title: Cost and value of performance indicators. Results from IBH's (Institute for Behavioral Healthcare) National Leadership Council.
abstract: Consumer Reports style report cards are becoming commonplace in our industry and will emerge as a necessary component of 21st century behavioral healthcare. As a result, health plans and providers are increasingly required to invest in and maintain an infrastructure for comparative performance measurement and reporting. Policymakers and accrediting agencies must be careful to require reporting about the most cost-effective indicators in order to minimize the extra cost burden imposed upon health plans and providers by this effort. The Institute for Behavioral Healthcare's National Leadership Council evaluated "real life" performance indicators already in use in health plans, facility-based provider settings, community mental health centers, and behavioral group practices. This study shows which performance indicators are most worth measuring and those which are not, and why. Significant implications for policy and accrediting organizations, and for the behavioral healthcare field, are discussed.
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Trabin
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Kramer
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Daniels
authors.forename: M A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Freeman
mesh_terms: D019538:Health Care Surveys; D007255:Information Services; D008605:Mental Health Services / Q000592:standards*; D019984:Quality Indicators, Health Care / Q000191:economics / Q000592:standards; D014481:United States