Society's search for a legal and ethical basis of physician-assisted suicide.
A review of the way physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is being addressed in the United States reveals three models, each functioning out of distinctive concepts of autonomy: (1) litigation, which utilizes philosophical autonomy; (2) legislation, which utilizes political autonomy; and (3) act of conscience by a physician, which utilizes consumer autonomy. Each model raises a correspondingly distinct set of ethical questions and challenges centered around their point of reference-the judicial system, voters, or the doctor-patient relationship. In the end, however, efforts to resolve the challenge of PAS will falter if they do not go beyond these models of autonomy. Religious institutions offer a more constructive setting for facing the life and death decisionmaking of PAS. The challenge for religion is to address PAS in solidarity with sufferers, physicians, and the community, rather than retreating into iconoclastic dogmas.
Morgan
R C
RC
Stetson University College of Law, St. Petersburg, FL 33707, USA. morgan@hermes.law.stetson.edu
Sutherland
D D
DD
D000368:Aged; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D006291:Health Policy; D006801:Humans; D012067:Religion; D017236:Suicide, Assisted / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000523:psychology; D014481:United States