Resistance to densification, tensile strength and capsule-filling performance of some pharmaceutical diluents.
The purpose of this study was to compare some indicators of capsule-filling performance, as measured by tapped density under different conditions, and elucidate possible quantitative relationships between variation of capsule fill-weight (%CV) and gravitational and inter-particle forces (attractive or frictional) derived from measurements of particle size, true density, low compression and tensile strength. Five common pharmaceutical diluents (lactose, maize starch, talc, Emcocel and Avicel) were investigated and two capsule-filling methods (pouring powder and dosator nozzle) were employed. It was found that for the pouring-type method the appropriateness of Hausner's ratio (HR), Carr's compressibility index (CC%) and Kawakita's constant (alpha) as indicators of capsule fill-weight variation decreases in the order alpha > CC% > HR; the appropriateness of these indicators also decreases with increasing cylinder size and with impact velocity during tapping. For the dosator-type method the appropriateness of the indicators decreases in the order HR > CC% > alpha, the opposite of that for the pouring-type method; the appropriateness of the indicators increases with decreasing cylinder size and impact velocity. The relationship between %CV and the ratio of inter-particle attractive to gravitational forces calculated from measurements of particle size and true density (Fvdw/Wp) was more significant for the pouring-type capsule-filling method. For the dosator-type method a significant relationship (1% level) was found between %CV and the product of Fvdw/Wp and a function expressing the increase, with packing density (p(f)), in the ratio of frictional to attractive inter-particle forces derived from compression (P) and tensile-strength (T) testing, d(log(P/T))/d(p(f)). The value of tapped density in predictions of capsule-filling performance is affected by the testing conditions in a manner depending on the filling method applied. For the pouring-type method predictions can be based on the ratio of attractive (inter-particle) to gravitational forces, whereas for the dosator-type method the contribution of frictional and attractive forces should, because of packing density change, also be taken into account.
Nikolakakis
I
I
Pharmacy Department, University of Thessaloniki, Greece.
Aragon
O B
OB
Malamataris
S
S
D002214:Capsules / Q000737:chemistry*; D002482:Cellulose / Q000737:chemistry; D019245:Compressive Strength; D007785:Lactose / Q000737:chemistry; D010316:Particle Size; D010592:Pharmaceutic Aids / Q000737:chemistry*; D013213:Starch / Q000737:chemistry; D013627:Talc / Q000737:chemistry; D013718:Tensile Strength; D003313:Zea mays / Q000737:chemistry
D002214:Capsules; D010592:Pharmaceutic Aids; D013627:Talc; D002482:Cellulose; D013213:Starch; D007785:Lactose