Incomplete reporting of men's fertility in the United States and Britain: a research note.
We evaluate men's retrospective fertility histories from the British Household Panel Survey and the U.S. Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID). Further, we analyze the PSID men's panel-updated fertility histories for their possible superiority over retrospective collection. One third to one half of men's nonmarital births and births within previous marriages are missed in estimates from retrospective histories. Differential survey underrepresentation of previously married men compared with previously married women accounts for a substantial proportion of the deficits in previous-marriage fertility. More recent retrospective histories and panel-updated fertility histories improve reporting completeness, primarily by reducing the proportion of marital births from unions that are no longer intact at the survey date.
Department of Sociology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802, USA. rendall@pop.psu.edu
M S
MS
Rendall
L
L
Clarke
H E
HE
Peters
N
N
Ranjit
G
G
Verropoulou
D015982:Bias; D001723:Birth Rate; D003625:Data Collection / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D005260:Female; D005298:Fertility; D006801:Humans; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D008297:Male; D008393:Marriage / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D008571:Men; D044469:Racial Groups; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D006113:United Kingdom; D014481:United States