title: Comparison of the coat protein, movement protein and RNA polymerase gene sequences of Australian, Chinese, and American isolates of barely yellow dwarf virus transmitted by Rhopalosiphum padi.
abstract: Barely yellow dwarf luteovirus-GPV (BYDV-GPV) is a common problem in Chinese wheat crops but is unrecorded elsewhere. A defining characteristic of GPV is its capacity to be transmitted efficiently by both Schizaphis graminum and Rhopaloshiphum padi. This dual aphid species transmission contrasts with those of BYDV-RPV and BYDV-SGV, globally distributed viruses, which are efficiently transmitted only by Rhopaloshiphum padi and Schizaphis graminum respectively. The viral RNA sequences encoding the coat protein (22K) gene, the movement protein (17K) gene, the region surrounding the conserved GDD motif of the polymerase gene and the intergenic sequences between these genes were determined for GPV and an Australian isolate of BYDV-RPV (RPVa). In all three genes, the sequences of GPV and RPVa were more similar to those of an American isolate of BYDV-RPV (RPVu) than to any other luteovirus for which there is data available. RPVa and RPVu were very similar, especially their coat proteins which had 97% identity at the amino acid level. The coat protein of GPV had 76% and 78% amino acid identity with RPVa and RPVu respectively. The data suggest that RPVu and RPVa are correctly named as strains of the same serotype and that GPV is sufficiently different from either RPV strain to be considered a distinct BYDV type. The coat protein and movement protein genes of GPV are very dissimilar to SGV. The polymerase sequences of RPVu, RPVa and GPV show close affinities with those of the sobemo-like luteoviruses and little similarity with those of the carmo-like luteoviruses. The sequences of the coat proteins, movement proteins and the polymerase segments of BYDV serotypes, other than RPV and GPV, form a cluster that is separate from their counterpart sequences from dicot-infecting luteoviruses. The RPV and GPV isolates consistently fall within a dicot-infecting cluster. This suggests that RPV and GPV evolved from within this group of viruses. Since these other viruses all infect dicots it seems likely that their common ancestor infected a dicot and that RPV and GPV evolved from a virus that switched hosts from a dicot to a monocot.
authors.affiliation: CRC for Plant Science, Canberra, Australia.
authors.forename: M B
authors.initials: MB
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.forename: Z
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Cheng
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Keese
authors.forename: M W
authors.initials: MW
authors.lastname: Graham
authors.forename: P J
authors.initials: PJ
authors.lastname: Larkin
authors.forename: P M
authors.initials: PM
authors.lastname: Waterhouse
mesh_terms: D001315:Australia; D002213:Capsid / Q000235:genetics*; D002681:China; D012321:DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases / Q000235:genetics*; D005814:Genes, Viral; D001467:Hordeum / Q000821:virology*; D017793:Luteovirus / Q000145:classification / Q000235:genetics* / Q000302:isolation & purification; D053830:Plant Viral Movement Proteins; D012367:RNA, Viral / Q000235:genetics; D017386:Sequence Homology, Amino Acid; D014481:United States; D014764:Viral Proteins / Q000235:genetics*
chemical_list: D053830:Plant Viral Movement Proteins; D012367:RNA, Viral; D014764:Viral Proteins; D012321:DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases