title: Effect of route of breathing on response to exposure in a swine confinement building.
abstract: Exposure of naive subjects to swine buildings results in acute nasal, lung, and peripheral blood inflammatory responses with an increase in nonallergic airway responsiveness. Because nasal passages filter large particles and soluble gases and because swine building exposure results in an acute inflammatory response at this level, we questioned what effect breathing through or avoiding this route would have on local and systemic inflammation. Nine normal young men 23 to 37 yr of age were exposed for 5 h to a swine building, once breathing normally and once with the mouth occluded (n = 8) (Protocol 1) or the nose occluded (n = 4) (Protocol 2); three subjects participated in both protocols. For each protocol each subject underwent a methacholine challenge for PC20 measurement, a nasal lavage, venous blood puncture, and a bronchoalveolor lavage (BAL) once before and once after each swine building exposure. Bronchial responsiveness as measured by PC20 decreased in most subjects after swine building exposure and was not influenced by the route of breathing. Nasal lavage neutrophils increased tenfold after each swine exposure, except when the nose was occluded where no alteration was observed. Total BAL cells significantly increased after each exposure to the swine building, this increase was not modified by the route of breathing. In Protocol 1, white blood cells increased from a baseline level of 7.0 to 10.5 x 10(9) cells/L after exposure with normal breathing and to 10.7 x 10(9) cells/L during nasal breathing exclusively. For Protocol 2, these respective values were: 5.6, 11.7 and 10.4 x 10(9)/L. Interleukins 6 and 8 levels in BAL, nasal washes, and serum were increased by swine building exposure, except in the nasal wash when the nose was occluded. In conclusion, the lung and blood responses to exposure in a swine confinement building are not modified by the route of breathing, suggesting that nasal inflammation and filtration are not important in the process and that small respirable particles and/or gases may be responsible for these responses.
authors.affiliation: Unité de Recherche, Centre de Pneumologie, Hôpital and Université Laval, Ste-Foy, Quebec, Canada.
authors.forename: Y
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Cormier
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Laviolette
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Bedard
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Dosman
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Israel-Assayag
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000822:Animal Husbandry; D000818:Animals; D002452:Cell Count; D016207:Cytokines / Q000032:analysis; D005541:Forced Expiratory Volume; D006799:Housing, Animal; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009058:Mouth Breathing; D017817:Nasal Lavage Fluid / Q000737:chemistry / Q000166:cytology; D015656:Respiratory Mechanics; D013552:Swine; D014797:Vital Capacity
chemical_list: D016207:Cytokines