The journalist's role in bioethics.
In the late 1950s and early 1960s, emerging advances in the biomedical sciences raised insufficiently noticed ethical issues, prompting science reporters to serve as a sort of Early Warning System. As awareness of bioethical issues increased rapidly everywhere, and bioethics itself arrived as a recognized discipline, the need for this early-warning press role has clearly diminished. A secondary but important role for the science journalist is that of investigative reporter/whistleblower, as in the Tuskegee syphilis trials and the government's secret plutonium experiments. Because the general public gets most of its information from the popular media, ways are suggested for journalists and bioethicists to work together.
Rosenfeld
A
A
March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation, White Plains, NY 10605, USA.
D026688:Bioethical Issues; D001675:Bioethics; D030881:Disclosure; D026822:Ethicists; D006801:Humans; D020452:Journalism / Q000639:trends; D024382:Professional Role; D012922:Social Change; D014481:United States; D035642:Whistleblowing