Predicting ovarian malignancy: application of artificial neural networks to transvaginal and color Doppler flow US.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the performance of artificial neural networks (ANNs) with that of multiple logistic regression (MLR) models for predicting ovarian malignancy in patients with adnexal masses by using transvaginal B-mode and color Doppler flow ultrasonography (US).


METHODS
A total of 226 adnexal masses were examined before surgery: Fifty-one were malignant and 175 were benign. The data were divided into training and testing subsets by using a "leave n out method." The training subsets were used to compute the optimum MLR equations and to train the ANNs. The cross-validation subsets were used to estimate the performance of each of the two models in predicting ovarian malignancy.


RESULTS
At testing, three-layer back-propagation networks, based on the same input variables selected by using MLR (i.e., women's ages, papillary projections, random echogenicity, peak systolic velocity, and resistance index), had a significantly higher sensitivity than did MLR (96% vs 84%; McNemar test, p = .04). The Brier scores for ANNs were significantly lower than those calculated for MLR (Student t test for paired samples, P = .004).


CONCLUSIONS
ANNs might have potential for categorizing adnexal masses as either malignant or benign on the basis of multiple variables related to demographic and US features.
Biagiotti
R
R
Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital, Università di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
Desii
C
C
Vanzi
E
E
Gacci
G
G
D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D016015:Logistic Models; D008875:Middle Aged; D016571:Neural Networks, Computer; D010051:Ovarian Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000453:epidemiology; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D018615:Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color / Q000706:statistics & numerical data