Multiplanar imaging in the preoperative assessment of metallic intraocular foreign bodies. Helical computed tomography versus conventional computed tomography.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of helical computed tomography (CT) versus conventional CT in the preoperative assessment of metallic intraocular foreign bodies on axial, coronal, and multiplanar reconstruction images in clinical routine.


METHODS
Prospective comparative trial, alternate assignment of consecutive patients.


METHODS
Eighteen patients with penetrating eye injuries and suspected metallic intraocular foreign bodies were studied.


METHODS
Alternate patients were assigned to undergo either helical CT or conventional CT in the axial plane. Both the helical and the conventional data were transferred to a workstation, and reconstructions in the coronal and sagittal planes were performed. Additional direct coronal scanning was performed only when necessary for preoperative assessment.


METHODS
The quality of the directly obtained axial and coronal, as well as the reconstructed coronal and sagittal images, was assessed for each, imaging method based on the ability to detect and accurately localize foreign bodies. The size of the foreign bodies was measured and compared to the actual diameter. Total examination time and radiation dose delivered to the lens were measured for each imaging method.


RESULTS
All foreign bodies were detected by each scanning method on the axial, the coronal, and on the reconstructed planes. The quality of the axial images was similar for helical and conventional CT. The helical technique provided high-quality reconstructed images comparable in quality to the directly obtained coronal planes in conventional CT. Reconstructions by conventional technique were not useful for preoperative assessment. The examination time for the total orbital volume was 18 seconds for helical CT examinations and 52 seconds for conventional CT examinations. Radiation dose delivered to the lens for the complete examination was 35 mGy for helical CT axial scanning, 56 mGy for conventional CT axial scanning, and 63 mGy for conventional CT coronal scanning.


CONCLUSIONS
Helical CT multiplanar imaging offers several significant advantages for the preoperative assessment of metallic intraocular foreign bodies compared to the conventional CT technique in clinical practice, including short examination time, reduced motion artifacts, reduced radiation exposure, and the ability to obtain diagnostically useful coronal and sagittal reconstruction images without the need for additional scanning.
Lakits
A
A
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Vienna, Austria.
Prokesch
R
R
Scholda
C
C
Bankier
A
A
Weninger
F
F
Imhof
H
H
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D005129:Eye Foreign Bodies / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000209:etiology; D015807:Eye Injuries, Penetrating / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000209:etiology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008670:Metals; D008875:Middle Aged; D011300:Preoperative Care; D011446:Prospective Studies; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods
D008670:Metals