Disability labeling vs. rehabilitation rhetoric for the chronically ill: a case study in policy contradictions.
Among persons with chronic renal disease, limited encouragement to use self-care treatment options and easy access to disability income benefits tend to reinforce the concept of disability rather than foster rehabilitation goals. More than 80% of all chronic renal disease patients on dialysis therapy receive treatment in facilities at which they become highly dependent on medical staff, and estimates of unemployment among persons aged 21-59 years suffering from this disease range from 60% to 75%. The authors' data indicate that patients who receive dialysis treatment within facilities experience negative effects on their perceived health status and health locus of control as compared to patients who practice self-care dialysis at home. Although many factors contribute to unemployment among dialysis patients, the availability of disability income benefits seems to act as the most important deterrent to employment. Increasing the emphasis on the rehabilitation of this chronically ill population will require a movement away from disability labeling by providers of care and the patients themselves, as well as adjustment in the dialysis reimbursement system and in the eligibility requirements for disability compensation.
D006262:Health; D006291:Health Policy; D006304:Health Status; D006437:Hemodialysis, Home; D006801:Humans; D007389:Internal-External Control; D007676:Kidney Failure, Chronic / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D010531:Peritoneal Dialysis, Continuous Ambulatory; D006435:Renal Dialysis / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D014481:United States