title: Managed care matures. What's behind the wave of anti-HMO legislation?
abstract: At first glance, it may appear as if managed care itself may be doomed. The avalanche of bills, measures, initiatives, Federal regulations, etc., seemed overwhelming in late 1996. Did this, in fact, portend a national shift away from managed care? What does the consumer protection and regulatory activity really mean? What directions for the future can be identified? This article seeks to answer those questions and highlights a case study of "reform gone awry" that may hold lessons for the national scene. The anti-HMO legislation activity does not represent a repudiation of managed care. Rather, it may be seen as a maturing of the entire process of redefining our medical delivery and financing system.
authors.affiliation: Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, Mason, OH, USA.
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: van Amerongen
mesh_terms: D018166:Health Care Reform / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D005102:Health Expenditures / Q000639:trends; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000639:trends; D007629:Kentucky; D008329:Managed Care Programs / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000639:trends; D017057:Medically Uninsured; D010344:Patient Advocacy / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D014481:United States