumble
authors.forename: D P
authors.initials: DP
authors.lastname: Hanel
authors.forename: A F
authors.initials: AF
authors.lastname: Tencer
authors.forename: P K
authors.initials: PK
authors.lastname: Kiser
mesh_terms: D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D002102:Cadaver; D005384:Finger Joint / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D009119:Muscle Contraction / Q000502:physiology; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D013536:Suture Techniques / Q000009:adverse effects; D013710:Tendons / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D013718:Tensile Strength