One spatial filter limits speed of detecting low and middle frequency gratings.
Reaction times for detecting sinusoidal gratings depend jointly on grating contrast and spatial frequency. We examine whether the effect of spatial frequency results from low-pass filtering in a single channel or reflects processing of different frequencies by two or more different processing streams. Observers performed a speeded two-alternative spatial forced-choice detection. Errors and reaction times were measured. Contrasts varied from 0.05 to 0.67, and spatial frequencies from 0.72 to 6.51 cpd. No effect of uncertainty about spatial frequency was found, arguing against multiple channels. The data are well fit by a single channel model driven by a low pass filter.
Thomas
J P
JP
Department of Psychology, UCLA 90095-1563, USA. thomas@mail1.lifesci.ucla.edu
Fagerholm
P
P
Bonnet
C
C
D000328:Adult; D015350:Contrast Sensitivity; D005260:Female; D005403:Fixation, Ocular; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D008959:Models, Neurological; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D011930:Reaction Time