A path analysis of medical school and residency performance. Implications for housestaff selection.
The selection and subsequent performance of 212 internal medicine residents was examined by factor analysis and path analysis. A three-factor solution accounted for most of the variance among the nine selection variables. These three factors, labeled Board Scores, Faculty Evaluations, and Academic Distinction, were then combined with in-training residency performance evaluations and composite scores on the ABIM certifying examination to produce a comprehensive path model of house staff selection and performance. The Academic Distinction factor emerged as the strongest predictor of residency performance,; the Faculty Evaluations factor was also a significant component of the model. Standardized test scores correlated poorly with clinical performance. The data suggest that increased attention to the content of letters of reference could substantially improve their predictive validity. Other means of reporting subjective evaluations may also be needed to increase the stature of non-cognitive attributes in house staff selection decisions.
D002641:Chicago; D002983:Clinical Competence; D003625:Data Collection; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005163:Factor Analysis, Statistical; D006746:Hospital Bed Capacity, 500 and over; D007388:Internal Medicine / Q000193:education*; D007396:Internship and Residency / Q000592:standards*; D010559:Personnel Management / Q000379:methods*; D010560:Personnel Selection / Q000379:methods*; D013223:Statistics as Topic; D013337:Students, Medical