Equivalence test and confidence interval for the difference in proportions for the paired-sample design.
This paper considers a model for the difference of two proportions in a paired or matched design of clinical trials, case-control studies and also sensitivity comparison studies of two laboratory tests. This model includes a parameter indicating both interpatient variability of response probabilities and their correlation. Under the proposed model, we derive a one-sided test for equivalence based upon the efficient score. Equivalence is defined here as not more than 100 delta per cent inferior. McNemar's test for significance is shown to be a special case of the proposed test. Further, a score-based confidence interval for the difference of two proportions is derived. One of the features of these methods is applicability to the 2 x 2 table with off-diagonal zero cells; all the McNemar type tests and confidence intervals published so far cannot apply to such data. A Monte Carlo simulation study shows that the proposed test has empirical significance levels closer to the nominal alpha-level than the other tests recently proposed and further that the proposed confidence interval has better empirical coverage probability than those of the four published methods.
Tango
T
T
Division of Theoretical Epidemiology, Institute of Public Health, Tokyo, Japan. tango@iph.go.jp
D002188:Cannabis; D016022:Case-Control Studies; D016001:Confidence Intervals; D003261:Contact Lenses / Q000592:standards; D004203:Disinfection / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D015994:Incidence; D016013:Likelihood Functions; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000592:standards; D015233:Models, Statistical; D009010:Monte Carlo Method; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Q000379:methods; D012107:Research Design; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D012893:Sleep Wake Disorders / Q000453:epidemiology; D019966:Substance-Related Disorders / Q000453:epidemiology