On the relationship between reading, listening and speaking: it's different for people's names.
Two experiments are reported that tested predictions derived from the framework of face, object, and word recognition proposed by Valentine, Brennen, and Brédart (1996). The findings were as follows: (1) Production of a celebrity's name in response to seeing the celebrity's face primed a subsequent familiarity decision to the celebrity's printed name. The degree of repetition priming observed was as great as that observed when a familiarity decision to the printed name was repeated in the prime and test phases of the experiment. (2) Making a familiarity decision to an auditory presentation of a celebrity's name primed a familiarity decision to the same celebrity's name presented visually. The magnitude of cross-modality priming was as great as the magnitude of within-modality repetition priming. This result for people's names contrasted with the effects observed in lexical decision tasks, in which no reliable cross-modality priming was observed. The results cannot be accounted for by previous models of face and name processing. They show a marked contrast between processing people's names and processing words. The results support the framework proposed by Valentine et al. (1996). The implications for models of speech production, perception, and reading are discussed, together with the potential of the methodology to elucidate our understanding of proper name processing.
Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths College, University of London, England. t.valentine@gold.ac.uk
T
T
Valentine
J
J
Hollis
V
V
Moore
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D003463:Cues; D006801:Humans; D008568:Memory / Q000502:physiology*; D008960:Models, Psychological; D009275:Names; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology; D011930:Reaction Time; D011932:Reading; D012660:Semantics; D013060:Speech / Q000502:physiology; D013067:Speech Perception / Q000502:physiology; D014825:Vocabulary