title: Comparative studies of DNA adduct formation in mice following dermal application of smoke condensates from cigarettes that burn or primarily heat tobacco.
abstract: A new cigarette (Eclipse) that primarily heats rather than burns tobacco has been developed. Since Eclipse primarily heats tobacco, the smoke chemistry is much simplified, consisting of 80% glycerol and water. With the simplified smoke chemistry, it would be expected that toxicological activity would be reduced. Smoke and smoke condensate from Eclipse have consistently yielded markedly reduced mutagenicity and cytotoxicity in in vitro tests when compared to smoke and smoke condensate from the 1R4F Kentucky reference cigarette, which is representative of typical low 'tar' cigarettes sold in the U.S. today. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the potential of mainstream cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) of Eclipse to produce DNA adducts in lung, heart and skin tissue of dermally-exposed mice and to compare the results with those obtained with CSC from the 1R4F Kentucky reference cigarette. CSC from Eclipse or 1R4F cigarettes was applied dermally to SENCAR mice three times a week for 30 weeks. Amounts of CSC applied were 30, 60 or 120 mg 'tar' per animal per week. Tissues were collected after 1, 4, 14 and 29 weeks of CSC application. DNA adducts were analyzed in lung, heart and skin tissues using the 32P-postlabeling method with P1 nuclease modification. Distinct time and dose-dependent diagonal radioactive zones (DRZ) were observed in the DNA from lung, heart and skin tissues of animals treated with 1R4F CSC. The relative adduct labeling (RAL) values of lung, heart and skin DNA from reference CSC-treated animals were significantly greater (p<0.05) than those of the solvent control animals. No corresponding DRZs were observed at any dose from the DNA of animals treated with CSC from Eclipse or solvent control (acetone) and the RAL values observed following application of Eclipse were not increased relative to the solvent control. These results provide additional evidence that the smoke condensate from the Eclipse cigarette is markedly less genotoxic than smoke condensate from tobacco-burning cigarettes representative of those currently sold in the U.S.
authors.affiliation: Product Evaluation, Research and Development, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco, Winston-Salem, NC 27102, USA. brownbg@rjrt.com
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Brown
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Kolesar
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Lindberg
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Meckley
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Mosberg
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Doolittle
mesh_terms: D000279:Administration, Cutaneous; D000818:Animals; D018736:DNA Adducts / Q000378:metabolism*; D005260:Female; D006321:Heart / Q000187:drug effects; D006358:Hot Temperature; D008168:Lung / Q000187:drug effects; D051379:Mice; D009153:Mutagens; D010947:Plants, Toxic; D012867:Skin / Q000187:drug effects; D012906:Smoke / Q000009:adverse effects*; D014026:Nicotiana / Q000009:adverse effects*
chemical_list: D018736:DNA Adducts; D009153:Mutagens; D012906:Smoke