title: Appropriate mammalian expression systems for biopharmaceuticals.
abstract: Process development for biopharmaceuticals is dictated by product quality, drug safety and economy of the manufacturing process. Not surprisingly, these factors also play a key role in the evaluation of mammalian cell expression systems to be used in the production of pharmacologically active glycoproteins. To date, the most prominent candidates for efficient expression of glycoproteins are mammalian cell lines such as mouse fibroblast cells (C 127-BPV), Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO-DHFR, CHO-NEOSPLA, CHO-GS), mouse myeloma cells (NSO-GS) as well as transgenic animals carrying c-DNA or genomic DNA which codes for the protein of interest. The expression titer in the case of glycoproteins is mainly determined by the promoter construct, the site of integration into the chromosome, the copy number and the type of protein in question. Based on expression titer, CHO-NEOSPLA and NSO-GS expression systems are most effective in the production of monoclonal antibodies and, to a lesser extent, of recombinant DNA derived proteins. However, based on overall product yield, expression of recombinant DNA derived proteins in transgenic animals is by far the most promising system. Therefore, for proteins required in large quantities, transgenic expression systems offer an attractive choice. However, cost of goods for products for which the dosage or the overall annual quantities are low, is dominated by downstream processing, filling, lyophilization and packaging and not by the fermentation process. Such proteins are preferentially produced by classical mammalian cell culture systems. Concerns which have to be addressed with respect to drug safety in the transgenic animal approach are the size of the herd, genetic stability from animal to animal, variation in productivity and in impurity profiles during lactation periods, microbial, viral, mycoplasma and prion contaminants, the dependence on health status and the life span of the animal. In a number of cases glycosylation of the protein is relevant for the prevention of immunogenicity of the protein, the pharmacological activity, the pharmacokinetic profile, solubility and stability against proteolysis. The glycosylation pattern, depending on protein structure, is influenced by the enzymatic system of the host cell as well as by fermentation conditions. Therefore, selection of host cells and culture conditions must take into account the requirement for a specific and stable glycosylation pattern. For the assessment of glycovariants, a number of protein analytical methods such as peptide mapping, isoelectric focusing, oligosaccharide mapping, MALDI-TOF (matrix assisted laser desorption mass spectrometry-time of flight), capillary electrophoresis and specific potency assays are available. In our experiments, glycosylation of proteins expressed in CHO cells was demonstrated to be very stable. Only extreme process times, cultivation methods and ammonium ion concentrations had an influence on the glycosylation profile. Among the three products investigated--tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), interferon omega and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule (s-ICAM)--t-PA expressed the most stable glycosylation pattern. Only at extreme ammonium concentrations an increase of mannose-5 structures was observed, whereas biantennary complex structures were reduced. On the other hand, interferon omega and s-ICAM showed greater susceptibility to increased ammonium concentrations and to adherent cultivation. Such conditions induced quantitative changes to the glycosylation pattern favoring the appearance of higher branched structures. Short cultivation times resulted in more heterogenous oligosaccharide structures. Since the glycosylation of the three proteins is different in the same host cell, the amino acid sequence of the protein apparently influences the glycosylation pattern and its sensitivity to culture conditions. In NSO-mouse myeloma cells, production of s-ICAM is two times as high as in CHO cells
authors.affiliation: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG, Biberach an der Riss, Germany.
authors.forename: R G
authors.initials: RG
authors.lastname: Werner
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Noé
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Kopp
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Schlüter
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D030801:Animals, Genetically Modified; D001483:Base Sequence; D001688:Biological Products / Q000096:biosynthesis*; D002478:Cells, Cultured; D006224:Cricetinae; D005822:Genetic Vectors; D006801:Humans; D008322:Mammals / Q000378:metabolism*; D051379:Mice; D008969:Molecular Sequence Data; D051381:Rats
chemical_list: D001688:Biological Products