title: How to defuse compliance time bombs. Part 2: Six hypothetical allegations. Panel discussion.
abstract: In the second and final part of this series, a panel of legal experts discusses more hypothetical allegations against a fictional laboratory, including billing for additional indices, using expired reagents, and falsifying the results of employee competency tests. Learn how to handle these dilemmas before they explode into full-blown legal violations.
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Frogale
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: McAdams
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Raspanti
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Sheehan
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Ward
mesh_terms: D019411:Clinical Laboratory Techniques / Q000592:standards; D004282:Documentation; D019983:Guideline Adherence; D007344:Insurance Claim Reporting; D007586:Job Application; D007755:Laboratories, Hospital / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000592:standards*; D011361:Professional Competence; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care; D012308:Risk Management; D014481:United States