Transvaginal versus transperineal ultrasonography: a blinded comparison in the assessment of cervical length at midgestation.
OBJECTIVE
The study's objective was to determine the correlation and agreement between transperineal ultrasonography and transvaginal ultrasonography in the assessment of cervical length in gravid patients.


METHODS
After a pilot, unblinded series of transperineal and transvaginal cervical length measurements in 200 gravid patients, 206 study patients between 14 and 34 weeks' gestation with intact membranes and cervical dilatation of < or = 2 cm underwent transperineal and transvaginal cervical length assessment under a blinded, 2-sonographer protocol. The Pearson correlation coefficient, Lin concordance coefficient, and Bland-Altman plot were used. Acceptable concordance was defined as > 0.82, with an acceptable correlation of > 0.9 and an acceptable difference between the means of < 3 mm. The power of the study to detect this degree of concordance was estimated to be 95% at this sample size.


RESULTS
Paired ultrasonographic measurements were obtained for all 206 study patients. Transperineal mean cervical length was 35 +/- 8.6 mm. Transvaginal mean cervical length was 35.9 +/- 8.8 mm. The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.959, and the Lin concordance coefficient was 0.955, with a 95% confidence lower bound of 0.949. Close agreement between transperineal and transvaginal measurements was observed across the full range of cervical lengths (1-5 cm). The estimated difference between the paired means was 1 mm. The 95% tolerance interval for any given paired observation (Transperineal length - Transvaginal length) was -5.7 to +4 mm.


CONCLUSIONS
Cervical length measured by transperineal ultrasonography demonstrates close correlation and agreement with transvaginal measurements. With sonographer experience and optimal technique, approximately 95% of transperineal cervical length observations can be expected to be within 5 mm of a given paired transvaginal measurement. Transperineal ultrasonography may be a preferred method of cervical length assessment for situations in which vaginal placement of instruments should be minimized.
Kurtzman
J T
JT
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Goldsmith
L J
LJ
Gall
S A
SA
Spinnato
J A
JA
D002584:Cervix Uteri / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D005260:Female; D005865:Gestational Age; D006801:Humans; D010502:Perineum; D011247:Pregnancy; D016216:Ultrasonography, Prenatal / Q000379:methods*; D014621:Vagina