title: DNA repair in primary human keratinocyte cultures after low level exposure to bis(2-chloroethyl)sulfide.
abstract: The literature has reported the appearance and disappearance of single-strand breaks (SSBs) in the DNA of rat keratinocytes after exposure to low levels of bis(2-chloroethyl) sulfide (BCES). Since SSBs are a consequence of depurination or depyrimidination followed by excision of the apurinic or apyrimidinic site and deoxyguanosine (GdR) is the major alkylation site in DNA exposed to BCES, it was hypothesized that repair occurred by a GdR-specific base replacement and not by large section repair. To test this hypothesis, cultures of human keratinocytes (HK) were preincubated with 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BUdR), a heavy analog of thymidine (TdR) incorporated into replicating DNA, immediately before exposure to BCES. Cultures were incubated postexposure with BUdR, radiolabeled GdR, and/or deoxyadenosine (AdR), to measure base-specific repair, and/or radiolabeled TdR, to measure DNA replication and large section repair. A CsCl density gradient was used to remove any BUdR-containing postexposure DNA replication. Each gradient was assayed for radioactivity (cpm) and DNA content (absorbance at 260 nm). The peak A260 fractions were pooled and rebanded in another CsCl gradient. If DNA repair had occurred, the specific activity (cpm/A260) of the peak A260 fraction in the gradient would be greater than control. After exposure of the cultures to BCES, there was a concentration-dependent increase in the specific activity for [3H]GdR but not [4C]TdR over the concentration range used (20-50 microM BCES). A concentration-dependent increase in specific activity was also detected after [14C]AdR exposure. The literature has also reported that the removal of damaged DNA bases after alkylation is via glycosylases. In this series of experiments, we have demonstrated that cultures of HK exposed to the alkylating agent BCES repair their damaged DNA by the replacement of the damaged base only. In the case of BCES exposure, it is the GdR base and to a lesser extent the AdR base.
authors: Department of Environmental and Industrial Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA. marc_decristofaro@med.unc.edu
authors: M F
authors: MF
authors: DeCristofaro
authors: I A
authors: IA
authors: Bernstein
authors: F L
authors: FL
authors: Vaughan
mesh_terms: D002273:Carcinogens / Q000633:toxicity*; D002478:Cells, Cultured; D004247:DNA / Q000096:biosynthesis*; D004249:DNA Damage / Q000187:drug effects; D004260:DNA Repair; D004261:DNA Replication / Q000502:physiology; D004277:DNA, Single-Stranded / Q000096:biosynthesis; D006801:Humans; D015603:Keratinocytes / Q000187:drug effects*; D009151:Mustard Gas / Q000633:toxicity*; D012867:Skin / Q000166:cytology / Q000187:drug effects
chemical_list: D002273:Carcinogens; D004277:DNA, Single-Stranded; D004247:DNA; D009151:Mustard Gas