title: [Intensive care medicine for elderly patients: how applicable are the APACHE III and III score systems?].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Scores like APACHE (Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation) were evaluated for unselected intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. Can they also be used for risk stratification and quality assurance in selected subgroups like elderly patients?
  
  
  METHODS
  Over a 3-year period data of all admissions of a 12 bed interdisciplinary ICU were collected. APACHE II and III scores and probabilities of hospital deaths were compared with observed outcomes. The discriminatory power was evaluated by calculating the areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Calibration was analyzed with standardized mortality ratios (SMR) and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of 3382 admissions due to exclusion criteria, 2795 patients were analyzed, 1396 (49.9%) of these were > or = 65 years, mean age 75 (65-99) years. 62.5% were non-operative, 37.5% postoperative admissions, 35% after emergency operations. ICU mortality was 11.7%, hospital mortality 25.1%. The areas under the ROC curves were 0.77 for APACHE II and 0.79 for APACHE III (whole collective 0.83 and 0.85, respectively). The SMR was 1.17 for APACHE II and 1.23 for APACHE III compared with 1.06 and 1.22 for all patients, respectively. Calibration for elderly patients was insufficient for APACHE II (Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square = 19, p < 0.025) as well as for APACHE III (chi-square = 41, p < 0.001), while it was good for all patients for APACHE II (chi-square = 12, p > 0.1) but not so for APACHE III (chi-square = 48, p < 0.001).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  APACHE II and III both show good discrimination for elderly patients although a little inferior than for all patients. Both scores can be used for risk stratification of elderly ICU patients. Mortality prognosis is not sufficient for geriatric patients although APACHE II calibrates well for all. Application of these scores for quality assurance in selected subgroups like elderly patients cannot be recommended based on these data.
authors.affiliation: Medizinische Klinik, Allgemeines Krankenhaus Hagen gem. GmbH.
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Markgraf
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Deutschinoff
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Pientka
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Scholten
mesh_terms: D018806:APACHE; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D003422:Critical Care; D005260:Female; D015577:Geriatric Assessment / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005858:Germany; D017052:Hospital Mortality; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011379:Prognosis; D012372:ROC Curve; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D016019:Survival Analysis
vernacular_title: Intensivmedizin bei älteren Patienten: Wie nützlich sind die Scoresysteme APACHE II und III?