Diet survey of two cultural groups in a coastal British Columbia community.
OBJECTIVE
As part of a larger study of polychlorinated dibenzodioxin (PCDD) and dibenzofuran (PCDF) pollution, to describe and compare Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal residents' recalled diets.


METHODS
We surveyed a stratified random sample aged 25 to 64 years: forest products mill employees (n = 84), Aboriginal reserve residents (n = 78), and other residents (n = 80). We administered a questionnaire on intake of fish/seafood, wild game and plants, domesticated animal meat and eggs, dairy products, vegetable oils and cereals; age, gender, childbearing, lactation, residence and smoking. We measured height and weight.


RESULTS
Reserve residents ate less seafood, but more fish roe, eulachon grease, smoked salmon, clams and sea urchins, more deer organs, hamburger meat, pork, fried chicken, and hot-dogs, but less rabbit, beef steaks/roasts, high-fibre cereals, potato chips, bread, cheese and milk.


CONCLUSIONS
We cannot yet quantify PCDD and PCDF intakes. The wild food consumption data are unique and may be useful for risk assessments in the target population and similar communities.
Jin
A
A
Department of Health Care and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver. ajin@unixg.ubc.ca
Teschke
K
K
Marion
S A
SA
D000328:Adult; D044467:American Indian or Alaska Native; D001955:British Columbia; D004034:Diet Surveys; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012494:Sampling Studies; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric