title: Do stress echocardiography and myocardial perfusion imaging have the same ability to identify the low-risk patient with known or suspected coronary artery disease?
abstract: Although both stress myocardial perfusion imaging and echocardiography may have significant prognostic value, the annual death/myocardial infarction rate appears to be much higher in patients with a negative stress echocardiogram. This may greatly limit its ability to act as a "gatekeeper" for additional invasive and interventional procedures.
authors.forename: K A
authors.initials: KA
authors.lastname: Brown
mesh_terms: D002316:Cardiotonic Agents; D003327:Coronary Disease / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000401:mortality; D003935:Diagnostic Techniques, Cardiovascular; D004280:Dobutamine; D004452:Echocardiography; D005080:Exercise Test; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D011379:Prognosis; D011877:Radionuclide Imaging; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D015996:Survival Rate
chemical_list: D002316:Cardiotonic Agents; D004280:Dobutamine