Beyond Pittsburgh: protocols for controlled non-heart-beating cadaver organ recovery.
Much of the ethical debate about controlled non-heart-beating cadaver (NHBC) organ recovery has focused on the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) protocol. Some commentators have voiced serious reservations about the ethical acceptability of that protocol; others have argued that the protocol contains sufficiently stringent ethical safeguards to warrant a limited and carefully monitored trial at UPMC. UPMC is not the only organization pursuing controlled NHBC organ procurement, however. The study of organ procurement organizations described in this article suggests that controlled NHBC organ procurement is a practice that, if not yet widespread, is certainly no longer isolated to a few organizations in which it is carefully monitored. Rather, it is being carried out under a variety of circumstances, many of which are less carefully constrained ethically than at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. The next stage of the ethical debate should focus on issues that are arising in a variety of settings as the practice spreads.
Spielman
B
B
Southern Illinois University Schools of Medicine and Law, Springfield, USA.
McCarthy
C S
CS
D000046:Academic Medical Centers; D002102:Cadaver; D016265:Conflict of Interest; D034723:Double Effect Principle; D004989:Ethics; D017041:Ethics Committees; D028741:Ethics Committees, Clinical; D004991:Ethics, Institutional; D005190:Family / Q000523:psychology; D006321:Heart / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D033182:Intention; D010414:Pennsylvania; D016414:Resuscitation Orders; D014019:Tissue Donors; D009927:Tissue and Organ Procurement / Q000592:standards*; D028761:Withholding Treatment