Strategies to improve insurance coverage for infertility services.
Various studies repeatedly have demonstrated that in the United States, only a minority of couples with infertility receive medical treatment and even fewer receive such treatment from specialists. Primarily couples of higher socioeconomic status receive such treatment. It is therefore obvious that a lack of insurance coverage greatly contributes to this country's disproportionately low utilization of fertility services compared with other developed nations. Such low utilization raises significant ethical and economic issues. For example, if the treatment of infertility is to be perceived as the treatment of a disease stage (a notion widely supported in our professional community), then how can we defend the fact that services are principally available only to the affluent? Moreover, by having access to only a fraction of the potential national market for infertility services, the national overhead for these services is distributed over only a fraction of potential buyers, greatly increasing unit costs. In short, obtaining a larger market for our services through better insurance coverage would solve ethical quandaries and, at the same time, reduce fertility costs on a unit level. How, then, can such improved insurance coverage be achieved? A number of possible strategies come to mind.
Gleicher
N
N
D004992:Ethics, Medical; D006801:Humans; D007246:Infertility / Q000191:economics*; D007348:Insurance, Health / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D014481:United States