Hemodynamic support in fluid-refractory pediatric septic shock.
OBJECTIVE
Assess outcome in children treated with inotrope, vasopressor, and/or vasodilator therapy for reversal of fluid-refractory and persistent septic shock.


METHODS
Survey; case series.


METHODS
Three pediatric hospitals.


METHODS
Fifty consecutive patients with fluid-refractory septic shock with a pulmonary artery catheter within 6 hours of resuscitation.


METHODS
Patients were categorized according to hemodynamic state and use of inotrope, vasopressor, and/or vasodilator therapy to maintain cardiac index (CI) >3.3 L/min/m2 and systemic vascular resistance >800 dyne-sec/cm/m to reverse shock.


METHODS
Hemodynamic state, response to class of cardiovascular therapy, and mortality.


RESULTS
After fluid resuscitation, 58% of the children had a low CI and responded to inotropic therapy with or without a vasodilator (group I), 20% had a high CI and low systemic vascular resistance and responded to vasopressor therapy alone (group II), and 22% had both vascular and cardiac dysfunction and responded to combined vasopressor and inotropic therapy (group III). Shock persisted in 36% of the children. Of the children in group I, 50% needed the addition of a vasodilator, and in group II, 50% of children needed the addition of an inotrope for evolving myocardial dysfunction. Four children showed a complete change in hemodynamic state and responded to a switch from inotrope to vasopressor therapy or vice versa. The overall 28-day survival rate was 80% (group I, 72%; group II, 90%; group III, 91%).


CONCLUSIONS
Unlike adults, children with fluid-refractory shock are frequently hypodynamic and respond to inotrope and vasodilator therapy. Because hemodynamic states are heterogeneous and change with time, an incorrect cardiovascular therapeutic regimen should be suspected in any child with persistent shock. Outcome can be improved compared with historical literature.
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
G
G
Ceneviva
J A
JA
Paschall
F
F
Maffei
J A
JA
Carcillo
D000293:Adolescent; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D002316:Cardiotonic Agents / Q000494:pharmacology / Q000627:therapeutic use; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D004280:Dobutamine / Q000494:pharmacology / Q000627:therapeutic use; D004298:Dopamine / Q000494:pharmacology / Q000627:therapeutic use; D004837:Epinephrine / Q000494:pharmacology / Q000627:therapeutic use; D005440:Fluid Therapy; D006439:Hemodynamics / Q000187:drug effects*; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D009599:Nitroprusside / Q000494:pharmacology / Q000627:therapeutic use; D009638:Norepinephrine / Q000494:pharmacology / Q000627:therapeutic use; D012772:Shock, Septic / Q000401:mortality / Q000628:therapy*; D015996:Survival Rate; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014662:Vasoconstrictor Agents / Q000494:pharmacology / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D014665:Vasodilator Agents / Q000494:pharmacology / Q000627:therapeutic use*
D002316:Cardiotonic Agents; D014662:Vasoconstrictor Agents; D014665:Vasodilator Agents; D009599:Nitroprusside; D004280:Dobutamine; D004298:Dopamine; D009638:Norepinephrine; D004837:Epinephrine