What we owe the author: rethinking editorial peer review.
Editorial peer reviewers play an important role in shaping the direction of knowledge growth of their discipline. Recent concern over reports of peer review misconduct has led some to advocate the establishment of a code of ethics for peer reviewers. Such a code should include guidelines for the discipline and for society at large, but it should also contain guidelines for the authors whose manuscripts are reviewed. Peer reviewers have a special obligation to show beneficence and fairness or impartiality towards the authors for whom they review. The practical application of these two ethical concepts is discussed.
Crigger
N J
NJ
School of Nursing, University of Central Florida, Orlando 32816-2210, USA.
D001319:Authorship; D026686:Beneficence; D035843:Biomedical Research; D032781:Codes of Ethics; D035081:Editorial Policies; D004995:Ethics, Professional; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D006801:Humans; D019359:Knowledge; D028681:Moral Obligations; D017712:Peer Review, Research / Q000592:standards*