title: Phenytoin pharmacokinetics following oral administration of phenytoin suspension and fosphenytoin solution to rats.
abstract: The administration of phenytoin suspension in conjunction with enteral nutrition supplements through nasogastric (NG) feeding tubes to humans has been associated with suboptimal phenytoin absorption, subtherapeutic concentrations, and breakthrough seizures. Postulated mechanisms include chelation to proteins and electrolytes in the enteral feeding, binding to NG tubing, and alterations in gastrointestinal pH resulting in precipitation of phenytoin. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the oral absorption of commercially available fosphenytoin injectable solution compared to phenytoin suspension in the rat to determine whether equivalent oral fosphenytoin and phenytoin suspension doses should be used for future human studies of fosphenytoin oral absorption in the presence of concomitant enteral nutrition. A single oral 30 mg/kg phenytoin equivalents dose of either commercially available fosphenytoin or phenytoin suspension was administered to male Wistar rats following an overnight fast. Blood samples (0.3 ml) for phenytoin plasma concentration were obtained from a jugular vein catheter at baseline and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 12 and 24 h post-study drug administration and analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (CV% < 6). Mean phenytoin Cmax was 85% [corrected] (P = 0.010) higher in fosphenytoin vs phenytoin treated rats. Tmax was 2.4 h (62%, P=0.021) shorter in fosphenytoin vs phenytoin treated rats. No significant differences in AUClast were found. The presence of a phosphate ester moiety does not appear to inhibit the appearance of phenytoin following oral administration of fosphenytoin. Phenytoin plasma concentration profiles following oral administration of fosphenytoin are characterized by higher Cmax and shorter Tmax values relative to oral administration of phenytoin suspension.
authors: School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Maryland, Baltimore 21201-1082, USA. burstein@pharmacy.ab.umd.edu
authors: A H
authors: AH
authors: Burstein
authors: D S
authors: DS
authors: Cox
authors: B
authors: B
authors: Mistry
authors: N D
authors: ND
authors: Eddington
mesh_terms: D000284:Administration, Oral; D000818:Animals; D000927:Anticonvulsants / Q000493:pharmacokinetics*; D008297:Male; D009994:Osmolar Concentration; D010672:Phenytoin / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000031:analogs & derivatives* / Q000097:blood / Q000493:pharmacokinetics* / Q000494:pharmacology; D051381:Rats; D017208:Rats, Wistar; D012996:Solutions; D013535:Suspensions; D013997:Time Factors
chemical_list: D000927:Anticonvulsants; D012996:Solutions; D013535:Suspensions; D010672:Phenytoin; C043114:fosphenytoin