title: No exit? The effect of health status on dissatisfaction and disenrollment from health plans.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To examine the implications of serious and chronic health problems on the willingness of enrollees to switch health plans if they are dissatisfied with their current arrangements.
  
  
  METHODS
  A large (20,283 respondents) survey of employees of three national corporations committed to the model of managed competition, with substantial enrollment in four types of health plans: fee-for-service, prepaid group practice, independent practice associations, and point-of-service plans.
  
  
  METHODS
  A set of logistic regression models are estimated to determine the probability of disenrollment, if dissatisfied, controlling for the influence on satisfaction and disenrollment of age, race, education, family income and size, gender, marital status, mental health status, pregnancy, duration of employment and enrollment in the plan, number of alternative plans, and HMO penetration in the local market. Separate coefficients are estimated for enrollees with and without significant physical health problems. Additional models are estimated to test for the influence of selection effects as well as alternative measures of dissatisfaction and health problems.
  
  
  METHODS
  Data were collected through a mailed survey with a response rate of 63.5 percent; comparisons to a subsample administered by telephone showed few differences.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In group/staff model HMOs and point-of-service plans, only 12-17 percent of the chronically ill enrollees who were so dissatisfied when surveyed that they intended to disenroll actually left their plan in the next open enrollment period. This compared to 25-29 percent of the healthy enrollees in these same plans, who reported this level of dissatisfaction and 58-63 percent of the enrollees under fee-for-service insurance.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Switching plans appears to be significantly limited for enrollees with serious health problems, the very enrollees who will be best informed about the ability of their health plan to provide adequate medical care. These effects are most pronounced in plans that have exclusive contracts with providers. We conclude that disenrollment provides only weak safeguards on quality for the sickest enrollees and that reported levels of dissatisfaction and disenrollment represent inaccurate signals of plan performance.
authors.affiliation: Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Schlesinger
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Druss
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Thomas
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D018588:Fee-for-Service Plans / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D005260:Female; D006125:Group Practice, Prepaid / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006264:Health Benefit Plans, Employee / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006304:Health Status; D006801:Humans; D007193:Independent Practice Associations / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D015273:Insurance Selection Bias; D016015:Logistic Models; D008297:Male; D018854:Managed Competition / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D017060:Patient Satisfaction / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011243:Preferred Provider Organizations / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014481:United States