title: [Satisfaction with locoregional anesthesia in women who had undergone cesarean section].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare satisfaction with local-regional and general anesthesia in women undergoing cesarean, the possible influence of time of evaluation and recall of the anesthesiologist.
  
  
  METHODS
  Retrospective study performed in all women who delivered by cesarean in the 6 first months of 1997. The women were assigned to two groups according to type of anesthesia, local-regional or general. Their satisfaction with anesthesia was evaluated by questionnaire 48 to 72 hours after surgery and two weeks after release. Most items required discrete-point answers, including a satisfaction of a scale of 0 to 10. During the second interview we also evaluated satisfaction with the procedure and hospital in general, as well as recall of the anesthesiologist. Group homogeneity was based on demographic, sociocultural, obstetric and surgical variables.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In a context of high satisfaction with anesthesia, 189 (76%) of the 247 women receiving local-regional anesthesia gave high evaluations to the anesthesia (8.90 +/- 1.5; mean: 10), compared with 58 (24%) of those receiving general anesthesia (8 +/- 2; mean 8.5) (p = 0.001). Both groups were homogeneous except for the distribution of emergencies, which occurred more often in those receiving general anesthesia (p < 0.001). Women who had received local-regional anesthesia expressed greater willingness to repeat or recommend the technique (p < 0.001). The highest score in this group was from women receiving intradural anesthesia along with fentanyl for local anesthesia, with significant differences only in comparison to epidural anesthesia. The differences in responses between the first and second interview were scarce. The hospital received a lower evaluation than did either anesthesia or surgery (p < 0.001). The anesthesiologist, who was less well recognized than the obstetrician was remembered better among women receiving local-regional anesthesia (p = 0.008).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Local-regional anesthesia can improve levels of satisfaction over that of general anesthesia among women undergoing cesarean surgery, and contributes to maintaining recall of the anesthesiologist. These results may be related to the fact of being conscious during the birth of a child.
authors.affiliation: Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Universitario de Valme, Sevilla.
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Caba
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Echevarría
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Gómez-Reja
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Calderón-Gavilán
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Martínez-Navas
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Merino-Grande
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Rodríguez-Rodríguez
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000772:Anesthesia, Local; D002585:Cesarean Section; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D011184:Postoperative Period; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires
vernacular_title: Satisfacción con la anestesia locorregional en mujeres intervenidas de cesárea.