Guidelines for pragmatic assessment for health planning in developing countries.
Although the primary health care strategy implemented since the Alma Ata declaration of 'health for all' appears to have contributed to improvements in selected health outcomes, the current ad hoc approach to health assessment and planning has impeded more substantial gains. A comprehensive yet pragmatic framework for country-level health programmers is needed that would permit consideration of the multiple steps involved in policy formulation and implementation. In the present paper, drawing upon an epidemiologic model (Iterative Measurement Loop) and an economic model (Cost-Effectiveness Analysis), we present guidelines for a pragmatic assessment for health planning. A format is provided for the conduct of these tasks which is operational in nature, is specific to the target country (or relevant region), can simultaneously consider multiple interventions, and is comprehensible to persons without sophisticated medical and/or economic backgrounds. Such a format enables articulation and consideration of local concerns as well as national and global considerations.
Stanton
B
B
University of Maryland, Baltimore 21201.
Wouters
A
A
D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis / Q000379:methods; D003906:Developing Countries; D004812:Epidemiologic Methods; D006285:Health Planning / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006301:Health Services Needs and Demand / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006801:Humans; D013677:Medical Laboratory Science / Q000191:economics / Q000592:standards; D017059:Models, Econometric; D010934:Planning Techniques; D011050:Policy Making; D011320:Primary Health Care / Q000600:supply & distribution*; D013742:Tetanus / Q000517:prevention & control