Quality of primary outpatient services in Dar-es-Salaam: a comparison of government and voluntary providers.
This study aimed to test whether voluntary agencies provide care of better quality than that provided by government with respect to primary curative outpatient services in Dar-es-Salaam. All non-government primary services were included, and government primary facilities were randomly sampled within the three districts of the city. Details of consultations were recorded and assessed by a panel who classed consultations as adequate, inadequate but serious consequences unlikely, and consultations where deficiencies in the care could have serious consequences. Interpersonal conduct was assessed and exit interviews were conducted. The study found that government registers of non-government 'voluntary' providers actually contained a high proportion of for-profit private providers. Comparisons between facilities showed that care was better overall at voluntary providers, but that there was a high level of inadequate care at both government and non-government providers.
Kanji
N
N
Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.
Kilima
P
P
Lorenz
N
N
Garner
P
P
D003151:Community Health Centers / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration / Q000592:standards; D003906:Developing Countries; D005380:Financing, Government; D006291:Health Policy; D011320:Primary Health Care / Q000191:economics / Q000592:standards*; D011635:Public Health Administration / Q000191:economics / Q000592:standards*; D013636:Tanzania; D014837:Voluntary Health Agencies / Q000191:economics / Q000592:standards*