Dilemmas facing regulatory and advisory bodies dealing with conflicting results.
Regulatory and advisory bodies have to take into account the possibility that conventional toxicological screening and testing methods may be failing to pick up relevant effects, with the implication that testing may need to go down to much lower exposure levels and use specifically designed studies. In the paper, attention is focused on the problems of understanding endocrine disrupting activity. The shape of the dose-response curve for endocrine disrupters may differ from that normally associated with toxic chemicals (the monotonic sigmoid curve). Thus, prediction of both the nature of the effects of potential endocrine disrupters and the intensity of those effects at different doses may be equally difficult. Endocrine effects are not currently amenable to analysis by a single apical assay. While existing toxicological tests can pick up many end-organ and functional effects that are relevant to endocrine disturbances, they are generally poor at exploring apparently subtle effects such as disturbances of brain endocrine homeostatic mechanisms which may be critical for normal development.
Barlow
S M
SM
Medical Research Council Institute for Environment & Health, Leicester.
D000818:Animals; D004700:Endocrine System Diseases / Q000139:chemically induced / Q000453:epidemiology*; D004787:Environmental Pollution / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D007878:Legislation as Topic / Q000639:trends*; D018570:Risk Assessment