title: The back door: venous-mediated metastasis into cervical lymph nodes as an alternative metastatic pathway for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
abstract: Circulating lymphocytes may home to lymph nodes (LNs) via paracortical postcapillary venules, high-endothelial venules (HEVs) that recognize circulating lymphocytes, enabling them to migrate into nodal cortical/paracortical regions. Our goal was to find any histologic, immunohistochemical, or in vitro evidence to support the hypothesis that squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) may gain access to LNs via an alternative venolymphatic pathway. Slides from 67 neck dissections with SCC were studied. Standard criteria for lymphatic-mediated metastasis were used; criteria for evidence ofvenolymphatic metastasis were tumor nests localized to the paracortical regions, directly contiguous to HEVs but not marginal sinuses. Cases in which LN architecture was obliterated by metastases were excluded. A modified Stamper-Woodruff assay, which assesses HEV binding, incubated cell lines from oral carcinomas and lung adenocarcinomas with fresh frozen LN sections. Double-blinded cell counts were performed by two observers and analyzed by Student's t test. Immunohistochemical examination was undertaken on 19 paraffin-embedded cases with the monoclonal antibody, MoAb CD44v6, to discover whether expression of this adhesion molecule correlated with metastatic pattern. Twenty-nine cases (66%) revealed evidence only for the LN route of metastasis; 4 cases (9%) were classified as venolymphatic metastasis; 11 cases (25%) showed evidence for both pathways. The Stamper-Woodruff assay confirmed that SCC cells preferentially bound to HEV within cervical LN sections more than did adenocarcinoma cells (P = .02). Strong staining to MoAb CD44v6 was seen in 18 (95%) of 19 SCCs with a membranous pattern. Occasionally, CD44v6 highlighted tumor emboli adjacent to HEVs, but no overall correlation could be made between CD44v6 expression and pattern of spread. Tumor metastasis via lymphatic channels is the predominant mode of metastatic spread, but the venolymphatic route is a plausible alternative pathway. The preferential attachment of SCC cells to HEVs supports this theory.
authors.affiliation: Department of Pathology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029, USA.
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Ivanov
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Som
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Wolf
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Misilim
authors.forename: S P
authors.initials: SP
authors.lastname: Li
authors.forename: M L
authors.initials: ML
authors.lastname: Urken
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Zhang
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Brandwein
mesh_terms: D002448:Cell Adhesion; D006023:Glycoproteins / Q000032:analysis; D006801:Humans; D018960:Hyaluronan Receptors / Q000032:analysis; D007150:Immunohistochemistry; D008197:Lymph Node Excision; D008198:Lymph Nodes / Q000166:cytology; D008207:Lymphatic Metastasis / Q000503:physiopathology; D009333:Neck; D018307:Neoplasms, Squamous Cell / Q000378:metabolism / Q000473:pathology*; D009959:Oropharyngeal Neoplasms / Q000378:metabolism / Q000473:pathology*; D014407:Tumor Cells, Cultured; D014680:Veins / Q000503:physiopathology
chemical_list: C112697:CD44v6 antigen; D006023:Glycoproteins; D018960:Hyaluronan Receptors