title: Clinical utility of sleep-deprived versus computer-assisted ambulatory 16-channel EEG in epilepsy patients: a multi-center study.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The objective of this prospective study was to compare the usefulness of a sleep-deprived electroencephalogram (EEG) versus a computer-assisted 16-channel ambulatory EEG in patients with historical information consistent with epilepsy but with a normal or non-diagnostic initial routine EEG.
  
  
  METHODS
  A total of 46 patients had both a 30-60 min sleep-deprived EEG and a computer-assisted ambulatory 24 h EEG. Each EEG was assigned a number and reviewed independently by two board-certified electroencephalographers for the presence of interictal epileptiform discharges and seizures.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Both the sleep-deprived EEG and ambulatory EEG improved detection of epileptiform discharges by a similar amount (24% versus 33%); however, the ambulatory EEG detected seizures in 7/46 (15%) patients, and in three patients the seizures were solely detected by the computer.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  we conclude that the computer-assisted ambulatory EEG offers greater benefit than a sleep-deprived recording because in addition to detecting interictal epileptiform discharges, it may also capture seizures. The discovery of unsuspected seizures can significantly impact clinical management.
authors.affiliation: Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA. Joyce.Liporace@mail.tju.edu
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Liporace
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Tatum
authors.forename: G L
authors.initials: GL
authors.lastname: Morris
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: French
mesh_terms: D000553:Ambulatory Care / Q000379:methods*; D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D004569:Electroencephalography; D004827:Epilepsy / Q000503:physiopathology*; D006801:Humans; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012892:Sleep Deprivation; D012984:Software