Cervicothoracic vascular injuries.
Arterial and venous trauma of the cervicothoracic region continues to present challenging problems for the surgeon, despite advances in vascular diagnostics and surgical technique. Whether due to penetrating or blunt mechanisms, overall incidence of these injuries is low, whereas morbidity and mortality remain high. Despite collective experience from busy trauma centers, there still remain controversies regarding diagnostic evaluation, operative approach, and surgical treatment of these potentially devastating injuries. Therefore, this article compares and contrasts recent literature and controversies surrounding the treatment of cervicothoracic trauma. Pros and cons of duplex ultrasonography and angiography in the diagnosis of carotid and vertebral artery injury are highlighted, and selective versus mandatory neck exploration for zone II penetrating injuries are discussed. Increasing awareness of blunt carotid artery injury is emphasized, including management dilemmas that frequently accompany this type of injury. In addition, we review interventional radiological techniques for the management of vertebral artery injury and surgical approaches for aortic arch branch vessel or major cervicothoracic vein injury.
McIntyre
W B
WB
Division of Vascular Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, CA 92354, USA.
Ballard
J L
JL
D001013:Aorta, Thoracic / Q000293:injuries / Q000601:surgery; D002339:Carotid Arteries / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000601:surgery; D020212:Carotid Artery Injuries; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011859:Radiography; D014463:Ultrasonography; D014680:Veins / Q000293:injuries / Q000601:surgery; D014711:Vertebral Artery / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000293:injuries* / Q000601:surgery; D014949:Wounds, Nonpenetrating / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000628:therapy*; D014950:Wounds, Penetrating / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000601:surgery*