Radiation dose and diagnosticity of barium enema examinations by radiographers and radiologists: a comparative study.
With the current emphasis on the extension of the role of the radiographer, radiographers in some hospitals now undertake some of the procedures traditionally performed by radiologists. In the present study, dose-area product (DAP) measurements for over 1000 barium enema examinations performed by radiologists and radiographers were analysed and compared to ascertain whether there were significant differences in the radiation dose to the patient, depending on the category of staff performing the examination. All examinations were reported by a radiologist. The radiologist's reports were analysed against the known outcomes to compare the diagnosticity of the examination when carried out by the two categories of staff. The study shows that although radiographers are able to produce consistent diagnostic results, there is an increase in patient dose due to extra films taken for reporting, which may be difficult to justify. Measures for reducing the dose from this component of the examination were explored.
Crawley
M T
MT
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Buckinghamshire, UK.
Shine
B
B
Booth
A
A
D000368:Aged; D001466:Barium Sulfate; D015179:Colorectal Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D003287:Contrast Media; D004733:Enema; D006801:Humans; D011829:Radiation Dosage; D011859:Radiography / Q000379:methods; D011871:Radiology
D003287:Contrast Media; D001466:Barium Sulfate