title: [A survey on return to work and fitness for work in Japan: the systems provided in corporate regulations and their application].
abstract: We conducted a survey to evaluate the current situation and the application of systems for return to work (RTW) and fitness for work (FFW) in Japanese companies. Self-administered questionnaires were mailed to 351 occupational health (OH) physicians listed in the membership directory of the Japan Society for Occupational Health published in 1990. The item of information sought were the size and industrial type of the company, the organization of OH staff, the process of assessment of RTW, the provision for sick leave in corporate regulations, the FFW criteria, and job training systems for RTW. Of the 145 companies from which questionnaire replies were received from OH physicians (response rate: 41%), 123 (85%) were manufacturing industries. When classified according to the number of employees, 41 (28%) had 3000 or more, 66 (46%) had between 1000 and 2999, 26 (18%) had 999 or fewer and 12 (8%) were unknown. 144 companies (99%) had provisions on temporary retirement in their corporate regulations. As for who makes compensation during temporary retirement, 66 (48%) and 61 (44%) companies answered "both company and health insurance society" and "health insurance society alone," respectively. 136 companies (94%) carried out assessment of RTW, and involved OH professionals and other related staff in the process of assessment. In the majority of cases, the OH physicians were in charge of the decision-making process on RTW and were authorized to make the final decision. In the companies with 3000 or more employees, the cases of longer-term sick leave were assessed in a more complete process than those of shorter-term sick leave. 119 companies (88%) conducted on additional health examination to assess the employee's FFW. Sixty-four companies (47%) had standardized criteria on FFW. One hundred and eighteen companies (83%) had job training systems for employees' RTW, and they mainly introduced restricting one's job and/or reducing one's work-load. It was suggested that complete systems for RTW and FFW were more available among companies with 3000 or more employees than among companies with 2999 or fewer employees.
authors.affiliation: Department of Environmental Epidemiology, University of Occupational Environmental Health, Fukuoka, Japan.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Tanaka
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Hoshuyama
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Takahashi
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Ito
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Okubo
mesh_terms: D003625:Data Collection; D007221:Industry; D018868:Insurance, Disability / Q000191:economics; D007564:Japan; D009787:Occupational Medicine / Q000592:standards*; D012050:Rehabilitation, Vocational / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D014938:Work Capacity Evaluation; D014942:Workers' Compensation / Q000191:economics