Strategic relevance and accountability expectations: new perspectives for health care information technology design.
In this article, we discuss the traditional systems analysis perspective on end-user information requirements analysis and extend it to merge with the new accountability expectations perspective to guide the future planning and design of health organization information systems. Underlying the strategic relevance of health care information technology (HCIT) are three critical questions: (1) What is the ideal HCIT model for the health organization in terms of achieving strategic expertise and competitive advantage? Specifically, how does this model link industry performance standards with organizational performance and accountability expectations? (2) How should the limitations of past HCIT models be reconciled to the benefits presented by the superior arrangement of the ideal model in the context of changing accountability expectations? (3) How should alternative HCIT solutions be evaluated in light of evidence-based accountability and organizational performance benchmarking? Insights into these questions will ensure that health care managers, HCIT practitioners and researchers can continue to focus on the most critical issues in harnessing today's fast-paced changing technologies for evolving strategically relevant, performance-based health organization systems.
Tan
J K
JK
Department of Health Care and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Modrow
R E
RE
D019985:Benchmarking; D002170:Canada; D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000458:organization & administration* / Q000592:standards; D007256:Information Systems / Q000458:organization & administration*; D008330:Management Audit; D017146:Models, Organizational; D010934:Planning Techniques; D012941:Social Responsibility; D013597:Systems Analysis; D014584:User-Computer Interface