[Accident medical expert assessment in Switzerland--does it meet current quality requirements?].
OBJECTIVE
Is the quality of the expert reports and the advises of physicians who evaluate injuries good enough to satisfy legal standards in Switzerland?


METHODS
262 expert reports were analysed for precise wording, documentation, and for their impact on conclusive judgement. Each report was evaluated for accurate patient history, which also included the patients subjective complaints, objective findings, diagnosis, and final evaluation by the physician.


RESULTS
Only a third of the expert reports satisfied all the aspects requested for accurate handling of the case. In two third of all cases, one or more important parts were missing. This lack of complete evaluation precluded a correct judgement and questions the adequate settlement of those cases.


CONCLUSIONS
The standards for medical expert reports and legal advises have to be redefined. We propose to increase the quality of expert reports by further educating physicians who are involved in trauma care.
Meine
J
J
D000059:Accidents / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D004282:Documentation; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005104:Expert Testimony / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D007346:Insurance, Accident / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D008487:Medical History Taking; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D013557:Switzerland; D014947:Wounds and Injuries / Q000145:classification / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000534:rehabilitation
Die ärztliche Unfallbegutachtung in der Schweiz--Erfüllt sie die heutigen Qualitätsanforderungen?