The double-edged sword of social service contracting: public accountability versus nonprofit autonomy.
The increased role of government contracts in the funding of nonprofits has heightened tensions as governments seek accountability and nonprofits seek to preserve autonomy. Considering both sides of the contract market this article suggests that the threat of government funding is exaggerated. Nonprofits are attractive contractor options because of their experience and trustworthiness. Governments should recognize that excessive intrusions limit the advantages of the nonprofit sector. At the same time, nonprofits should be conscious of the implications of public funding, just as they must be of other sources of funding.
School of Public Administration, University of Southern California.
J M
JM
Ferris
D003284:Contract Services; D003659:Decision Making, Organizational; D005380:Financing, Government / Q000639:trends*; D009939:Organizations, Nonprofit / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration*; D011057:Politics; D012941:Social Responsibility; D012947:Social Work / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration*; D014481:United States