Risk adjustment: where are we now?
Risk adjustment is intended to minimize selection of patients or enrollees in health plans. Current efforts generally are recognized as inadequate, but improvement is difficult. The greatest short-term gain will come from introducing diagnostic information, though outpatient diagnosis data are unreliable. Initial efforts may use inpatient data, but this creates incentives to hospitalize people. Even exploiting diagnosis information leaves substantial imperfections. Partial capitation, common in behavioral health, reduces incentives to select patients and stent on services, but current policy resists it, perhaps because policymakers misinterpret the lesson of the Prospective Payment System. Theoretically, not paying plans more for providing additional services is optimal only if consumers are well informed.
Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
J P
JP
Newhouse
D002204:Capitation Fee / Q000458:organization & administration; D003953:Diagnosis-Related Groups; D004465:Economic Competition; D018588:Fee-for-Service Plans / Q000458:organization & administration; D017048:Health Care Costs; D006279:Health Maintenance Organizations / Q000191:economics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D015273:Insurance Selection Bias; D006278:Medicare / Q000191:economics; D011050:Policy Making; D011445:Prospective Payment System / Q000458:organization & administration; D012052:Reimbursement, Incentive / Q000458:organization & administration*; D012308:Risk Management; D014481:United States