title: To what extent is surgery superior to endoscopic therapy in the management of chronic pancreatitis?
abstract: The surgeon was the only figure involved in the management of chronic pancreatitis patients unresponsive to medical treatment, until a few years ago. Nowadays, because of less invasive, endoscopy offers a seductive alternative to surgery. Up to now no clinical prospective and randomized data comparing the results of the two different approaches are available. Surgery seems to be the only solution for chronic pancreatitis with duodenal stenosis and the last chance of eliminating diagnostic uncertainty. Also in the case of biliary tract involvement surgery should be regarded as the procedure of choice, inasmuch as the stenosis is benign and generally long-lasting, and endoscopic treatment would have to be repeated several times; endoscopy, in this indication, should be reserved only for patients who present contraindicating surgery conditions (such as severe jaundice, colangitis etc.); the endoscopist should assess whether to insert a stent or a naso-biliary drainage tube referring the patient back to the surgeon once good clinical conditions have been restored. Endoscopy and surgery should be regarded not as adversaries in the management of chronic pancreatitis and its complications, but as complementary procedures in an integrated approach. The maximum degree of complementarity should be achieved in the management of pseudocysts and in cases presenting severe, incapacitating pain. In selected cases endoscopy can play a definitive role. The generally good surgical outcomes, moreover, should convince endoscopists not to insist with repeated, hazardous manoeuvres in cases of failure. Particularly interesting is the possibility of performing endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy prior to surgical treatment in cases of chronic calcifying calcific pancreatitis. The crushing of the calculi and partial clearance of the duct have simplified surgery and complete clearance of the duct in those patients receiving such treatment in our experience.
authors.affiliation: Surgical Department, University of Verona, Borgo Roma Hospital, Italy.
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Bassi
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Falconi
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Caldiron
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Salvia
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Sartori
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Valerio
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Butturini
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Contro
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Casetti
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Marcucci
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Pederzoli
mesh_terms: D002908:Chronic Disease; D013505:Digestive System Surgical Procedures / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D010195:Pancreatitis / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D011379:Prognosis; D016717:Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic / Q000379:methods*; D016896:Treatment Outcome