[Intramedullary pinning for humeral diaphysis fractures. A minimal risk osteosynthesis. 82 cases].
OBJECTIVE
This study was designed to evaluate the complication rate of a novel intramedullary pinning technique described in 1988. After 10 years of clinical experience, it was possible to establish a significant difference in terms of healing delay compared with other fixation methods or conservative treatment.


METHODS
During a 10-year period, a total of 82 fractures, mostly isolated, unstable fractures, were treated. Retrograde intramedullary pinning (RIMP) was used for proximal and midshaft fractures and antegrade pinning (AIMP) for distal fractures. Statistical analysis was used to investigate the role of all parameters that may influence healing delay.


RESULTS
92.7% of the fractures healed in an average time of 9 weeks. Neither location nor fracture type, nor even an intrefragmental gap had any significant influence on healing delay. There were 7 primary axial deviations of more than 10 degrees in which union was achieved and 6 nonunions. These nonunions were mostly proximal fractures and inappropriate fixation. No radial nerve injury, no infection, and no deterioration of the fracture site was observed. There were 27 pin migrations, mainly towards the shoulder, which dit not affect the final anatomic and functional outcome. Functional result was good in 88% of cases. Four algodystrophy syndromes and 6 nonunions induced stiffness, mainly in the shoulder.


CONCLUSIONS
Intramedullary pinning using this technique did not induce any severe iatrogenic condition. Healing delay compares favorably with better results of conservative treatment. Improving surgical technique should further minimize disadvantages of this method.


CONCLUSIONS
Humeral intramedullary pinning technique has a low complication rate. It is a good compromise between conservative treatment and conventional osteosynthesis. It causes little trauma to the patients, allows stabilization of any fracture site, and delay to bone union is similar to that with conservative treatment.
Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, Centre Hospitalier Général de Saint-Denis.
J Y
JY
De la Caffinière
R
R
Benzimra
F
F
Lacaze
A
A
Chaine
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D005594:Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D017102:Fracture Healing; D017759:Fractures, Malunited / Q000209:etiology; D005599:Fractures, Ununited / Q000209:etiology; D006801:Humans; D006810:Humeral Fractures / Q000145:classification / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010149:Postoperative Pain / Q000209:etiology; D011859:Radiography; D013997:Time Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome
Embrochage centromédullaire des fractures de la diaphyse humérale. Une ostéosynthèse à risque minimum. A propos de 82 cas.