title: Validation and comparison of two computerized methods of obtaining a diet history.
abstract: The aim of this study was to validate two computerized methods of obtaining a diet history (DH and EBIS). The food consumption of 12 men and eight women was calculated by weighing each food item over a period of 8 days. Thereafter the diet history was taken over this period by using both programs alternatively. The intake of energy, protein, fat and carbohydrates, and 10 further nutrients was evaluated and the percentage difference calculated. In general, the intake of nutrients calculated from the diet history tended to be underestimated by most of the people interviewed. The mean daily intake of the nutrients calculated from the DH program deviates from -34% to +20% (mean SD = 48.1) and -35% to +15% for EBIS (mean SD = 28.1). In conclusion, both computerized methods proved useful for epidemiological studies, but not for the determination of deficiencies in individuals.
authors: Hohenheim University, Department of Physiology of Nutrition, Stuttgart, Germany.
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Landig
authors: J G
authors: JG
authors: Erhardt
authors: J C
authors: JC
authors: Bode
authors: C
authors: C
authors: Bode
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D003201:Computers; D015930:Diet Records; D004040:Dietary Carbohydrates / Q000008:administration & dosage; D004041:Dietary Fats / Q000008:administration & dosage; D004043:Dietary Fiber / Q000008:administration & dosage; D004044:Dietary Proteins / Q000008:administration & dosage; D002149:Energy Intake; D005188:False Negative Reactions; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015596:Nutrition Assessment; D012984:Software
chemical_list: D004040:Dietary Carbohydrates; D004041:Dietary Fats; D004043:Dietary Fiber; D004044:Dietary Proteins