title: Double-agents and trace-deletion in agrammatism.
abstract: The Trace-Deletion Hypothesis (henceforth TDH; Grodzinsky 1986, 1995) states that syntactic traces are deleted in agrammatism and that whenever a trace is deleted, a default strategy is activated. The default strategy assigns the role of Agent to the first NP. In structures where a second NP receives the Agent role syntactically, the consequence is that the agrammatic representation contains two conflicting Agents for the same action. This is the mechanism that induces guessing and the random performance on comprehension tests that has often been observed for passives and certain other structures. In this paper, we isolate the default strategy of the TDH, using a sentence-picture matching task in which one of the pictures matches the meaning arrived at by the default strategy. Our results show that an agrammatic representation does not involve double-Agents, and thus the default strategy (and therefore the TDH) is refuted.
authors.affiliation: Department of Linguistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, 48824, USA. beretta@pilot.msu.edu
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Beretta
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Munn
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001039:Aphasia, Broca / Q000175:diagnosis*; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests