title: Why bother to spatially embed EEG? Comments on Pritchard et al., Psychophysiology, 33, 362-368, 1996.
abstract: In a recent paper, Pritchard, Krieble, and Duke (Psychophysiology, 33, 362-368, 1996) studied the validity of spatial embedding of electroencephalographic (EEG) data and rejected this method in favor of time-delay embedding. The present paper describes the nonlinear characterization of brain dynamics using either spatial or time-delay embedding. We discuss the arguments published in Pritchard et al. (1996) and demonstrate that the spatial embedding cannot be rejected on this basis. We also point out the limitations of both spatial and time-delay embeddings related to the spatial extension and the high-dimensional dynamics of brain activity.
authors.affiliation: Unité de Neurosciences Cognitives & Imagerie Cérébrale, LENA-CNRS UPR 640, Hôpital de la Salpêtrière, Paris, France. lenalp@ext.jussieu.fr
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Pezard
authors.forename: J P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Lachaux
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Thomasson
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Martinerie
mesh_terms: D002540:Cerebral Cortex / Q000502:physiology*; D004569:Electroencephalography / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D008959:Models, Neurological; D017711:Nonlinear Dynamics; D013997:Time Factors