Influence of nail varnish on the remineralization of enamel single sections assessed by microradiography and confocal laser scanning microscopy.
Single-section techniques are attractive in enamel de- and remineralization investigations because they allow longitudinal studies in which mineral changes can be assessed by microradiography (TMR). Nail varnish (NV) is in general applied to coat the cut thin-section sides. The aims of this study were to investigate: (1) NV penetration depth in cut surfaces of demineralized enamel, (2) the influence of NV on cut surfaces of demineralized enamel on TMR, (3) the influence of NV penetration on a following remineralization. Cut surfaces of thin sections of demineralized enamel were NV coated; the NV was peeled off and the penetration depth assessed by confocal laser scanning microscopy. The NV penetration was 18+/-5 micrometer (mean+/-SD) in demineralized enamel. To evaluate the possible influence of NV on TMR, cut surfaces of thin sections of demineralized enamel were coated (twice) and microradiographed before and after nail varnishing. The NV effect (total effect of penetrated and surface NV) on the main parameters of TMR, Ld and DeltaZ, was less than 5% of the mean values. In the remineralization experiment (remineralization with 1.5 mM Ca2+, 0.9 mM phosphate, pH 7, 1 ppm F for 1 and 2 weeks), lesions in bulk samples, lesions in thin sections with NV-coated cut surfaces and lesions in thin sections in a PMMA (polymethylmethacrylate) holder were compared. (1) The remineralization of bulk samples and of NV-coated thin sections is different in one aspect. The amounts of mineral deposited in the lesions expressed as DeltaZ are comparable after 1 week. But because the NV penetrates part of the lesion outside, there was an Ld difference. The lesion depth difference between bulk lesions and NV-coated lesions in thin sections was statistically significant and was about 19% less in NV-coated lesions after 1 week; after 2 weeks of remineralization there was no difference in Ld between bulk- and NV-coated lesions any more. (2) There was no difference in remineralization efficacy between lesions in bulk samples and lesions in thin sections in the PMMA holder.
Iijima
Y
Y
Department of Preventive Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan. iijima@nova.dh.nagasaki-u.ac.jp
Takagi
O
O
Duschner
H
H
Ruben
J
J
Arends
J
J
D000293:Adolescent; D002118:Calcium / Q000627:therapeutic use; D002327:Cariostatic Agents / Q000627:therapeutic use; D002648:Child; D003743:Dental Enamel / Q000737:chemistry / Q000187:drug effects / Q000648:ultrastructure*; D005459:Fluorides / Q000627:therapeutic use; D006801:Humans; D006863:Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; D008852:Microradiography; D018613:Microscopy, Confocal; D008867:Microtomy; D008903:Minerals / Q000737:chemistry; D010150:Paint; D010710:Phosphates / Q000627:therapeutic use; D019904:Polymethyl Methacrylate / Q000737:chemistry; D013499:Surface Properties; D013997:Time Factors; D017001:Tooth Demineralization / Q000378:metabolism / Q000473:pathology; D014089:Tooth Remineralization
D002327:Cariostatic Agents; D008903:Minerals; D010710:Phosphates; D019904:Polymethyl Methacrylate; D005459:Fluorides; D002118:Calcium