A survey of biomedical scientists and consultant pathologists involved in the cervical screening programme.
The past decade has seen a transformation in the National Health Service Cervical Screening Programme (NHSCSP) largely driven by responses to various screening scandals. Independent inquiries into these laboratory failures have identified a number of contributing factors. The aim of this postal survey was to determine how widespread these factors are throughout screening laboratories in England. The results indicate that issues around recruitment and retention of staff, the training of pathologists and low morale appear to be widespread. However, the results do not indicate a widespread breakdown in working relationships between consultants and biomedical scientists, although there is room for improvement in their relationships with hospital management. Finally, there seem to be mixed messages about the commitment of consultants to the screening programme.
Brown
D C
DC
Department of Histo/Cytopathology, Whittington Hospital, London, UK.
Griffiths
D
D
D002055:Burnout, Professional; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007400:Interprofessional Relations; D007588:Job Satisfaction; D007755:Laboratories, Hospital / Q000458:organization & administration* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000458:organization & administration*; D009013:Morale; D010336:Pathology; D010561:Personnel Staffing and Scheduling; D015397:Program Evaluation; D013222:State Medicine; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D006113:United Kingdom; D002577:Uterine Cervical Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis*; D014940:Work Schedule Tolerance; D016526:Workload