Comparing productive vocabulary measures from the CDI and a systematic diary study.
Expressive vocabulary data gathered during a systematic diary study of one male child's early language development are compared to data that would have resulted from longitudinal administration of the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories spoken vocabulary checklist (CDI). Comparisons are made for (1) the number of words at monthly intervals (9; 10.15 to 2; 0.15), (2) proportion of words by lexical class (i.e. noun, predicate, closed class, 'other'), (3) growth curves. The CDI underestimates the number of words in the diary study, with the underestimation increasing as vocabulary size increases. The proportion of diary study words appearing on the CDI differed as a function of lexical class. Finally, despite the differences in vocabulary size, logistic curves proved to be the best fitting model to characterize vocabulary development as measured by both the diary study and the CDI. Implications for the longitudinal use of the CDI are discussed.
Robinson
B F
BF
University of Louisville, USA. bfrobio1@homer.louisville.edu
Mervis
C B
CB
D002663:Child Language; D002675:Child, Preschool; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007804:Language Development; D007807:Language Tests; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D008297:Male; D010507:Periodicity; D011996:Records; D013997:Time Factors; D014825:Vocabulary