Comparison of accuracy between compression- and injection-molded complete dentures.
BACKGROUND
A clinically significant incisal pin opening may occur after processing complete dentures if a compression molding technique is used. To recover the proper vertical dimension of occlusion, a time-consuming occlusal adjustment is necessary that often destroys the anatomy of the artificial teeth. A new injection molding process claims to produce dentures that require few, if any, occlusal adjustments in the laboratory after processing.


OBJECTIVE
This laboratory study compared incisal pin opening, dimensional accuracy, and laboratory working time for dentures fabricated by this new injection system with dentures constructed by the conventional compression molding technique.


METHODS
Two groups of 6 maxillary and 6 mandibular dentures were evaluated as follows: group 1 (control), Lucitone 199, compression molded with a long cure cycle; and group 2, Lucitone 199, injection molded with a long cure. Incisal pin opening was measured with a micrometer immediately after deflasking. A computerized coordinate measuring machine was used to measure dimensional accuracy of 3-dimensional variations in selected positions of artificial teeth in 4 stages of denture fabrication. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and t tests were performed to compare the groups.


RESULTS
A significant difference was found in pin opening between groups (t test). Horizontal dimensional changes evaluated with repeated measures ANOVA revealed no significant differences between groups. However, analysis of vertical dimensional changes disclosed significant differences between the groups. There was no appreciable difference in laboratory working time for flasking and molding denture bases between the injection and compression molding techniques when polymethyl methacrylate resin was used.


CONCLUSIONS
The injection molding method produced a significantly smaller incisal pin opening over the standard compression molding technique. The injection molding technique, using polymethyl methacrylate, was a more accurate method for processing dentures. There were no appreciable differences in laboratory working time between the injection and compression molding techniques.
Nogueira
S S
SS
School of Dental Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. nogueira@foar.unesp.br
Ogle
R E
RE
Davis
E L
EL
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D003725:Dental Articulators; D003779:Denture Design / Q000379:methods*; D003824:Denture, Complete; D019904:Polymethyl Methacrylate; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D013997:Time Factors; D014716:Vertical Dimension
D019904:Polymethyl Methacrylate