The ascendancy of primary care: permanent or temporary?
The conventional wisdom strongly suggests a health care provider food chain for the future: Primary care physicians (PCPs), principally family practitioners, on the top playing the lead role, distantly followed by specialists, with hospitals and other ancillary services even further down the line. Is this a reasonable expectation? Will PCPs dominate the new systems? Or will they be but one of many equally necessary components of these developing integrated health care delivery organizations? Looking at the various models now developing, it would seem that future integrated delivery systems will utilize both PCPs and specialists, but with strong augmentation from a diverse assortment of other health care professionals, including nonphysician providers, educators, and administrators. To separate the illusion of primary care dominance of the coming health care system from the likely reality, we should first determine what is driving the apparent present demand for primary care physicians. Next, we will examine the possible and probable reactions to that demand from an economic standpoint and from the points of view of both health care professionals and the public. Finally, we must try to picture how health care provider organizations of the future are likely to look and how they will integrate their health care professionals.
Barnett
A E
AE
Friendly Hills Healthcare Network, La Habra, CA, USA.
D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D005194:Family Practice; D018578:Hospital-Physician Relations; D010821:Physicians, Family / Q000191:economics / Q000639:trends*; D011320:Primary Health Care / Q000191:economics / Q000639:trends*; D014481:United States