The sensitivity of the results of molecular docking to induced fit effects: application to thrombin, thermolysin and neuraminidase.
This paper describes the application of PRO_LEADS to the flexible docking of ligands into crystallographically derived enzyme structures that are assumed to be rigid. PRO_LEADS uses a Tabu search methodology to perform the flexible search and an empirically derived estimate of the binding affinity to drive the docking process. The paper tests the extent to which the assumption of a rigid enzyme compromises the accuracy of the results. All-pairs docking experiments are performed for three enzymes (thrombin, thermolysin and influenza virus neuraminidase) based on six or more ligand-enzyme crystal structures for each enzyme. In 76% of the cases, PRO_LEADS can successfully identify the correct ligand conformation as the lowest energy configuration when the enzyme structure is derived from that ligand's crystal structure, but the methodology only docks 49% of the cases successfully when the ligand is docked against enzyme crystal structures derived from other ligands. Small movements in the enzyme structure lead to an under-prediction in the energy of the correct binding mode by up to 14 kJ/mol and in some cases this under-prediction can lead to the native mode not being recognised as the lowest energy solution. The type of movements responsible for mis-docking are: the movement of sidechains as a result of changes in C alpha position; the movement of sidechains without changes in C alpha position; the movement of flexible portions of main chains to facilitate the formation of hydrogen bonds; and the movement of metal atoms bound to the enzyme active site. The work illustrates that the assumption of a rigid active site can lead to errors in identification of the correct binding mode and the assessment of binding affinity, even for enzymes which show relatively small shift in atomic positions from one ligand to the next. A good docking code, such as PRO_LEADS, can usually dock successfully if there is induced fit in relatively rigid enzymes but there remains the need to develop improved strategies for dealing with enzyme flexibility. The work implies that treatments of enzyme flexibility which focus only on sidechain rotations will not deal with the critical shifts responsible for mis-docking of ligands in thrombin, thermolysin and neuraminidase. The paper demonstrates the utility of all pairs docking experiments as a method of assessing the effectiveness of docking methodologies in dealing with enzyme flexibility.
Murray
C W
CW
Proteus Molecular Design Ltd., Macclesfield, Cheshire, U.K. c.w.murray@proteus.co.uk
Baxter
C A
CA
Frenkel
A D
AD
D001665:Binding Sites; D003461:Crystallography; D008024:Ligands; D009439:Neuraminidase / Q000737:chemistry*; D011487:Protein Conformation; D012984:Software; D013820:Thermolysin / Q000737:chemistry*; D013917:Thrombin / Q000737:chemistry*; D014867:Water / Q000737:chemistry
D008024:Ligands; D014867:Water; D009439:Neuraminidase; D013917:Thrombin; D013820:Thermolysin