title: Characteristics of local electrograms with diastolic potentials: identification of different components of return pathways in ventricular tachycardia.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Diastolic potentials are often sought as a possible site for catheter ablation in post-infarct ventricular tachycardia. However, delivery of energy at such sites is often unsuccessful. The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics of local electrograms with diastolic potentials and to identify activation pattern which might indicate the critical portion of the return path of the ventricular tachycardia reentry circuit.
  
  
  METHODS
  In 17 patients with post-myocardial infarction ventricular tachycardia, 30 ventricular tachycardias were mapped with an 112 bipolar endocardial balloon at the time of surgery. Diastolic mapping of the return tract in ventricular tachycardia was performed. Four activation patterns were observed (15 figure 8 patterns, 2 circular patterns, 2 biregional patterns and 11 monoregional patterns). Of 3,360 local electrograms, 207 (6.2%) demonstrated a diastolic potential in ventricular tachycardia. They were classified into following four categories, based on the appearance and timing of the systolic component. Type A-1 electrogram: systolic activation was of low amplitude (< 2 mV) and was prolonged (> or = 100 msec), but preceded the onset of the surface QRS in ventricular tachycardia. Type A-2 electrogram: systolic activation was of low amplitude, was prolonged, but followed the onset of the surface QRS. Type B electrogram: systolic electrogram was fractionated, but relatively normal amplitude (2.0-3.6 mV). Type C electrogram: systolic electrogram was almost normal.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of all electrograms with diastolic potentials, three type A-1 electrograms (1.4%) were located at the exit of the return pathway, 11 type A-1 electrograms (5.3%) were located at the pre-exit site. No type A-1 was found at an entrance/bystander area. 21 type A-2 electrograms (10.1%) were at the pre-exit and 83 type A-2 electrograms (40.2%) were located at the entrance/bystander area, but such electrograms were never found at the exit site. 71 type B electrograms (34.3%) and 18 type C electrograms (8.7%) were located at the entrance/bystander area. To distinguish the type A-2 electrograms at the pre-exit site from those at the entrance/bystander area, the diastolic potential to QRS interval was measured. This interval at the pre-exit was significantly shorter than that at the entrance/bystander area (-47.2 +/- 10.7 vs -96.3 +/- 31.3 msec, p = 0.0001).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Type A-1 electrograms indicated the exit or pre-exit site of return pathway. Type A-2 electrograms with diastolic potential to QRS interval < -50 msec indicated the pre-exit site. However, the other types of local electrograms with diastolic potential did not indicate the critical portion of the ventricular tachycardia circuit. These observations may be helpful during catheter mapping and ablation of patients with post-infarct ventricular tachycardia.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Diastolic potentials are often sought to direct catheter ablation in post-infarct ventricular tachycardia. We investigated the characteristics of local electrograms showing diastolic activity in an attempt to determine whether critical portions of the ventricular tachycardia circuit could be identified by a typical "signature." In 17 patients with a remote myocardial infarction, 30 ventricular tachycardias were mapped with 112 bipolar endocardial balloon at the time of surgery. Diastolic potentials in association with low amplitude (< 2 mV) and prolonged (> or = 100 msec) systolic electrograms preceding the onset of QRS were found at the exit site and pre-exit site of return pathway. A similar systolic electrogram occurring after QRS onset with a diastolic potential to QRS interval of < -50 msec was found at the pre-exit site. However, other local electrograms with diastolic activity were at sites remote from the exit or pre-exit of the return pathway. These observations may be helpful during catheter mapping and ablation in patients with ventricular tachycardia.
authors.affiliation: Division of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, Toronto Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Saito
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Downar
authors.forename: J C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Doig
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Masse
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Sevaptsidis
authors.forename: M H
authors.initials: MH
authors.lastname: Shi
authors.forename: T C
authors.initials: TC
authors.lastname: Chen
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Kimber
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Harris
authors.forename: L L
authors.initials: LL
authors.lastname: Mickleborough
mesh_terms: D018780:Body Surface Potential Mapping; D017115:Catheter Ablation; D003971:Diastole; D005260:Female; D006329:Heart Conduction System / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000601:surgery; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D016343:Monitoring, Intraoperative; D009203:Myocardial Infarction / Q000150:complications; D011300:Preoperative Care; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D017180:Tachycardia, Ventricular / Q000209:etiology / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000601:surgery