Using the critical incident survey to assess hospital service quality.
This survey was designed to determine "standards of excellence" in hospital services as defined by (a) former patients, (b) physicians, (c) hospital employees, and (d) corporate insurance subscribers. One hundred forty-seven (147) patients, 188 employees, and 20 corporate subscribers were interviewed by telephone, and 52 physicians were interviewed in their offices. The interview consisted of a single question: "Can you think of a time when, as a patient/employee/employer/physician, you had a particularly satisfying or dissatisfying experience with a local hospital?" Reported incidents were reviewed, and 239 "critical incidents" were identified. These incidents were classified into 12 descriptive categories relating to the underlying factors in the incident reports. Six focus groups were later held with participants segregated by the population pool they represented. These groups were asked to develop definitions of "excellence" in hospital service quality and standards for service which would "exceed expectations." The focus groups created 122 standards of excellence, which were classified into 43 categories. Overall, the largest percentages of corporate, physician, and employee critical incidents were classified as "Administrative Policy" issues. Patients most often reported "Nurturing" incidents as critical to their perceptions of hospital service quality.
Longo
B
B
Connor
G
G
Barnhart
T
T
D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D002140:California; D003258:Consumer Behavior / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D017144:Focus Groups; D015285:Hospital-Patient Relations; D006761:Hospitals / Q000592:standards*; D007407:Interviews as Topic / Q000592:standards; D008505:Medical Staff, Hospital / Q000523:psychology; D015233:Models, Statistical; D012107:Research Design; D012308:Risk Management