Comparison of cutting efficiency and instrumentation of curved canals with nickel-titanium and stainless-steel instruments.
The cutting efficiency and the effects of instrumentation on curved canal shape of both stainless-steel and nickel-titanium nonstandardized ProFile Series 29 hand instruments and stainless-steel Flexoreamer were investigated under standardized conditions. Concerning cutting efficiency in rotary motion, the Flexoreamer had significantly (p < 0.01) greater cutting efficiency than stainless-steel ProFiles and nickel-titanium ProFiles. Changes in the canal shape differed significantly between the different instruments at all measuring points (p < 0.001). After instrumentation with Flexoreamers with inclusion of two half-sizes (#17 and #22), there were fewer undesirable changes in canal shape compared with both stainless-steel and nickel-titanium ProFile Series 29 instruments. In this study, it seemed that flexible stainless-steel instruments with noncutting tips were superior to the nonstandardized ProFile Series 29 instruments with regard to cutting efficiency and instrumentation of curved canals.
Schäfer
E
E
Poliklinik für Zahnerhaltung, Münster, Germany.
Lau
R
R
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D003762:Dental Instruments; D003786:Dental Pulp Cavity / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D004867:Equipment Design; D008953:Models, Anatomic; D003765:Models, Dental; D009532:Nickel; D018583:Pliability; D018915:Root Canal Preparation / Q000295:instrumentation*; D013193:Stainless Steel; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D014025:Titanium
C040654:titanium nickelide; D013193:Stainless Steel; D009532:Nickel; D014025:Titanium