title: Somatosensory extinction for meaningful objects in a patient with right hemispheric stroke.
abstract: Implicit, high level processing of extinguished objects has often been described in the visual modality. In the tactile domain, however, research on this topic is meagre and it is still uncertain whether processing of tactually presented stimuli can be affected by the same attentional disorders as visual stimuli. In this paper we describe a patient, ENM, with visual neglect and light touch extinction who, in a naming task of objects presented in the tactile modality, simultaneously to both hands, showed extinction for left hand objects. He was, nevertheless, able to make above chance Same/Different judgements on the two stimuli. We also tested two neurologically intact subjects who performed the test wearing a ski-glove on the left hand to impair the recognition of left hand objects. In these subjects, Same/Different judgements were at chance level when recognition rate was as low as that found in patient ENM. This happened when either the objects, although sharing the same name were different in shape (conditions Same-Different) or when the two objects were different with respect to the category name but were actually physically similar (conditions Different-Similar). However, when the objects were either identical or completely different, i.e., in a condition where judgement could be based simply on the physical analysis of the object shape (condition Same Identical and Different Dissimilar), their Same/Different judgements were above chance, despite the tactual deficit. Our conclusion was that patient ENM showed implicit recognition of left hand objects, at least in the Same Different and in the Different-Similar conditions, whereas, in the same conditions, normal subjects with an artificial sensory impairment did not. Our results also show that Same/Different judgements may be, in some conditions, less demanding than naming tasks, as suggested by Farah et al. Furthermore, patient ENM performed the test both with uncrossed and crossed hands. We found that extinction always affected the hand contralateral to the brain damage, although there was a tendency for a decrement of the ipsilesional hand performance in the crossed condition. We discuss these findings with reference to the most recent theories on the existence of a body centered spatial frame of reference.
authors: Dipartimento di Psicologia Generale, Universita' di Padova, Italy. amberti@psico.unipd.it
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Berti
authors: S
authors: S
authors: Oxbury
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Oxbury
authors: P
authors: P
authors: Affanni
authors: C
authors: C
authors: Umilta
authors: L
authors: L
authors: Orlandi
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D002540:Cerebral Cortex / Q000473:pathology / Q000502:physiology; D002561:Cerebrovascular Disorders / Q000150:complications / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000523:psychology; D007839:Functional Laterality; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory; D008606:Mental Processes; D014110:Touch; D014796:Visual Perception