title: Joining a capitated IPA: should you, or shouldn't you?
abstract: The "bygone" doctor practiced in the good old days under a relatively uncomplicated, clearly defined system. Physicians could afford to be independent. To survive in practice today, say the authors of "Renegotiating Health Care: Resolving Conflict to Build Collaboration," physicians must adapt to change or the health-care market will pass them by. Today's "evolving" doctor is a partner, contributing to and deriving benefit through collaborative patient-care networks, physician practice organizations, and medical services organizations. Historical rivalries have been forgotten as hospitals, insurers, and physicians seek and achieve innovative alliances. Still, resistance to these plans runs strong. The following story typifies one dilemma that faces physicians today. It concerns a hypothetical group practice that must decide whether to form a capitated individual practice association.
authors.affiliation: Harvard School of Public Health, USA.
authors.forename: L J
authors.initials: LJ
authors.lastname: Marcus
authors.forename: B C
authors.initials: BC
authors.lastname: Dorn
mesh_terms: D002204:Capitation Fee; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D003657:Decision Making; D007193:Independent Practice Associations / Q000191:economics*; D011216:Practice Management, Medical; D014481:United States