title: Paradigms for mental health nursing: fragmentation or integration?
abstract: Debate about the best paradigm for mental health nursing is compounded by threats from mainstreaming and genericism. In nursing education, integrated practice may have been devalued in a matrix of reductionist disciplines. The 'gendered' nature of professional knowledge may create a schismatic and self-defeating attitude in nurses. Conversely, nurses may be exhorted to adopt a 'male' paradigm in order to gain academic credibility, in which the caring dimension may be lost. Other polarities such as ideological distinctions between treatment in hospital and care in the community lead to conceptual confusion. These schisms in care are detrimental to both professionals and users. The writers argue that these tensions may be addressed in an 'androgenous' model which presents a challenge to both value systems, rejects the dominance of schismatic models, and offers the potential for a new professional integrity.
authors.affiliation: European Institute of Health & Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
authors.forename: P A
authors.initials: PA
authors.lastname: Chan
authors.forename: M J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Rudman
mesh_terms: D004508:Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate / Q000458:organization & administration; D004645:Empathy; D005260:Female; D019513:Feminism; D005783:Gender Identity; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006801:Humans; D019359:Knowledge; D008297:Male; D016294:Models, Nursing; D010687:Philosophy, Nursing; D011209:Power, Psychological; D017009:Professional Autonomy; D011568:Psychiatric Nursing / Q000193:education* / Q000458:organization & administration*