title: Pneumoperitoneum risk prognosis and correction of venous circulation disturbances in laparoscopic surgery. A pilot study.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  This study was initiated to find a method of determining the prognosis for possible changes in hemodynamic and respiratory parameters in patients with pneumoperitoneum (PP).
  
  
  METHODS
  We devised a model for a pseudopneumoperitoneum (PPP), which is created by encircling the wide pneumochamber on the entire abdomen and inflating it to a preset pressure. To verify the prognostic possibilities of the proposed model, we studied the pneumotachygraphy parameters, noninvasive and invasive monitoring parameters of PPP after induction of anaesthesia, and venous circulation disturbances, as well as the medical effect of the intermittent sequential compression device.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In healthy patients, the restrictive lung syndrome did not approach the risky limit. In patients >/=60 years old, this syndrome was very close to the limit. In a number of patients with serious cardiovascular and pulmonary pathology, the pressure of >10 mmHg was considered to be intolerable. Lung compliance, which was the parameter most sensitive to the increased intraabdominal pressure, was 47 +/- 10 at baseline, and 29 +/- 4 (p > 0.05) at both PPP and real PP (14 mmHg).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The PPP model is quite similar to the real PP and can be used for preoperative prognosis in laparoscopic surgery. The elevated intraabdominal pressure results in a significant disturbance of venous blood flow in the lower extremities. The use of the device for peristaltic pneumomassage of the lower limbs is effective in correcting negative changes in venous hemodynamics in laparoscopic surgery.
authors.affiliation: Center of Abdominal Endoscopic Surgery, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 70 Nizhnaya Pervomayskaya Street, Moscow 105203, Russia.
authors.forename: S I
authors.initials: SI
authors.lastname: Emeljanov
authors.forename: V V
authors.initials: VV
authors.lastname: Fedenko
authors.forename: E M
authors.initials: EM
authors.lastname: Levite
authors.forename: S A
authors.initials: SA
authors.lastname: Panfilov
authors.forename: I G
authors.initials: IG
authors.lastname: Bobrinskaya
authors.forename: A V
authors.initials: AV
authors.lastname: Fedorov
authors.forename: N L
authors.initials: NL
authors.lastname: Matveev
authors.forename: V V
authors.initials: VV
authors.lastname: Evdoshenko
authors.forename: S V
authors.initials: SV
authors.lastname: Luosev
authors.forename: V V
authors.initials: VV
authors.lastname: Bokarev
authors.forename: S R
authors.initials: SR
authors.lastname: Musaeva
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D002302:Cardiac Output; D017081:Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic / Q000379:methods*; D003187:Compliance; D005260:Female; D006439:Hemodynamics; D006801:Humans; D007866:Leg / Q000098:blood supply*; D008168:Lung / Q000503:physiopathology; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010865:Pilot Projects; D011028:Pneumoperitoneum, Artificial / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D011379:Prognosis; D012016:Reference Values; D012039:Regional Blood Flow; D012129:Respiratory Function Tests; D018570:Risk Assessment; D014680:Veins / Q000503:physiopathology*