[Aerosol therapy].
Aerosol therapy plays a major role in the diagnosis and treatment of various lung diseases. The aim of inhalation therapy is to deposit a reproducible and adequate dose of a specific drug to the airways, in order to achieve a high, local, clinical effect while avoiding serious systemic side effects. To achieve this goal, it is therefore important to have an efficient inhalation device to deliver different medications. However, the currently available therapeutic inhalation devices (nebuliser, pressurised metered-dose inhaler and dry powder inhaler) are not very efficient in aerosol delivery and have several disadvantages. Inhalation devices can be assessed by in vitro studies, filter studies and radiolabelled deposition studies. Several radiolabelled deposition studies have shown that nebulisers and pressurised metered-dose inhalers are not very efficient in aerosol delivery. In children, before 1997, only 0.5% to 15% of the total nebulised or actuated dose from a nebuliser or pressurised metered-dose inhaler actually reached the lungs. These numbers were somewhat improved in adults, 30% of the total nebulised or actuated dose reaching the airways. Aerosol therapy with dry powder inhalers was the most efficient before 1997, 30% of the total dose being deposited in the lungs of adults and children. In 1997, new developments in pressurised metered-dose inhalers much improved their efficiency in aerosol delivery. Lung deposition can be increased by up to 60% with use of a non-electrostatic holding chamber and/or a pressurised metered-dose inhaler with a hydrofluoroalkane propellant possessing superior aerosol characteristics. Several studies comparing the clinical efficiency of different inhalation devices have shown that the choice of an optimal inhalation device is crucial. In addition to the aerosol characteristics, ventilation parameters and airway morphology have an important bearing on deposition patterns. These parameters may be greatly influenced by the patient's acceptance of a specific inhalation device and therefore determine the choice of the device used. It is important for the clinical impact to develop more efficient inhalation devices, which need to be assessed for use in different age groups. These devices should be cheap, easy to use, portable, usable with all medications and environmentally safe.
Wildhaber
J H
JH
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Perth, Australia. hannesw@cyllene.uwa.edu.au
D000328:Adult; D000336:Aerosols; D000893:Anti-Inflammatory Agents / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects; D001985:Bronchial Provocation Tests; D001993:Bronchodilator Agents / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects; D002648:Child; D006801:Humans; D008173:Lung Diseases, Obstructive / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000209:etiology; D009330:Nebulizers and Vaporizers; D013256:Steroids
D000336:Aerosols; D000893:Anti-Inflammatory Agents; D001993:Bronchodilator Agents; D013256:Steroids
Aerosoltherapie.