Comparing measures of monocular distance perception: verbal and reaching errors are not correlated.
Monocular perception of egocentric distance via optic flow generated by head movement toward a target was investigated with a helmet-mounted video camera and display. Ability to perceive target distance was assessed with 2 response measures: verbal reports and reaches. Systematic and random errors differed as a function of the response measure. Verbal estimates of targets within and beyond reach were obtained before and after the performance of reaches to targets within reach. Systematic errors of verbal estimates changed but did not decrease overall. Random error decreased. Verbal estimates and reaches were performed concurrently to targets within reach. Verbal and reaching errors were uncorrelated. Verbal judgments appear to have been anchored using the range of distances experienced while reaching rather than being calibrated to the perceptual information itself. Discussion focuses on the advantages of action response measures.
Pagano
C C
CC
Department of Psychology, Clemson University, South Carolina 29634-1511, USA. cpagano@clemson.edu
Bingham
G P
GP
D000328:Adult; D004215:Distance Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006257:Head / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009068:Movement / Q000502:physiology; D013060:Speech / Q000502:physiology*; D015349:Vision, Monocular / Q000502:physiology*; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*