title: Reliability of three methods of occlusion classification.
abstract: Four orthodontic faculty at one dental school classified 25 dental casts according to the classification systems of Angle, Katz, and the British Incisor Classification. The dental casts were selected from a pool of 350 pretreatment graduate orthodontic cases and were those deemed the most atypical. The results demonstrated that Katz's classification was more reliable than both Angle and the British. Angle's classification was the least reliable of the three methods.
authors.affiliation: University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
authors.forename: S Q
authors.initials: SQ
authors.lastname: Du
authors.forename: D J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Rinchuse
authors.forename: T G
authors.initials: TG
authors.lastname: Zullo
authors.forename: D J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Rinchuse
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D008310:Malocclusion / Q000145:classification*; D003765:Models, Dental; D015588:Observer Variation; D015203:Reproducibility of Results