The Nobel Prize and the biomedical paradigm: is it time for a change?
An examination of the early history of Nobel Committee deliberations, coupled with a survey of discoveries for which prizes have been awarded to date--and, equally revealing, discoveries for which prizes have not been awarded--reveals a pattern. This pattern suggests that Committee members may have internalized the received, biomedical model and conferred awards in accord with the physicalistic premises that ground this model. I consider the prospect of a paradigm change in medical science and the possible repercussions of such a change on the distribution of Nobel prizes "within the domain of physiology or medicine." For expository purposes, I contrast a model based on a science of pathophysiology with one based on a science of pathopsychophysiology. I propose a means whereby members might minimize the potentially blinding effects of model-dependence and come to evaluate medical discoveries from an inter-model rather than an exclusively intra-model perspective. By bringing to light questions rarely asked and proposing answers, I seek to open a dialogue and furnish a vehicle by which the putative delimiting effects of model-dependence might be overcome.
L
L
Foss
D001676:Biofeedback, Psychology; D006801:Humans; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D009613:Nobel Prize; D009936:Organizational Innovation; D010336:Pathology; D010686:Philosophy, Medical; D010827:Physiology; D015990:Placebo Effect; D011603:Psychophysiology; D012586:Science