title: Not a 'proper' solution? The gap between professional guidelines and users' views about the safety of using emergency contraception.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  As a form of contraception which is used after sex, emergency contraception occupies a singular place in the birth control repertoire. The relatively high UK incidence of pregnancy terminations and of teenage pregnancy, combined with the recognition that much early sex remains unplanned and unprotected, has led to calls for better access to emergency contraceptive methods. In this study a combination of self-completion questionnaires and semi-structured interviews was used to explore views of emergency contraception among women who were using the method.
  
  
  METHODS
  Five hundred and ten women attending two family planning clinics in Oxford and London completed a questionnaire in the waiting room and 53 women who were attending for emergency contraception took part in semi-structured interviews.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The view, presented in recently published UK guidelines, that emergency contraception is a reliable method and not dangerous to repeat, was not shared by the respondents. The rationale for and sources of women's concerns about the strength of the dose of hormonal emergency contraception and the nature of side-effects are explored.
authors.affiliation: ICRF General Practice Research Group, University of Oxford, UK.
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Ziebland
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Maxwell
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003281:Contraceptives, Postcoital / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000627:therapeutic use; D004739:England; D005260:Female; D006266:Health Education / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006801:Humans; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D011247:Pregnancy; D011253:Pregnancy in Adolescence; D011639:Public Opinion; D012307:Risk Factors; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires