Administrative decision making in response to sudden health care agency funding reductions: is there a role for ethics?
In October 1993, a survey of health care agency administrators was undertaken shortly after they had experienced two sudden reductions in public funding. The purpose of this investigation was to gain insight into the role of ethics in health administrator decision making. A mail questionnaire was designed for this purpose. Descriptive statistics and content analysis were used to summarize the data. Staff reductions and bed closures were the two most frequently reported mechanisms for addressing the funding reductions. Most administrators did not believe that these changes would have a negative public impact. In contrast, the majority indicated that future changes in reaction to additional funding reductions would have a negative public impact. Approximately one-third of the administrators reported ethics to be an element of recent administrative decision making, and one-half could foresee that ethics would be important in the future if reductions continued. These findings are discussed in relation to ethics. Issues for additional research are outlined.
D M
DM
Wilson
D000416:Alberta; D003363:Cost Control; D003659:Decision Making, Organizational; D004991:Ethics, Institutional; D005380:Financing, Government / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006270:Health Facility Administrators / Q000523:psychology*; D006801:Humans; D040841:Resource Allocation; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires