Comparative cost-effectiveness of four-layer bandaging in the treatment of venous leg ulceration.
This paper reports the results of an analysis designed to estimate the expected annual cost per patient of treating venous leg ulcers, and to evaluate the relative cost-effectiveness of a systematic treatment regimen using a four-layer compression bandaging system (Profore) compared with usual care. A Markov model has been developed which simulates the transition of patients between health states (healed and unhealed) over a 52-week period. Healing rates used in the model are derived from those reported in the literature. By running the model for a cohort of 100 patients over 52 weeks it is possible to estimate expected outcomes and annual budgetary costs for alternative treatment regimens. Results suggest that, when compared with usual care, a systematic treatment regimen using Profore is unambiguously more cost-effective. Patient outcomes are improved and annual treatment costs reduced. An important implication is that failure to co-ordinate treatment policies and to use the most cost-effective treatments may result in substantial inefficiency in the use of NHS resources. This inefficiency could represent the equivalent of between 350,000 Pounds and 1.08 million Pounds annually for a typical health authority.
Carr
L
L
York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, UK.
Philips
Z
Z
Posnett
J
J
D001458:Bandages / Q000191:economics*; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D006801:Humans; D007871:Leg Ulcer / Q000191:economics* / Q000628:therapy*; D017059:Models, Econometric; D016896:Treatment Outcome