Aggressive regulator or passive price-taker: what role should HIPCs (health insurance purchasing cooperatives) play?
Despite extensive variations on the theme, managed competition continues to be the favored model of federal and state governments in crafting health reform. A critical element in managed competition is the establishment of health insurance purchasing cooperatives (HIPCs), which band together the collective buying power of individuals or employers to give them market "clout". Policymakers must decide whether they want a HIPC to be an aggressive regulator--using its power to force changes among health plans--or a passive price-taker that contracts with plans meeting key criteria.
Wicks
E K
EK
Institute for Health Policy Solutions, Washington, DC.
D016536:Competitive Medical Plans / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D005431:Florida; D006291:Health Policy / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D015271:Insurance Pools / Q000458:organization & administration*; D008329:Managed Care Programs / Q000458:organization & administration*; D017146:Models, Organizational; D017008:Negotiating; D012380:Role; D013221:State Health Plans / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D014481:United States; D014861:Washington