title: Measurement error in epidemiology: the design of validation studies II: bivariate situation.
abstract: The bias in relative risk estimates caused by errors in measurement of the relevant exposure is being increasingly recognized in epidemiology. Estimation of the necessary correction factor to remove this bias for univariate exposure has been considered in an earlier paper. We consider here the multivariate situation in which non-differential errors in measurement can lead to incorrect identification of the variable most closely associated with disease. Estimation of the necessary correction factor when the true exposure is unobservable necessarily requires assumptions. We explore the robustness of the estimation to departures from a range of assumptions. The value of good biomarkers is demonstrated. We present a bivariate example in which failure to take account of measurement error leads to the incorrect exposure being identified as the important determinant of disease risk.
authors.affiliation: Department of Mathematics, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong.
authors.forename: M Y
authors.initials: MY
authors.lastname: Wong
authors.forename: N E
authors.initials: NE
authors.lastname: Day
authors.forename: N J
authors.initials: NJ
authors.lastname: Wareham
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D015982:Bias; D002318:Cardiovascular Diseases / Q000209:etiology; D004734:Energy Metabolism; D004813:Epidemiology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D016015:Logistic Models; D008297:Male; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D010809:Physical Fitness; D012306:Risk; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires