title: Comparison of different regimens of electrical stimulation applied to nonmobilized and newly mobilized latissimus dorsi muscle.
abstract: We investigated the possibility of preventing further aggravation of muscle ischemia and necrosis in newly mobilized, unconditioned latissimus dorsi muscle (LDM) by utilizing short increments of stimulation with intervening rest periods. Adult St. Croix sheep (N = 12) weighing 30 +/- 8 kg were used in this study. Fatigue tests (30 min) using different stimulation regimens before and after LDM mobilization were performed on all animals; the length of time to return to baseline levels was also measured. Our investigation yielded results that contradict the conventional wisdom that any electrical stimulation damages newly mobilized LDM and will cause a considerable decrease in contractile force (CF). Stimulation regimens using continuous contractions at 30 and 60 contractions per minute (CPM) for 30 minutes were damaging to the LDM. CF also dropped significantly and returned slowly to baseline values: at 60 CPM, CF dropped to 50 +/- 4% and did not return to baseline even after 90 minutes of rest; at 30 CPM, CF dropped to 61 +/- 4% and baseline was restored after 80 minutes of rest. Electrical stimulation using continuous contractions at a slower rate (15 CPM) was tolerable, although a 23% decrease in CF was noted (p < 0.05 when compared to 60 CPM). These results did not satisfy us that such a regimen would be useful for cardiac assistance immediately after cardiomyoplasty. The work-rest regimen at 30 CPM also gave poor results: CF decreased to 75 +/- 2% and baseline was restored after 80 minutes of rest. Promising results were seen when utilizing a work-rest regimen at 15 CPM. The newly mobilized LDM showed no visible signs of fatigue: CF decreased minimally to 92 +/- 3% (p < 0.05 when compared to 30 CPM), and light microscopic analysis of biopsies revealed no morphological damage exceeding that typically seen after subtotal mobilization. Such results open avenues for future investigations: beginning electrical stimulation immediately after cardiomyoplasty (using a single impulse and a slow rate of contraction); decreasing the length of time necessary to obtain full cardiac assistance; and beginning partial cardiac assistance immediately after cardiomyoplasty (if needed) for approximately 30 minutes several times a day.
authors.affiliation: Sinai Samaritan Medical Center, Milwaukee Heart Project, WI 53201-0342, USA. ahcvch@execpc.com
authors.forename: V S
authors.initials: VS
authors.lastname: Chekanov
authors.forename: M A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Rieder
authors.forename: G V
authors.initials: GV
authors.lastname: Tchekanov
authors.forename: L M
authors.initials: LM
authors.lastname: Smith
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Eisenstein
authors.forename: D H
authors.initials: DH
authors.lastname: Schmidt
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D009202:Cardiomyopathies / Q000628:therapy; D004599:Electric Stimulation Therapy; D009119:Muscle Contraction; D018763:Muscle Fatigue; D018482:Muscle, Skeletal / Q000098:blood supply* / Q000502:physiology*; D012756:Sheep; D013997:Time Factors