Effects of protraction mechanics on the midface.
Forty patients with Class III maxillary deficiencies were each treated with a bonded maxillary palatal expansion appliance followed by protraction. Nineteen of the 40 patients were retained with a Frankel III appliance. This group was compared with 24 Class I patients treated solely with bonded expansion appliance mechanotherapy. To determine at which level protraction mechanics affects the maxilla, the Walker's analysis and other cephalometric measurements were used. The protraction group showed significant increases (p <.05) in the following measurements: ANB angle, Wits, A perpendicular to nasion and in sella to A point. Anterior molar movement, without changes in posterior nasal spine or upper incisor to SN, was evident (p <.05). Favorable change in the facial profile was noted. There were no changes in the angles between sella-nasion and its relationship with the Frankfurt, occlusal, palatal, and mandibular planes. Walker's analysis showed no change in the position of orbitale. The control group did not demonstrate any significant changes in the position of the maxillary complex as a result of expansion mechanics. The retention group maintained the position of the maxilla postprotraction. Facial contour was maintained and other profile related variables improved.
Pangrazio-Kulbersh
V
V
University of Detroit Mercy, School of Dentistry, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Berger
J
J
Kersten
G
G
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D002508:Cephalometry / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D002648:Child; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005145:Face; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008313:Malocclusion, Angle Class III / Q000473:pathology / Q000628:therapy; D008437:Maxilla / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D017289:Orthodontic Appliances, Functional / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D010155:Palatal Expansion Technique / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D013997:Time Factors