Interval cancers in a randomized controlled trial of screening for colorectal cancer using a faecal occult blood test.
BACKGROUND
The sensitivity of unhydrated Haemoccult II has been examined in the context of a randomized controlled trial of faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer in Nottingham, UK.


METHODS
Both traditional and proportional incidence methods were used to calculate sensitivity separately for both sexes, for two age groups at entry to the trial, for first screen and repeat screens and for three subsites within the large bowel.


RESULTS
The traditional method of estimation yielded a sensitivity of 59% whereas the corresponding figure obtained using the proportional incidence method was 54%. The difference between the estimates using the two methods was greatest in subjects aged > or = 65 at entry to the trial and in cancers of the distal colon.


CONCLUSIONS
The results suggest that there may be a higher proportion of slower growing tumours in subjects aged > or = 65 and that cancers occurring in the distal colon may have a longer mean sojourn time than cancers proximal to the sigmoid colon.
Cancer Screening Evaluation Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey, UK.
S M
SM
Moss
J D
JD
Hardcastle
D A
DA
Coleman
M H
MH
Robinson
V C
VC
Rodrigues
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D003110:Colonic Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000453:epidemiology*; D004812:Epidemiologic Methods; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008403:Mass Screening; D008875:Middle Aged; D009780:Occult Blood; D012004:Rectal Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000453:epidemiology*; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D012811:Sigmoid Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000453:epidemiology