When should managed care firms terminate private benefits for chronically mentally ill patients?
Corporate America's healthcare cost crisis and the country's budget deficit are forcing limits on the resources used to finance healthcare, including mental healthcare. At the same time, the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act bars discrimination against patients with chronic illnesses, including chronic mental illness. Therefore, corporate benefits managers need guidance on how to ethically and rationally allocate scarce clinical resources to those high-morbidity insureds who utilize disproportionate amounts of these resources. In particular, how should we define the public/private interface: When do patients who repeatedly fail to respond to treatment fall out of the private sector's responsibility? The author, medical director for a leading behavioral healthcare utilization management company, offers the following guidelines recommending reasonable and practical limitations on trials of treatment for seven common categories of difficult psychiatric patients.
Peer Review Analysis, Inc., Boston, MA, USA.
S N
SN
Gerson
D002908:Chronic Disease / Q000191:economics*; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D015276:Health Care Rationing / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D008329:Managed Care Programs / Q000191:economics / Q000592:standards / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000145:classification / Q000191:economics*; D008605:Mental Health Services / Q000191:economics; D017149:Private Sector; D017150:Public Sector; D014481:United States; D014600:Utilization Review