A comparative study of four coronal obturation materials in endodontic treatment.
The aim of this study was to compare, in vitro, the ability of temporary versus permanent materials to seal the access cavity. Eighty human maxillary single-canal teeth were prepared biomechanically and obturated with gutta-percha and an endodontic cement AH Plus, using the warm vertical compaction technique. All access cavities were sealed with 1 of 4 materials (Cavit, Fermit, Tetric, or Dyract). Microleakage was assessed by methylene blue dye penetration. The teeth were submitted to 100 thermocycles, with temperature varying from 0 degree to 55 degrees C. The greatest degree of leakage was observed with the temporary materials (Cavit and Fermit). There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in leakage between all materials except between Dyract and Tetric. This suggests that it may be more prudent to use a permanent restorative material for provisional restorations to prevent inadequate canal sealing and the resulting risk of fluid penetration.
D002133:Calcium Sulfate; D020770:Compomers; D003188:Composite Resins; D003738:Dental Cements; D003763:Dental Leakage / Q000517:prevention & control*; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent; D003794:Dental Restoration, Temporary; D004338:Drug Combinations; D004853:Epoxy Resins; D006171:Gutta-Percha; D006801:Humans; D008689:Methacrylates; D011109:Polymethacrylic Acids; D011145:Polyvinyls; D012387:Root Canal Filling Materials; D012389:Root Canal Obturation / Q000379:methods*; D017640:Silicates; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D019228:Tooth Crown; D015034:Zinc Oxide