The cerebellopontine angle: does the translabyrinthine approach give adequate access?
A long-standing but unfounded criticism of the translabyrinthine approach is the misperception that this approach does not give adequate access to the cerebellopontine angle. Because of what is perceived as limited visualization and operating space within the cerebellopontine angle, some surgeons still believe that the translabyrinthine approach is inappropriate for large acoustic tumors. In this study, the surgical access to the cerebellopontine angle by virtue of the translabyrinthine approach is measured and analyzed. The parameters are compared with those measured for the retrosigmoid approach. This series objectively confirms that the translabyrinthine approach offers the neurotologic surgeon a shorter operative depth to the tumor, via a similar-sized craniotomy. This permits superior visualization by virtue of a wider angle of surgical access. Such access is achieved with the merit of minimal cerebellar retraction.
Fagan
P A
PA
Department of Neuro-otology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Sheehy
J P
JP
Chang
P
P
Doust
B D
BD
Coakley
D
D
Atlas
M D
MD
D002530:Cerebellopontine Angle / Q000601:surgery*; D003399:Craniotomy; D007758:Ear, Inner; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008722:Methods; D009464:Neuroma, Acoustic / Q000601:surgery; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed