title: The use of gemcitabine in non-small-cell lung cancer. Provincial Lung Cancer Disease Site Group. Provincial Systemic Treatment Disease Site Group.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Is there a role for the use of gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)?
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To make recommendations about the use of gemcitabine in the management of medically appropriate patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The outcomes of interest were survival, response rate, symptomatic response, response duration and toxicity.
  
  
  METHODS
  Evidence was selected and reviewed by 2 members of the Provincial Lung Cancer Disease Site Group (DSG) of the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guidelines Initiative. The practice guideline report was reviewed by the Provincial Lung Cancer DSG and by the Systemic Treatment Disease Site Group. These committees comprise medical and radiation oncologists, surgeons, pathologists, nurses, a psychologist, a medical sociologist and administrators. One community representative participated in the development of this practice guideline.
  
  
  METHODS
  Five phase II studies of single-agent gemcitabine in advanced NSCLC were reviewed. Four of these are published as full reports. Two randomized phase II studies comparing single-agent gemcitabine with etoposide plus cisplatin were also reviewed. One of these studies is fully published. Seven phase II studies of gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin and I phase II study of gemcitabine in combination with ifosfamide were reviewed. Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 1 randomized phase II study, published in abstract form, compared gemcitabine combination chemotherapy with cisplatin combination chemotherapy. An additional phase II study, published in abstract form, of gemcitabine as salvage therapy in previously treated patients was also included.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Four phase II studies of single-agent gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 or more showed a combined response rate of 19% (intention-to-treat analysis; 95% confidence interval [CI] 15% to 24%) or 21% (efficacy analysis; 95% CI 17% to 26%) in advanced NSCLC. Median survival ranged from 7 to 9 months. Improvement from baseline in cough, hemoptysis and dyspnea was comparable to what would be expected with radiation therapy and with standard combination chemotherapy regimens. Improvement from baseline in their performance status was reported in 52% of treated patients. The 2 randomized phase II studies reported equivalent response rates for gemcitabine compared with etoposide plus cisplatin; the response data were pooled, which resulted in a nonsignificant benefit for gemcitabine (common odds ratio [OR] 0.90; 95% CI 0.43 to 1.90; p = 0.78). Gemcitabine has most frequently been combined with cisplatin, yielding a combined response rate of 44% (intention-to-treat; 95% CI 36% to 47%) or 45% (efficacy; 95% CI 39% to 51%) from 7 phase II studies. Median survival times ranged from 10 to 14 months. One phase II randomized study compared gemcitabine-cisplatin-vinorelbine vs. cisplatin-epirubicin-vindesine plus lonidamine and demonstrated a higher response rate (62% vs. 35%) in favour of the gemcitabine combination. Three RCTs demonstrated increased response rates for the combination of gemcitabine-cisplatin over either cisplatin alone or other combination regimens [(gemcitabine-cisplatin 35% vs. etoposide-cisplatin 12%; p = 0.001), (gemcitabine-cisplatin 31% vs. cisplatin 9%; p = 0.0001), (gemcitabine-cisplatin 40% vs. mitomycin, ifosfamide, cisplatin 28%; p = 0.03)].
  
  
  RESULTS
  The major dose-limiting toxicity is neutropenia. Despite this, infection rates are low. Significant adverse effects that have an impact on the patient's quality of life or require the discontinuance of treatment are reported to be less than with any other single agent or combination of agents. Grade 3 or 4 dyspnea has been reported to occur in fewer than 2% of cases and may be drug related. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
authors.affiliation: Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre, Ontario.
authors.forename: W K
authors.initials: WK
authors.lastname: Evans
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Kocha
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Gagliardi
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Eady
authors.forename: T E
authors.initials: TE
authors.lastname: Newman
mesh_terms: D000964:Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D000970:Antineoplastic Agents / Q000008:administration & dosage; D000972:Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic / Q000008:administration & dosage; D000971:Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000627:therapeutic use; D002289:Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / Q000188:drug therapy*; D002945:Cisplatin / Q000008:administration & dosage; D017322:Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; D016001:Confidence Intervals; D003841:Deoxycytidine / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000031:analogs & derivatives* / Q000627:therapeutic use; D004305:Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; D005047:Etoposide / Q000008:administration & dosage; D006801:Humans; D008175:Lung Neoplasms / Q000188:drug therapy*; D009367:Neoplasm Staging; D009503:Neutropenia / Q000139:chemically induced; D016017:Odds Ratio; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D012074:Remission Induction; D016879:Salvage Therapy; D015996:Survival Rate; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D000093542:Gemcitabine
chemical_list: D000964:Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; D000970:Antineoplastic Agents; D000972:Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; D003841:Deoxycytidine; D005047:Etoposide; D002945:Cisplatin; D000093542:Gemcitabine