Whose quality of life is it anyway? Some problems with the emerging quality of life consensus.
Two critiques of the emerging consensus in the conceptualization and measurement of quality of life were presented. The first suggests that there are insuperable problems in assessing subjective indicators of quality of life and that this aspect of the quality of life approach should be abandoned. The second critique is that the quality of life approach, which claims to liberate people from a medical model, may paradoxically serve to extend the license of services to exert control over all facets of a person's life. In this view, the quality of life approach should be abandoned altogether. The solutions that follow from these two critiques were critically discussed with the aim of provoking a debate around the quality of life approach.
Hatton
C
C
Hester Adrian Research Centre, University of Manchester, United Kingdom.
D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D008607:Intellectual Disability / Q000523:psychology / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D007389:Internal-External Control; D010549:Personal Satisfaction; D011209:Power, Psychological; D011788:Quality of Life