Correlates of honor ratings in a clinical clerkship employing a faculty forum evaluation system.
5he purpose of this study was to determine whether or not suspected variables affected a surgery clerk's chances of being awarded an honor rating. Findings indicated a significant relationship between a student receiving an honor rating and his or her preceptor's predetermined level of student advocacy, the number of completed patient interview and physical examination write-ups, and final examination scores. There was no significant relationship found between honor ratings and the preceptor's status, the sequence in which the student was discussed or the length of time spent discussing the student at the final evaluation meeting, or the number of clinical faculty present at the meeting. These results lend support to the faculty forum evaluation approach, but suggest a need for further scrutiny of some influencing variables to ensure all students are fairly considered and honor ratings judiciously awarded.
D002982:Clinical Clerkship / Q000592:standards*; D004504:Education, Medical, Undergraduate / Q000592:standards*; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005180:Faculty, Medical; D006748:Hospital Departments; D007087:Illinois; D013503:Surgery Department, Hospital