Bibliometric methods for the evaluation of arthritis research.
This study uses bibliometric methods to evaluate the magnitude and quality of publications in arthritis research in the UK and compare this with that of other countries. Arthritis research was defined by publication in a specialist journal or by specific title key words or address. Outputs from 13 countries between 1988 and 1995 were analysed by number, research level (from clinical to basic) and potential impact on other researchers (from low to high). The UK has a strong presence in arthritis research and the highest relative commitment of all the countries studied. UK output was more clinical than that of other countries, except Spain, and was of relatively high impact. A second study examined UK arthritis papers supported by different funding sources, including government, private-non-profit and industry. Papers with funding acknowledgements were of significantly higher impact and less clinical than those without. The Arthritis Research Campaign was the leading funder in the UK with high-impact papers which, over the 8 yr period, have become more clinical than those supported by other funding sources, except hospital trusts.
Lewison
G
G
Unit for Policy Research in Science and Medicine, The Wellcome Trust, London.
Devey
M E
ME
D001168:Arthritis; D015706:Bibliometrics; D016206:Databases, Bibliographic; D014943:Global Health; D006801:Humans; D011642:Publications / Q000706:statistics & numerical data / Q000639:trends; D012106:Research / Q000706:statistics & numerical data* / Q000639:trends; D012109:Research Support as Topic / Q000706:statistics & numerical data / Q000639:trends; D006113:United Kingdom