title: Extraperitoneal laparoscopic urethropexy with Marlex mesh.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Extraperitoneal laparoscopic urethropexy (ELU) has recently been developed as a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Use of the laparoscopic stapling device and Marlex mesh in the extraperitoneal space may allow for a technically easier procedure and shorter operative times compared with other laparoscopic techniques without compromising long-term efficacy. We present our initial results and 2.5-year interim analysis with this alternative method of laparoscopic urethropexy.
  
  
  METHODS
  Twenty-four consecutive patients with urodynamically demonstrated genuine SUI underwent attempted ELU at a single institution from December 1994 to December 1995. Operative data were collected from the patient chart, and follow-up data were obtained by telephone interview. Treatment was considered successful if, at last follow-up, a patient was using one or fewer pads daily and would recommend the procedure to a friend.
  
  
  RESULTS
  ELU was completed in 22 of 24 patients. In 1 patient with a prior history of pelvic surgery, the preperitoneal space was not accessible. Of the 22 patients, 20 were available for follow-up. The mean operative time was 69 minutes. There were no intraoperative complications. At initial follow-up (mean 10.5 months), 18 (90%) of 20 patients reported subjective cure of SUI (one or fewer pads daily). At a mean follow-up of 29 months (range 23 to 34), 16 (80%) of 20 patients had subjective cure of SUI. Six patients would not recommend the procedure to a friend, all of whom had de novo urgency and/or urge incontinence. Thus, using our strict criteria, ELU was successful in 14 (70%) of 20 patients at a mean follow-up of 2.5 years. No patient has had permanent urinary retention.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  ELU can be performed rapidly and safely in patients without previous pelvic surgery. De novo urgency incontinence may be problematic. Future analysis of this subset of patients will determine whether this procedure is durable in the long term.
authors.affiliation: Division of Urology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
authors.forename: D S
authors.initials: DS
authors.lastname: Blander
authors.forename: V L
authors.initials: VL
authors.lastname: Carpiniello
authors.forename: J F
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Harryhill
authors.forename: T R
authors.initials: TR
authors.lastname: Malloy
authors.forename: E S
authors.initials: ES
authors.lastname: Rovner
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001672:Biocompatible Materials; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy; D008875:Middle Aged; D011095:Polyethylenes; D011126:Polypropylenes; D013536:Suture Techniques; D014521:Urethra; D014550:Urinary Incontinence, Stress / Q000628:therapy*
chemical_list: D001672:Biocompatible Materials; C016674:Plastipore; D011095:Polyethylenes; D011126:Polypropylenes