Technology assessment, coverage decisions, and conflict: the role of guidelines.
As pressure grows for health plans to be accountable for increasing quality of care within a cost-control environment, coverage of new technologies becomes a particularly challenging issue. For a number of reasons, health plans have adopted evidence-based methods for guiding technology decisions. The implementation of these methods has not been free of controversy, and conflicts have arisen between plans and proponents of technologies who often use the political and legal arena in an attempt to secure coverage. Unless these conflicts are resolved, the healthcare system may have difficulty meeting cost and quality objectives. Technology assessment and coverage process guidelines and flexible coverage approaches may be possible ways of resolving these conflicts.
Sheingold
S H
SH
Health Care Financing Administration, Baltimore, MD 21244, USA.
D016265:Conflict of Interest; D003659:Decision Making, Organizational; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine / Q000191:economics*; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D019458:Insurance Coverage; D008329:Managed Care Programs / Q000458:organization & administration; D013673:Technology Assessment, Biomedical / Q000191:economics*; D014481:United States; D016270:United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; D014486:United States Food and Drug Administration