title: Improved left ventricular endocardial border delineation and opacification with OPTISON (FS069), a new echocardiographic contrast agent. Results of a phase III Multicenter Trial.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The echocardiographic contrast-enhancing effects and safety profile of ALBUNEX (a suspension of air-filled albumin microspheres) were compared with the new contrast agent OPTISON (formerly FS069: a suspension of albumin microspheres containing the gas perfluoropropane) in 203 patients with inadequate noncontrast echocardiograms.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  The efficacy of ALBUNEX has been limited by its short duration of action. By using perfluoropropane instead of air within the microsphere, its duration of action is increased.
  
  
  METHODS
  Each patient received ALBUNEX (0.8 and 0.22 mL/kg) and OPTISON (0.2, 0.5, 3.0, and 5.0 mL) on separate days a minimum of 48 hours apart. Echocardiograms were evaluated for increase in left ventricular (LV) endocardial border length, degree of LV opacification, number of LV endocardial border segments visualized, conversion from a nondiagnostic to a diagnostic echocardiogram, and duration of contrast enhancement. A thorough safety evaluation was conducted.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Compared with ALBUNEX, OPTISON more significantly improved every measure of contrast enhancement. OPTISON increased well-visualized LV endocardial border length by 6.0+/-5.1, 6.9+/-5.4, 7.5+/-4.7, and 7.6+/-4.8 cm, respectively, for each of the four doses, compared with only 2.2+/-4.5 and 3.4+/-4.6 cm, respectively, for the two ALBUNEX doses (p < 0.001). 100% LV opacification was achieved in 61%, 73%, 87%, and 87% of the patients with the four doses of OPTISON, but in only 16% and 36% of the patients with the two ALBUNEX doses (p < 0.001). Conversion of nondiagnostic to diagnostic echocardiograms with contrast occurred in 74% of patients with the optimal dose of OPTISON (3.0 mL) compared with only 26% with the optimal dose of ALBUNEX (0.22 mL/kg) (p < 0.001). The duration of contrast effect was also significantly greater with OPTISON than with ALBUNEX. In a subset of patients with potentially poor transpulmonary transit of contrast (patients with chronic lung disease or dilated cardiomyopathy), OPTISON more significantly improved the same measures of contrast enhancement compared with ALBUNEX and did so to the same extent as in the overall population. Side effects were similar and transient with the two agents.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  OPTISON appears to be a safe, well-tolerated echocardiographic contrast agent that is superior to ALBUNEX.
authors.affiliation: New Jersey VA Medical Center, East Orange 07018, USA.
authors.forename: J L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Cohen
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Cheirif
authors.forename: D S
authors.initials: DS
authors.lastname: Segar
authors.forename: L D
authors.initials: LD
authors.lastname: Gillam
authors.forename: J S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Gottdiener
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Hausnerova
authors.forename: D E
authors.initials: DE
authors.lastname: Bruns
mesh_terms: D000418:Albumins; D002311:Cardiomyopathy, Dilated / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000503:physiopathology; D003287:Contrast Media; D004305:Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; D004452:Echocardiography; D004699:Endocardium / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000503:physiopathology; D005466:Fluorocarbons; D006352:Heart Ventricles / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000503:physiopathology; D006801:Humans; D007089:Image Enhancement; D008173:Lung Diseases, Obstructive / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000503:physiopathology; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D018487:Ventricular Dysfunction, Left / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000503:physiopathology; D016277:Ventricular Function, Left / Q000502:physiology*
chemical_list: D000418:Albumins; C060687:Albunex; D003287:Contrast Media; C099458:FS 069; D005466:Fluorocarbons