title: Productivity-cost controversies in cost-effectiveness analysis: review and research agenda.
abstract: Productivity costs represent true costs to society and should not be ignored in a cost-effectiveness analysis. However, there is dissension among health economists regarding measurement of productivity costs. Certain health economists argue for inclusion of productivity costs in the denominator of the cost-effectiveness ratio, measured in quality-adjusted life-years. Others argue that productivity costs should be included in the numerator of the cost-effectiveness ratio, measured in dollars using the friction-cost method or the human-capital method. This paper reviews the productivity-cost controversies and offers suggestions for future research addressing the debated issues.
authors: College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210, USA.
authors: E A
authors: EA
authors: Rothermich
authors: D S
authors: DS
authors: Pathak
mesh_terms: D017281:Cost of Illness; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D004526:Efficiency; D006801:Humans; D018434:Sickness Impact Profile