title: Decision making in CPR: attitudes of hospital patients and healthcare professionals.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To examine the opinions of patients and healthcare professionals regarding the process of making decisions about cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).
  
  
  METHODS
  A cross-sectional survey of 511 healthcare professionals (doctors, nurses and allied health professionals) (64% response rate) and 152 patients (58% response rate) at the John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, in June 1994.
  
  
  METHODS
  Opinions on who should be involved in CPR decision making; what issues are important when making the decision; and how these decisions should be communicated.
  
  
  RESULTS
  80% (95% confidence interval [CI], 72%-86%) of patients and 99% (95% CI, 98%-100%) of healthcare professionals (P<0.001) thought patients' views should be taken into account when making CPR decisions. More patients (29%; 95% CI, 22%-38%) than healthcare professionals (14%; 95% CI, 11%-17%) indicated that doctors should be the main decision makers. Two-thirds of respondents regarded the patient's wishes, diagnosis and quality of life as important factors. Most respondents (82%) felt comfortable discussing CPR, but only 29% (95% CI, 22%-37%) of patients and 57% (95% CI, 52%-61%) of healthcare professionals had actually discussed CPR with others (P<0.001). More than half of all respondents preferred to express their wishes about CPR in writing (47% [95% CI, 39%-55%] of patients, 69% [95% CI, 64%-73%] of healthcare professionals; P<0.01); the others preferred to tell a family member or close friend. Most patients (60%; 95% CI, 52%-68%) and healthcare professionals (85%; 95% CI, 81%-88%) wanted their views in their medical records (P< 0.001).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Most patients want to be involved in CPR decision making and many want some form of advance directive. Although there are some differences in opinions between patients and healthcare professionals, both perceive decision making at the end of life as a shared process, primarily involving the patient and doctor.
authors.affiliation: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, NSW. ikerridge@mail.newcastle.edu.au
authors.forename: I H
authors.initials: IH
authors.lastname: Kerridge
authors.forename: S A
authors.initials: SA
authors.lastname: Pearson
authors.forename: I E
authors.initials: IE
authors.lastname: Rolfe
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Lowe
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D001315:Australia; D016887:Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006784:Hospitals, Teaching; D006786:Hospitals, Urban; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008499:Medical Records; D008505:Medical Staff, Hospital; D008875:Middle Aged; D009517:New South Wales; D010358:Patient Participation; D016414:Resuscitation Orders