Development of a brief questionnaire for screening for multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome.
The objective of this study was to identify a parsimonious set of questions that has high sensitivity and specificity for screening for individuals with multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) syndrome. We performed a cross-sectional survey using a case-control design. Subjects were derived from patients seen at an academically based Occupational and Environmental Medicine Clinic. Cases consisted of patients who fulfilled the Cullen definition for MCS. Controls were patients who had diagnoses excluding MCS and asthma and who were matched to cases by age and sex. Cases and controls filled out a screening questionnaire that, among things, elicited responses as to whether and how subjects reacted to 122 different types of environmental exposures. Data from 44 pairs of cases and controls were available for analysis. The average age of cases was 50.2 years, and 91% was female. Among cases, the most common exposure that was purported to incite MCS was 'indoor air quality contaminants (unspecified)' (59%), followed by solvents (27.3%). After randomly excluding five cases and controls, a stepwise selection procedure for two-group discriminant analysis revealed that the main contributors to the discrimination of the remaining cases and controls were self-reported reactions to copy machine emissions, marking pens, aftershave, window cleaner, nylon fabric, pine-scented products, and rayon material. When a positive response to these factors was used as the sole method for discriminating cases from controls, only one of 41 cases was misclassified as a control while none of the controls was misclassified as a case. When the same method was applied to the five excluded cases and five excluded controls, only one of the five cases was misclassified while none of the five controls was misclassified as a case. Among patients with MCS defined by the Cullen criteria in this clinical setting, having a reaction to these seven common potential exposures comprised a parsimonious set of factors that discriminated between MCS patients and age- and sex-matched normal controls. These questions may have utility in screening for individuals with MCS in general population survey studies.
Hu
H
H
Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. howard.hu@channing.harvard.edu
Stern
A
A
Rotnitzky
A
A
Schlesinger
L
L
Proctor
S
S
Wolfe
J
J
D016902:Air Pollution, Indoor / Q000009:adverse effects; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D015994:Incidence; D008297:Male; D008403:Mass Screening; D008875:Middle Aged; D018777:Multiple Chemical Sensitivity / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000453:epidemiology; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D012997:Solvents / Q000009:adverse effects; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires / Q000592:standards*
D012997:Solvents