Intermittency in preplanned elbow movements persists in the absence of visual feedback.
It has been observed for nearly 100 years that visually guided human movements appear to be composed of submovements, intermittently executed overlapping segments. This paper presents experiments to investigate the pervasiveness of movement intermittency and, in particular, whether it is exclusively due to visual feedback. With and without visual feedback, human subjects were asked to 1) move with constant velocity and 2) draw elliptical figures on a phase-plane display (showing velocity vs. position) that required cyclic movements at different frequencies. In both tasks, we found that removal of visual feedback did not significantly change movement intermittency. Subjects were unable to generate movements at constant speed. In addition, subjects moved less smoothly when drawing slower phase-plane ellipses. Furthermore, elliptical phase-plane figures were not always drawn at the frequency suggested by the center of the display. Instead, subjects moved more slowly than the tall (fast) ellipse displays suggested, and faster than the wide (slow) displays suggested. These results show that 1) movement intermittency is not exclusively due to visual feedback and 2) may in fact be a fundamental feature of movement behavior.
Doeringer
J A
JA
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
Hogan
N
N
D000328:Adult; D004550:Elbow / Q000502:physiology*; D005246:Feedback; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009068:Movement / Q000502:physiology*; D010827:Physiology / Q000295:instrumentation; D013997:Time Factors; D014785:Vision, Ocular / Q000502:physiology*