Effects of nisoldipine and lisinopril on left ventricular mass and function in diabetic nephropathy.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the effects of the calcium channel blocker, nisoldipine, and the ACE inhibitor, lisinopril, on left ventricular mass (LVM) and systolic function in type 1 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy.


METHODS
M-mode echocardiography was performed in 50 hypertensive type 1 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy enrolled in a 1-year, randomized, double-blind, parallel study of antihypertensive treatment with nisoldipine CC (20-40 mg/day) or lisinopril (10-20 mg/day). Ambulatory 24-h blood pressure was measured with the Takeda TM 2420 device (A & D, Tokyo, Japan) every 3 months. Three patients dropped out and seven patients were excluded due to technical difficulties.


RESULTS
The 24-h diastolic blood pressure was reduced from 83 to 80 mmHg in the nisoldipine group (P = 0.06) and from 85 to 80 mmHg in the lisinopril group (P = 0.02). The decline in systolic blood pressure was not significant with any of the two treatments, and no difference in reduction of blood pressure was seen between groups. LVM corrected for body surface area (LVMI) was comparable between groups at baseline and increased from 96 +/- 5 to 107 +/- 6 g/m2 (mean +/- SEM; P = 0.007) in the nisoldipine group and from 95 +/- 4 to 103 +/- 5 g/m2 (P = 0.03) in the lisinopril group. The mean difference between the change in LVMI in the two groups was 2.9 (95% CI 6.8 to 12.7) g/m2. The prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy rose from 18 (95% CI 6-30) to 30% (16-44) during the study period. A multiple linear regression analysis revealed that after 1 year of treatment, LVMI increased with higher systolic blood pressure level and declining glomerular filtration rate (R2 = 0.25). Fractional shortening was within normal range at baseline, 42 +/- 1 vs. 41 +/- 1% with nisoldipine and lisinopril, respectively, and did not change during follow-up.


CONCLUSIONS
Antihypertensive treatment with nisoldipine or lisinopril to bring diastolic blood pressure level within the normal target range does not hinder a rise in LVMI in type 1 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy.
Tarnow
L
L
Steno Diabetes Center, Gentofte, Denmark.
Sato
A
A
Ali
S
S
Rossing
P
P
Nielsen
F S
FS
Parving
H H
HH
D000328:Adult; D000806:Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D001794:Blood Pressure / Q000187:drug effects; D018660:Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory; D002121:Calcium Channel Blockers / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D003922:Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; D003928:Diabetic Nephropathies / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000473:pathology* / Q000503:physiopathology; D003971:Diastole; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D004452:Echocardiography; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D017706:Lisinopril / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015737:Nisoldipine / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D016277:Ventricular Function, Left / Q000187:drug effects*
D000806:Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; D002121:Calcium Channel Blockers; D015737:Nisoldipine; D017706:Lisinopril