Is odor processing related to oral breathing?
This paper addresses two questions related to the inherent association between breathing and odor perception: Does central nervous processing of odors change when an artificial breathing technique (velopharyngeal closure) is introduced and secondly, does odor processing vary with the oral breathing phase (inhalation or exhalation)? Chemosensory event-related potentials (CSERP) were obtained from eight female subjects while they were smelling an odor mixture (citral, eugenol, linalool, menthol and isoamylacetate). Each subject was required to perform spontaneous mouth breathing (120 trials) as well as the velopharyngeal closure technique (120 trials). Simultaneously, a thermistor monitored the phase of the respiratory cycle. The results reveal that the central nervous correlates of odor processing change with the breathing technique but not with the oral breathing cycle. The findings that early stimulus processing is faster (N1 latency) and late stimulus processing more pronounced (P3 amplitudes) when the subjects are breathing spontaneously are discussed with regard to attentional effects. The reduction of the N1 amplitude during the spontaneous breathing condition may be caused by larger latency variations and longer stimulus rise-times. Furthermore, it is concluded that the oral breathing cycle is less important than the nasal breathing cycle for olfactory information transmission.
Pause
B M
BM
Department of Psychology, Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel, Germany. bmpause@psychologie.uni-kiel.de
Krauel
K
K
Sojka
B
B
Ferstl
R
R
D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology; D002540:Cerebral Cortex / Q000502:physiology*; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological / Q000502:physiology*; D005071:Evoked Potentials / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D009055:Mouth; D009666:Nose; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D012119:Respiration; D012903:Smell / Q000502:physiology*; D014836:Volition / Q000502:physiology