Integration after adaptation to transparent motion: static and dynamic test patterns result in different aftereffect directions.
One of the many interesting questions in motion aftereffect (MAE) research is concerned with the location(s) along the pathway of visual processing at which certain perceptual manifestations of this illusory motion originate. One such manifestation is the unidirectionality of the MAE after adaptation to moving plaids or transparent motion. This unidirectionality has led to the suggestion that the origin of this MAE might be a single source (gain control) located at, or beyond areas that are believed to be responsible for the integration of motion signals. In this report we present evidence against this suggestion using a simple experiment. For the same adaptation pattern, which consisted of two orthogonally moving transparent patterns with different speeds, we show that the direction of the resulting unidirectional MAE depends on the nature of the test stimulus. We used two kinds of test patterns: static and dynamic. For exactly the same adaptation conditions, the difference in MAE direction between testing with static and dynamic patterns can be as large as 50 degrees. This finding suggests that this MAE is not just a perceptual manifestation of a passive recovery of adapted motion sensors but an active integrative process using the output of different gain controls. A process which takes place after adaptation. These findings are in line with the idea that there are several sites of adaptation along the pathway of visual motion processing and that the nature of the test pattern determines the fate of our perceptual experience of the MAE.
Verstraten
F A
FA
Helmholtz Instituut, Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands. f.a.j.verstraten@bio.uu.nl
van der Smagt
M J
MJ
Fredericksen
R E
RE
van de Grind
W A
WA
D000223:Adaptation, Psychological; D006801:Humans; D009039:Motion Perception; D009903:Optical Illusions; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D011581:Psychological Tests