Healthcare access and mobility between the UK and other European Union states: an 'implementation surplus'.
European Union (EU) policy on mobility requires ensuring healthcare access for EU residents who travel between EU states. This case-study investigates how this policy has been implemented in respect of EU visitors to the UK. EU visitors to the UK have similar access to 'immediately needed' National Health Service (NHS) healthcare to UK residents. For non-urgent healthcare, the NHS has official systems to discourage 'medical tourism' and divert such patients to the private sector or to reclaim the costs of NHS hospital treatment for EU visitors. Yet these official systems contrast with the flexibility and liberality of actual NHS practice towards EU visitors. Research on health policy implementation mostly examines reasons for 'implementation failure'. However, the present study indicates a health policy being implemented more fully than policy-makers may have anticipated. In the case of healthcare access for EU visitors to the UK, an implementation surplus is evident rather than an implementation deficit.
Sheaff
R
R
University of Manchester, UK. rsheaff@fs1.cpcr.man.ac.uk
D005060:Europe; D005062:European Union; D005251:Fees, Medical; D006291:Health Policy; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006302:Health Services Research; D017721:Hospital Costs; D009313:National Health Programs; D019982:Organizational Case Studies; D017149:Private Sector; D013222:State Medicine / Q000191:economics; D014195:Travel; D006113:United Kingdom