The MIB-1 tumor proliferation index in adult renal epithelial tumors with granular cytoplasm: biologic implications and differential diagnostic potential.
The histologic diagnosis of adult renal epithelial neoplasms with prominent eosinophilic cytoplasm (renal oncocytoma, chromophobe renal-cell carcinoma (RCC), eosinophilic variant of clear-cell RCC, eosinophilic variant of papillary RCC, and collecting duct carcinoma), could be problematic in some cases because of overlapping morphologic features. Precise diagnosis is essential, however, because it often connotes a distinct biologic behavior. Proliferative activity has not been specifically investigated in this spectrum of renal tumors, so we studied the MIB-1 proliferation index in 20 renal oncocytomas, 12 chromophobe RCCs, 9 eosinophilic variants of papillary RCCs, and 13 eosinophilic variants of clear-cell RCCs. Our purpose was to identify the biologic potential of these renal tumors on the basis of MIB-1 tumor proliferation index and to ascertain whether that index had diagnostic value. Overall, nuclear grade correlated with MIB-1 tumor proliferation index (P=.03). The mean proliferation index progressively increased from renal oncocytomas (0.3) to chromophobe RCCs (0.8) to eosinophilic variants of papillary RCCs (2.2) to eosinophilic variants of clear-cell RCCs (4.1) (P=.002). None of the renal oncocytomas or chromophobe RCCs had an index greater than 2, whereas 8 of 13 eosinophilic variants of clear-cell RCCs had an index greater than 2; in 5 of these, it was more than 3. Thus, in the differential diagnosis between renal oncocytoma/chromophobe RCC and eosinophilic variant of RCC, an MIB-1 index of greater than 3 with appropriate morphologic correlation would strongly support the diagnosis of the latter. We also concluded that the progressive increase in MIB-1 tumor proliferation index across the spectrum of granular renal-cell neoplasms parallels the emerging data in the current literature concerning the biologic potential of adult renal epithelial tumors and justifies histologic categorization of adult renal epithelial neoplasms.
Tickoo
S K
SK
Department of Pathology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Amin
M B
MB
Linden
M D
MD
Zarbo
R J
RJ
D000230:Adenocarcinoma / Q000378:metabolism / Q000473:pathology; D018249:Adenoma, Oxyphilic / Q000378:metabolism / Q000473:pathology; D000328:Adult; D000911:Antibodies, Monoclonal / Q000276:immunology; D002292:Carcinoma, Renal Cell / Q000378:metabolism / Q000473:pathology; D002455:Cell Division; D003593:Cytoplasm / Q000473:pathology / Q000648:ultrastructure; D003594:Cytoplasmic Granules / Q000473:pathology; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D006801:Humans; D007150:Immunohistochemistry; D019394:Ki-67 Antigen / Q000032:analysis* / Q000276:immunology; D007668:Kidney / Q000737:chemistry / Q000473:pathology; D007680:Kidney Neoplasms / Q000378:metabolism / Q000473:pathology*; D008940:Mitotic Index; D009375:Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial / Q000378:metabolism / Q000473:pathology*
D000911:Antibodies, Monoclonal; D019394:Ki-67 Antigen