title: Regular versus randomized sentences, nouns versus prepositions, and assimilation in salience.
abstract: The authors' research supports an alternative to the theory that organization improves retention by producing fewer elements for processing. College students' recall of randomized words was better for nouns than for prepositions. Regular sentences improved recall, but this improvement was less for nouns than for prepositions. According to the alternative theory, a part assimilates (increases in similarity) to its high-in-salience organization-produced group, thus increases in salience, and hence is retained better. The high-in-salience group for a regular sentence should be the sentence's meaning. Because the nouns were recalled better, they were more similar in salience to the regular sentences' meanings than were the prepositions. Assimilation should be minimal when parts are very similar. Therefore, the nouns' assimilation in salience should have been less than the prepositions', explaining the nouns' less improvement in recall.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Howard University, Washington, DC 20059, USA. donlking@erols.com
authors.forename: D L
authors.initials: DL
authors.lastname: King
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Normington
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D019336:Cognitive Science; D006801:Humans; D011939:Mental Recall; D011582:Psychological Theory; D011932:Reading; D012153:Retention, Psychology