Similar mechanisms underlie curvature comparison by static and dynamic touch.
In four experiments, we tested whether haptic comparison of curvature ranging from -4/m to +4/m is qualitatively the same for static and for dynamic touch. In Experiments 1 and 3, we tested whether static and dynamic curvature discrimination are based on height differences, attitude (slope) differences, curvature differences, or a combination of these geometrical variables. It was found that both static and dynamic hepatic curvature discrimination are based on attitude differences. In Experiments 2 and 4, we tested whether this mechanism leads to errors in the comparison of stimuli with different lengths for static and dynamic touch, respectively. If the judgments are based on attitude differences, subjects will make systematic errors in these comparisons. In both experiments, we found that subjects compared the curvatures of strips of the same length vertically, whereas they made systematic errors if they were required to compare the curvatures of strips of different lengths. Longer stimuli were judged to be more curved than shorter stimuli with the same curvature. We conclude that similar mechanisms underlie static and dynamic haptic curvature comparison. Moreover, additional data comparison showed that static and dynamic curvature comparison is not only qualitatively, but also quantitatively similar.
Pont
S C
SC
Utrecht University, Helmholtz Instituut, The Netherlands.
Kappers
A M
AM
Koenderink
J J
JJ
D006801:Humans; D010812:Physical Stimulation / Q000379:methods*; D011594:Psychometrics; D012684:Sensory Thresholds / Q000502:physiology; D014110:Touch / Q000502:physiology*