Recent medical malpractice reform measures in eight key states.
Over the course of the past quarter century, technological developments in medical science have made it possible for physicians to save the lives and preserve the health of countless patients. Unfortunately, it must be remembered that medicine is still as much an art as it is a science. As such, due to this human element, there is always the risk of occasional errors or failures in treatment. When these problems occur in bunches, the stage is set for a medical malpractice crisis. In an attempt to minimize the rising tort litigation and settlement costs associated with this crisis, eight states have responded with a variety of measures designed to limit the doctrine of joint and several liability, noneconomic damages, punitive damages, the collateral source rule, attorney's fees, and the number of complaints. Since the measures in these subject states apply to different areas of law, it is not the purpose of the authors to catalogue and explain in detail all of these changes, much less their impact on litigation and settlement costs. Rather, the intent of this article is to provide a general description and comparison of legislation in these eight states, a discussion of the specific changes that appear most important, and a description of the effect these changes are expected to have upon the costs of defending medical malpractice claims.
D002140:California; D005249:Fees and Charges / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D005431:Florida; D007087:Illinois; D007883:Legislation, Medical; D008318:Malpractice / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D008404:Massachusetts; D008824:Michigan; D009518:New York; D013781:Texas; D014481:United States; D014861:Washington