Predicting performance on text: delayed versus immediate predictions and tests.
Delayed judgments of learning for word pairs are more accurate than immediate judgments of learning when the memory test is delayed. In the present experiment, I investigated a similar paradigm with text. Participants predicted performance on texts either immediately after reading the texts or after a delay following the reading of other texts, and tests were given either immediately or after a delay. Immediate ratings with an immediate test produced the most accurate predictions, and immediate ratings with a delayed test produced less accurate predictions. Delaying both the ratings and the test did not produce more accurate predictions than immediate predictions and a delayed test. The results for delayed judgments of learning with text were different from those with word pairs.
Maki
R H
RH
North Dakota State University, Fargo, USA. rumaki@ttu.edu
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D015982:Bias; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D007858:Learning; D008568:Memory / Q000145:classification*; D011932:Reading; D012647:Self-Assessment; D013997:Time Factors; D014936:Word Association Tests