A model of the impact of reimbursement schemes on health plan choice.
Flat capitation (uniform prospective payments) makes enrolling healthy enrollees profitable to health plans. Plans with relatively generous benefits may attract the sick and fail through a premium spiral. We simulate a model of idealized managed competition to explore the effect on market performance of alternatives to flat capitation such as severity-adjusted capitation and reduced supply-side cost-sharing. In our model flat capitation causes severe market problems. Severity adjustment and to a lesser extent reduced supply-side cost-sharing improve market performance, but outcomes are efficient only in cases in which people bear the marginal costs of their choices.
Keeler
E B
EB
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. emmett_keeler@rand.org
Carter
G
G
Newhouse
J P
JP
D002204:Capitation Fee / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D003258:Consumer Behavior / Q000191:economics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D019981:Health Care Sector; D006301:Health Services Needs and Demand / Q000191:economics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D015273:Insurance Selection Bias; D018854:Managed Competition / Q000191:economics* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D017059:Models, Econometric; D011445:Prospective Payment System / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012052:Reimbursement, Incentive; D012308:Risk Management / Q000191:economics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data