title: Pharmacists' concerns and perceived benefits from the deregulation of hormonal emergency contraception (HEC).
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To ascertain pharmacists' views, assess willingness for involvement and delineate individual perceived competence in the supply of deregulated hormonal emergency contraception (HEC).
  
  
  METHODS
  Cross-sectional postal questionnaire utilising closed, open and Likert-scale questions.
  
  
  METHODS
  Three thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine registered pharmacists abstracted from the mailing list of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In total 1543 (38.6%) questionnaires were returned and analysed. Overall 1165 (75.5%) of pharmacists stated their willingness to be involved in the deregulated supply of HEC. However, pharmacists identified the need for specific training before effective deregulation should take place. Overall, 616 (39.9%) of respondents felt individually competent to supply deregulated HEC with a positive association between perceived competence and willingness to supply deregulated HEC (p < 0.05). Pharmacists perceive the major benefits of deregulation to be a reduced unwanted pregnancy rate and a subsequent reduced abortion rate. They perceive that deregulation would allow quicker and less restricted access to HEC by clients, facilitating an increased overall supply of HEC. Pharmacists express a number of concerns, tempering their collective desire to see HEC deregulation. The majority of these concerns related to safeguarding clients and the possible adverse public health effects associated with the possible reduced use of barrier methods of contraception.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Most pharmacists would be willing to supply HEC if it were deregulated to 'pharmacy only' from 'prescription only' medicine status. Although concerns were raised, these were mainly related to safety issues, with few pharmacists identifying moral and ethical barriers to deregulation. For effective deregulation to occur issues of professional competence need to be addressed.
authors.affiliation: School of Health Sciences, The University of Sunderland, Sunderland, Tyne & Wear, UK.
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Blackwell
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Cooper
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Taylor
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Holden
mesh_terms: D000028:Abortion, Induced; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D002983:Clinical Competence; D003273:Contraceptive Devices; D003281:Contraceptives, Postcoital / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D011307:Drug Prescriptions; D004512:Education, Pharmacy; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D005260:Female; D006297:Health Services Accessibility; D006801:Humans; D007880:Legislation, Drug; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009014:Morals; D010595:Pharmacists / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D011247:Pregnancy; D011275:Pregnancy, Unwanted; D011634:Public Health; D012449:Safety; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D006113:United Kingdom
chemical_list: D003281:Contraceptives, Postcoital