Methodological issues in evaluating Rorschach validity: a comment on Burns and Viglione (1996), Weiner (1996), and Ganellen (1996)
The old controversy regarding the Rorschach Inkblot Test has recently revived. The present article suggests that the debate will be most productive if careful attention is paid to methodological issues. Three recent examples illustrate how incorrect conclusions regarding Rorschach validity may occur if methodological issues are not evaluated carefully. The present article examines (a) Burns and Viglione s (1996) conclusion that the Rorschach Human Experience Variable (HEV) is a predictor of interpersonal relatedness among adults; (b) Weiner s (1996) conclusion that the D score and Morbid Responses (MOR) are valid measures of experienced distress in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD); and (c) Ganellen s (1996a, 1996b) conclusion that the Rorschach Depression Index (DEPI) and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) are comparable in their power to identify diagnoses of depression.
Wood
J M
JM
Department of Psychology, University of Texas at El Paso, 79968, USA. jwood@utep.edu
Nezworski
M T
MT
Stejskal
W J
WJ
Garven
S
S
West
S G
SG
D000328:Adult; D003863:Depression / Q000175:diagnosis; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D016015:Logistic Models; D008950:MMPI / Q000592:standards; D011594:Psychometrics / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*; D012016:Reference Values; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012107:Research Design / Q000592:standards*; D012392:Rorschach Test / Q000592:standards*; D013313:Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic / Q000523:psychology; D013315:Stress, Psychological / Q000175:diagnosis