Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis.
We randomised 102 knees suitable for a unicompartmental replacement to receive either a unicompartmental (UKR) or total knee replacement (TKR) after arthrotomy. Both groups were well matched with a predominance of females and a mean age of 69 years. Patients in the UKR group showed less perioperative morbidity, but regained knee movement more rapidly and were discharged from hospital sooner. At five years, two UKRs and one TKR had been revised; another TKR was radiologically loose. All other knees appeared to be clinically and radiologically sound. Pain relief was good in both groups but the number of knees able to flex > or =120 degrees was significantly higher in the UKR group (p < 0.001) and there were more excellent results in this group. Our findings have shown that UKR gives better results than TKR and that this superiority is maintained for at least five years.
Newman
J H
JH
Avon Orthopaedic Centre, Southmead Hospital, Westbury on Trym, Bristol, UK.
Ackroyd
C E
CE
Shah
N A
NA
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D019645:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D007719:Knee Joint / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D007720:Knee Prosthesis; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010003:Osteoarthritis / Q000601:surgery*; D010147:Pain Measurement; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D011859:Radiography; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular