title: [Problems surrounding absence seizures].
abstract: The diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of childhood absence epilepsy (CAE) and juvenile absence epilepsy (JAE) were reviewed with reference to 94 patients with typical absence seizures (82 with CAE, 12 with JAE) and the literature. The patients were separated into two groups based on clinical features, age at onset of seizures, and EEG findings. There has been much discussion on the age that represents the borderline between CAE and JAE. My view is that JAE begins with puberty, i.e. at around 10 years old. The treatment of choice for CAE is valproic acid (VPA). If the seizures are not controlled with VPA, add-on therapy with ethosuximide is recommended. For patients who respond poorly to these drugs, clonazepam in often effective. Lamotrigine, which is not yet commercially available in Japan, is effective when combined with VPA. As for school performance, some patients showed excellent results. However, about half of them performed weakly. Patients followed beyond 20 years were free of absence seizures in both groups, but suffered from GTCS with occurred sporadically in CAE as well as in JAE. The social prognosis in CAE and JAE may not be as good as we believed it to be.
authors.affiliation: Department of Pediatrics, Nippon Medical School Second Hospital, Kanagawa.
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Hashimoto
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D002648:Child; D004832:Epilepsy, Absence / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000503:physiopathology*; D004830:Epilepsy, Tonic-Clonic / Q000150:complications; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male