title: Feasibility and tolerance of pulsed dose rate interstitial brachytherapy.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Pulsed dose rate (PDR) treatment is a new approach that associates the physical advantages of high-dose-rate (HDR) technology with the potential radiobiological advantages of low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy. This retrospective study analyzes the feasibility, toxicity, and preliminary oncologic results in a series of 43 patients treated with PDR interstitial brachytherapy.
  
  
  METHODS
  Twenty-four patients with pelvic, 17 patients with head and neck, and 2 patients with breast cancers were treated. Twenty-eight patients had primary and 15 recurrent tumors; 14 had received prior external irradiation to the same site. The doses per pulse at the prescription isodose were 0.4-1 Gy (median 0.5 Gy), delivered using a single cable-driven 0.3-1.0 Ci 192-iridium source (PDR Nucletron Micro-Selectron).
  
  
  RESULTS
  The median treated volumes (at the prescribed isodose) were 28 cc for pelvic, 8.33 cc for head and neck, and 40 cc for breast malignancies. Of 14,499 source and 14,499 dummy source transfer procedures, 3 technical machine failure events were observed (0.02%). Grade 3 acute toxicities were seen in 5/43 patients (4 oral stomatitis, 1 vaginal mucositis) and grade 4 acute toxicity in one patient (rectovaginal fistula). Grade 3-4 late complications were observed in 4/41 (9.8%) patients: 1 pubic fracture, 1 rectovaginal fistula, 1 vesicovaginal fistula and 1 local necrosis. With a median follow-up of 18 months, 10/41 patients progressed locoregionally (6 pelvic, 4 head and neck), 3 developed local recurrence and distant metastasis (3 pelvic), 3 only distant metastasis (2 pelvic, 1 head and neck). Two patients are lost to follow-up.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  PDR interstitial brachytherapy for pelvic, head and neck, and breast malignancies is feasible and the acute and late toxicities seem acceptable. Although the physical advantages of PDR are clear, further follow-up is required to determine how results compare with those obtained with standard LDR brachytherapy.
authors: Division of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
authors: C
authors: C
authors: de Pree
authors: Y
authors: Y
authors: Popowski
authors: D
authors: D
authors: Weber
authors: P
authors: P
authors: Nouet
authors: M
authors: M
authors: Rouzaud
authors: J M
authors: JM
authors: Kurtz
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001918:Brachytherapy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000532:radiotherapy*; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005260:Female; D006258:Head and Neck Neoplasms / Q000532:radiotherapy*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009364:Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / Q000532:radiotherapy; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D010386:Pelvic Neoplasms / Q000532:radiotherapy*; D011832:Radiation Injuries / Q000209:etiology / Q000473:pathology; D011836:Radiation Tolerance; D012189:Retrospective Studies