A prospective comparison of the costs of reusable and limited-reuse laparoscopic instruments.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the cost and performance of 2 types of laparoscopic instrumentation: reusable laparoscopic hook cautery instruments and curved scissors, or limited-reuse laparoscopic hook cautery instruments and curved scissors.


METHODS
A randomized trial.


METHODS
The operating room of a tertiary care hospital.


METHODS
All general surgeons performing laparoscopic procedures at the hospital were randomized to be supplied with either reusable or limited-reuse hook cautery and curved scissors. Instrument use was recorded, together with principal outcome measures.


METHODS
Life expectancy of the instruments, the number of cases for which they were used, the number, nature and cost of repairs, their purchase cost and surgeon satisfaction.


RESULTS
Reusable hook cautery instruments were less expensive than their limited-reuse counterparts. Excellent surgeon satisfaction was reported with the use of this type of instrument. The limited-reuse curved scissors arm of the study was terminated early because of a breach in study protocol.


CONCLUSIONS
Reusable hook cautery instruments were better than their limited-reuse counterparts. Rigorous attempts to compare the cost of laparoscopic instruments may be limited by their rapid evolution in design and the availability of many types of instruments on the market.
DesCôteaux
J G
JG
Department of Surgery, Foothills Hospital, University of Calgary, Alta.
Blackmore
K
K
Parsons
L
L
D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D004209:Disposable Equipment / Q000191:economics*; D017743:Equipment Reuse / Q000191:economics*; D006801:Humans; D020706:Laparoscopes; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000191:economics; D013525:Surgical Instruments / Q000191:economics*