Microhardness of provisional fixed prosthodontic materials.
BACKGROUND
Provisional restorations play a critical role in the success of restorative treatment. Thus, the provisional restoration must maintain its surface integrity throughout the restorative process.


OBJECTIVE
This study evaluated the microhardness of 5 prosthodontic provisional materials.


METHODS
Cylindrical samples of 3 bis-acryl resin composites (Integrity, Protemp Garant, Temphase) and 2 methyl methacrylate acrylic resins (Jet, Temporary Bridge) were fabricated (n = 5 per material). Specimens were wet-sanded through 600 grit abrasive and stored in artificial saliva at 37 degrees C for a total of 14 days. Baseline Knoop hardness (KHN) was measured 24 hours after specimen fabrication. Three microhardness measurements were obtained from each specimen. Knoop hardness was again recorded after 14 days of storage.


RESULTS
ANOVA and Duncan's tests (P<.05) indicated a significant difference between the methyl methacrylate type resins and the bis-acryl resin composites at both time intervals.


CONCLUSIONS
The hardness of most materials (Integrity, Protemp Garant, Jet) decreased over time. All of the bis-acryl resin composite materials exhibited superior microhardness over traditional methyl methacrylate (Jet, Temporary Bridge) resins.
Diaz-Arnold
A M
AM
College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52245, USA. ana_arnold@uiowa.edu
Dunne
J T
JT
Jones
A H
AH
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D003764:Dental Materials / Q000737:chemistry*; D003794:Dental Restoration, Temporary / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006244:Hardness; D006801:Humans; D008422:Materials Testing / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D012464:Saliva, Artificial; D013499:Surface Properties; D013997:Time Factors
D003764:Dental Materials; D012464:Saliva, Artificial