Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: a structured review of the methodological literature.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review methods for systematic review/meta-analysis in order to identify the different methodological and statistical methods that have been proposed. A summary of the main findings is presented here, with emphasis given to health services research topics.


METHODS
A thorough systematic search for methodological papers was carried out using a variety of methods, including the use of electronic databases. Approximately 1000 potentially relevant references were identified, a number of them from education, psychology and sociology.


RESULTS
After briefly reviewing the procedural methods required to carry out a review, and the basic statistical methods used to combine study estimates, less established methods are discussed. These include methods for dealing with publication bias, meta-regression, meta-analysis of individual patient data, the synthesis of non-randomized evidence alone and in combination with randomized studies. Bayesian modelling and economic evaluation through meta-analysis. Recommendations for meta-analytical practice are given; these are either distilled from previous guidelines, or constructed where there appears to be a broad consensus across the literature.


CONCLUSIONS
It is hoped that this review will provide a consistent and comprehensive, but concise, description of the methods available for synthesizing evidence, that it will promote better quality reviews of the results of health services research and identify specific areas which require methodological development.
Sutton
A J
AJ
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Leicester, UK.
Jones
D R
DR
Abrams
K R
KR
Sheldon
T A
TA
Song
F
F
D001499:Bayes Theorem; D006302:Health Services Research; D015201:Meta-Analysis as Topic; D015233:Models, Statistical; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D012044:Regression Analysis; D000078202:Systematic Reviews as Topic; D006113:United Kingdom