Understanding the pattern of support for the elderly: a comparison between Israel and Sweden.
Cross-cultural comparison can offer critical input to analyses of the interplay between formal and informal services for the elderly. Israel and Sweden have very different population structures and represent different points on the spectrum of welfare state development: Sweden has a much higher percentage of elderly, a less traditional family structure, and a much more developed system of public support. In addition, there are thought to be different attitudes toward family ties, with a less family-oriented value structure in Sweden. The natural question is to what extent these differences translate into differences in the extent and nature of family support for the elderly. In this article, family structure, living arrangements, disability rates, and formal and informal sources of help in Sweden and Israel are compared at various points in time. While there is a greater rate of formal service provision in Sweden and some substitution for family support seems to have occurred, informal care has nevertheless remained important. In both countries, residential patterns are critical: it is when the elderly live alone that the formal system has tended to replace the family. The rate of institutionalization is particularly important in determining the rate of disabled elderly requiring care, both formal and informal, in the community.
Habib
J
J
JDC-Brookdale Institute of Gerontology and Human Development, Jerusalem, Israel.
Sundstrom
G
G
Windmiller
K
K
D000368:Aged; D017028:Caregivers / Q000639:trends; D003431:Cross-Cultural Comparison; D005544:Forecasting; D016330:Frail Elderly; D006801:Humans; D007557:Israel; D008134:Long-Term Care / Q000639:trends; D009313:National Health Programs / Q000639:trends*; D012943:Social Security / Q000639:trends*; D013548:Sweden