Thirty years of fetal and neonatal physiologic measurements. Have they made a difference?
In looking at fetal and neonatal measurement technology as covered in this issue and as reported in areas not covered in this issue, we need to ask the question: Has this technology made a difference? Unfortunately, the answer is not clear. There are cases where the answer is a solid "yes" and other cases where "maybe" is the best we can say at the present time. There are also a few examples where even though noble attempts have been made, the answer must be "no." What does this mean in terms of what needs to be done? We certainly need to continue the development of new measurement technology and to carry out this development based on sound physiologic and engineering principles. We need to understand better the physical and biologic basis of the measurements that we make and to perform carefully controlled clinical trials of technology before bringing it to the marketplace. Data presentation and archiving is an important issue that, although it is being addressed today, still has future implications as the amount of data increase. Finally, we must not forget the importance of our ultimate goal of helping families to have healthy, happy offspring.
Neuman
M R
MR
Joint Program in Biomedical Engineering, Herff College of Engineering, University of Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
D004864:Equipment and Supplies; D005318:Fetal Heart / Q000502:physiology; D005323:Fetal Monitoring / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods; D005333:Fetus / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D007231:Infant, Newborn / Q000502:physiology*; D010500:Perinatology / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods / Q000639:trends*; D012119:Respiration