Organised cervical cancer screening still leads to higher coverage than spontaneous screening in The Netherlands.
In The Netherlands, early detection of cervical cancer by programme and spontaneous screening has been common practice for more than two decades. Both types of screening are mainly performed by general practitioners. Therefore, the question is raised of whether programme screening still enhances screening uptake. To answer this question, we analysed the national health interview survey in the years 1992-1996. The coverage rate, defined as the percentage of women with at least one smear taken in the previous 5 years, was 91% for women invited for programme screening compared with 68% for women not invited. The performance of the organised programme in reducing excessive screening, i.e. smears taken in excess of the recommended age and interval range, was not clear and the effect seemed small. Furthermore, we found that half the non-attenders were 'protected' by a recent smear or a hysterectomy, and of the unprotected women, 72% showed a positive attitude towards the programme. We conclude that even after a long history of cervical cancer screening, an organised programme is still required to ensure a high coverage.
Bos
A B
AB
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
van Ballegooijen
M
M
van Gessel-Dabekaussen
A A
AA
Habbema
J D
JD
D000328:Adult; D001294:Attitude to Health; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D008875:Middle Aged; D009426:Netherlands / Q000453:epidemiology; D010342:Patient Acceptance of Health Care / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D016312:Treatment Refusal; D002583:Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / Q000453:epidemiology*; D014626:Vaginal Smears / Q000706:statistics & numerical data