title: Community members' perceptions of evidence: the effects of gender in a recovered memory civil trial.
abstract: Community members judged a civil trial in which a memory had either been recovered or kept secret until therapy 12 years later. Female jurors were more likely to find the defendant liable and to compensate female plaintiffs more than male plaintiffs, whereas the reverse pattern held for male jurors. Female plaintiffs who reported recovered memories were compensated least, whereas female plaintiffs who kept the abuse secret were compensated most. A mediational model was posited and results indicated that the origin of the memory of sexual abuse and victim gender influenced assessments of trial testimonies that were related to the trial outcomes. Results supported the postulated model and indicated significant juror-gender differences in evaluating and weighing the evidence.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: ForsterLee
authors.forename: I A
authors.initials: IA
authors.lastname: Horowitz
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Ho
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: ForsterLee
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: McGovern
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001294:Attitude to Health; D002959:Civil Defense; D003159:Community-Institutional Relations; D005104:Expert Testimony; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008569:Memory Disorders / Q000523:psychology*; D008875:Middle Aged; D011897:Random Allocation; D020127:Recovery of Function; D012094:Repression, Psychology; D012737:Sex Factors