Diversion of mentally disordered offenders: a legitimate role for clinicians?
Consultations to the courts often extend beyond criminal competencies and may include implicit statements regarding the diversion of mentally disordered offenders to treatment facilities.  Arguments for diversion are based on humanitarian interests and treatment needs.  Arguments opposing diversion recommendations emphasize (a) the variability of opinions regarding treatability, (b) the lack of sufficient outcome data, and (c) the potential for negative consequences in offering unsolicited opinions on diversion.  Initial data from 271 pretrial evaluations underscore the range in psychiatric use of diversion recommendations, although inpatient referrals in particular appear to be based on clinical status.
University of North Texas, Denton 76203.
R
R
Rogers
R M
RM
Bagby
D000328:Adult; D003415:Crime; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007298:Insanity Defense; D007883:Legislation, Medical; D008297:Male; D016743:Mental Competency / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000150:complications / Q000523:psychology / Q000628:therapy*; D012017:Referral and Consultation; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014481:United States