Comparative assessment of distance processing and hemispheric specialization in humans and baboons (Papio papio).
This comparative study explored the ability to process distance and its lateralization in humans and baboons. Using a conditional matching-to-sample procedure in a divided-field format, subjects had to decide whether or not the distance between a line and a dot belonged to a short- or a long-distance category. Experiments 1, 2, and 4 demonstrated the ability of baboons to process and categorize distances. Moreover, humans showed better distance processing for right visual field/left hemisphere presentations than for left visual field/right hemisphere (LVF-RH) displays (Experiments 1-2). The same bias was found in baboons (Experiment 1), but in a weaker way. In Experiment 3, naive human individuals were tested and the difficulty of the discrimination was enhanced. There was a LVF-RH advantage which vanished with practice. Results are discussed by referring to theories (i.e., Kosslyn, 1987) of visuospatial processing for coordinate and categorical judgments.
Dépy
D
D
Center for Research in Cognitive Neurosciences, CNRS, Marseille, France. delph@lnf.cnrs-mrs.fr
Fagot
J
J
Vauclair
J
J
D000328:Adult; D000818:Animals; D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology*; D004215:Distance Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D007839:Functional Laterality; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010215:Papio; D011930:Reaction Time; D013028:Space Perception / Q000502:physiology; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology