Consumer information and competition between nonprofit and for-profit nursing homes.
This paper develops implications of Arrow's hypothesis that nonprofit organizations are prevalent in health care because of quality uncertainty. The model analyzes the ability of nonprofits to mitigate market failures created by asymmetric information in an environment characterized by potential competition from both explicitly for-profit firms and for-profits in disguise (profit-motivated firms who obtain nonprofit status in order to exploit the perceived trustworthiness of the nonprofit sector). Under certain conditions, it is shown that nonprofit status can serve as a credible signal of quality and that nonprofits can decrease the underprovision of quality both by providing high quality services and indirectly via a spillover effect on quality in the for-profit sector. Applicability to long-term care and implications for empirical research and policy towards nonprofits in health care are discussed.
Hirth
R A
RA
Department of Health Management and Policy, Department of Economics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, USA. rhirth@umich.edu
D019985:Benchmarking; D004465:Economic Competition; D006269:Health Facilities, Proprietary / Q000191:economics*; D006302:Health Services Research; D007255:Information Services; D008134:Long-Term Care / Q000191:economics; D017059:Models, Econometric; D009735:Nursing Homes / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration*; D009939:Organizations, Nonprofit / Q000191:economics*; D010067:Ownership; D014481:United States