title: Imaging of the rotator cuff: an arthrographic pitfall.
abstract: We present a case where MRI and arthrography of the shoulder reports provided seemingly conflicting data. The subsequent findings at arthroscopy revealed a potential pitfall in arthrographic interpretation.
authors.affiliation: University Department of Radiology, Level 5, Box 219, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, Cambs, CB2 2QQ, UK.
authors.forename: T K
authors.initials: TK
authors.lastname: Blanchard
authors.forename: C R
authors.initials: CR
authors.lastname: Constant
authors.forename: P W
authors.initials: PW
authors.lastname: Bearcroft
authors.forename: T J
authors.initials: TJ
authors.lastname: Marshall
authors.forename: A K
authors.initials: AK
authors.lastname: Dixon
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D001175:Arthrography; D001178:Arthroplasty; D001182:Arthroscopy; D003287:Contrast Media / Q000008:administration & dosage; D004724:Endoscopy; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D007270:Injections, Intra-Articular; D007482:Iothalamate Meglumine / Q000008:administration & dosage; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D017006:Rotator Cuff / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery; D019534:Shoulder Impingement Syndrome / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery
chemical_list: D003287:Contrast Media; D007482:Iothalamate Meglumine