title: A decade of salpingoscopy.
abstract: With the introduction of the salpingoscopy of the tubal ampullary mucosa in the 1980s, this diagnostic endoscopic examination not only disclosed an exciting world of sharp and detailed in vivo images of the actual site of human fertilization. Its systematic use in the assessment of the tubal factor in subfertile couples also provides specific, clinically relevant and prognostically valuable information, since it clearly demonstrates the presence or absence of anatomical distortions, especially adhesions between and destruction of mucosal folds, on a micro-endoscopic, i.e., mucosal level. The routine salpingoscopy of a free, patent tube is easy to perform and the procedure then takes about 10 min for both sides. In contrast with hysterosalpingography, a proximal (e.g., tubocornual or isthmic) block does not prevent us from examining the ampullary mucosa with the salpingoscope, whereas a small incision at the site of the occlusion with one of the techniques of operative laparoscopy, enables the inspection of the mucosa of a hydrosalpinx. With salpingoscopy, and using a simple classification system, a trained endoscopist can evaluate the sequelae of tubal inflammatory disease and their impact on fertility nearly as efficiently as with mucosal microbiopsies and they can direct their patients accordingly, either towards reconstructive (micro)surgery or towards medically assisted reproduction. In case of a tubal pregnancy, the effort to salpingoscopically evaluate both the affected and unaffected side may help to understand the underlying ethiology of the ectopic. Since patency and a normal appearance of the fimbriated end surely do not imply the absence of endoluminal pathology, it is advisable to select only salpingoscopically normal tubes to perform tubal transfers of gametes, zygotes or embryos. In the still ongoing discussion regarding preventive salpingectomy prior to IVF-ET in case of a uni- or bilateral hydrosalpinx, blind victimization of the Fallopian tube can in our opinion be avoided by a proper endoscopic selection of cases.
authors.affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Brussels, Belgium. patrick.puttemans@med.kuleuven.ac.be
authors.forename: P J
authors.initials: PJ
authors.lastname: Puttemans
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: De Bruyne
authors.forename: S M
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Heylen
mesh_terms: D004724:Endoscopy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods; D005184:Fallopian Tube Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis; D005187:Fallopian Tubes / Q000473:pathology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007247:Infertility, Female / Q000175:diagnosis; D000292:Pelvic Inflammatory Disease / Q000175:diagnosis; D011247:Pregnancy; D011256:Pregnancy Outcome