Integrating guidelines and the clinical record: the role of semantically constrained terminologies.
The extent to which protocols and guidelines will be used depends critically on how well they are integrated with existing medical records and each other. Effective integration requires consistent information structures and content, but if the union between components becomes too intimate it may restrict interaction with other applications. Such isolation leads to operational inefficiencies and can be financially unattractive. Systematic representation methods for protocols address part of the problem but are hampered by the unsuitability of existing medical terminologies; the effort required for bespoke development is prohibitive. Unifying and generalising terminological functions in a single "Terminology Server" that can support both construction of systems and their operational use promises to reduce development effort whilst allowing individual designers considerable independence. However, significant theoretical and practical questions remain about how far the problems of communication can be mitigated by a generalised, use-independent terminological system.
Glowinski
A
A
Biomedical Informatics Unit, Imperial Cancer Research Fund Laboratories, London.
D004739:England; D006801:Humans; D016490:Integrated Advanced Information Management Systems; D008491:Medical Informatics Applications; D016347:Medical Records Systems, Computerized; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care; D017432:Unified Medical Language System