The changing nature of conflict and famine vulnerability: the case of livestock raiding in Turkana District, Kenya.
The context of famine in Turkana has changed in recent years as the role played by livestock raiding in contributing to famine has increased. External responses to famine in Turkana have largely been drought driven, for example, food assistance and livestock restocking programmers, which have failed to meet the real needs of herders. The role of armed conflict in the form of raiding has been overlooked as a common feature of societies facing famine and food insecurity. The traditional livelihood-enhancing functions of livestock raiding are contrasted with the more predatory forms common today. The direct impact of raiding on livelihood security can be devastating, while the threat of raids and measures taken to cope with this uncertainty undermine herders' livelihood strategies. Self-imposed restrictions on mobility negatively affect the vegetation of both grazed and ungrazed pastures and restrict the available survival strategies. Predatory raiding leads to a collapse in the moral economy. Some implications of this for relief and development policy are considered, including approaches to conflict resolution.
Hendrickson
D
D
d.hendrickson@conciliation.gn.apc.org
Armon
J
J
Mearns
R
R
D000822:Animal Husbandry; D000818:Animals; D000829:Animals, Domestic; D003469:Culture; D004190:Disasters; D006801:Humans; D007630:Kenya; D012066:Relief Work / Q000458:organization & administration; D013217:Starvation; D014754:Violence