title: Uses of ecologic studies in the assessment of intended treatment effects.
abstract: Because of the potential for confounding by indication (disease severity) in individual-level observational studies of intended treatment effects, a treatment designed to prevent an adverse event may appear to cause it. We use a hypothetical example to show that despite substantial variation in the frequency of treatment among patients residing in different geographic areas, a constant area-specific mortality rate can be observed, indicating the absence of confounding by indication at the ecologic level. The advantage of ecologic over individual-level observational studies in the assessment of intended treatment effects holds even if variations in disease severity, socioeconomic status, and other unmeasured factors are taken into account, as long as treatment utilization is influenced by practice style in the local medical community independently of disease severity. Ecologic studies can suggest the need for changes in practice, help resolve ethical issues, and indicate priorities for randomized trials.
authors.affiliation: The Bureau of Reproductive and Child Health, Laboratory Centre for Disease Control, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.
authors.forename: S W
authors.initials: SW
authors.lastname: Wen
authors.forename: M S
authors.initials: MS
authors.lastname: Kramer
mesh_terms: D015982:Bias; D015986:Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D015987:Effect Modifier, Epidemiologic; D006801:Humans; D009026:Mortality; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012107:Research Design; D012111:Residence Characteristics; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome