title: Comparisons of contact lens, foil, fiber and skin electrodes for patterns electroretinograms.
abstract: Pattern electroretinograms are small physiologic signals that require good patient cooperation and long recording times, particularly when conditions are not optimal. Six electrodes were compared to evaluate their efficacy. Pattern electroretinograms were recorded in eight healthy volunteers to high-contrast, pattern-reversal checks (40' width) with Burian-Allen, DTL fiber, C-glide, gold foil, HK loop and skin electrodes. Raw data for 320 reversals were analyzed off-line to evaluate signal amplitude, quality, P50 and N95 peak times, artifact rate and electrical noise. Insertion time, impedance and subjective comfort were also assessed. The Burian-Allen contact lens electrode gave the largest signal and lowest impedance but was the least comfortable and had the highest artifact rate (p < 0.01). A skin electrode on the lower eyelid produced the smallest pattern electroretinogram with the poorest quality (p < 0.05). The four other electrodes were foil or fiber electrodes in contact with the tear film, conjunctiva and/or the inferior cornea. The signal from these showed only minor differences. When electrodes are compared for pattern electroretinograms recording, the foil and fiber electrodes do not differ substantially but contact lens and skin electrodes show substantial disadvantages.
authors.affiliation: Department of Vision Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Scotland, UK.
authors.forename: D L
authors.initials: DL
authors.lastname: McCulloch
authors.forename: G B
authors.initials: GB
authors.lastname: Van Boemel
authors.forename: M S
authors.initials: MS
authors.lastname: Borchert
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D004596:Electroretinography / Q000295:instrumentation*; D006801:Humans; D008839:Microelectrodes / Q000592:standards*; D008875:Middle Aged; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D012160:Retina / Q000502:physiology*