Memorability judgments for high- and low-frequency words.
Five experiments were conducted in order to examine subjects' judgments of the memorability of high- (HF) and low-frequency (LF) words in the context of a recognition memory task. In Experiment 1, the subjects were provided study/test experience with a list of HF and LF words prior to making memorability judgments for a new list of HF and LF items. The findings were consistent with previous evidence (Greene & Thapar, 1994; Wixted, 1992) suggesting that subjects are not explicitly aware of the greater recognition memorability of LF words. Experiments 2-5 embedded the memorability judgment task within the recognition test itself. In these experiments, the subjects consistently gave higher memorability ratings to LF items. The contrast between the pattern of results found when the subjects made their judgments at the time of list presentation (Experiment 1) and that when they made their judgments during the recognition test (Experiments 2-5) is consistent with recent evidence that even seemingly highly related metamnemonic judgments (e.g., ease of learning judgments vs. judgments of learning for the same items) may be based on very different factors if they occur at different points in the study/test cycle. The present findings are also consistent with the possibility that very rapid retrieval of memorability information for HF and LF words may affect recognition decisions and may contribute to the recognition memory word frequency effect.
Guttentag
R
R
Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina, Greensboro 27412, USA. guttenta@goodall.uncg.edu
Carroll
D
D
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D015982:Bias; D003071:Cognition; D005189:False Positive Reactions; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008568:Memory / Q000145:classification*; D008960:Models, Psychological; D014706:Verbal Learning; D014936:Word Association Tests