Bioimpedance: is it a predictor of true water volume?
Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) has been reported to be insensitive to changes in water volumes in individual subjects. This study was designed to investigate the effect on the intra- and extracellular resistances (Ri and Re) of the segments of subjects for whom body water was changed without significant change to the total amount of electrolyte in the respective fluids. Twelve healthy adult subjects were recruited. Ri and Re of the leg, trunk, and arm of the subjects were determined from BIA measures prior to commencement of two separate studies that involved intervention, resulting in a loss/gain of body water effected either by a sauna followed by water intake (study 1) or by ingestion (study 2). Ri and Re of the segments were also determined at a number of times following these interventions. The mean change in body water, expressed as a percentage of body weight, was 0.9% in study 1 and 1.25% in study 2. For each study, the results for each subject were normalized for each limb to the initial (prestudy) value and then the normalized results for each segment were pooled for all subjects. ANOVA of these pooled results failed to demonstrate any significant differences between the normalized mean values of Ri or Re of the segments measured through the course of each study. The failure to detect a change in Ri or Re is explained in terms of the basic theory of BIA.
Thomas
B J
BJ
Center for Medical and Health Physics, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Cornish
B H
BH
Ward
L C
LC
Jacobs
A
A
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001823:Body Composition; D001834:Body Water / Q000502:physiology; D001835:Body Weight / Q000502:physiology; D004326:Drinking; D017097:Electric Impedance; D005110:Extracellular Space / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010953:Plasma Volume / Q000502:physiology; D013546:Sweating