Constitutional rights versus malpractice insurance settlements.
The increasing costs and complexity of malpractice litigation have created an statutory right that allows malpractice insurance companies to settle malpractice claims regardless of the desires of the defendant physician. In the past, the consequences of settling a malpractice claim out of court were not as important as they are today. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 mandates that any settlement in behalf of a physician be documented in the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB), which must be consulted every time the physician is credentialed. This NPDB requirement denies due process to health care providers and thus becomes a violation of the federal and many state constitutions. Physician executives and medical leaders must bring these issues to the table and negotiate solutions before damage to practicing physicians and the U.S. health care delivery system caused by this legal paradox become too severe.
A E
AE
Trentalance
D002961:Civil Rights / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D007343:Insurance Carriers; D007351:Insurance, Liability / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D016365:Liability, Legal; D008318:Malpractice / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D016749:National Practitioner Data Bank; D010820:Physicians / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D014481:United States