Ethics of reproductive technology: AFS recommendations, dissent.
The Ethics Committee of the American Fertility Society recently released its report, "Ethical Considerations of the New Reproductive Technologies." The report examines general ethical, legal, and biological aspects of and makes ethical recommendations on procreative technologies, from standard in vitro fertilization, through all its possible variations and accompaniments, including donor gametes and preembryos, surrogate mothers, and cryopreservation. The judgment of ethical acceptability of third-party involvement in reproductive technology is the report's weakest aspect. The potential impact of such participation was not sufficiently weighed because of primacy given to a single value: the provision of a baby to an individual couple, or even an individual, who could not otherwise have one. A dissent to the report is based on two analyses: Third-party involvement itself violates the marriage covenant, independent of any potential damaging effects or benefits, and relaxation of marital exclusivity could harm the marriage (and marriage in general) and the prospective child. The committee also failed to resolve the problem of preembryo status. Instead, it recommended that local programs offering reproductive assistance draw up their own policies.
D026683:Advisory Committees; D001675:Bioethics; D002410:Catholicism; D034462:Dissent and Disputes; D033041:Embryo Research; D004624:Embryo Transfer; D005307:Fertilization in Vitro; D006126:Group Processes; D007315:Insemination, Artificial; D007316:Insemination, Artificial, Heterologous; D008393:Marriage; D028681:Moral Obligations; D009014:Morals; D018587:Oocyte Donation; D012945:Social Values; D013094:Spermatozoa