title: Cost analysis of 2 empiric antibacterial regimens containing glycopeptides for the treatment of febrile neutropenia in patients with acute leukaemia.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Patients with cancer-associated neutropenia are at high risk of developing severe infections which can be fatal if treatment is not promptly administered. For this reason, fever is treated as soon as possible with broad spectrum antibacterial therapy. The objective of this study was to conduct a cost analysis in Italy comparing 2 empiric glycoprotein-containing antibacterial regimens for the treatment of febrile neutropenia in patients with acute leukaemia.
  
  
  METHODS
  A retrospective cost analysis was conducted, using the records of 527 febrile neutropenic patients with acute leukaemia who participated in an 18-month multicentre (29 Italian haematological units) randomised trial during 1991. All patients received either of the following 2 empiric intravenous regimens, each containing 3 antibacterial agents: ceftazidime (2 g, 3 times daily) and amikacin (15 mg/kg/day, in 3 separate doses) plus teicoplanin (6 mg/kg, in a single dose) or vancomycin (30 mg/kg/day, in 2 separate doses). Economic analyses were carried out from a hospital perspective. Only the direct costs per patient, i.e. mean antibacterial treatment and management cost, mean overall treatment failure cost and mean cost of adverse effects, were included.
  
  
  RESULTS
  No differences were found in the clinical response, defined as the improvement in the rate of fever or infection (if documented), between the 2 regimens. However, tolerability, defined as the incidence of adverse effects probably or definitely related to the assigned treatment, was reported to be better with the teicoplanin-rather than the vancomycin-containing regimen.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Thus retrospective cost analysis showed that despite the higher acquisition cost of teicoplanin relative to vancomycin, the lower incidence of adverse effects associated with teicoplanin and its ease of administration (single daily dose) resulted in equivalent overall treatment costs between teicoplanin- and vancomycin containing regimens.
authors.affiliation: Istituto di Medicina Interna e Scienze Oncologiche, Policlinico Monteluce, Perugia, Italy. clime@unipg.it
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Bucaneve
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Menichetti
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Del Favero
mesh_terms: D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000191:economics* / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D000970:Antineoplastic Agents / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000627:therapeutic use; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D006020:Glycopeptides; D006801:Humans; D007558:Italy; D007938:Leukemia / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000191:economics*; D015337:Multicenter Studies as Topic; D009503:Neutropenia / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000191:economics* / Q000209:etiology; D016896:Treatment Outcome
chemical_list: D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents; D000970:Antineoplastic Agents; D006020:Glycopeptides