title: The emergence of maternal-fetal conflict policies.
abstract: George Washington University Medical Center's Policy on decisionmaking by pregnant patients is being widely circulated by the ACLU; copies of the Policy can be obtained by calling the American Civil Liberties Union Reproductive Freedom Project. There is, of course, much disagreement over the details of the Policy; not everyone will agree with its underlying philosophy favoring maternal rights. Nevertheless, there does seem to be a consensus that wherever possible these conflicts should be resolved in accordance with previously adopted policies rather than by the courts on an ad hoc basis. Had the Policy been in place in 1987, the Carder case would probably not have been submitted to a judge in the first place, nor would Angela Carder have been forced to undergo a Caesarean section. All hospitals should consider adopting a maternal-fetal conflict policy, and those that do so should be aware of the George Washington University Medical Center Policy, whether or not they agree with its provisions. Whatever policy each hospital ultimately develops should be integrated with decisionmaking and informed consent policies already in place. The formulation and implementation of such a policy, reflecting the hospital's legal and ethical obligations to its pregnant patients, will go a long way towards preventing unnecessary resort to the courts.
authors: P G
authors: PG
authors: Neumann
authors: L
authors: L
authors: Valladares
mesh_terms: D002585:Cesarean Section; D003657:Decision Making; D004219:District of Columbia; D017041:Ethics Committees / Q000592:standards; D005260:Female; D005333:Fetus; D006745:Hospital Bed Capacity, 300 to 499; D006785:Hospitals, University / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D016134:Organizational Policy; D010358:Patient Participation / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D011247:Pregnancy; D013727:Terminal Care / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D016312:Treatment Refusal