title: [Comparison of spiral computed tomography without contrast media and intravenous urography in the diagnosis of renal colic].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  This prospective study was designed to determine the reliability of noncontrast spiral CT scan, compared to that of intravenous urography (IVU), in the diagnostic assessment of acute renal colic.
  
  
  METHODS
  53 patients, admitted with an empirical diagnosis of renal colic after initial assessment, were included and underwent spiral CT scan without contrast agent injection, immediately followed by IVU. These examinations were performed according to a blind protocol by two different radiologists. We initially looked for the presence of stones and/or urinary tract obstruction. Patients with a stone and/or obstruction (urinary tract dilatation) visible on CT scan were then examined for the presence of CT signs associated with stone disease (infiltration of the perirenal and periureteric fat, oedema of the ureteric wall and loss of sinus fat). We calculated the statistical correlation between the presence or absence of obstruction and these accessory signs.
  
  
  RESULTS
  45 stones were recovered (in 36 cases before the two examinations). 36 stones were identified on CT versus only 24 on urography. Urinary tract dilatation was demonstrated in 26 out of 53 cases by both urography and CT. The frequency of accessory signs visible on CT in the presence of stones (n = 36) was 66% for infiltration of periureteric fat, 36% for infiltration of perirenal fat and 75% for oedema of the ureteric wall. In the presence of urinary tract dilatation, these frequencies were 92%, 84% and 60% respectively.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Noncontrast spiral CT is a reliable and rapid diagnostic modality for the detection of urinary stones, providing a morphological study equivalent to that of IVU and able to guide appropriate treatment. It should replace IVU in the diagnostic assessment of renal colic.
authors.affiliation: Service d'Urologie, CHU Brugmann, Bruxelles, Belgique.
authors.forename: J F
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Thibeau
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Sourtzis
authors.forename: M A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Bellemans
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Vandendris
mesh_terms: D000208:Acute Disease; D000328:Adult; D003085:Colic / Q000209:etiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007669:Kidney Calculi / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000473:pathology; D008297:Male; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011877:Radionuclide Imaging; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed; D014545:Urinary Calculi / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000473:pathology; D014567:Urography
vernacular_title: Comparaison du scanner spiralé sans contraste et de l'urographie intraveineuse dans le diagnostic de la colique néphrétique.