Intercomparison of effective erythemal irradiance measurements from two types of broad-band instruments during June 1995.
The biologically effective global solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR) measurements from a multiband UVR monitor and a conventional broadband UVR monitor are compared. The measurements were performed during the varied weather conditions of June 1995. We compared the daily total exposures measured by both instruments, as well as the ratio of the measured doses throughout the course of each day. The daily total exposures agreed within approximately 11% throughout the month. The ratio between the measured doses held at 1.12 between 0900 and 1700 h (solar zenith angles approximately 16-52 degrees). The ratio decreased from 1.12 to 0.90 during the next 90 min outside that period (solar zenith angles approximately 52-72 degrees) and decreased further beyond that point. Spectral response and cosine response mismatch between the instruments are discussed as the possible cause of discrepancies between the measured doses. Implications for erythemal irradiance monitoring and suggestions for further study are discussed.
Wengraitis
S
S
Laser/Optical Radiation Program, U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA 21010-5422. Stephen_Wengraitis@chppm-ccmail.apgea.army.mil
Benedetta
D
D
Sliney
D H
DH
D004890:Erythema / Q000209:etiology*; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D006801:Humans; D018462:Photobiology / Q000295:instrumentation; D011834:Radiation Monitoring / Q000295:instrumentation*; D014466:Ultraviolet Rays / Q000009:adverse effects*