Comparative immunochemical analyses of the developmental expression and distribution of ameloblastin and amelogenin in rat incisors.
Mineralized tissues are unique in using proteins to attract and organize calcium and phosphate ions into a structured mineral phase. A precise knowledge of the expression and extracellular distribution of matrix proteins is therefore very important in understanding their function. The purpose of this investigation was to obtain comparative information on the expression, intracellular and extracellular distribution, and dynamics of proteins representative of the two main classes of enamel matrix proteins. Amelogenins were visualized using an antibody and an mRNA probe prepared against the major alternatively spliced isoform in rodents, and nonamelogenins by antibodies and mRNA probes specific to one enamel protein referred to by three names: ameloblastin, amelin, and sheathlin. Qualitative and quantitative immunocytochemistry, in combination with immunoblotting and in situ hybridization, indicated a correlation between mRNA signal and sites of protein secretion for amelogenin, but not for ameloblastin, during the early presecretory and mid- to late maturation stages, during which mRNA signals were detected but no proteins appeared to be secreted. Extracellular amelogenin immunoreactivity was generally weak near secretory surfaces, increasing over a distance of about 1.25 microm to reach a level slightly above an amount expected if the protein were being deposited evenly across the enamel layer. Immunolabeling for ameloblastin showed an inverse pattern, with relatively more gold particles near secretory surfaces and much fewer deeper into the enamel layer. Administration of brefeldin A and cycloheximide to stop protein secretion revealed that the immunoblotting pattern of amelogenin was relatively stable, whereas ameloblastin broke down rapidly into lower molecular weight fragments. The distance from the cell surface at which immunolabeling for amelogenin stabilized generally corresponded to the point at which that for ameloblastin started to show a net reduction. These data suggest a correlation between the distribution of amelogenin and ameloblastin and that intact ameloblastin has a transient role in promoting/stabilizing crystal elongation. (J Histochem Cytochem 46:911-934, 1998)
Nanci
A
A
Faculty of Dentistry, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. nancia@ere.umontreal.ca
Zalzal
S
S
Lavoie
P
P
Kunikata
M
M
Chen
W
W
Krebsbach
P H
PH
Yamada
Y
Y
Hammarström
L
L
Simmer
J P
JP
Fincham
A G
AG
Snead
M L
ML
Smith
C E
CE
D053523:Amelogenin; D000818:Animals; D003746:Dental Enamel Proteins / Q000378:metabolism*; D005110:Extracellular Space / Q000378:metabolism; D015151:Immunoblotting; D007150:Immunohistochemistry; D017403:In Situ Hybridization; D007180:Incisor / Q000378:metabolism*; D007424:Intracellular Fluid / Q000378:metabolism; D008297:Male; D012333:RNA, Messenger / Q000378:metabolism; D051381:Rats; D017208:Rats, Wistar
C098519:Ambn protein, rat; D053523:Amelogenin; C507201:Amelx protein, rat; D003746:Dental Enamel Proteins; D012333:RNA, Messenger