title: The past, present, and future of sex segregation methodology.
abstract: We review the logic underlying margin-free analyses of sex segregation arrays. In the course of our review, we show that the Karmel-MacLachlan decomposition does not live up to its margin-free billing, as the index upon which it rests, Ip, is itself margin-sensitive. Moreover, because the implicit individualism of D is necessarily inconsistent with margin-free analysis, the field would do well to abandon not merely the Karmel-MacLachlan decomposition but all related efforts to purge marginal dependencies from D-inspired measures. The criticisms that Watts (1998) levels against our log-multiplicative approach are likewise unconvincing. We demonstrate that our preferred models pass the test of organizational equivalence, that the "problem" of zero cells can be solved by applying well-developed methods for ransacking incomplete or sparse tables, and that simple log-multiplicative models can be readily devised to analyze disaggregate arrays. We illustrate these conclusions by analyzing a new cross-national archive of detailed segregation data.
authors.affiliation: Department of Sociology, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA. grusky@leland.stanford.edu
authors.forename: D B
authors.initials: DB
authors.lastname: Grusky
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Charles
mesh_terms: D003431:Cross-Cultural Comparison; D005060:Europe; D005260:Female; D005544:Forecasting; D006801:Humans; D007564:Japan; D016014:Linear Models; D008297:Male; D017059:Models, Econometric; D009790:Occupations / Q000145:classification / Q000706:statistics & numerical data / Q000639:trends*; D011287:Prejudice; D013223:Statistics as Topic / Q000379:methods / Q000639:trends*; D014481:United States