Porcelain veneers: dentin bonding optimization and biomimetic recovery of the crown.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to investigate the biomimetic principle in porcelain veneer reconstruction, or in other words, to assess the extent to which the restoration can mimic the biomechanics and structural integrity of the original tooth. Using an optimized luting procedure, porcelain veneers are expected to present such features even when bonded to an extensive dentin surface.


METHODS
Dentin-bonded porcelain veneers were assessed using functional and cyclic thermal loads with respect to two parameters: coronal stiffness (investigated using experimental strain gauges and finite element analysis) and morphology of the tooth-restoration interface (scanning electron microscope evaluation). Two different application modes of the same dentin-bonding agent, Optibond FL, were evaluated: a traditional method (dentin adhesive applied when proceeding to luting the veneer) and an alternative method (dentin adhesive applied to dentin and cured before taking the impression for the veneer).


RESULTS
In the finite element model, the crown compliance increased by a factor of 2.16 after facial enamel removal and returned to 96% of its original value after the placement of the veneer. The finite element values showed a good correlation with strain gauge experimental results (one-sample t test, P > 0.35 after facial enamel removal and P > 0.19 after veneer placement). The dentin adhesive application mode was not critical to the recovery of tooth stiffness (analysis of variance, P = 0.10). However, qualitative scanning electron microscope observations demonstrated that the traditional dentin adhesive application was associated with bonding failures between the hybrid layer and the overlying resin, whereas unbroken and continuous interfaces were obtained with the new method using the same dentin adhesive.


CONCLUSIONS
The results of this study definitely favor the biomimetic behavior of porcelain veneers bonded to teeth using an optimized application mode of dentin adhesives, because this treatment modality proved to restore both the mechanical behavior and microstructure of the intact tooth.
Magne
P
P
University of Minnesota, Minnesota Dental Research Center for Biomaterials and Biomechanics, Department of Oral Science, School of Dentistry, Minneapolis 55455-0329, USA. pascal@web.dent.umn.edu
Douglas
W H
WH
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D003188:Composite Resins; D001840:Dental Bonding; D003776:Dental Porcelain / Q000737:chemistry*; D003799:Dental Stress Analysis; D003801:Dental Veneers; D017220:Dentin-Bonding Agents; D004548:Elasticity; D020342:Finite Element Analysis; D006801:Humans; D007180:Incisor / Q000502:physiology*; D008437:Maxilla; D008855:Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; D016896:Treatment Outcome
D003188:Composite Resins; D017220:Dentin-Bonding Agents; D003776:Dental Porcelain