Efforts to regulate the collection and use of genetic information.
Public fascination with and support for genetic medicine is complicated by a deeply held fear that genetic information will be used by third parties (eg, insurers, employers, school systems) in ways that will harm the individuals from whom it was derived. Since the mid-1990s there has been much state and some federal legislative activity to address 2 closely related issues: the maintenance of genetic privacy and the prevention of genetic discrimination. These laws have had to confront several challenging questions such as what constitutes a genetic test, is genetic information qualitatively different from other medical information, and is there a means to distinguish between the two. In general the state laws are not well crafted. I will argue that a far more preferable policy is to draft a global, comprehensive medical records privacy law and to develop a model statute that defines the role of predictive genetic information in insurance underwriting. Concerns over misuse of genetic information also pose major issues for the conduct of genomic research. Among those I discuss are ownership of the DNA sample, significant changes in the scope of consent that must precede the decision to volunteer as a subject in genomic research, the reuse of long-archived samples, the challenges to intellectual property rights that flow from research, and the rise of the doctrine of community consent.
Reilly
P R
PR
Shriver Center for Mental Retardation, Inc, Waltham, MA 02154-6316, USA.
D003219:Confidentiality / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D004247:DNA / Q000235:genetics; D005821:Genetic Techniques; D005826:Genetics, Medical / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D008499:Medical Records / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D018907:Privacy; D014481:United States
D004247:DNA