Horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex and head stability in response to torso perturbations during visual search.
Eye, head, and torso movements were recorded using magnetic search coils while six normal human subjects made unconstrained eye and head movements as they searched for targets in a panoramic visual environment. Torso movements were imposed by pseudorandom rotations of a servomotor-driver chair in which subjects were seated; body motion was partially transmitted to the head as a perturbation. Horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain (eye velocity divided by head velocity) and head gain (head velocity divided by torso velocity) were determined. Measurements were performed with unaided vision and while subjects wore x4 binocular telescopic spectacles. Since the head was free to move during the experiment, much of the perturbation delivered to the torso was compensated by head rotation on the neck. During the 50 ms immediately following chair rotation, the head corrected 98% of the torso motion. For the interval 50-80 ms after the perturbation 81-85% of the perturbation was corrected by head movement. The degree of head compensation did not significantly depend on magnification or type of visual target. The density distribution for VOR gain was calculated over the entire course of each trial and was found to be sharply centered between 0.9 and 1.0 for trials with unmagnified vision. The gain density distribution with x4 telescopes was broader and centered around 1.5, reflecting visual enhancement. Gain of the VOR was also determined during four discrete epochs covering the period from 50 ms before to 130 ms after the onset of each imposed torso rotation. The first, second, and fourth epochs were 50 ms each, while the third epoch was 30 ms. The torso began to rotate in the second epoch (0-50 ms), and the onset of head rotation was in the third epoch (50-80 ms). Gains of the VOR determined during the first three epochs were in response to self-generated head rotation and were not significantly different from each other, averaging 1.0+/-0.4 (n=1604, mean+/-SD) with unaided vision and increased significantly (P<0.05) to 1.4+/-0.6 (n=2464) with telescopic spectacles. Gain of the VOR during the fourth (80-130 ms) epoch was in response to the imposed perturbation; this averaged 0.9+/-0.3 (n=1380) with unaided vision and increased significantly to 1.1+/-0.4 (n=2185) with telescopic spectacles. The wearing of telescopic spectacles thus induced an enhancement of VOR gain, which was dependent on the context of the associated head movement. The greater enhancement of VOR gain during self-generated head movement suggests that the large enhancement may be at least partially mediated by the motor program itself. However, the smaller, but still significant gain enhancement with telescopic spectacles observed during unpredictable, externally imposed head motion had a latency too short to be mediated by visual pursuit. We propose that the smaller gain enhancement during passive rotation is due to a small, context-dependent, parametric increase in the gain of canal or proprioceptive mediated eye movements.
Crane
B T
BT
Jules Stein Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7002, USA.
Demer
J L
JL
D000054:Acceleration; D000328:Adult; D005139:Eyeglasses; D005260:Female; D005403:Fixation, Ocular / Q000502:physiology; D019416:Head Movements / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009333:Neck / Q000502:physiology; D011434:Proprioception / Q000502:physiology; D011698:Pursuit, Smooth / Q000502:physiology*; D012027:Reflex, Vestibulo-Ocular / Q000502:physiology*