Contact lens articles in the literature: an update.
OBJECTIVE
To determine if the pattern of publication of contact lens articles in the ophthalmic literature has changed in recent years.


METHODS
We searched the literature of the past 5 years and reviewed the abstracts of all published papers that presented information on contact lenses. The journals reviewed included the American Journal of Ophthalmology, Archives of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology, and The CLAO Journal. We determined whether articles were positive, negative, or neutral.


RESULTS
We reviewed a total of 1,189,451 articles and 48,811 (4.10%) eye articles; of the latter, 987 (2.02%) discussed contact lenses. Only 86 total contact lens articles were published in the three major ophthalmology journals, of which almost 40% presented negative information (e.g., complications of contact lens usage). The CLAO Journal published 136 contact lens articles during the same time period (39.7% were positive and 30.1% were negative).


CONCLUSIONS
In the past 5 years, fewer contact lens articles have appeared in the ophthalmic literature than had appeared in the previous five years, and, in addition, more of these articles were negative. The CLAO Journal continues to publish the largest number of contact lens articles, although the percentage of positive articles has decreased somewhat, from 50% to 39.7%.
Department of Ophthalmology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
M C
MC
Ford
P R
PR
Kastl
D003261:Contact Lenses; D016208:Databases, Factual; D006801:Humans; D009885:Ophthalmology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011643:Publishing / Q000706:statistics & numerical data* / Q000639:trends; D012189:Retrospective Studies