Pollen recovery in atmospheric samples collected with the Rotorod Sampler over multiple-day periods such as weekends.
BACKGROUND
Conventional wisdom holds that multiple-day samples should not be obtained with the Rotorod Sampler because sampling efficiency declines over long sampling periods such as weekends.


OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this present investigation was to test this position under experimental conditions.


METHODS
Atmospheric pollen samples were collected over 24-hour, 48-hour, and 72-hour periods by five Rotorod Samplers operated in a compact sampling array. Pollen counts obtained from the latter two sampling periods were compared with corresponding values computed from 24-hour samples. Differences in pollen recovery were assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient and paired comparisons t-tests.


RESULTS
Two hundred seventeen atmospheric samples were obtained between March 30 and October 8, 1998. Differences between the 48-hour and 72-hour samples and their computed counterparts were not statistically significant when the atmospheric pollen concentration was less than 100 pollen grains per cubic meter of air (p/m3). At higher pollen concentrations large quantitative and statistically significant differences were noted.


CONCLUSIONS
These data suggest that particle loading on Rotorod collector rods caused sample quality to deteriorate when atmospheric pollen concentrations exceed 100 p/m3. Multiple-day sampling periods appear to be justified when the atmospheric pollen concentration is less than this threshold. Adjusting the Rotorod Sampler's duty cycle may offer a means to collect samples over periods longer than 24 hours during times of the year when pollen shed is heavy.
Frenz
D A
DA
Multidata, Inc., Minnetonka, Minnesota 53305-1533, USA.
Boire
A A
AA
D000397:Air Pollution / Q000032:analysis*; D002452:Cell Count; D008722:Methods; D011058:Pollen / Q000166:cytology*; D018401:Sample Size; D012621:Seasons; D013997:Time Factors