Retiree medical plan design: determining the philosophy, communicating the need.
Much has been written, both in benefit-related journals and in the general press, about the recent statement, FAS 106, issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). This statement requires most employers to begin accounting for retiree health care benefit costs for active employees as well as current retirees, creating a significant negative financial impact. Most of the attention has been focused on getting the numbers that will tell the extent of the impact resulting from FAS 106. The next step has been to review retiree medical coverage to see how the affected companies can change it to reduce their liability. Although the urge is strong to adopt a quick-fix solution, employers can greatly benefit by reviewing their benefit philosophies and making plan decisions that make sense for them. This article discusses key questions that can help focus the issue on company philosophies and lays out a framework for determining suitable plan designs that can also help companies manage the retiree medical liability.
Dopkeen
J C
JC
Kastiel
D
D
D000066:Accounting / Q000592:standards; D000368:Aged; D003142:Communication; D006801:Humans; D007348:Insurance, Health / Q000191:economics*; D007353:Insurance, Long-Term Care; D006278:Medicare / Q000458:organization & administration; D010415:Pensions; D010559:Personnel Management / Q000191:economics*; D010684:Philosophy; D012179:Retirement / Q000191:economics*; D012306:Risk; D014481:United States