Anorectal pressure gradient and rectal compliance in fecal incontinence.
To study whether anorectal pressure gradients discriminated better than standard anal manometry between patients with fecal incontinence and subjects with normal anal function, anorectal pressure gradients were measured during rectal compliance measurements in 36 patients with fecal incontinence and in 22 control subjects. Anal and rectal pressures were measured simultaneously during the rectal compliance measurements. With standard anal manometry, 75% of patients with fecal incontinence had maximal resting pressure within the normal range, and 39% had maximum squeeze pressure within the normal range. Anorectal pressure gradients did not discriminate better between fecal incontinence and normal anal function, since, depending on the parameters used, 61%-100% of the incontinent patients had anorectal pressure gradients within the normal range. Patients with fecal incontinence had lower rectal volumes than controls at constant defecation urge (median 138 ml and 181 ml, P < 0.05) and at maximal tolerable volume (median 185 ml and 217 ml, P < 0.05). We conclude that measurements of anorectal pressure gradients offer no advantage over standard anal manometry when comparing patients with fecal incontinence to controls. Patients with fecal incontinence have a lower rectal volume tolerability than control subjects with normal anal function.
Rasmussen
O O
OO
Department of Surgery D, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rønholt
C
C
Alstrup
N
N
Christiansen
J
J
D001003:Anal Canal / Q000503:physiopathology*; D016022:Case-Control Studies; D005242:Fecal Incontinence / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000503:physiopathology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008365:Manometry; D008875:Middle Aged; D011312:Pressure; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012007:Rectum / Q000503:physiopathology*