title: Reliability and validity of noninvasive imaging of internal carotid artery pseudo-occlusion.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Our study evaluated noninvasive tests for the diagnosis of atheromatous internal carotid artery (ICA) pseudo-occlusion.
  
  
  METHODS
  Twenty patients (17 men, 3 women; mean age +/-SD, 64.3+/-11.6 years) with angiographically proven atheromatous ICA pseudo-occlusion (20 vessels) were prospectively examined with MR angiography (MRA; 2D and 3D time-of-flight techniques), color Doppler-assisted duplex imaging (CDDI) and power-flow imaging (PFI) with and without an intravenous ultrasonic contrast agent. As a control group, 13 patients (13 men; mean+/-SD age, 63.0+/-9.0 years) with angiographically proven ICA occlusion (13 vessels) were studied with the same techniques. For the determination of interobserver agreement (kappa statistics), the findings of each diagnostic technique were read by 2 blinded and independent observers who were not involved in patient recruitment and initial data acquisition. Specificity and sensitivity were calculated for all noninvasive techniques (observer consensus) in comparison to the standard of reference (intra-arterial angiography).
  
  
  RESULTS
  Interobserver reliabilities were kappa=0.86 for intra-arterial angiography, kappa=0.90 for unenhanced CDDI, kappa=0. 93 for enhanced CDDI, kappa=0.93 for unenhanced PFI, kappa=1.0 for enhanced PFI, kappa=0.93 for 2D MRA, and kappa=0.77 for 3D MRA, respectively (P<0.0001). Specificities and sensitivities were 0.92 and 0.70 for unenhanced CDDI, 0.92 and 0.83 for enhanced CDDI, 0.92 and 0.95 for unenhanced PFI, 1.0 and 0.94 for enhanced PFI, 1.0 and 0.65 for 2D MRA, and 0.89 and 0.47 for 3D MRA, respectively.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Advanced ultrasonographic techniques, especially PFI (with only 1 false-positive diagnosis of occlusion in the present series), can provide reliable and valid data to differentiate between ICA pseudo-occlusion and complete occlusion. In contrast, time-of-flight MRA at its present state is not capable of predicting minimal residual flow within a nearly occluded ICA.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Neurology, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Germany.
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Fürst
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Saleh
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Wenserski
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Malms
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Cohnen
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Aulich
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Neumann-Haefelin
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Schroeter
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Steinmetz
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Sitzer
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D002343:Carotid Artery, Internal / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D016893:Carotid Stenosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D002533:Cerebral Angiography; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D018810:Magnetic Resonance Angiography; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015588:Observer Variation; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D014463:Ultrasonography / Q000379:methods