title: Using reliability information to annotate RNA secondary structures.
abstract: A number of heuristic descriptors have been developed previously in conjunction with the mfold package that describe the propensity of individual bases to participate in base pairs and whether or not a predicted helix is "well-determined." They were developed for the "energy dot plot" output of mfold. Two descriptors, P-num and H-num, are used to measure the level of promiscuity in the association of any given nucleotide or helix with alternative complementary pairs. The third descriptor, S-num, measures the propensity of bases to be single-stranded. In the current work, we describe a series of programs that were developed in order to annotate individual structures with "well-definedness" information. We use color annotation to present the information. The programs can annotate PostScript files that are created by the mfold package or the PostScript secondary structure plots produced by the Weiser and Noller program XRNA (Weiser B, Noller HF, 1995, XRNA: Auto-interactive program for modeling RNA, The Center for Molecular Biology of RNA, Santa Cruz, California: University of California; Internet: ftp://fangio.ucsc.edu/pub/XRNA). In addition, these programs can annotate ss files that serve as input to XRNA. The annotation package can also handle structure comparison with a reference structure. This feature can be used to compare predicted structure with a phylogenetically deduced model, to compare two different predicted foldings, and to identify conformational changes that are predicted between wild-type and mutant RNAs. We provide several examples of application. Predicted structures of two RNase P RNAs were colored with P-num information and further annotated with comparative information. The comparative model of a 16S rRNA was annotated with P-num information from mfold and with base pair probabilities obtained from the Vienna RNA folding package. Further annotation adds comparisons with the optimal foldings obtained from mfold and the Vienna package, respectively. The results of all of these analyses are discussed in the context of the reliability of structure prediction.
authors.affiliation: Institute for Biomedical Computing, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. zuker@ibc.wustl.edu
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Zuker
authors.forename: A B
authors.initials: AB
authors.lastname: Jacobson
mesh_terms: D003198:Computer Simulation; D004722:Endoribonucleases / Q000737:chemistry; D008958:Models, Molecular; D009690:Nucleic Acid Conformation; D012313:RNA / Q000737:chemistry*; D012329:RNA, Bacterial / Q000737:chemistry; D016337:RNA, Catalytic / Q000737:chemistry; D016053:RNA, Protozoan / Q000737:chemistry; D012336:RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / Q000737:chemistry; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D043262:Ribonuclease P; D012984:Software
chemical_list: D012329:RNA, Bacterial; D016337:RNA, Catalytic; D016053:RNA, Protozoan; D012336:RNA, Ribosomal, 16S; D012313:RNA; D004722:Endoribonucleases; D043262:Ribonuclease P