title: Foreperiod length, but not memory, affects human reaction time in a precued, delayed response.
abstract: The effect of foreperiod length on reaction time in memorized (MM) and nonmemorized (NM), precued, delayed responses was investigated. Six subjects participated in one long and one short foreperiod schedule testing session. An aiming task, using elbow supination/pronation, in response to a visual stimulus was employed. In the MM condition, target spatial information was available for a fraction of the foreperiod duration. In the NM condition, target information was available continuously until the subject attained the target position. Subjects responded with a significantly longer latency in the long foreperiod schedule. Within each foreperiod schedule, the shortest foreperiod resulted in significantly longer reaction time. However, the absolute value of foreperiod did not have a major effect on reaction time latency. Memorization and nonmemorization conditions did not affect reaction time.
authors.affiliation: School of Physical Education and Neuroscience Research Centre, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
authors.forename: A A
authors.initials: AA
authors.lastname: Mohagheghi
authors.forename: J G
authors.initials: JG
authors.lastname: Anson
authors.forename: B I
authors.initials: BI
authors.lastname: Hyland
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Parr-Brownlie
authors.forename: J R
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Wickens
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003463:Cues; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D011403:Pronation / Q000502:physiology; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D011930:Reaction Time; D013484:Supination / Q000502:physiology; D013997:Time Factors