General practitioner funding policy: from where to whither?
Six public policy objectives relating to general practitioner (GP) funding since 1938 have been identified. They concern national health insurance, rural GP shortages, care for the poor, health promotion, cost effectiveness and community control. Each of these objectives is examined in turn, focusing on the extent to which each has been met. In all cases past policies have been, at best, only partially successful in meeting their objectives and have required little in the way of dismantling prior to the introduction of new GP funding initiatives subsequent to 1993. Theoretical principles relating to the development of efficient and coherent public policy are discussed. New Zealand policy relating to funding of GP services has rarely conformed to such principles. There is an emerging consensus between social democrats and libertarians that targeted programmes for the poor is the equitable and efficient way to proceed. A key policy decision concerns the balance between planned primary care services for low income groups and more traditional market style arrangements for others.
Health Services Research Centre, Victoria University of Wellington.
P
P
Crampton
M C
MC
Brown
D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D005194:Family Practice / Q000191:economics* / Q000458:organization & administration; D005381:Financing, Organized / Q000379:methods*; D006291:Health Policy / Q000191:economics; D006293:Health Promotion; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000191:economics; D006302:Health Services Research; D008489:Medical Indigency; D009313:National Health Programs; D009520:New Zealand; D010821:Physicians, Family / Q000600:supply & distribution; D011640:Public Policy; D012424:Rural Population; D000078329:Workforce