title: Improving population-based cervical cancer screening in general practice: effects of a national strategy.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To assess the effects of a Dutch national prevention programme, aimed at general practitioners (GPs), on the adherence to organizational guidelines for effective cervical cancer screening in general practice. To identify the characteristics of general practices determining success.
  
  
  METHODS
  A prospective questionnaire study with pre- and post-measurement (before and 15 months after the introduction of the national programme).
  
  
  METHODS
  A random sample of one-third of all 4758 Dutch general practices. One GP was asked to participate per practice.
  
  
  METHODS
  A national GP prevention programme to improve population-based prevention of cervical cancer combining various methods for quality improvement in general practice, performed on a national, district and practice level. Outreach visitors were a key strategy in bringing about behavioural changes.
  
  
  METHODS
  The proportion of practices adhering to 10 recommendations (in four guidelines) to organize effective cervical cancer screening.
  
  
  RESULTS
  After 15 months, all Dutch practices showed significant improvement in adherence to nine out of 10 recommendations. Two recommendations, in particular 'identifying women who should be medically excluded from screening' and 'sending a reminder to non-compliers' showed the largest absolute increases of 26% and 33%, respectively. Besides more intensive support of outreach visitors, practice characteristics such as 'computerization' and 'delegation of many clinical tasks to the practice assistant' were important in improving the adherence to guidelines.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The national programme, with a combination of various methods for quality improvement, appeared to be effective in improving the organization of cervical screening in general practice. Computerization and, to a lesser extent, delegation of many clinical tasks to the practice assistant and more intensive support to practices, positively influenced the effectiveness of the national programme.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Quality of Care Research, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: R P
authors.initials: RP
authors.lastname: Hermens
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Hak
authors.forename: M E
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Hulscher
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Mulder
authors.forename: M A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Tacken
authors.forename: J C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Braspenning
authors.forename: R P
authors.initials: RP
authors.lastname: Grol
mesh_terms: D004282:Documentation; D005194:Family Practice / Q000592:standards*; D005260:Female; D019983:Guideline Adherence; D006801:Humans; D016015:Logistic Models; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000458:organization & administration*; D009313:National Health Programs / Q000458:organization & administration*; D009426:Netherlands; D016017:Odds Ratio; D015397:Program Evaluation; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012042:Registries; D017010:Reminder Systems; D002583:Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / Q000517:prevention & control*