[Could the evaluation of the cost of complications be a worthwhile means to improve radiotherapy?].
At the present time, the current improvement of technical and dosimetric aspects of radiation oncology has to be evaluated in terms of potential benefit for the patient and the society. For this last point of view, specially designed economic analyses must be performed in order to justify the number of resources involved by these technical improvements. If the question is how the current technical procedures could reduce the risk of undesirable side-effects, the response cannot be immediately drawn from the literature. This paper emphasizes the possibility to evaluate the role of side-effects as endpoints of economic analyses when using special models in medical decision making such as Markov's. Only few oncologic situations are reliable to properly analyze the relationship between sophisticated radiation techniques and the incidence of post-radiation complications. These situations should be selected when prospective economic analyses are planned in the field of radiation therapy.
Daly-Schveitzer
N
N
Département de radiothérapie oncologique, institut Claudius-Regaud, Toulouse, France.
D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D017048:Health Care Costs; D006801:Humans; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000191:economics / Q000401:mortality / Q000532:radiotherapy; D011832:Radiation Injuries / Q000191:economics* / Q000628:therapy; D011878:Radiotherapy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000191:economics; D017211:Treatment Failure
L'évaluation du coût des complications peut-elle contribuer à la poursuite du développement de la radiothérapie?