title: Comparison of two bowel preparations for colonoscopy: sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate versus sulphate-free polyethylene glycol lavage solution.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Adequate preparation of the bowel is essential for accurate colonoscopic examination. We compared colonic preparation with sodium picosulphate plus magnesium citrate (SPS-Mg) with sulphate-free polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage (PEG-EL) solution before colonoscopy, for quality of bowel cleansing, patient discomfort, and side effects.
  
  
  METHODS
  Sixty-eight consecutive patients were randomly assigned to receive either 3 sachets of SPS-Mg (16.5 g each) (n = 39) or 3 L of PEG-EL (n = 29) on the day before colonoscopy. Shortly before the procedure each patient was interviewed to determine the degree of discomfort (1 = none or mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) and side effects. The quality of bowel cleansing was graded by a gastroenterologist who was unaware of the method of preparation (from 1 = poor to 4 = excellent).
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of the 29 PEG-EL patients, four (14%) did not complete the preparation because of side effects. The degree of discomfort was significantly greater with PEG-EL (mean score, 2.3 +/- 0.7) than with SPS-Mg (mean score, 1.4 +/- 0.5; p < 0.01). Nausea and vomiting were significantly more common in the PEG-EL group (38% vs 13%; p < 0.05). Using intention-to-treat analysis, bowel cleansing proved to be significantly better with SPS-Mg than with PEG-EL (mean score +/- SD, 3.05 +/- 0.9 and 2.57 +/- 1.0, respectively; p = 0.036).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Colonic preparation with SPS-Mg is better tolerated, associated with significantly fewer side effects, and results in higher quality bowel cleansing than preparation with PEG-EL.
authors.affiliation: Department of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Regev
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Fraser
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Delpre
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Leiser
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Neeman
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Maoz
authors.forename: V
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Anikin
authors.forename: Y
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Niv
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D002400:Cathartics / Q000009:adverse effects; D002951:Citrates; D019343:Citric Acid / Q000009:adverse effects; D003106:Colon; D003113:Colonoscopy; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009942:Organometallic Compounds / Q000009:adverse effects; D010847:Picolines / Q000009:adverse effects; D011092:Polyethylene Glycols / Q000009:adverse effects; D011446:Prospective Studies; D007507:Therapeutic Irrigation
chemical_list: D002400:Cathartics; D002951:Citrates; D009942:Organometallic Compounds; D010847:Picolines; D019343:Citric Acid; D011092:Polyethylene Glycols; C005701:picosulfate sodium; C110422:magnesium citrate