The telltale heart: public policy and the utilization of non-heart-beating donors.
The transplant community has quietly initiated efforts to expand the current pool of cadaver organ donors to include those who are dead by cardiac criteria but cannot be pronounced dead using brain-based criteria. There are many reasons for concern about "policy creep" regarding who is defined as a potential organ donor. These reasons include loss of trust in the transplant community because of confusion over the protocols to be used, blurring the line between life and death, stress on family members, and burdens imposed on health care providers when a long-standing policy regarding who can serve as a cadaver organ donor is unilaterally changed. While these concerns are not sufficient reason for abandoning efforts to broaden existing eligibility standards for cadaver donation, they are sufficient reasons for the transplant community to desist in changing existing standards without widespread professional and public discussion.
Caplan
A L
AL
Center for Biomedical Ethics, University of Minnesota.
D002102:Cadaver; D003643:Death; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D005190:Family; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D018594:Human Body; D006801:Humans; D008020:Life Support Care / Q000592:standards; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D011639:Public Opinion; D011640:Public Policy; D018570:Risk Assessment; D014019:Tissue Donors / Q000600:supply & distribution; D009927:Tissue and Organ Procurement / Q000458:organization & administration / Q000592:standards*; D035502:Trust; D014481:United States; D028761:Withholding Treatment