title: Reflections on the Michigan splint and other intraocclusal devices.
abstract: It seems obvious in retrospect that the treatment of disorders by interocclusal devices followed two paths: stabilization splints and functional orthopedic appliances. The dividing line between them is not always clear. Both have some function related to the position of the mandible. They may not differ significantly in their control of occlusal stability (e.g., telescoping devices anchored to stabilization splints). The stabilization splint, as well as other conservative measures, will play an increasing role in accepted therapy for TMD. The use of anterior repositioning devices for TMD, including MPD syndrome, will decrease. Research may provide answers that allow them to be used more specifically and predictably. Perhaps there will be but little change in their use where there is an association of TMD and Class II malocclusion. There will be an increase in the use of interocclusal devices for the treatment of snoring and obstructive apnea. Some additional directions seem to have emerged in the late 1980s and early 1990s: In the absence of pain and significant debilitation, treatment for TMD, if any, is to be reversible. Prevention or aggravation of TMD should be practiced to the extent possible during dental procedures. One long-term, well-designed, prospective study indicated that the incidence and severity of TMD could be reduced by appropriate occlusal adjustment. There is a small, but nevertheless important minority of patients with TMD who progress to persistent pain and/or dysfunction. Initial management of the vast majority of patents with TMD should be use of noninvasive reversible therapies. Surgery is indicated in only a relatively small percentage of cases of TMD. Research on interocclusal devices should not terminate simply because they are in part dental devices (i.e., biomechanical forms of treatment). The diagnosis and treatment of TMD has been called a dilemma, especially for those patients with chronic pain for whom no treatment has been effective. However, it would be ill-advised to abandon what treatment is already known to be effective by allowing those few but psychosocially important patients with chronic pain to determine what should be done for the vast majority of patients with TMD: reversible forms of treatment, including physiotherapy, pharmacologicals, and the stabilization occlusal bite plane splint.
authors.affiliation: University of Michigan School of Dentistry, USA.
authors.forename: M M
authors.initials: MM
authors.lastname: Ash
authors.forename: S P
authors.initials: SP
authors.lastname: Ramfjord
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D008310:Malocclusion / Q000628:therapy; D017090:Occlusal Splints; D010347:Patient Care Planning; D012891:Sleep Apnea Syndromes / Q000628:therapy; D013705:Temporomandibular Joint Disorders / Q000628:therapy