[Physician practice patterns and attitudes to euthanasia in Germany. A representative survey of physicians].
Growing life expectancy and increasing pharmaceutical and technical methods in medicine are leading to more and more discussions among the general population and among physicians as to whether methods to shorten the sufferings of mortally ill persons should be legalised further. In Australia 60% of physicians wish to be able to perform active euthanasia if this would be legal. In the Netherlands physicians do not commit an offence if they perform euthanasia on the basis of ethically consented rules. In the FRG the National Board of Physicians (Bundesärztekammer) still rejects any liberalisation concerning active euthanasia. However, little is known of the attitudes and behaviour of physicians concerning the questions of active and passive euthanasia. Sponsored by Gruner and Jahr publishers for a magazine "Stern" publication we conducted a representative study among physicians working in hospitals and their colleagues in free practices concerning this topic. Beginning with qualitative interviews with 50 physicians we tested the questionnaire developed and looked for the data production method best fitting for this difficult matter resulting in telephone interviews or a self-administered questionnaire. In the main study a representative sample of n = 282 physicians in free practices and n = 191 physicians in hospitals were interviewed. The response rates were 94% and 51% respectively. Analysis of non-responses did not indicate any bias. Half of the physicians think that a broader discussion on euthanasia is necessary, 34% disagree and 17% consider even a discussion already dangerous. 6% of the physicians in hospitals and 11% in free practices have already experienced methods of active euthanasia. Half of the physicians have seen patients who strongly wished euthanasia, a situation which happens once in every two years. The majority of physicians feel a deep understanding but only a minority of 4% comply with the wish. The vast majority of physicians advocate indirect euthanasia. However, they experience difficulties in defining the difference between active and passive euthanasia in a concrete situation. Summing up, our data indicate that a broader and open discussion on euthanasia seems necessary even if this discussion in Germany will be even more difficult than in other countries due to our recent past. The discussion will be reopened by a proposal on guidelines concerning euthanasia launched by the German National Board of Physician
Kirschner
R
R
FB + E Forschung, Beratung + Evaluation GmbH, c/o Frauenklinik im Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin.
Elkeles
T
T
D000368:Aged; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D001293:Attitude to Death; D005065:Euthanasia / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D005858:Germany; D006801:Humans; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D017236:Suicide, Assisted / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence
Arztliche Handlungsmuster und Einstellungen zur Sterbehilfe in Deutschland. Eine Repräsentativbefragung unter Arzten.