title: Peritoneal response to a septic challenge. Comparison between open laparotomy, pneumoperitoneum laparoscopy, and wall lift laparoscopy.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Laparoscopic surgery has a lower incidence of surgical infection than open surgery. Differential factors that may modify the bacterial biology and explain this finding to some extent include CO(2) atmosphere, less desiccation of intraabdominal structures, fewer temperature changes, and a better preserved peritoneal and systemic immune response. Previous data suggest that the immune response and acute phase response are better preserved after laparoscopy. Therefore, we designed a study to evaluate the early peritoneal response to sepsis in an experimental peritonitis model comparing open surgery with CO(2) and abdominal wall lift laparoscopy.
  
  
  METHODS
  The study subjects comprised 360 mice distributed into the following four groups: group 1, n = 72 (controls); group 2, n = 96 (open surgery), 2-3 cm laparotomy, with abdominal cavity exposed to the air for 30 min; group 3, n = 96, CO(2) laparoscopy (5 mmHg pneumoperitoneum) for 30 min; group 4, n = 96, wall lift laparoscopy for 30 min. Intraabdominal contamination in the four groups was induced with 1 ml of E. coli suspension (1 x 10(4) CFU/ml) 10 min before abdomen closure. Peritoneal fluid and blood samples were obtained 1.5, 3, 24, and 72 h after surgery, and TNF, IL-1, and IL-6 were measured (via ELISA), as well as quantitative culture.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The number of CFU (colony-forming units) obtained in peritoneal fluid and positive blood culture rates were significantly lower in the laparoscopic groups than in the open group. IL-1 peritoneal levels were significantly lower after 24 h and 72 h in the laparoscopy groups. IL-6 levels decreased sharply in the laparoscopy groups at 24 h and 72 h. There were no differences between the two types of laparoscopy models (CO(2) and wall lift).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Peritoneal response to sepsis is better preserved after laparoscopy than after open surgery. CO(2) does not seem to influence bacterial growth. According to these findings, laparoscopy entails less local trauma and better preserved intraabdominal conditions.
authors.affiliation: Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Avda. Padre Claret 167, 08025 Barcelona, Spain.
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Balagué
authors.forename: E M
authors.initials: EM
authors.lastname: Targarona
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Pujol
authors.forename: X
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Filella
authors.forename: J J
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Espert
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Trias
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001202:Ascitic Fluid; D007375:Interleukin-1 / Q000378:metabolism; D015850:Interleukin-6 / Q000378:metabolism; D010535:Laparoscopy; D007813:Laparotomy; D051379:Mice; D011028:Pneumoperitoneum, Artificial; D018805:Sepsis; D013312:Stress, Physiological / Q000276:immunology*; D014409:Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha / Q000378:metabolism
chemical_list: D007375:Interleukin-1; D015850:Interleukin-6; D014409:Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha