title: Systematic review of the effectiveness of planned short hospital stays for mental health care.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To determine the effectiveness of planned short hospital stays versus standard care for people with serious mental illness.
  
  
  METHODS
  Systematic review of all randomised controlled trials comparing planned short hospital stay versus long hospital stay or standard care for people with serious mental illness.
  
  
  METHODS
  Four trials enrolled 628 patients.
  
  
  METHODS
  Relapse; readmission; death (suicides and all causes); violent incidents (self, others, property); lost to follow up; premature discharge; delayed discharge; mental state (not improved); social functioning; patient satisfaction, quality of life, self esteem, and psychological wellbeing; family burden; imprisonment; employment status; independent living; total cost of care; and average length of hospital stay.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Patients allocated to planned short hospital stays had no more readmissions (in four trials, odds ratio 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 1.29 with no heterogeneity between trials), no more losses to follow up (in three trials of 404 patients, 1.09, 0.62 to 1.91 with no heterogeneity between trials), and more successful discharges on time (in three trials of 404 patients, 0.47, 0.27 to 0.85) than patients allocated long hospital stays or standard care. Some evidence showed that patients allocated planned short hospital stay were no more likely to leave hospital prematurely and had a greater chance of being employed than those allocated long hospital stay or standard care. Data on mental, social, and family outcomes could not be summated, and there were few or no data on patient satisfaction, deaths, violence, criminal behaviour, and costs.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The effectiveness of care in mental hospitals is important to patients, carers, and policy makers. Despite inadequacies in the data, this review suggests that planned short hospital stays do not encourage a "revolving door" pattern of care for people with serious mental illness and may be more effective than standard care. Further pragmatic trials are needed on the most effective organisation and delivery of care in mental hospitals.
authors.affiliation: Berkshire Health Authority, Reading, Berkshire RG30 2BA. paul.johnstone@Exchange.berks-ha.anglox.nhs.uk
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Johnstone
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Zolese
mesh_terms: D000203:Activities of Daily Living; D004651:Employment; D017048:Health Care Costs; D006778:Hospitals, Psychiatric / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D007902:Length of Stay / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000628:therapy*; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D010347:Patient Care Planning; D011567:Psychiatric Department, Hospital / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D006113:United Kingdom