title: MIDCAB characteristics and results: the CardioThoracic Systems (CTS) registry.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The CardioThoracic Systems (CTS) registry of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) was established to examine baseline characteristics of patients undergoing this surgical procedure, document details of the procedures including grafting techniques and post-operative complication rates, and assess post-operative graft patency.
  
  
  METHODS
  A total of 508 consecutive patients who had MIDCAB using CTS instrumentation between April 1996 and March 1997 at 35 international centers were analyzed.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The mean age of patients, 27% of whom were women, was 63 years. Eight percent had previous coronary artery bypass surgery. While nearly all patients had significant stenoses in the left anterior descending artery, 23% had disease in two vessels and 9% in three vessels. Almost all procedures used the left internal mammary artery, with 7% employing multiple or sequential grafts. The entire surgical procedure lasted on average 135 min (median 2 h), with a mean time of 14 min to perform anastomosis. Surgical approaches, including anastomosis technique and method used to maintain bloodless field, varied widely across clinical centers. In-hospital complication rates were relatively low, with 0.6% mortality (0% perioperative), 1.2% conversion to sternotomy with cardiopulmonary bypass, 1.4% conversion to sternotomy without bypass, and 5.5% redo or reintervention. In total, 92% of patients were free from all of these events at hospital discharge; women showed a strong trend toward increased risk for major in-hospital events compared with men. Rib fracture was the most common complication, reported in 12% of patients. Post-operative angiography, performed in 83 patients at an average 2.2 days post-procedure, found full patency in 78 (94%).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The CTS registry data indicates that in the great majority of patients, MIDCAB using CTS instrumentation was performed safely and with acute success. Comparative studies, most importantly clinical trials, are needed to determine the types of patients who benefit most from this procedure, as well as its longer-term outcome.
authors.affiliation: Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. holubkov@edc.gsph.pitt.edu
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Holubkov
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Zenati
authors.forename: J J
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Akin
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Erb
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Courcoulas
mesh_terms: D001026:Coronary Artery Bypass / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007387:Internal Mammary-Coronary Artery Anastomosis / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D019060:Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000453:epidemiology; D012042:Registries / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D013997:Time Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014654:Vascular Patency