title: Comparison of three cold kit reconstitution techniques for the reduction of hand radiation dose.
abstract: In the performance of conventional nuclear pharmacy work, personnel usually receive the highest hand radiation dose during reconstitution of 99Tcm-labelled radiopharmaceuticals. This study was conducted to compare the hand radiation doses incurred during the preparation of 99Tcm-labelled radiopharmaceuticals using three different reconstitution procedures: (1) the standard reconstitution method (i.e. withdrawing 99Tcm activity and normal saline [NS] into the same syringe before adding to the cold kit) (standard); (2) an alternative reconstitution procedure using two syringes to add normal saline separately before 99Tcm activity to the cold kit (NS/Tc); and (3) a standard reconstitution procedure using a robotic system (Amercare Syringe Fill Station, model NuMed SFS 3a, Amercare Ltd, Oxon, UK) (robot). Radiation doses were monitored by thermoluminescent dosimeters (Landauer Inc., Glenwood, IL, USA) on the base of the fourth finger (i.e. ring finger) of the non-dominant hand and on the mid-portion of the second finger (i.e. index finger) of the dominant hand. Three sets of ring badges were measured for each procedure, with 10 stimulated or real reconstitutions per set. Two different radiopharmaceutical kits were evaluated: 99Tcm-MDP, as it is the most frequently used radiopharmaceutical in the majority of nuclear medicine departments (all three reconstitution methods; i.e. standard, NS/Tc and robot), and 99Tcm-sestamibi, as it is not only reconstituted with the highest amount of radioactivity but is also the most frequently dispensed radiopharmaceutical in our laboratory (standard and robot). All kits were prepared from an elution vial containing a standardized amount of 99Tcm activity (i.e. 104.4 +/- 3.6 GBq). To each of the cold MDP and sestamibi kits, 20.7 +/- 1.2 GBq and 44.2 +/- 0.7 GBq of 99Tcm activity were added, respectively. Average accumulated radiation doses for 10 reconstitutions to the fingers (non-dominant/dominant) for the preparations of 99Tcm-MDP were as follows: 14.2 +/- 0.9 mSv/2.8 +/- 0.8 mSv (standard), 10.0 +/- 0.6 mSv/2.7 +/- 0.2 mSv (NS/Tc), and 0.6 +/- 0.1 mSv/1.3 +/- 0.1 mSv (robot). For 99Tcm-sestamibi, the average accumulated radiation doses for 10 reconstitutions to the fingers (non-dominant/dominant) were 6.7 +/- 0.7 mSv/4.6 +/- 0.5 mSv (standard) and 1.1 +/- 0.1 mSv/3.1 +/- 0.4 mSv (robot). When compared to the standard reconstitution method, our results show that the NS/Tc method slightly reduced radiation dose to the non-dominant hand, without any significant reduction for the dominant hand. However, the robot has proved to be the most effective method to considerably reduce radiation dose to both hands. A robotic system should be a useful ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) tool to prepare other high-activity 99Tcm-labelled radiopharmaceuticals, as well as therapeutic and PET radiopharmaceuticals.
authors.affiliation: Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
authors.forename: T V
authors.initials: TV
authors.lastname: Bogsrud
authors.forename: T J
authors.initials: TJ
authors.lastname: Herold
authors.forename: D W
authors.initials: DW
authors.lastname: Mahoney
authors.forename: J C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Hung
mesh_terms: D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D006225:Hand; D006801:Humans; D017056:Medical Laboratory Personnel; D009683:Nuclear Medicine; D011829:Radiation Dosage; D011835:Radiation Protection / Q000295:instrumentation*; D019275:Radiopharmaceuticals / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000302:isolation & purification; D012371:Robotics; D013669:Technetium Tc 99m Medronate / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000302:isolation & purification; D017256:Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000302:isolation & purification
chemical_list: D019275:Radiopharmaceuticals; D017256:Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi; D013669:Technetium Tc 99m Medronate