Comparison between personal exposure to 60 Hz magnetic fields and stationary home measurements for people living near and away from a 735 kV power line.
This study compares stationary home measurements with a personal exposure monitor of 60 Hz magnetic fields in a group of 18 people living near a 735 kV line and 17 people living far away from the line. Most of them were white collar workers who worked during the day. They wore a personal Positron meter for 24 h, while a similar meter was left in their home, away from any appliances. For people living away from the line, the impact of residential activities appeared rather weak when considering the average intensity of the field during the awake period (at home): 0.22 microT for personal exposure versus 0.18 microT for stationary measurements (P = 0.09). The impact of residential activities during the awake period was more detectable when using the percentage of time with exposure above 0.78 microT: median 0.4 for personal vs. 0.0 for stationary measurements (P =.01). The temporal variability of the exposure during the awake period was also significantly higher for personal exposure than for stationary measurements. For people living near the line, the intensity of the magnetic field from the line dominated the personal exposure when considering the mean of measurements and the percentage of time above a threshold. However, the temporal variability was greater for the personal exposure during the awake period. Although limited due to its small sample size, the present study seems to demonstrate the usefulness of considering different indexes of exposure when assessing residential exposure to 60 Hz magnetic fields.
Levallois
P
P
Direction de la santé publique de Québec, Beauport, Québec, Canada. patrick.levallois@msp.ulaval.ca
Gauvin
D
D
Gingras
S
S
St-Laurent
J
J
D000328:Adult; D004574:Electromagnetic Fields / Q000009:adverse effects*; D004781:Environmental Exposure; D005260:Female; D006798:Housing; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D016273:Occupational Exposure