title: Evaluation of the Washington State Workers' Compensation Managed Care Pilot Project I: medical outcomes and patient satisfaction.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  This study examined the effect of managed care on medical outcomes and patient satisfaction as part of an evaluation of the Washington State Workers' Compensation Managed Care Pilot.
  
  
  METHODS
  One hundred twenty firms (7,041 employees) agreed to have their injured workers treated in managed-care plans. Managed care introduced two changes from the fee-for-service (FFS) delivery system currently used by injured workers in Washington State: (1) experience-rated capitation, and (2) a primary occupational-medicine delivery model. The FFS control group included injured workers employed at 392 firms (12,000 employees). A total of 1,313 workers who experienced occupationally related injuries or illnesses between April 1995 and June 1996 were interviewed by telephone at 6 weeks after injury regarding their medical outcomes and satisfaction with care. Workers whose injuries resulted in four or more lost workdays (n = 372) were also interviewed at 6 months after injury on the same topics. The areas surveyed included functional outcomes and satisfaction with care, providers, and access to providers.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The measures of functional outcome reflected no consistent differences between the managed care and the FFS conditions. The workers who attended the managed-care system reported lower levels of satisfaction with care, particularly with access to providers. For example, 58% of managed-care patients reported satisfaction with their attending physician as compared with 69% of FFS patients (P<0.01).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Workers treated through managed-care arrangements were less satisfied with their care, but their medical outcomes were similar to those of workers who received traditional FFS care. The current workers' compensation system in Washington State affords injured workers great latitude in choosing providers. If provider choice is substantially restricted by managed care, worker satisfaction is likely to diminish.
authors.affiliation: Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle 98195-7660, USA.
authors.forename: K B
authors.initials: KB
authors.lastname: Kyes
authors.forename: T M
authors.initials: TM
authors.lastname: Wickizer
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Franklin
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Cain
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Cheadle
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Madden
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Murphy
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Plaeger-Brockway
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Weaver
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D018588:Fee-for-Service Plans; D005260:Female; D018166:Health Care Reform; D006302:Health Services Research; D006801:Humans; D007182:Income; D015601:Injury Severity Score; D008297:Male; D008329:Managed Care Programs / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D009787:Occupational Medicine / Q000639:trends*; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D010865:Pilot Projects; D015397:Program Evaluation; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014861:Washington; D014942:Workers' Compensation / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*