title: Tolerance in a rigorous science.
abstract: Scientists often evaluate other people's theories by the same standards they apply to their own work; it is as though scientists may believe that these criteria are independent of their own personal priorities and standards. As a result of this probably implicit belief, they sometimes may make less useful judgments than they otherwise might if they were able and willing to evaluate a specific theory at least partly in terms of the standards appropriate to that theory. Journal editors can play an especially constructive role in managing this diversity of standards and opinion.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City 84112-0251, USA. shimp@psych.utah.edu
authors.forename: C P
authors.initials: CP
authors.lastname: Shimp
mesh_terms: D007400:Interprofessional Relations; D008960:Models, Psychological; D010380:Peer Review / Q000592:standards*; D010506:Periodicals as Topic / Q000592:standards*; D010565:Persuasive Communication; D012586:Science / Q000592:standards*