title: [Comparative investigations of a combined vaccine against parvovirus and erysipelas and corresponding monovaccines in different vaccination schedules. 1: Field trial].
abstract: In a field trial, the development of antibodies of a combined vaccine against the porcine parvovirus (PPV) as well as against swine erysipelas was compared with corresponding mono vaccines. Furthermore, these vaccines were used in different vaccination schedules. The tests were carried out on 109 gilts in three closed farms. In all gilts, a basic immunization repeated twice was carried out at the age of six months and at intervals of three weeks. The revaccination was carried out four months after the basic immunization with half of the animals, and six months after the basic immunization with the remaining gilts. Between the combined vaccine and the mono vaccine no significant differences in the development of antibodies against PPV could be found according to different vaccination schedules. The gilts having been vaccinated with the mono vaccine and boostered six months later showed significantly higher antibody titers against Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae. Between the remaining vaccination groups no significant difference in the development of the antibodies against swine erysipelas could be found. On only one farm, a continuous decrease of antibody titers against PPV in case of altogether 238 non-vaccinated piglets until the sixth month of life could be observed. On the two other farms, an increase of antibody titers against PPV could be found at different points of time, which indicates an infection of the piglets. Between the individual vaccination groups no significant antibody titers against PPV could be measured in milk tests. With regard to the number of piglets born alive per litter, the number of piglets born dead per litter and the number of mummies, a significant difference could neither be found between the vaccination groups 1-4.
authors.affiliation: II. Medizinischen Tierklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Ritzmann
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Gerbermann
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Gyra
authors.forename: H M
authors.initials: HM
authors.lastname: Eichinger
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Heinritzi
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001428:Bacterial Vaccines; D004888:Erysipelothrix; D005260:Female; D007115:Immunization Schedule; D010322:Parvoviridae Infections / Q000276:immunology / Q000517:prevention & control / Q000662:veterinary*; D013552:Swine; D013553:Swine Diseases / Q000276:immunology* / Q000517:prevention & control; D013554:Swine Erysipelas / Q000276:immunology* / Q000517:prevention & control; D014611:Vaccination / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary; D017778:Vaccines, Combined; D014765:Viral Vaccines
chemical_list: D001428:Bacterial Vaccines; D017778:Vaccines, Combined; D014765:Viral Vaccines
vernacular_title: Vergleichende Untersuchungen über den Einsatz eines Parvovirose-Rotlauf-Kombinationsimpfstoffes sowie entsprechender Monovakzinen bei unterschiedlichen Revakzinationszeitpunkten. Teil 1: Feldversuch