Comparative reject analysis in conventional film-screen and digital storage phosphor radiography.
The aim of this study was comparative analysis of rejected radiographs in conventional and digital radiology under the aspects number of rejected images and reasons for rejection. During 2 months waste films of conventional radiography were collected; in digital radiography each image-delete command at the postprocessing workstation was documented. Rejected images were analysed and assigned to four categories. The overall reject rate was 27.6% in the conventional and 2.3% in the digital department. Whereas in the conventional department the main reason for rejection was "exposure" and "others" (i.e. problems related to film handling), the main reason in the digital environment was "positioning". The high exposure tolerance of digital systems markedly reduces the amount of faulty images. This is not only economically rewarding, but may also reduce unnecessary X-ray exposure of patients due to image retake.
Peer
S
S
Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Peer
R
R
Walcher
M
M
Pohl
M
M
Jaschke
W
W
D006801:Humans; D011786:Quality Control; D011856:Radiographic Image Enhancement / Q000592:standards*; D011872:Radiology Department, Hospital / Q000592:standards*; D011873:Radiology Information Systems; D014963:X-Ray Intensifying Screens / Q000592:standards*