title: Effect of LH or GnRH on the dominant follicle of the first follicular wave in beef heifers.
abstract: A study was designed to characterise ovarian follicular dynamics in heifers treated with porcine luteinizing hormone (pLH) or gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) on days 3, 6 or 9 (ovulation = day 0), corresponding to the growing, early-static, and late-static phases of the first follicular wave. Following ovulation, 65 beef heifers were assigned, by replicate, to the following seven treatment groups: 25 mg im of pLH on days 3, 6 or 9 (n = 9 per group); 100 microg im of GnRH on days 3, 6 or 9 (n = 9 per group); or controls (no treatment; n = 11). Ovulation occurred within 36 h in 67%, 100% and 67% of heifers treated with pLH and in 89%, 56% and 22% of heifers treated with GnRH on days 3, 6 or 9, respectively (treatment-by-day interaction, P < 0.09). Combined for all treatment days, ovulation rates were 78% and 56% in pLH- and GnRH-treated groups, respectively (P < 0.09). Overall, mean day (+/- SD) of emergence of the second follicular wave in heifers that ovulated was different from that in controls or in heifers that did not ovulate (P < 0.05). Mean (+/- SD) day of emergence of the second wave occurred earlier (day 5.6+/-1.2; P < 0.05) in heifers that ovulated after treatment on day 3 (n = 14) than in controls (day 8.7+/-1.6; n = 11); however, wave emergence in all heifers treated on day 6 (day 8.1+/-0.5; n = 18) did not differ from controls, regardless of whether or not ovulation occurred. In the heifers that ovulated in response to treatment on day 9 (n = 8), the emergence of the second follicular wave was delayed (day 10.9+/-0.4; P < 0.05). The day of emergence of the second wave in the 14 treated heifers that failed to ovulate, irrespective of the day of treatment (day 8.9+/-1.4) did not differ from control heifers. The emergence of the second wave was more synchronous in day 6 heifers (regardless of whether they ovulated) and in day 9 heifers that ovulated compared to control heifers (P < 0.05). Results did not support the hypothesis that the administration of pLH or GnRH at known stages of the follicular wave in cycling heifers would consistently induce ovulation or atresia and, thereby, induce emergence of a new follicular wave at a predictable interval. New wave emergence was induced consistently (1.3 days post-treatment) only in those animals that ovulated in response to treatment. However, 22% of LH-treated heifers and 44% of GnRH-treated heifers failed to ovulate. Treatments did not induce atresia of the dominant follicle or alter the interval to new wave emergence in animals that did not ovulate in response to treatment.
authors.affiliation: Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
authors.forename: M F
authors.initials: MF
authors.lastname: Martinez
authors.forename: G P
authors.initials: GP
authors.lastname: Adams
authors.forename: D R
authors.initials: DR
authors.lastname: Bergfelt
authors.forename: J P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Kastelic
authors.forename: R J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Mapletoft
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002417:Cattle; D004971:Estrus / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D007987:Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone / Q000494:pharmacology*; D007986:Luteinizing Hormone / Q000494:pharmacology*; D008460:Meat; D010060:Ovulation / Q000187:drug effects*; D010062:Ovulation Induction / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary; D013552:Swine
chemical_list: D007987:Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; D007986:Luteinizing Hormone