title: Controversies in acetabular fractures.
abstract: Open reduction and internal fixation has become the standard of care for the treatment of most displaced acetabular fractures. As surgical techniques have become refined, long term results of surgical fixation have improved. During the past 10 to 15 years, several controversies have surfaced in the orthopaedic literature regarding the treatment of acetabular fractures. The recent literature regarding acetabular fixation was reviewed. Controversies include the most efficacious surgical approach for complex acetabular fractures; the effectiveness of intraoperative sciatic nerve monitoring; the most effective method of prophylaxis against deep vein thrombosis; and the indications for and method of prophylaxis against heterotopic bone formation.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham 35233, USA.
authors.forename: J P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Stannard
authors.forename: J E
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Alonso
mesh_terms: D000077:Acetabulum / Q000293:injuries* / Q000294:innervation; D005593:Fracture Fixation, Internal / Q000379:methods*; D050723:Fractures, Bone / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D007431:Intraoperative Complications / Q000517:prevention & control; D008991:Monitoring, Physiologic; D009999:Ossification, Heterotopic / Q000517:prevention & control; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000517:prevention & control; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians'; D012584:Sciatic Nerve / Q000293:injuries / Q000502:physiology; D013927:Thrombosis / Q000517:prevention & control