title: The equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil psychological instruments: implications for measures of negative affect.
abstract: The use of computerized psychological assessment is a growing practice among contemporary mental health professionals. Many popular and frequently used paper-and-pencil instruments have been adapted into computerized versions. Although equivalence for many instruments has been evaluated and supported, this issue is far from resolved. This literature review deals with recent research findings that suggest that computer aversion negatively impacts computerized assessment, particularly as it relates to measures of negative affect. There is a dearth of equivalence studies that take into account computer aversion's potential impact on the measurement of negative affect. Recommendations are offered for future research in this area.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion 57069, USA. sschulen@usd.edu
authors.forename: S E
authors.initials: SE
authors.lastname: Schulenberg
authors.forename: B A
authors.initials: BA
authors.lastname: Yutrzenka
mesh_terms: D000339:Affect; D003201:Computers; D006236:Handwriting; D006801:Humans; D010552:Personality Assessment; D011580:Psychological Techniques