title: Quality of care in unlicensed homes for the aged in the eastern townships of Quebec.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The recent proliferation of unlicensed homes for the aged in Quebec, coupled with the increased needs of the population they serve, has raised concerns about the quality of case these homes provide. The authors compared the quality of care in unlicensed homes with that in licensed long-term care facilities in a region of Quebec.
  
  
  METHODS
  The study involved 301 impaired people aged 65 and over in 88 residential care facilities (52 unlicensed, 36 licensed) in the Eastern Townships of Quebec. Study participants were chosen according to a 2-stage sampling scheme: stratified sampling of the primary units (facilities) and random sampling of the secondary units (residents). Quality of care was measured using the QUALCARE scale, a multidimensional instrument that uses a 5-point scale to assess 6 dimensions of care: environmental, physical, medical management, psychosocial, human rights and financial. A mean score of more than 2 was considered indicative of inadequate care.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Overall, the quality of care was similar in the unlicensed and licensed facilities (mean global score 1.61 [standard error of the mean (SEM) 0.06] and 1.47 [SEM 0.09] respectively). Examination of dimension-specific quality-of-care scores revealed that the unlicensed homes performed worse than the licensed facilities in 2 areas of care: physical care (mean score 1.80 [SEM 0.08] v. 1.51 [SEM 0.09] respectively, p = 0.017) and medical management (1.37 [SEM 0.06] v. 1.14 [SEM 0.05], p = 0.004). The dimension-specific scores also revealed that both types of homes lacked appropriate attention to the psychosocial aspect of care. Overall, 25% of the facilities provided inadequate care to at least one resident. This situation was especially prevalent among homes with fewer than 40 residents, where up to 20% of the residents received inadequate care.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Most of the unlicensed homes for the aged that were studied delivered care of relatively good quality. However, some clearly provided inadequate care.
authors.affiliation: Département des sciences de la santé communautaire, Faculté de médecine, Université de Sherbrooke, Que. gbravo@courrier.usherb.ca
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Bravo
authors.forename: M F
authors.initials: MF
authors.lastname: Dubois
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Charpentier
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: De Wals
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Emond
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D016852:Housing for the Elderly / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D008004:Licensure; D009735:Nursing Homes / Q000592:standards*; D017064:Process Assessment, Health Care; D011787:Quality of Health Care / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011792:Quebec