title: Commercialization of BRCA1/2 testing: practitioner awareness and use of a new genetic test.
abstract: It was our purpose to determine the characteristics of practitioners in the United States who were among the first to inquire about and use the BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) genetic tests outside of a research protocol. Questionnaires were mailed to all practitioners who requested information on or ordered a BRCA1/2 test from the University of Pennsylvania (UPenn) Genetic Diagnostics Laboratory (GDL) between October 1, 1995 and January 1, 1997 (the first 15 months the test was available for clinical use). The response rate was 67% of practitioners; 54% (121/225) were genetic counselors, 39% (87/225) were physicians or lab directors. Most physicians were oncologists, pathologists, or obstetrician/gynecologists, but 20% practiced surgery or internal or general medicine. Fifty-six percent (125/225) had ordered a BRCA1/2 test for a patient; most of the rest had offered or were willing to offer testing. Of those who had offered testing, 70% had a patient decline BRCA1/2 testing when offered. Practitioners perceived that patients' fear of loss of confidentiality was a major reason for declining. Nearly 60% of practitioners reported that their patients had access to a genetic counselor, but 28% of physicians who ordered a BRCA1/2 test reported having no such access, despite the GDL's counseling requirement. The proportion of physicians reporting no access to genetic counselors for their patients increased from 22.4% in the first half of the study to 50% in the last half. Many practitioners have an interest in BRCA1/2 testing, despite policy statements that discourage its use outside of research protocols. Practitioner responses suggest that patient interest in testing seems to be tempered by knowledge of potential risks. An apparent increase in patient concern about confidentiality and inability to pay for testing could indicate growing barriers to testing. Although most practitioners reported having access to counseling facilities, perceived lack of such access among an increasing proportion of practitioners indicates that lab requirements for counseling are difficult to enforce and suggests that an increasing proportion of patients may not be getting access to counseling.
authors: Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, California, USA.
authors: M K
authors: MK
authors: Cho
authors: P
authors: P
authors: Sankar
authors: P R
authors: PR
authors: Wolpe
authors: L
authors: L
authors: Godmilow
mesh_terms: D001364:Awareness; D024682:BRCA2 Protein; D019398:Genes, BRCA1; D005817:Genetic Counseling; D005820:Genetic Testing / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006302:Health Services Research; D006801:Humans; D009363:Neoplasm Proteins / Q000235:genetics*; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians'; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014157:Transcription Factors / Q000235:genetics*; D014481:United States
chemical_list: D024682:BRCA2 Protein; D009363:Neoplasm Proteins; D014157:Transcription Factors