Gender differences in muscular strength: an allometric model approach.
Despite the fact that allometric modeling has been shown to be a more valid technique for group comparisons of body-size-adjusted muscular strength, no study to date has compared gender differences using absolute (no adjustment for body mass, BM), ratio (force/BM) and allometric (force/BMa) models for an active duty military population. Our purpose in this study was to use these models to compare gender differences in three strength tasks: maximal weight lifted to 152 cm height, maximal isometric force on an upright cable pull and maximal isometric handgrip force. Subjects were 989 and 987 active duty men and women, respectively, each of whom had fat-free mass (FFM) assessed hydrostatically. Results indicate that the ranges of gender difference in strength (%) were 57.9-103.7, 14.5-64.7 and 18.7-77.9 for absolute, ratio and allometrically scaled expressions, respectively, for BM and FFM. We conclude: 1. Men exhibit greater strength than women for all three indices regardless of model approach. 2. The magnitude of these differences is smaller when considering FFM rather than BM, but is larger when considering allometric vs. ratio models.
Vanderburgh
P M
PM
University of Dayton, OH 45469-1210, USA.
Kusano
M
M
Sharp
M
M
Nindl
B
B
D000328:Adult; D001824:Body Constitution; D015992:Body Mass Index; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008954:Models, Biological; D018482:Muscle, Skeletal / Q000502:physiology*; D012727:Sex Characteristics