The effect of different calculation methods of flywheel parameters on the Wingate Anaerobic Test.
Researchers compared different methods of calculating kinetic parameters of friction-braked cycle ergometers, and the subsequent effects on calculating power outputs in the Wingate Anaerobic Test (WAnT). Three methods of determining flywheel moment of inertia and frictional torque were investigated, requiring "run-down" tests and segmental geometry. Parameters were used to calculate corrected power outputs from 10 males in a 30-s WAnT against a load related to body mass (0.075 kg.kg-1). Wingate Indices of maximum (5 s) power, work, and fatigue index were also compared. Significant differences were found between uncorrected and corrected power outputs and between correction methods (p < .05). The same finding was evident for all Wingate Indices (p < .05). Results suggest that WAnT must be corrected to give true power outputs and that choosing an appropriate correction calculation is important. Determining flywheel moment of inertia and frictional torque using unloaded run-down tests is recommended.
Coleman
S G
SG
Moray House Faculty of Education, Department of Physical Education, Movement and Leisure Studies, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Hale
T
T
D000054:Acceleration; D000328:Adult; D015308:Anaerobic Threshold; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001823:Body Composition; D002138:Calibration; D003654:Deceleration; D016552:Ergometry / Q000295:instrumentation*; D005080:Exercise Test / Q000379:methods*; D005221:Fatigue / Q000503:physiopathology; D017276:Friction; D006801:Humans; D016014:Linear Models; D008297:Male; D019415:Torque; D016474:Weight-Bearing; D014937:Work / Q000502:physiology