title: Why "sounds are judged longer than lights": application of a model of the internal clock in humans.
abstract: Three experiments, using temporal generalization and verbal estimation methods, studied judgements of durations of auditory (500-Hz tone) and visual (14-cm blue square) stimuli. With both methods, auditory stimuli were judged longer, and less variable, than visual ones. The verbal estimation experiments used stimuli from 77 to 1183 msec in length, and the slope of the function relating mean estimate to real length differed between modalities (but the intercept did not), consistent with the idea that a pacemaker generating duration representations ran faster for auditory than for visual stimuli. The different variability of auditory and visual stimuli was attributed to differential variability in the operation of a switch of a pacemaker-accumulator clock, and experimental data suggested that such switch effects were separable from changes in pacemaker speed. Overall, the work showed how a clock model consistent with scalar timing theory, the leading account of animal timing, can address an issue derived from the classical literature on human time perception.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, The University, Manchester, U.K. wearden@psy.man.ac.uk
authors.forename: J H
authors.initials: JH
authors.lastname: Wearden
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Edwards
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Fakhri
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Percival
mesh_terms: D001288:Attention; D001307:Auditory Perception; D003118:Color Perception; D005793:Generalization, Psychological; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D010898:Pitch Perception; D013998:Time Perception; D014796:Visual Perception