title: Difference in security of stent jail between Palmaz-Schatz, NIR, and Multi-Link stents: the effect of balloon inflation through stent struts.
abstract: After placing a stent in the main vessel of a bifurcation lesion, it is often necessary to perform further balloon inflation or stent placement through the stent struts in order to treat a lesion of the secondary vessel or side branch. This balloon inflation with dilatation through the cells of the stent in the main vessel results in stent strut disfigurement. This disfigurement causes various degrees of stenosis within the main vessel secondary to stent strut deformity. The degree of strut deformity, and therefore stenosis, may vary significantly depending on stent design and structure. A model of a bifurcation lesion with an angle of 45 degrees was created from acrylic resin. The diameters of the main vessel and the secondary vessel were both 3.5 mm. Deployment of the Palmaz-Schatz stent (PS, n = 5), NIR stent (n = 5), or Multi-Link stent (n = 5) was performed in the main vessel with a 3.5-mm balloon catheter inflated to 6 atm. A second 3.5-mm balloon catheter was then inflated to 6 atm through the stent struts of the main vessel and into the ostium of the secondary vessel. The minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and cross-sectional area (CSA) at the ostium of the side branch and the stenosis within the main vessel were then measured, taking into account the stent deformity that occurred. Kissing balloon dilatation with two 3.5-mm balloon catheters was then performed and the stenosis secondary to stent deformity in the main vessel was remeasured. The MLD of the Multi-Link stent at the side-branch ostium was greater compared with those of the Palmaz-Schatz stent or the NIR stent (2.4 +/- 0.1, 1.6 +/- 0.1, 1.7 +/- 0.1 mm, P < 0.01) and CSA (4.9 +/- 0.5, 2.7 +/- 0.3, 2.5 +/- 0.3 mm(2), P < 0.01). Balloon inflation through the stent struts caused stent deformity that resulted in some degree of stenosis within the stent of the main vessel in all three stent types. Kissing balloon inflation reduced, but never eliminated, this stenosis. The percent stenosis in the main vessel secondary to stent deformity (PS 34% +/- 9%, NIR 25% +/- 8%, Multi-Link 34% +/- 7%, NS) and residual stenosis postkissing balloon inflation (PS 12% +/- 1%, NIR 10% +/- 3%, Multi-Link 14% +/- 3%, NS) were not significantly different among these three stents. At the side-branch ostium, the MLD and CSA were significantly greater for the Multi-Link stent compared with those of the Palmaz-Schatz or NIR stent. Balloon inflation through the stent struts caused stent deformity that resulted in stenosis within the stent in the main vessel. Kissing balloon inflation reduced this stenosis, but some residual stenosis always remained. The stenoses within the main vessel did not differ among the three stent types. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 48:230-234, 1999.
authors.affiliation: The Third Department of Internal Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Kinoshita
authors.forename: Y
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Kobayashi
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: De Gregorio
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Nameki
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Kuroda
authors.forename: Y
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Yamamoto
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Miyazaki
authors.forename: Y
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Masuda
mesh_terms: D015906:Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary / Q000295:instrumentation*; D002404:Catheterization / Q000295:instrumentation*; D004867:Equipment Design; D019544:Equipment Failure Analysis; D006083:Graft Occlusion, Vascular / Q000628:therapy; D006801:Humans; D008955:Models, Cardiovascular; D015607:Stents