Definitive identification of Bacillus anthracis--a review.
The word 'problem' is seen with some frequency in relation to clear differentiation between Bacillus anthracis and B. cereus. In fact, although the close relationship of these two species is undisputed, it is only in the case of a few borderline isolates, rarely encountered in practice, that any sort of identification problem exists. Until recently this was only important to the taxonomist who found it unsatisfactory not to be able to identify definitively such isolates. To most others, if the isolate was unable to produce anthrax in a laboratory animal, it was discarded as irrelevant without being named, or it was called B. cereus or given a name such as B. anthracis similis, or even a totally unrelated name. More recently, in view of the new light in which B. anthracis is increasingly seen, resulting from its putative association with bioaggression, clear identification has become a more critical issue. This paper reviews the current state of the art and suggests the way forward for the future.
Turnbull
P C
PC
Centre for Applied Microbiology and Research, Porton Down, Salisbury, UK. lxdwhy@public.bta.net.cn
D000818:Animals; D000881:Anthrax / Q000382:microbiology; D001407:Bacillus / Q000145:classification / Q000235:genetics / Q000302:isolation & purification; D001408:Bacillus anthracis / Q000145:classification / Q000235:genetics / Q000302:isolation & purification; D015373:Bacterial Typing Techniques; D014644:Genetic Variation; D016680:Genome, Bacterial; D006801:Humans