Negotiating the moral order: paradoxes of ethics consultation.
Ethics consultation at the bedside has been hailed as a better way than courts and ethics committees to empower patients and make explicit the value components of treatment decisions. But close examination of the practice of ethics consultation reveals that it in fact risks subverting those ends by interpolating a third (expert) party into the doctor-patient encounter. In addition, the practice of bioethics through consultation does the broader cultural work of fashioning a shared moral order in the face of manifestly plural individual commitments. In doing so, however, bioethics furthers medicine's position as a privileged domain of public moral discourse in contemporary American society.
B J
BJ
Crigger
D018864:Cultural Diversity; D026689:Ethical Analysis; D026822:Ethicists; D028741:Ethics Committees, Clinical; D033061:Ethics Consultation; D026690:Ethics, Clinical; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D006801:Humans; D033222:Judicial Role; D009014:Morals; D010358:Patient Participation; D010362:Patients' Rooms; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D024382:Professional Role; D012017:Referral and Consultation / Q000592:standards*; D012945:Social Values; D014481:United States