Whither private health insurance? Self-destruction or rebirth?
The American public increasingly finds itself disenchanted with the system for health care financing in this country. Three forms of reform proposal are examined: those that place the locus of primary responsibility for health insurance coverage on the individual, those that would rely on employer mandates with patients and government bearing the residual responsibility, and those that lodge chief financial responsibility with the government, and act as primary agent for cost control. The second approach, government-mandated employer-provided health insurance, appears to be the most politically viable at this time. However, that option is likely to be acceptable to the business community only if the mandate is coupled with additional regulation of private health insurance. Specifically, private health insurance in such a system likely would be based on mandatory open enrollment, community-rated premiums, and all-payer reimbursement, under which every payer pays a given provider the same fee for the same service.
Princeton University, NJ.
U E
UE
Reinhardt
D003258:Consumer Behavior / Q000191:economics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D003625:Data Collection; D006264:Health Benefit Plans, Employee / Q000191:economics*; D006291:Health Policy / Q000191:economics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D007348:Insurance, Health / Q000191:economics*; D017057:Medically Uninsured; D017059:Models, Econometric; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D009310:National Health Insurance, United States / Q000191:economics*; D014481:United States