Induced delivery of anencephalic fetuses: a response to James L. Walsh and Moira M. McQueen.
James Walsh and Moira McQueen accurately conclude that the early delivery of anencephalic fetuses is morally acceptable, but the reasoning they use to reach that conclusion is flawed. First, the principle of double effect does not require a weighing of good and evil, but rather seeks a sufficient reason for tolerating the physical evil indirectly intended. Second, the principle of double effect requires a clear distinction between physical and moral causality. Third, the Catholic moral tradition will not admit direct and intended killing of the innocent. Rather, early delivery of anencephalic fetuses is permissible because of the pathology associated with delivery of anencephalic fetuses at full term. Thus, the early delivery of an anencephalic infant is acceptable if the purpose of the moral act is avoiding a pathological condition on the part of the mother.
Saint Louis University Health Sciences Center, MO.
K
K
O'Rourke
J
J
deBlois
D000757:Anencephaly; D001927:Brain Diseases; D002410:Catholicism; D034723:Double Effect Principle; D004989:Ethics; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D005260:Female; D040821:Human Characteristics; D006801:Humans; D033182:Intention; D007751:Labor, Induced / Q000592:standards*; D008427:Maternal Health Services / Q000592:standards*; D028681:Moral Obligations; D009014:Morals; D028723:Personhood; D011247:Pregnancy; D037841:Pregnant People; D012068:Religion and Medicine; D028725:Theology; D014481:United States