Privacy rights and HIV testing in the hospital setting: a medicolegal quagmire for administrators.
The results of HIV testing must protect public health while preserving individual rights against unnecessary intrusions. To determine whether actual risks justify mandatory testing and reporting, the best possible objective medical information must be considered. Legislators and courts must not cave in to public sentiment and fears. Courts must scrutinize HIV testing legislation carefully to ensure that the legislative history is accurate and the primary goal is concern for public health, not for discriminating or creating scapegoats.
Department of Psychiatry, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC.
L S
LS
Mann
T N
TN
Wise
D015492:AIDS Serodiagnosis / Q000592:standards*; D000573:American Hospital Association; D000574:American Medical Association; D002487:Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.; D002961:Civil Rights / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D003140:Communicable Disease Control / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D003219:Confidentiality / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D015658:HIV Infections / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000517:prevention & control; D006761:Hospitals / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D014481:United States