Responsibility of health providers and the media in response to scientific information.
During the last 2 years, there have been a number of reports on oral contraceptives (OCs) and their effects on breast cancer and vascular events. The pill scare that followed the controversy of the third-generation combined OCs has produced immeasurable amounts of medical publications and public mass media coverage, all showing great disparity on the aspects that they have emphasized. It would seem that personal points of view, whether or not they are associated with other interests, and not directly related to the nature of the scientific information, could lead to opposed interpretations of the same facts and would lead the reader to perceive a different message. The consequences of over-reporting the adverse effects of oral contraceptives on the general population, such as pill discontinuation and a rise in abortion rates, deserve special consideration in regard to the responsibility of health professionals and the mass media in the diffusion of scientific information. The aim of this paper is to analyze the repercussions of the diffusion of scientific information about oral contraceptives on the general public and the responsibility of health professionals and the mass media, and to propose some considerations to be taken into account when giving scientific information on oral contraceptives.
Martinez
F
F
Contraception Unit, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain.
D015982:Bias; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000139:chemically induced; D003270:Contraceptive Agents / Q000009:adverse effects*; D004059:Diffusion of Innovation; D004995:Ethics, Professional; D005260:Female; D006266:Health Education; D006282:Health Personnel; D006801:Humans; D007255:Information Services; D008402:Mass Media; D013673:Technology Assessment, Biomedical; D014652:Vascular Diseases / Q000139:chemically induced
D003270:Contraceptive Agents