title: Comparison of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation with standard medical therapy in hypercapnic acute respiratory failure.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare the efficacy of standard medical therapy (ST) and noninvasive mechanical ventilation additional to standard medical therapy in hypercapnic acute respiratory failure (HARF).
  
  
  METHODS
  Single center, prospective, randomized, controlled study.
  
  
  METHODS
  Pulmonary medicine directed critical care unit in a university hospital.
  
  
  METHODS
  Between March 1993 and November 1996, 30 HARF patients were randomized to receive ST or noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) in addition to ST.
  
  
  METHODS
  NPPV was given with an air-cushioned face via a mechanical ventilator (Puritan Bennett 7200) with initial setting of 5 cm H2O continuous positive airway pressure and 15 cm H2O pressure support.
  
  
  RESULTS
  At the time of randomization, patients in the ST group had (mean+/-SD) PaO2 of 54+/-13 mm Hg, PaCO2 of 67+/-11 mm Hg, pH of 7.28+/-0.02, and respiratory rate of 35.0+/-5.8 breaths/min. Patients in the NPPV group had PaO2 of 55+/-14, PaCO2 of 69+/-15, pH of 7.27+/-0.07, and respiratory rate of 34.0+/-8.1 breaths/min. With ST, there was significant improvement of only respiratory rate (p < 0.05). However, with NPPV, PaO2 (p < 0.001), PaCO2 (p < 0.001), pH (p < 0.001), and respiratory rate (p < 0.001) improved significantly compared with baseline. Six hours after randomization, pH (p < 0.01) and respiratory rate (p < 0.01) in NPPV patients were significantly better than with ST. Hospital stay for NPPV vs ST patients was, respectively, 11.7+/-3.5 and 14.6+/-4.7 days (p < 0.05). One patient in the NPPV group required invasive mechanical ventilation. The conditions of six patients in the ST group deteriorated and they were switched to NPPV; this was successful in four patients, two failures were invasively ventilated.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study suggests that early application of NPPV in HARF patients facilitates improvement, decreases need for invasive mechanical ventilation, and decreases the duration of hospitalization.
authors.affiliation: Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Marmara University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. turege@superonline.com
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Celikel
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Sungur
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Ceyhan
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Karakurt
mesh_terms: D000208:Acute Disease; D006801:Humans; D006935:Hypercapnia / Q000209:etiology; D011175:Positive-Pressure Respiration; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012131:Respiratory Insufficiency / Q000150:complications / Q000628:therapy*; D016896:Treatment Outcome