Evaluation of the monocyte counting by the ABX Vega. Comparison with the manual method and fluoro-flow cytometry.
This study allowed evaluation and comparison of the precision (20 samples) and agreement (200 samples) of the relative and absolute values of the monocyte count using three methods: microscopic, flow cytometry and the automated ABX Vega hematology analyzer. Flow cytometry is the most precise method, even if the coefficient of variation of the automated analyzer is very similar. The coefficient of correlation between the ABX Vega and the flow cytometer is very satisfactory (r=0.8042). This study of the agreement also made it possible to confirm the difficulty that automated hematology analyzers have in differentiating between some granulocytes and monocytes and their propensity to overstimate the latter when the sample includes immature forms of granulocytes. This fact stresses the importance of the microscopic method, despite its lack of precision. The observed discrepancies did not lead to any difficulties in clinical interpretation; however, this finding should be taken into consideration, particularly in myleoproliferative syndromes and the laboratory monitoring of chemotherapy.
Morillon
M
M
Service de Biologie Clinique, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées, Marseille Armées, France.
Maslin
J
J
De Pina
J J
JJ
Louis
F J
FJ
Martet
G
G
D005434:Flow Cytometry / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D007958:Leukocyte Count / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*; D009000:Monocytes