Flavor-cued modulation of intake in rats: role of familiarity and impact on 24-h intake.
Following training with distinctively flavored nutritive solutions that differ in concentration and thus in caloric value, rats demonstrate flavor-postingestive consequence learning by preferentially consuming one of the flavors in two-bottle tests (both flavors in nutrient-identical solutions.) Experiment 1 investigated whether the relative familiarity of the flavor-nutrient combinations encountered in two-bottle tests contributes to the observed preference. One of the training concentrations (rather than the customary intermediate concentration) was used to present the flavors in testing; thus, one of the flavors was in a familiar context while the other was in an unfamiliar context. The results of two independent trials (rats trained with 1 and 5% sucrose; rats trained with 5 and 40% sucrose) confirmed that two-bottle test preference was not a preference for the familiar flavor-nutrient combination. Experiment 2 examined whether caloric expectancies based upon a previously learned flavor-postingestive consequence association would affect total daily intake. On alternating days, rats consumed 30 mL of dilute (5%) and concentrated (40%) sucrose, each distinctively flavored. When given 30 mL of 22.5% sucrose containing each of the flavors on separate test days, they ate less chow and thus fewer total calories over 24 h when given the flavor previously paired with concentrated sucrose. Experiment 3 replicated the design of Experiment 2 except that fat calories were used instead of sucrose; no significant adjustment of chow intake in extinction tests was noted, even when the number of fat calories used in training was increased (Experiment 4). Thus, rats did not exhibit flavor-cued modulation of chow intake when trained with fat, in contrast to responsivity to flavor cues when trained with sucrose. This differential responding to fat versus carbohydrate calories is consistent with previous observations, in a variety of paradigms, that modulation of caloric intake is less energetically appropriate when ingested foods are high in fat relative to high-carbohydrate foods.
Warwick
Z S
ZS
Department of Psychology, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore 21250, USA.
Synowski
S J
SJ
Coons
V
V
Hendrickson
A
A
D000818:Animals; D003463:Cues; D004040:Dietary Carbohydrates / Q000494:pharmacology; D004041:Dietary Fats / Q000494:pharmacology; D019422:Dietary Sucrose / Q000494:pharmacology; D002149:Energy Intake / Q000502:physiology; D005247:Feeding Behavior / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D051381:Rats; D020318:Rats, Long-Evans; D013649:Taste / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology*
D004040:Dietary Carbohydrates; D004041:Dietary Fats; D019422:Dietary Sucrose