title: Relationship between corneal thickness and measured intraocular pressure in a general ophthalmology clinic.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To assess whether central corneal thickness (CCT) is a confounding factor in the classification of patients attending for glaucoma assessment in a district general hospital.
  
  
  METHODS
  Cross-sectional study by a single observer.
  
  
  METHODS
  Patients attending a general ophthalmic clinic: 235 clinically normal eyes, 52 eyes with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG), 335 eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), 12 eyes with pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PXE), 42 eyes with chronic angle closure glaucoma (CACG), and 232 glaucoma suspect (GS) eyes.
  
  
  METHODS
  Central corneal thickness was measured using ultrasonic pachymetry.
  
  
  METHODS
  Correlation of CCT and diagnosis.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Mean CCT was 553.9 microm (95% confidence intervals [CI] for the mean, 549.0-558.8 microm) in the clinically normal eyes, 550.1 microm (95% CI, 546.6-553.7 microm) in the POAG eyes, 514.0 microm (95% CI, 504.8-523.3 microm) in the NTG eyes, 530.7 microm (95% CI, 511.2-550.1 microm) in the PXE eyes, 559.9 microm (95% CI, 546.8-573.0 microm) in the CACG eyes, and 579.5 microm (95% CI, 574.8-584.1 microm) in the GS eyes. The differences of mean CCT between the groups were highly significant (P< 0.001 analysis of variance). Eighty-five percent of eyes with NTG and only 36% of eyes with POAG had a mean CCT of 540 microm or less. Thirteen percent of eyes with POAG and 42% of GS eyes had a mean CCT greater than 585 microm.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The CCT measurement is desirable in patients attending for glaucoma assessment in a district general hospital to avoid misclassification resulting from the relationship between CCT and tonometric pressure. Central corneal thickness alone is not an accurate predictor for the clinical diagnosis in this group of eyes. However, many eyes diagnosed as having NTG have thin corneas, which would tend to lower the tonometrically recorded intraocular pressure (IOP), so the finding of a less-than-normal thickness cornea introduces some doubt as to the diagnosis of NTG. For the GS eyes, most eyes had thick corneas, which would tend to increase the tonometrically recorded IOP. Thus, GS eyes with modest elevation of IOP and a thick cornea may be at low risk of progressing to POAG. Thus, many patients with "high IOPs" and a thick CCT do not necessarily have high IOPs and may not need to be followed as GS eyes.
authors.affiliation: Eye Department, Royal Bolton Hospital, England. sunilshah@doctors.org.uk
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Shah
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Chatterjee
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Mathai
authors.forename: S P
authors.initials: SP
authors.lastname: Kelly
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Kwartz
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Henson
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: McLeod
mesh_terms: D003315:Cornea / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology*; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D005901:Glaucoma / Q000145:classification* / Q000175:diagnosis*; D006068:Gonioscopy; D006801:Humans; D007429:Intraocular Pressure; D011446:Prospective Studies; D014065:Tonometry, Ocular / Q000379:methods; D014463:Ultrasonography; D058609:Visual Field Tests; D014794:Visual Fields