title: Spot sputum screening: evaluation of an intervention in two homeless shelters.
abstract: METHODS
  Two homeless shelters in Birmingham, Alabama.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To interrupt tuberculosis transmission and evaluate the utility of spot sputum screening.
  
  
  METHODS
  Two shelters participated in the study between May 1996 and February 1997. A spot sputum specimen was collected on a given evening from each overnight client. Information was obtained regarding symptoms and tuberculin skin test (TST) status. There were four screenings during two rounds, with TST in round one only.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of 127 persons involved in the study, 120 (95%) provided specimens, and four tuberculosis cases were identified (4/127, 3.1%). Symptoms were infrequently reported. RFLP analysis (IS6110) confirmed a two-band cluster in three of the four cases; another matching two-band strain was found in a drug rehabilitation client staying in one shelter. Secondary RFLP typing (pTBN12) confirmed the homeless cluster. Costs were $1311 per case identified. Among 92 clients with a prior TST, 40% reported a positive result (37/92). Of 21 PPD tests read, 11 were > or =10 mm (52%).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Spot sputum screening is effective in identifying unsuspected tuberculosis cases in shelters. It has acceptable costs, is logistically simple and efficient. Symptom screening was not useful in this general homeless population. RFLP analysis showed cloning of the two-band strain. Given the evidence for ongoing transmission, sputum screening should be considered in shelter settings.
authors.affiliation: Division of General Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA. kimerlin@uab.edu
authors.forename: M E
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Kimerling
authors.forename: C F
authors.initials: CF
authors.lastname: Shakes
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Carlisle
authors.forename: K H
authors.initials: KH
authors.lastname: Lok
authors.forename: W H
authors.initials: WH
authors.lastname: Benjamin
authors.forename: N E
authors.initials: NE
authors.lastname: Dunlap
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000407:Alabama; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005260:Female; D006703:Ill-Housed Persons / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006798:Housing / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods*; D008875:Middle Aged; D009169:Mycobacterium tuberculosis / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D016133:Polymerase Chain Reaction; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013183:Sputum / Q000382:microbiology*; D014374:Tuberculin Test; D014376:Tuberculosis / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000517:prevention & control