The primacy of primary control is a human universal: a reply to Gould's (1999) critique of the life-span theory of control.
This reply to S. J. Gould's (1999) critique of J. Heckhausen and R. Schulz's (1995) life-span theory of control addresses four issues: (1) the universal claim that primary control holds functional primacy over secondary control, (2) the status of secondary control as a confederate to primary control, (3) empirical evidence and paradigms for investigating universality and cultural variations, and (4) the capacity of the human control system to manage both gains and losses in control throughout the life span and aging-related decline in particular. Theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence from evolutionary, comparative, developmental, and cultural psychology are presented to support the authors' view that primary control striving holds functional primacy throughout the life span and across cultural and historical settings. Recommendations for empirically investigating the variations in the way primary control striving is expressed in different cultures are outlined.
Heckhausen
J
J
Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
Schulz
R
R
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002648:Child; D003431:Cross-Cultural Comparison; D005008:Ethnopsychology; D006803:Human Development; D006801:Humans; D007389:Internal-External Control; D009042:Motivation; D011582:Psychological Theory