Comparison of graphic symbol learning in individuals with aphasia and right hemisphere brain damage.
This study compared the differences in performance on recognition of graphic symbols across time by individuals with aphasia, individuals with right-hemisphere brain damage, and neurologically normal adults. The subjects, seen individually, learned 40 Blissymbols. The symbols were selected so that the effects of symbol translucency and complexity on the recognition of graphic symbols could be examined. A paired-associate learning paradigm was used to teach the symbol-referent pairs to subjects. The results indicated that individuals with aphasia and neurologically normal adults do not differ significantly in recognition of graphic symbols. However, individuals with right-hemisphere damage recognized fewer symbols compared to individuals with aphasia and normal adults, suggesting that they have difficulty in associative learning of graphic symbols. Additionally, translucency was found to be a potent factor in the recognition of Blissymbols by all groups. The finding that individuals with severe chronic aphasia can learn and retain graphic symbols has significant clinical implications for aphasia rehabilitation.
Koul
R K
RK
Department of Communication Disorders, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX 79409-2073, USA.
Lloyd
L L
LL
D000368:Aged; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001037:Aphasia / Q000503:physiopathology*; D001921:Brain / Q000503:physiopathology*; D005260:Female; D007839:Functional Laterality; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D013561:Symbolism