Beware: hospital control or ownership of medical groups.
The rapidly changing, unsettled economic and political health care environment is cause for great anxieties for physicians and hospitals alike. Most physicians have joined IPAs or medical groups in order to obtain continued access to patients who are rapidly shifting from indemnity to cost saving HMOs and PPOs. Many hospitals are seeking to increase their primary care provider base by obtaining control of physicians which may increase their opportunity for institutional success. In many cases, hospitals are providing substantial subsidies or buying physician practices, sometimes in apparent violation of anti-trust law. Physicians ostensibly receive good management advice and infrastructure support from hospital business officers or hospital controlled MSOs. However, when the hospital controls individual physicians or medical groups, there is an inherent conflict of interest because of very different strategic needs. It is not in the physicians' best interests to succumb to the siren songs which hospitals are playing. Providing the highest level of care possible for patients requires that physicians maintain professional independence and autonomy now and in the foreseeable future. Equitable negotiation and collaboration between medical groups and hospitals can only be obtained when there is a lawful and level playing field.
Hepps
S A
SA
University of California, Irvine, Newport Beach, CA 92660, USA.
D016265:Conflict of Interest; D019033:Delivery of Health Care, Integrated / Q000639:trends; D006123:Group Practice / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006759:Hospital-Physician Joint Ventures / Q000458:organization & administration*; D018578:Hospital-Physician Relations; D008329:Managed Care Programs / Q000639:trends; D010067:Ownership; D017009:Professional Autonomy; D011682:Purchasing, Hospital; D014481:United States