Comparison of anti-M2-muscarinic effect of AF-DX 116 on atrioventricular nodal conduction with those of pirenzepine and atropine as antibradyarrhythmic drugs.
Selectivity of antimuscarinic actions of AF-DX 116 (AF-DX) on the atrioventricular (AV) nodal conduction was compared with those of pirenzepine and atropine by using the canine isolated, blood-perfused AV node preparation and the open-chest in situ dog heart. In the isolated AV node preparation, dose-response curves for negative dromotropic effects (prolongation of Atrio-His interval) of carbachol (CCh) injected into the posterior septal artery were shifted to the right in parallel by AF-DX, pirenzepine, and atropine with apparent pA2-values of 13, 27.5, and 0.45 microg, respectively, and slopes of the modified Schild plot of nearly unity. Meanwhile, dose-response curves for coronary vasodilator effects of CCh were shifted to the right by AF-DX, pirenzepine, and atropine with the apparent pA2 values of 68, 12.5, and 0.55 microg, respectively, but the slopes were far from unity. In the in situ open-chest heart, dose-response curves for negative dromotropic effects (prolongation of AV conduction time) of CCh given intravenously were shifted to the right in parallel by AF-DX, pirenzepine, and atropine with apparent pA2 values of 36, 32, and 1.25 microg/kg, respectively, and the slope of nearly unity, whereas dose-response curves for hypotensive effects of CCh were shifted to the right by AF-DX, pirenzepine, and atropine with apparent pA2 values of 105, 15, and 0.65 microg/kg, respectively, but the slopes of AF-DX and pirenzepine were far from unity. In addition, prolongations of AV conduction time by electrical stimulation of the left vagus nerve in the in situ heart were suppressed by AF-DX, pirenzepine, and atropine with the ID50, dose for 50% suppression, of 40, 35, and 1.9 microg/kg, respectively. These results suggest that (a) the potency of antimuscarinic actions of AF-DX on the CCh-induced negative dromotropic effects was almost equal to that of pirenzepine, and approximately 30 times less potent than atropine; (b) the M2-subtype selectivity of AF-DX was considerably higher in comparison with pirenzepine and atropine; and (c) the muscarinic receptor subtype on the canine AV node is entirely of the M2-type, but only sparsely developed in the coronary vascular beds.
Sasaki
S
S
Department of Pharmacology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, Japan.
Motomura
S
S
D000818:Animals; D000889:Anti-Arrhythmia Agents / Q000494:pharmacology*; D001283:Atrioventricular Node / Q000187:drug effects*; D001285:Atropine / Q000494:pharmacology; D006348:Cardiac Surgical Procedures; D004285:Dogs; D005260:Female; D066298:In Vitro Techniques; D008297:Male; D010276:Parasympatholytics / Q000494:pharmacology*; D010477:Perfusion; D010890:Pirenzepine / Q000031:analogs & derivatives* / Q000494:pharmacology
D000889:Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; D010276:Parasympatholytics; D010890:Pirenzepine; D001285:Atropine; C048593:otenzepad