Relationship between external resistances, lung function changes and maximal exercise capacity.
In upper airway obstruction (UAO) the relationship between the degree of obstruction, exercise limitation and lung function indices is not well established. Therefore, we investigated in nine healthy subjects (age 36+/-9 yrs) the effects of two added resistances at the mouth (R1 = added resistance with 7.8 mm diameter; R2 = 5.7 mm) on forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), peak expiratory flow (PEF), airway resistance (Raw) and maximal breathing capacity (measured during 15 s = measured maximum breathing capacity (MBCm); calculated as FEV1x37.5 = calculated maximum breathing capacity (MBCc)) on the one hand, and maximum exercise capacity (W'max), minute ventilation (V'E) and CO2 elimination (V'CO2) on the other. We found that R1 had almost no influence on FEV1 but decreased PEF by approximately 35% and increased Raw by almost 300%; it decreased W'max by merely approximately 10% while maximal exercise ventilation (V'Emax) was only 65% of control and only reached approximately 40% MBCc and approximately 70% MBCm; yet V'E and V'CO2 were significantly reduced at high exercise levels indicating hypoventilation. With R2, FEV1 was reduced by 25% and PEF by 55%, and Raw was increased by 600%; W'max was approximately 60% of control, V'Emax was only 35% of control and reached approximately 30% MBCc and approximately 60% MBCm, V'E was already reduced at moderate exercise levels. We conclude that: 1) an upper airway obstruction of 6 mm diameter (but not of 8 mm) had a marked influence on maximum exercise capacity due to hypoventilation; 2) calculated maximum breathing capacity markedly overestimated measured maximum breathing capacity because the forced expiratory volume in one second is an insensitive index of upper airway obstruction and because it does not take inspiratory flow limitation into account; and 3) a 10% decrease in maximum exercise capacity was linearly related with a 7% decrease in the forced expiratory volume in one second and a 150% increase in airway resistance. A 10% decrease in maximal exercise ventilation was related to a 8.5% decrease in peak expiratory flow and 9% decrease in measured maximum breathing capacity.
Melissant
C F
CF
Dept of Pneumology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg (Leuven), Belgium.
Lammers
J W
JW
Demedts
M
M
D000328:Adult; D000402:Airway Obstruction / Q000503:physiopathology*; D000403:Airway Resistance; D017079:Exercise Tolerance; D005541:Forced Expiratory Volume; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008449:Maximal Expiratory Flow-Volume Curves; D009055:Mouth / Q000502:physiology; D010366:Peak Expiratory Flow Rate; D012123:Pulmonary Ventilation; D012016:Reference Values; D015656:Respiratory Mechanics