title: Comparison of nose and face mask CPAP therapy for sleep apnoea.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Many patients with sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome (SAHS) find nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment unsatisfactory due to side effects related to mouth air leakage. A study was performed to compare side effects with face mask and nose mask CPAP therapy in patients with SAHS, with and without uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (U3P).
  
  
  METHODS
  Twenty newly diagnosed patients with SAHS took part in a randomised double limb trial of face or nose mask CPAP therapy (four weeks per limb) in which CPAP compliance in terms of machine run time was measured and patients answered a symptom questionnaire on side effects resulting from the mask. Ten patients with SAHS with U3P (SAHS/U3P) who were already regular users of nasal CPAP were also given a four week trial of face mask CPAP to compare compliance and symptoms. Ten patients with SAHS were matched with the 10 SAHS/U3P patients for body mass index, age, apnoea/hypopnoea index, and CPAP pressure. Long term compliance was estimated one year after the mask comparison studies.
  
  
  RESULTS
  For patients with SAHS nightly compliance was higher with a nose mask (mean (SE) 5.3 (0.4) hours/night CPAP) than with a face mask (4.3 (0.5) hours/night CPAP), p = 0.01 (mean difference 1.0 hour/night, 95% CI 1.8 to 0.3). Nose masks were rated more comfortable by 19 of 20 patients (p < 0.001) despite more mouth leak related symptoms. For SAHS/U3P patients compliance was marginally higher with nose masks (5.1 (0.7) hours/night CPAP) than with face masks (4.0 (0.8) hours/night CPAP), p = 0.07 (mean difference 1.1 hour/night, 95% CI 2.1 to 0.1). Nose masks were rated more comfortable by seven of 10 patients. There were no significant differences in side effect scores with face and nose masks. At one year nine of 10 SAHS patients and nine of 10 SAHS/U3P patients were still using CPAP. Compliance was 5.4 (0.6) hours/night for the SAHS patients and 3.5 (0.4) hours/night for the SAHS/U3P patients, p = 0.02 (mean difference 1.9 hour/night, 95% CI 3.6 to 0.3).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Compliance is greater with nose mask CPAP than with face mask CPAP because the overall comfort is better and compensates for increased symptoms associated with mouth leakage. Improved face mask design is needed.
authors.affiliation: Department of Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary, UK.
authors.forename: I L
authors.initials: IL
authors.lastname: Mortimore
authors.forename: A T
authors.initials: AT
authors.lastname: Whittle
authors.forename: N J
authors.initials: NJ
authors.lastname: Douglas
mesh_terms: D004311:Double-Blind Method; D005145:Face; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008397:Masks / Q000009:adverse effects; D008875:Middle Aged; D009666:Nose; D010349:Patient Compliance; D011175:Positive-Pressure Respiration / Q000295:instrumentation*; D012891:Sleep Apnea Syndromes / Q000601:surgery / Q000628:therapy*