title: Comparison of ropivacaine and lidocaine for intravenous regional anesthesia in volunteers: a preliminary study on anesthetic efficacy and blood level.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Ropivacaine may be useful for intravenous regional anesthesia, but its anesthetic effectiveness and toxicity have not been evaluated.
  
  
  METHODS
  Two doses of ropivacaine (1.2 and 1.8 mg/kg) and one dose of lidocaine (3 mg/kg) were compared for intravenous regional anesthesia in 15 volunteers. An arm tourniquet was inflated for 30 min after injection and then deflated in two cycles. Sensory block was measured by response to touch, cold, pinprick, and transcutaneous electric stimulation, and motor function was measured by hand grip strength and muscle power. Median, ulnar, radial, and musculocutaneous nerve functions were tested before local anesthetic injection and then at 5-min intervals until blocks resolved. The plasma ropivacaine and lidocaine concentrations were determined from arterial and venous blood samples drawn from the unanesthetized arm.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Sensory and motor blocks were complete within 25 min and 30 min, respectively, in all three treatment groups. However, recovery of sensory and motor block after tourniquet release was slowest in the high-dose ropivacaine group. Anesthesia to pinprick and transcutaneous electric stimulation was sustained in all the volunteers in the high-dose ropivacaine group for 55 min and 85 min, respectively, whereas complete recovery was observed in the lidocaine group (P = 0.008) and partial recovery in the low-dose ropivacaine group (P < 0.05) during the same period. Motor block also was sustained in the high-dose ropivacaine group for 70 min, which was significantly longer than in the lidocaine group (P < 0.05). All volunteers (five of five) given lidocaine and one volunteer given high-dose ropivacaine reported light-headedness and hearing disturbance during tourniquet release when the arterial plasma lidocaine and ropivacaine concentrations were 4.7+/-2.1 microg/ml (mean) and 2.7 micro/ml, respectively.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Compared with lidocaine, intravenous regional anesthesia with ropivacaine appears to be comparable but has longer-lasting residual anesthesia.
authors.affiliation: Department of Anesthesia, The Toronto Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. vincentchan@compuserve.com
authors.forename: V W
authors.initials: VW
authors.lastname: Chan
authors.forename: M J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Weisbrod
authors.forename: Z
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Kaszas
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Dragomir
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000577:Amides / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000097:blood / Q000494:pharmacology*; D000771:Anesthesia, Intravenous; D000779:Anesthetics, Local / Q000494:pharmacology*; D006801:Humans; D008012:Lidocaine / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000097:blood / Q000494:pharmacology*; D000077212:Ropivacaine
chemical_list: D000577:Amides; D000779:Anesthetics, Local; D000077212:Ropivacaine; D008012:Lidocaine