Surface treatment techniques for resin composite repair.
OBJECTIVE
To compare bond strengths of fresh resin composites to previously polymerized ("aged") composites following various surface treatments.


METHODS
Eighty Pertac Hybrid (PH) and an equal number of Silux Plux (SLX) specimens were fabricated and stored for 1 week prior to surface treatment. The specimens were then polished and stored for an additional 24 hours prior to final surface treatment. The surface treatments included use of one of the following: (1) diamond bur (DB), (2) microetcher with 50 microns Al2O3@80 psi pressure (ME), (3) high-pressure air abrasion with 27 microns Al2O3@psi, (KCP), or (4) low-pressure silicate ceramic deposition using 30 microns particles@34 psi (CJ-S) with a microetcher. Half of the samples were treated with a silanating agent. Fresh resin composite (same type as used for the aged specimen) was bonded to the treated surfaces, and specimens were then stored 24 h and thermocycled 300 x at 5 degrees and 55 degrees C prior to testing for shear bond strength. Two-way ANOVA was used to determine significant differences between mean shear bond strengths for both composite materials.


RESULTS
Significant differences were found between the groups for both surface treatment and silane use (P < 0.05). The interaction between the two main effects was also significant (P < 0.05). Overall, the highest bond strengths were found when the low-pressure silicate ceramic deposition system (CJ-S) was used, with or without silane.
Bouschlicher
M R
MR
University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242, USA.
Reinhardt
J W
JW
Vargas
M A
MA
D000399:Air Pressure; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D003188:Composite Resins / Q000737:chemistry*; D001840:Dental Bonding; D017269:Dental Prosthesis Repair / Q000379:methods* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D019243:Enamel Microabrasion / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D013499:Surface Properties; D013997:Time Factors
D003188:Composite Resins