Sensitivity, functional analysis, and behavior genetics: a response to Freeman et al.
Freeman et al. (1998) asserted that sensitivity theory is circular, unsupported by empirical evidence, and represents an "either/or" decision in regard to applied behavior analysis. We reply by showing that sensitivities are objectively measured and that our theory permits testable predictions. Further, we briefly summarize the results of recent studies that support our theory, including investigations that link sensitivities to genes and challenging behavior. Finally, we reject the idea that sensitivity theory and functional analysis represent an "either/or" viewpoint and call again for research to integrate these approaches.
Reiss
S
S
Ohio State University, USA.
Havercamp
S M
SM
D001526:Behavioral Symptoms / Q000145:classification / Q000235:genetics*; D001527:Behaviorism; D020022:Genetic Predisposition to Disease / Q000523:psychology*; D006801:Humans; D008607:Intellectual Disability / Q000523:psychology; D009042:Motivation