Reducing legal fees in medical group practices. The role of health care alternative dispute resolution.
Conflict is a growth industry, particularly in an increasingly complex health care system. Litigation is the most common, and most costly, method of settling health care disputes. Highly adversarial, the process of litigation often generates as much, if not more, hostility than the original dispute. In addition, satisfaction with the outcome is very low. The challenge that has arisen is to manage the conflicts so that the underlying needs and interests of all the parties can best be met. Often the techniques and processes of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) can be successfully used in resolving these sorts of conflicts quickly, cheaply and with greater satisfaction for all parties. Various applications of ADR are currently being used or tested in a variety of health care disputes in the United States and Canada. Tremendous success has been achieved in mediating medical malpractice claims, medical staff disputes, economic credentialing conflicts, insurer relations issues and denial of coverage disputes. Professional relations and departmental staff disputes, partnership and employee conflicts, and organizational disputes within clinics, HMOs and large group practices have all been found particularly amenable to ADR. These are all situations in which everyone benefits from quick, non-hostile resolutions and on-going relationships can continue.
Joseph
D M
DM
Institute for Medical Conflict Management, Tucson, AZ 85749, USA.
D002170:Canada; D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D003363:Cost Control / Q000379:methods; D003406:Credentialing / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D006123:Group Practice / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D016365:Liability, Legal / Q000191:economics*; D008318:Malpractice / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D017008:Negotiating; D014481:United States