title: Evidence-based medicine and the real world: understanding the controversy.
abstract: Controversy has surrounded the 'paradigm' of evidence-based medicine since its introduction in 1992 as a new approach to the teaching and practice of medicine. Here, we address two questions: (1) is evidence-based medicine a good thing?; and (2) why has so much controversy arisen? In addressing these questions, we propose that the discussion surrounding evidence-based medicine should no longer be about whether the application of evidence in clinical practice is a good thing, because it obviously is. Instead, the debate ought to focus on the more difficult question of how to enhance its acceptability among busy clinicians practising in the 'real world'. For the future, we optimistically anticipate an enhanced adoption of evidence-based medicine, as clinicians will become increasingly capable of efficiently accessing existing and forthcoming evidence resources.
authors.affiliation: Department of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, the University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
authors.forename: W A
authors.initials: WA
authors.lastname: Ghali
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Saitz
authors.forename: P M
authors.initials: PM
authors.lastname: Sargious
authors.forename: W Y
authors.initials: WY
authors.lastname: Hershman
mesh_terms: D003657:Decision Making; D003695:Delivery of Health Care; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine / Q000639:trends; D006801:Humans; D010506:Periodicals as Topic