title: Sentence interference in the Stroop task.
abstract: In two experiments on Stroop interference, we examined whether sentences can be processed without the intention of the reader. Participants named the ink colors in which words in sentences were printed, and the ink colors in which the same words, randomly arranged, were printed. In Experiment 1, sentences yielded longer response times (RTs) and more errors than did nonsentences, but only when they included words that were highly relevant to the color-naming task (i.e., color and color-related words). In Experiment 2, sentences yielded more errors than did nonsentences, and sentences in which the color words matched the set of ink colors yielded longer RTs than did nonsentences. The results indicate that sentence processing can be obligatory when the component words are highly relevant to the task.
authors.affiliation: University of Colorado, Boulder 80309-0345, USA.
authors.forename: A G
authors.initials: AG
authors.lastname: Brega
authors.forename: A F
authors.initials: AF
authors.lastname: Healy
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D003071:Cognition; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007266:Inhibition, Psychological; D008297:Male; D008570:Memory, Short-Term; D011578:Psycholinguistics; D011581:Psychological Tests; D011930:Reaction Time