The monopolistic integrated model and health care reform: the Swedish experience.
This article reviews recent reforms geared to creating internal markets in the Swedish health-care sector. The main purpose is to describe driving forces behind reforms, and to analyse the limitations of reforms oriented towards internal markets within a monopolistic integrated health-care model. The principal part of the article is devoted to a discussion of incentives within Swedish county councils, and of how these incentives have influenced reforms in the direction of more choices for consumers and a separation between purchasers and providers. It is argued that the current incentives, in combination with criticism against county council activities in the early 1990's, account for the present inconsistencies as regards reforms. Furthermore, the article maintains that a weak form of separation between purchasers and providers will lead to distorted incentives, restricting innovative behaviour and structural change. In conclusion, the process of reforming the Swedish monopolistic integrated health-care model in the direction of some form of internal market is said to rest on shaky ground.
Anell
A
A
Swedish Institute for Health Economics (IHE), Lund, Sweden.
D003256:Community Participation; D003284:Contract Services; D019033:Delivery of Health Care, Integrated / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration*; D004465:Economic Competition / Q000639:trends; D018166:Health Care Reform / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006286:Health Planning Councils; D006297:Health Services Accessibility; D017146:Models, Organizational; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D012052:Reimbursement, Incentive; D013222:State Medicine / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration*; D013548:Sweden