Behavioral science foundations of the Rorschach test: research and clinical applications.
Never without its critics, the Rorschach Test continues to be widely used in clinical settings. The test continues to be criticized vigorously. Rorschach critics appear to fall into two broad groups: those leveling valid methodological concerns about the test s behavioral science foundations and method critics who appear to deny the validity of the test on strictly a priori or theoretical considerations. Many critics do not appear to be acquainted with the extensive Rorschach research literature. The current paper provides an overview of several domains of applied and laboratory Rorschach behavioral science, including statistical power analysis, interobserver agreement and interrater reliability, Rorschach assessment of thought disorder, and emerging research linking Rorschach variables with diagnostic criteria from the DSM-IV, as a means of educating both adherents and detractors alike concerning the test s scientific track record and applicability to clinical assessment.
Acklin
M W
MW
acklin@hawaii.edu
D001525:Behavioral Sciences / Q000379:methods*; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D003953:Diagnosis-Related Groups / Q000145:classification; D006801:Humans; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000145:classification / Q000175:diagnosis*; D015588:Observer Variation; D011586:Psychology, Clinical / Q000379:methods*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012107:Research Design; D012392:Rorschach Test / Q000592:standards*