title: The optimal radiologic method for assessing spinal canal compromise and cord compression in patients with cervical spinal cord injury. Part II: Results of a multicenter study.
abstract: METHODS
  A multicenter, retrospective study using computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging data to establish quantitative, reliable criteria of canal compromise and cord compression in patients with cervical spinal cord injury.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To develop and validate a radiologic assessment tool of spinal canal compromise and cord compression in cervical spinal cord injury for use in clinical trials.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  There are few quantitative, reliable criteria for radiologic measurement of cervical spinal canal compromise or cord compression after acute spinal cord injury.
  
  
  METHODS
  The study included 71 patients (55 men, 16 women; mean age, 39.7 +/- 18.7 years) with acute cervical spinal cord injury. Causes of spinal cord injury included motor vehicle accidents (n = 36), falls (n = 20), water-related injuries (n = 8), sports (n = 5), assault (n = 1), and farm accidents (n = 1). Canal compromise was measured on computed tomographic scan and T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, and cord compression at the level of maximum injury was measured on T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. All films were assessed by two independent observers.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There was a strong correlation of canal compromise and/or cord compression measurements between axial and midsagittal computed tomography, and between axial and midsagittal T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Spinal canal compromise assessed by computed tomography showed a significant although moderate correlation with spinal cord compression assessed by T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Virtually all patients with canal compromise of 25% or more on computed tomographic scan had evidence of some degree of cord compression on magnetic resonance imaging, but a large number of patients with less than 25% canal compromise on computed tomographic scan also had evidence on magnetic resonance imaging of cord compression.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In patients with cervical spinal cord injury, the midsagittal T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging provides an objective, quantifiable, and reliable assessment of spinal cord compression that cannot be adequately assessed by computed tomography alone.
authors: Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto Hospital-Western Division. mfehlings@torhosp.toronto.on.ca
authors: M G
authors: MG
authors: Fehlings
authors: S C
authors: SC
authors: Rao
authors: C H
authors: CH
authors: Tator
authors: G
authors: G
authors: Skaf
authors: P
authors: P
authors: Arnold
authors: E
authors: E
authors: Benzel
authors: C
authors: C
authors: Dickman
authors: B
authors: B
authors: Cuddy
authors: B
authors: B
authors: Green
authors: P
authors: P
authors: Hitchon
authors: B
authors: B
authors: Northrup
authors: V
authors: V
authors: Sonntag
authors: F
authors: F
authors: Wagner
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Wilberger
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D002574:Cervical Vertebrae / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D016014:Linear Models; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013115:Spinal Canal / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000293:injuries; D013117:Spinal Cord Compression / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000209:etiology; D013119:Spinal Cord Injuries / Q000150:complications / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed