title: Gender differences in ethical perceptions of business practices: a social role theory perspective.
abstract: This study presents a meta-analysis of research on gender differences in perceptions of ethical decision making. Data from more than 20,000 respondents in 66 samples show that women are more likely than men to perceive specific hypothetical business practices as unethical. As suggested by social role theory (A. H. Eagly, 1987), the gender difference observed in precareer (student) samples declines as the work experience of samples increases. Social role theory also accounts for greater gender differences in nonmonetary issues than in monetary issues. T. M. Jones's (1991) issue-contingent model of moral intensity helps explain why gender differences vary across types of behavior. Contrary to expectations, differences are not influenced by the sex of the actor or the target of the behavior and do not depend on whether the behavior involves personal relationships or action vs. inaction.
authors.affiliation: University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa 35487-0225, USA. gfranke@cba.ua.edu
authors.forename: G R
authors.initials: GR
authors.lastname: Franke
authors.forename: D F
authors.initials: DF
authors.lastname: Crown
authors.forename: D F
authors.initials: DF
authors.lastname: Spake
mesh_terms: D003659:Decision Making, Organizational; D004989:Ethics; D005260:Female; D005783:Gender Identity; D006801:Humans; D016018:Least-Squares Analysis; D008297:Male; D011582:Psychological Theory; D012723:Sex