title: Chest radiograph in the evaluation of first time wheezing episodes: review of current clinical practice and efficacy.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate the current clinical use and utility of chest radiographs (CXR) in the workup of pediatric patients with first time wheezing (FTW) episodes.
  
  
  METHODS
  Urban children's hospital.
  
  
  METHODS
  Retrospective review of medical records of patients seen in the emergency department in 1994 with disposition diagnoses of asthma or reactive airways disease, bronchiolitis, pneumonia, congenital heart disease, congestive heart failure, or foreign body aspiration to identify those patients presenting with FTW episodes.
  
  
  METHODS
  Clinical findings in FTW were compared in patients receiving a CXR (121, 41%) and those who did not (177, 59%). Comparisons were made between patients with a clinically significant CXR (CXR-pos) (29, 24%) and those without (92, 76%). CXR-pos was defined as a CXR result which would be expected to alter patient management. Comparisons between groups were analyzed using the two-tailed Student's t test for continuous variables and the chi2 statistic for categorical data. The level of significance was determined at P < 0.05.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Two hundred ninety-eight episodes of FTW were identified of 1984 patient charts reviewed. Patients receiving CXR differed from those who did not by being of a greater age (39 vs 20 months, P < 0.01), having lower pulse oximetry (89.7 vs. 92.7%, P < 0.01), being less likely to have a family history of asthma (47.5 vs 63.2%, P < 0.01), or history of atopy (40.6 vs 59.4%, P < 0.01). Those with localized wheezes (59.4 vs 40.6% P < 0.01), localized rales (59.3 vs 40.7 % P < 0.01), and localized decreased breath sounds (59.3 vs 40.7%, P = 0.01) were also more likely to receive a CXR. Among patients receiving CXR, clinical characteristics associated with CXR-pos were elevated temperature (37.9 vs 37.5 degrees C, P = 0.04), absence of family history of asthma 72.6 vs 27.4%, P < 0.01), and the presence of localized wheezes (76.0 vs 24.0%, P = 0.02), or localized rales (76.0 vs 24.0%, P < 0.01).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Clinicians in this setting do not routinely obtain a CXR in patients with FTW episodes. Retrospective examination of clinician practice revealed several clinical characteristics that were associated with increased use of CXR in FTW. Increased utility of the CXR was associated with patients having elevated temperature, an absence of a family history of asthma, and localized wheezes or rales by ausculatory examination.
authors.affiliation: Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver 80218, USA.
authors.forename: M G
authors.initials: MG
authors.lastname: Roback
authors.forename: D A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: Dreitlein
mesh_terms: D002675:Child, Preschool; D004635:Emergency Medicine; D006331:Heart Diseases / Q000503:physiopathology; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D013902:Radiography, Thoracic / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012135:Respiratory Sounds / Q000209:etiology*; D012140:Respiratory Tract Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity