Excess capacity: markets regulation, and values.
OBJECTIVE
To examine the conceptual bases for the conflicting views of excess capacity in healthcare markets and their application in the context of today's turbulent environment.


METHODS
The policy and research literature of the past three decades.


METHODS
The theoretical perspectives of alternative economic schools of thought are used to support different policy positions with regard to excess capacity. Changes in these policy positions over time are linked to changes in the economic and political environment of the period. The social values implied by this history are articulated.


METHODS
Standard library search procedures are used to identify relevant literature.


RESULTS
Alternative policy views of excess capacity in healthcare markets rely on differing theoretical foundations. Changes in the context in which policy decisions are made over time affect the dominant theoretical framework and, therefore, the dominant policy view of excess capacity.


CONCLUSIONS
In the 1990s, multiple perspectives of optimal capacity still exist. However, our evolving history suggests a set of persistent values that should guide future policy in this area.
Madden
C W
CW
Department of Health Services, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle 98195, USA.
D001294:Attitude to Health; D003659:Decision Making, Organizational; D004465:Economic Competition; D017598:Efficiency, Organizational; D019981:Health Care Sector; D006291:Health Policy / Q000639:trends; D006301:Health Services Needs and Demand / Q000191:economics*; D006739:Hospital Administration / Q000191:economics*; D006742:Hospital Bed Capacity / Q000191:economics* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D018803:Models, Economic; D009936:Organizational Innovation; D012945:Social Values; D014481:United States