Is there an alternative to a National Health Board for Technology Assessment?
The National Health Board, a lynchpin of the managed competition philosophy of health reform, would perform a necessary function in regards to technology assessment for clinical decision making. However, would such an agency have what it takes to provide adequate turnaround, and nonbiased decision-making ability to play this crucial part of the reform process?
ECRI, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462.
J C
JC
Lerner
D003659:Decision Making, Organizational; D004059:Diffusion of Innovation; D006075:Governing Board / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006077:Government Agencies / Q000458:organization & administration*; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D015276:Health Care Rationing / Q000458:organization & administration; D018166:Health Care Reform / Q000458:organization & administration*; D007348:Insurance, Health / Q000191:economics / Q000592:standards*; D016730:Program Development; D012941:Social Responsibility; D013673:Technology Assessment, Biomedical / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000458:organization & administration*; D014481:United States