title: A comparison of the educational opportunities on junior medical attachments in general practice and in a teaching hospital: a questionnaire survey.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To obtain students' perceptions of the educational quality of the general internal medicine teaching overall and to determine whether specific learning objectives were better addressed in general practice or in hospital.
  
  
  METHODS
  The survey was carried out after a 10 week block of general internal medicine, consisting of five weeks taught in general practice and five weeks taught in a teaching hospital. Students were randomly allocated to start in either general practice or hospital. The outcome measure was a questionnaire survey of students perceptions' of their learning on the two halves of the block. Each student completed the same questionnaire twice: once after their hospital experience and once after their general practice experience. Statistical Analysis was carried out using the SPSS package for Windows 3.1. Group means were calculated for each response, and the mean differences for each student's responses for the two learning environments were analysed using t-tests for paired samples.
  
  
  METHODS
  Royal Free and University College Medical School at University College London.
  
  
  METHODS
  The study population was the entire annual intake (n = 225) of students into the first clinical year at one UK medical school.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Students perceived they learnt more about history taking and physical examination in the community, whereas they learnt more about writing up their clerkings, keeping progress notes and disease management in hospital.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The community and hospital environments appear to have different strengths for the teaching of medical students. These data support judicious transfer of clinical skills teaching from teaching hospitals into general practice, when the circumstances achieved here can be duplicated. However, some aspects of the clinical attachment, particularly record keeping and disease management, are probably better taught in hospital at present.
authors.affiliation: Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, University College London, UK.
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Murray
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Jolly
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Modell
mesh_terms: D015510:Clinical Medicine / Q000193:education*; D003258:Consumer Behavior; D004504:Education, Medical, Undergraduate / Q000379:methods*; D005194:Family Practice / Q000193:education*; D006784:Hospitals, Teaching; D006801:Humans; D011231:Preceptorship; D011897:Random Allocation; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D006113:United Kingdom