title: Does the use of psychiatrists as sources of information improve media depictions of mental illness? A pilot study.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The aim of this study is to determine whether mental illnesses are depicted in less negative ways in print media when psychiatrists rather than lay persons are the source of information.
  
  
  METHODS
  Seven items from a special report on mental health, four derived from lay sources and three from psychiatrists, were subjected to a discourse analysis informed by knowledge of media practices.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The psychiatrists were clearly distinguished and deployed as experts in contrast to lay sources. Two of the psychiatrists presented mental illnesses in less negative ways than in the other items. These more positive depictions were undermined by the devices that the journalists used to give authority to the portrayals of mental illness and by the need to create 'newsworthy' items.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  If psychiatrists and other mental health professionals are to have a positive effect on how media depict mental illness, they will have to develop closer relationships with journalists and a better appreciation of media priorities and practices.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of Auckland, New Zealand. r.nairn@auckland.ac.nz
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Nairn
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006266:Health Education; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000523:psychology*; D009520:New Zealand; D009524:Newspapers as Topic; D011570:Psychiatry; D011639:Public Opinion; D012928:Social Desirability