Professional ethics: are we on the wrong track?
Are we on the wrong track, in terms of our expectations of a code of practice, professional ethics teaching or the wider field of moral philosophy, in our search for clear answers to the ethical problems that arise in clinical practice; or are we simply wrong in believing that there are always clear answers? This article examines a particular case, an account of which appeared in Nursing Standard at the end of 1996. The conclusion reached is that we are likely to be misguided in assuming that there are always clear, straightforward answers to the ethical problems of clinical practice. However, more than a fleeting acquaintance with the field of ethics may help us to begin to think with greater clarity about what we do and why we do it. The hope is that this might lead to considered, humane practice by design, with the critical understanding and support of our professional peers and employers.
Scott
P A
PA
University of Stirling, Department of Nursing and Midwifery, UK.
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D032763:Behavior Control; D032781:Codes of Ethics; D003479:Curriculum; D004506:Education, Nursing; D004993:Ethics, Nursing; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D024802:Nurse's Role; D010344:Patient Advocacy; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D010687:Philosophy, Nursing; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D028662:Principle-Based Ethics; D028743:Professional Misconduct; D012926:Social Control, Formal; D012941:Social Responsibility; D016312:Treatment Refusal; D006113:United Kingdom