Gender and projective imagination of threat in achievement and affiliation situations.
In a study by Pollak and Gilligan (1982) where fantasies of violence were seen as indicative of perception of danger, women responded with more violent imagery to situations of achievement, whereas men responded with more violent imagery to affiliation situations. This indicates gender differences in motivational needs, which corresponds to modern gender development theories (e.g., Chodorow, 1978). In the present studies, the hypotheses that women fear achievement situations whereas men fear situations of affiliation were tested on Swedish samples totaling 44 men and 47 women. In Study 1, the hypothesis that violent imagery correlates with affiliation themes in the stories written by men was partly supported, whereas the hypothesis that violent imagery would be highly correlated with achievement themes in the stories written by women was not confirmed. In Study 2, no support was obtained for the hypotheses. In sum, contrary to previous studies, no substantial support was obtained for the hypothesis that women connect violent imagery with achievement situations, whereas some evidence was found for the hypothesis that men construe danger as arising from affiliation situations. The greater incidence of violence in men's fantasy reported in previous studies was not supported in either of the two studies. The results are discussed in the context of cross-cultural differences.
Marongiu
S
S
Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Ekehammar
B
B
D000328:Adult; D003431:Cross-Cultural Comparison; D005239:Fear; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007092:Imagination; D008297:Male; D011386:Projective Techniques; D012737:Sex Factors; D014754:Violence