title: CABG shortly after AMI treated with thrombolysis: an analysis of the surgical group and a comparison with PTCA in the DANAMI study. Danish multicenter randomized study of invasive versus conservative treatment in patients with inducible ischemia after thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To present surgical results of the DANAMI study comparing conservative and invasive treatment of postinfarction myocardial ischaemia and to compare these with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTCA) which was the alternative invasive treatment in that study.
  
  
  METHODS
  A group of 413 patients with verified acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis within 12 h of the onset of symptoms, who demonstrated postinfarction myocardial ischaemia were treated with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or PTCA. Patients with left main lesions, three-vessel disease, two-vessel disease with more than three stenoses and patients with occlusions of a non-infarct related vessel had primary CABG. Patients with 1- and 2-vessel disease with not more than a total of three stenoses had PTCA. In case of failed PTCA patients had secondary CABG. The median distance from AMI to CABG was 45 days. PTCA was performed at a mean of 39 days after the infarction.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 147 patients had CABG and 266 had PTCA. The operative mortality for CABG was 1.4%. No PTCA patients died in relation to the procedure, 0.8% developed acute myocardial infarction as a consequence of the procedure, 1.5% had acute CABG and 3.5% elective CABG due to failed PTCA. In spite of more severe coronary artery disease among the CABG patients there was no difference in survival at 2.4 years. The CABG group had significantly fewer episodes of unstable angina, 10.2% versus 25.6% (P = 0.0002). No CABG patients had re-do revascularisation at 2.4 years follow-up versus 15.4% of the PTCA patients. At 3 years 80% of the CABG patients were free of angina compared to the 61% of the PTCA group (P < 0.0001).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Low morbidity and mortality justifies the deferred elective revascularisation in patients with postinfarction myocardial ischaemia even in patients with silent ischaemia. There is no difference in survival at 2.4 years between CABG and PTCA but CABG offers more lasting results concerning incidence of stable and unstable angina than PTCA, which, however, is a valuable alternative in patients with less severe coronary artery disease.
authors.affiliation: Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Aalborg, Denmark.
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Hjelms
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Alstrup
authors.forename: P K
authors.initials: PK
authors.lastname: Paulsen
authors.forename: U
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Niebuhr-Jørgensen
authors.forename: L I
authors.initials: LI
authors.lastname: Andersen
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Arendrup
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000789:Angina, Unstable / Q000209:etiology; D015906:Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary / Q000401:mortality; D001026:Coronary Artery Bypass / Q000401:mortality; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009203:Myocardial Infarction / Q000150:complications / Q000628:therapy*; D017202:Myocardial Ischemia / Q000209:etiology; D015996:Survival Rate; D015912:Thrombolytic Therapy