Civilian rectal trauma: a changing perspective.
BACKGROUND
Recently the Organ Injury Scaling Committee of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma developed a Rectal Injury Scaling System (RISS). Little data exist regarding its clinical utility.


METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed 45 patients with rectal injuries to assess the impact of the RISS on patient management and outcome. We compared RISS grade I patients (group I, partial-thickness injury) with patients with grades 2, 3, and 4 injuries (group II, full-thickness injury).


RESULTS
Group II underwent distal rectal washout and repair of the injury twice as often and had a significantly higher rate of diversion of the fecal stream. This was associated with a 3-fold increase in complications. The only complications in group I were in patients managed with diversion of the fecal stream and distal rectal washout.


CONCLUSIONS
Our data suggest that aggressive surgical management for RISS grade I injury may not be necessary. Implementation of therapy based on the RISS may improve outcomes of civilian rectal trauma.
Morken
J J
JJ
Department of Surgery, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minn 55415, USA.
Kraatz
J J
JJ
Balcos
E G
EG
Hill
M J
MJ
Ney
A L
AL
West
M A
MA
Van Camp
J M
JM
Zera
R T
RT
Jacobs
D M
DM
Odland
M D
MD
Rodriguez
J L
JL
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003125:Colostomy / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007902:Length of Stay; D008297:Male; D010808:Physical Examination; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000401:mortality; D012002:Rectal Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery*; D012007:Rectum / Q000293:injuries*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D016896:Treatment Outcome