A taxonomy of health networks and systems: bringing order out of chaos.
OBJECTIVE
To use existing theory and data for empirical development of a taxonomy that identifies clusters of organizations sharing common strategic/structural features.


METHODS
Data from the 1994 and 1995 American Hospital Association Annual Surveys, which provide extensive data on hospital involvement in hospital-led health networks and systems.


METHODS
Theories of organization behavior and industrial organization economics were used to identify three strategic/structural dimensions: differentiation, which refers to the number of different products/services along a healthcare continuum; integration, which refers to mechanisms used to achieve unity of effort across organizational components; and centralization, which relates to the extent to which activities take place at centralized versus dispersed locations. These dimensions were applied to three components of the health service/product continuum: hospital services, physician arrangements, and provider-based insurance activities.


METHODS
We identified 295 health systems and 274 health networks across the United States in 1994, and 297 health systems and 306 health networks in 1995 using AHA data. Empirical measures aggregated individual hospital data to the health network and system level.


RESULTS
We identified a reliable, internally valid, and stable four-cluster solution for health networks and a five-cluster solution for health systems. We found that differentiation and centralization were particularly important in distinguishing unique clusters of organizations. High differentiation typically occurred with low centralization, which suggests that a broader scope of activity is more difficult to centrally coordinate. Integration was also important, but we found that health networks and systems typically engaged in both ownership-based and contractual-based integration or they were not integrated at all.


CONCLUSIONS
Overall, we were able to classify approximately 70 percent of hospital-led health networks and 90 percent of hospital-led health systems into well-defined organizational clusters. Given the widespread perception that organizational change in healthcare has been chaotic, our research suggests that important and meaningful similarities exist across many evolving organizations. The resulting taxonomy provides a new lexicon for researchers, policymakers, and healthcare executives for characterizing key strategic and structural features of evolving organizations. The taxonomy also provides a framework for future inquiry about the relationships between organizational strategy, structure, and performance, and for assessing policy issues, such as Medicare Provider Sponsored Organizations, antitrust, and insurance regulation.
Research, Health Research and Educational Trust, Chicago, IL 60606, USA.
G J
GJ
Bazzoli
S M
SM
Shortell
N
N
Dubbs
C
C
Chan
P
P
Kralovec
D000573:American Hospital Association; D016000:Cluster Analysis; D019058:Community Networks / Q000145:classification* / Q000458:organization & administration*; D003284:Contract Services / Q000458:organization & administration; D003659:Decision Making, Organizational; D019033:Delivery of Health Care, Integrated / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006302:Health Services Research; D006801:Humans; D017146:Models, Organizational; D010067:Ownership / Q000458:organization & administration; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D013597:Systems Analysis; D014481:United States