A comparison of principle-based and case-based approaches to ethical analysis.
Illness is not just something that persons have or get--it is something that they experience. They live this experience fully with their entire being--emotionally, psychologically, spiritually, and physiologically. Any method of ethical analysis must take care to not simplify the process of dealing with morally troubling cases. The multidimensional nature of human life is so complex that the decisions made in these situations are seldom if ever strictly medical decisions--they are also social, emotional, religious, and moral ones. Ethical dilemmas present in today's health care settings compel members of HECs to engage in and contribute toward meaningful dialogue in ethics that is collaborative, multidisciplinary, and mutually respectful. The inevitability of change in the way in which the health needs of people are going to be handled in the future demands this proactive approach. Individuals who accept this responsibility must equip themselves for ethical analysis that deals effectively with the inevitably complex questions that will arise.
Artnak
K E
KE
D026686:Beneficence; D019090:Case Management / Q000592:standards; D032764:Casuistry; D003657:Decision Making; D034462:Dissent and Disputes; D026689:Ethical Analysis; D028663:Ethical Theory; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D006126:Group Processes; D015276:Health Care Rationing / Q000592:standards; D006694:Holistic Health; D006801:Humans; D009014:Morals; D010344:Patient Advocacy / Q000592:standards; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D010686:Philosophy, Medical; D028662:Principle-Based Ethics; D012935:Social Justice; D014481:United States