Differential response of non-transferrin bound iron uptake in rat liver cells on long-term and short-term treatment with iron.
BACKGROUND
Uptake of non-transferrin-bound iron by the liver is important as a clearance mechanism in iron overload. In contrast to physiological uptake via receptor-mediated endocytosis of transferrin, no regulatory mechanisms for this process are known. This study compares the influence of long-term and short-term depletion and loading of hepatocytes with iron on the uptake of non-transferrin bound iron, its affinity, specificity and the interaction with the transferrin-mediated pathways.


METHODS
Rats were fed iron-deficient, normal and 3,5,5-trimethylhexanoyl-ferrocene-containing diets to obtain livers with the corresponding desired status and the hepatocytes from these livers were used for transport studies. Hepatocytes from normal rats were depleted or loaded with iron by short-term treatment with desferrioxamine or ferric ammonium citrate, respectively. Uptake of non-transferrin bound iron was assayed from ferric citrate and from ferric diethylene triammine pentaacetate.


RESULTS
Uptake of non-transferrin-bound iron in hepatocytes could be seen as consisting of a high-affinity (Km=600 nM) and a low-affinity component. Whereas in normal and in iron-starved rats the high-affinity component was more prominent, it disappeared altogether in hepatocytes from rats with iron overload resulting from prolonged feeding with TMH-ferrocene-enriched diet. Overloading also led to loss of inhibition by diferric transferrin, which occured in starved as well as normal cells. In contrast, short-term iron-depletion of isolated hepatocytes with desferrioxamine had only a weak stimulatory effect, whereas treatment with ferric ammonium citrate strongly increased the uptake rates. However, the inhibition by diferric transferrin also disappeared. In both cases, uptake of non-transferrin bound iron was inhibited by apotransferrin.


CONCLUSIONS
Non-transferrin bound iron uptake in liver cells is apparently regulated by the iron status of the liver. The mode of response to iron loading depends on the method of loading in terms of time course and the form of iron used. It cannot be explained by the behavior of the iron regulatory protein, and it is complex, seeming to involve more than one transport system.
Scheiber-Mojdehkar
B
B
Institute of Medical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Austria.
Zimmermann
I
I
Dresow
B
B
Goldenberg
H
H
D000821:Animal Feed; D000818:Animals; D001692:Biological Transport; D002478:Cells, Cultured; D004032:Diet; D004705:Endocytosis; D005260:Female; D005296:Ferrous Compounds / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000494:pharmacology*; D007501:Iron / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000378:metabolism*; D000090463:Iron Deficiencies; D007700:Kinetics; D008099:Liver / Q000187:drug effects / Q000378:metabolism*; D000075163:Metallocenes; D051381:Rats; D017208:Rats, Wistar; D013997:Time Factors; D014168:Transferrin / Q000378:metabolism*
D005296:Ferrous Compounds; D000075163:Metallocenes; D014168:Transferrin; C050224:3,5,5-trimethylhexanoylferrocene; D007501:Iron