Medical faculty use of the journal literature, publishing productivity and the size of health sciences library journal collections.
OBJECTIVE
This 1990-1991 study explored the relationship between the size of health sciences library journal collections and the number of different journals cited by medical school faculty in departments of biochemistry and medicine.


METHODS
Two regression equations, including variables associated with a national stratified sample of 622 faculty who published articles during those two years, were used to explore factors correlated with variations in faculty use of the journal literature and faculty publishing productivity.


RESULTS
Results suggest that, after controlling for other variables in the models, neither the number of different journals those faculty cited, nor the number of articles they published, had statistically significant correlations with the number of journals in the health sciences library collection.


CONCLUSIONS
The traditional view that the size of an academic health sciences library's journal collection is a good measure of how well that library is positioned to support faculty research may not be entirely accurate.
Byrd
G D
GD
Health Sciences Library, State University of New York at Buffalo 14214, USA.
D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D005180:Faculty, Medical; D005102:Health Expenditures; D007993:Libraries, Medical / Q000191:economics; D010506:Periodicals as Topic / Q000191:economics; D011643:Publishing; D012044:Regression Analysis; D012106:Research; D012494:Sampling Studies; D014481:United States