title: Comparison of appropriateness of cholesterol testing in general practice with the recommendations of national guidelines: an audit of patient records in 20 general practices.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare the profiles of those patients selected by general practitioners for measurement of serum cholesterol with the recommended profiles for opportunistic cholesterol testing described in the national practice guidelines published by the Dutch College of General Practitioners.
  
  
  METHODS
  Retrospective audit of general practitioners' records.
  
  
  METHODS
  Practice records of 3577 adult patients systematically sampled from 20 general practices.
  
  
  METHODS
  With criteria set by the national guidelines, the proportion of patients per practice (a) for whom cholesterol testing would be considered justified, and (b) for whom cholesterol testing would be considered unjustified, and the proportion of patients within each of these groups who had had a cholesterol measurement recorded.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Cholesterol tests were performed on 415 (11.7%) of the 3577 patients. National guidelines on the management of hypercholesterolaemia state that a positive cardiovascular risk profile is an indication for cholesterol measurement. Just under one fifth (668) of the patients in this study were recorded as having a positive cardiovascular risk profile, but only 31% of these had had their cholesterol measured. Of the patients without recorded evidence of a positive cardiovascular risk profile cholesterol had been measured in 8%. Restricting the analyses to the age group 18-65 (n = 3060) of whom 12.5% had a positive risk profile, did not improve the results. In practices with a computerised information system 37% of patients with recorded evidence of a positive cardiovascular risk profile had had their cholesterol measured.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Cholesterol testing was not targeted as selectively as recommended by the national guidelines. The major problem was failure to test those likely to benefit. Improving the targeting of cholesterol measurements would undoubtedly increase the workload of general practitioners. If the national guidelines are to have an effect on health promotion the first step must be to increase the proportion of patients with positive cardiovascular risk profiles who get their cholesterol tested. A major factor in successfully selecting cases seems to be that practices are equipped with a computerised medical information system.
authors.affiliation: Department of General Practice, University of Maastricht, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: van der Weijden
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Dansen
authors.forename: B J
authors.initials: BJ
authors.lastname: Schouten
authors.forename: J A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Knottnerus
authors.forename: R P
authors.initials: RP
authors.lastname: Grol
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002318:Cardiovascular Diseases / Q000097:blood / Q000453:epidemiology; D002784:Cholesterol / Q000097:blood*; D005194:Family Practice / Q000592:standards*; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008485:Medical Audit; D008875:Middle Aged; D009426:Netherlands; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012307:Risk Factors