Marginal adaptation and retention of a glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomers and a polyacid-modified resin composite in cervical Class-V lesions.
OBJECTIVE
An 18-month follow-up clinical trial of one conventional glass-ionomer (HIFI Master Palette), three resin-modified glass-ionomers (Fuji II LC, Vitremer, 3M Exp. 155) and one polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) was conducted to evaluate their clinical effectiveness in Class-V cervical lesions. In addition, the interface between dentin and two resin-modified glass-ionomers and one polyacid-modified resin composite was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).


METHODS
After evaluation of the restorations immediately following placement (baseline), all patients were subjected to a strict recall schedule with controls at 6, 12 and 18 months. The clinical effectiveness was recorded in terms of retention and marginal integrity, clinical microleakage, caries recurrence, and tooth vitality. A chi 2-test (p < 0.05) was used to test for significant differences between materials. In case of restoration loss or special defects, a replica was made to examine the surface texture and restoration margins by SEM. In vitro, the interface was examined by SEM after an argon-ion-beam etching technique was used to enhance surface relief and disclose interfacial substructures.


RESULTS
Retention appeared to be good for all the materials tested. Marginal discrepancies were localized at the incisal enamel and/or the cervical dentin margin, except for the polyacid-modified resin composite that showed most of the defects at the incisal enamel margin. None of the systems could guarantee margins free of microleakage for a long time. In vitro, the type of dentin pre-treatment defines to a great extent the morphology of the resultant interface between dentin and the restorative material tested.


CONCLUSIONS
In this clinical study, the retention rate of the tested materials was good and even excellent for some products. Perfect marginal adaptation deteriorated too fast. The marginal adaptation of the polyacid-modified resin composite at the enamel site would probably have been better by the use of selective enamel or total acid etching. Marginal sealing remains a problem. Future research should concentrate on improving the marginal adaptation and sealing capacities before a broader clinical use can be advocated.
Gladys
S
S
BIOMAT-Department of Operative Dentistry and Dental Materials, School for Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium.
Van Meerbeek
B
B
Lambrechts
P
P
Vanherle
G
G
D000180:Acrylic Resins; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D020770:Compomers; D003188:Composite Resins; D001840:Dental Bonding; D003763:Dental Leakage; D018772:Dental Marginal Adaptation; D019232:Dental Restoration Failure; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent / Q000379:methods; D003804:Dentin / Q000648:ultrastructure; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements; D006801:Humans; D008689:Methacrylates; D008855:Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; D008875:Middle Aged; D012117:Resins, Synthetic; D017640:Silicates; D014072:Tooth Abrasion / Q000628:therapy; D019237:Tooth Cervix; D014077:Tooth Erosion / Q000628:therapy
D000180:Acrylic Resins; D020770:Compomers; D003188:Composite Resins; C088486:Dyract; C079765:Fuji II LC cement; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements; C119725:HIFI Master Palette; D008689:Methacrylates; D012117:Resins, Synthetic; D017640:Silicates; C084550:Vitremer