title: [Randomized clinical trials and systemic reviews in nursing literature: a comparison between German and international nursing research].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To ascertain whether there are randomised-controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews on nursing care, written in German language, which need to be identified for inclusion in systematic reviews of the effects of health care. Quantitative comparison of German-language and international nursing research.
  
  
  METHODS
  Searches by Medline and CINAHL (1988-1997) and searches by hand of seven nursing journals, published in German language, to identify RCTs and systematic reviews.
  
  
  METHODS
  Total number of RCTs identified and number of RCTs published in German language journals.
  
  
  RESULTS
  15 RCTs related to nursing care have been identified. No RCTs have been found by hand search of nursing journals. There were no nurse researchers as first authors for RCTs.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  German nurse researchers need to adapt high quality study designs to nursing interventions studies to achieve international research standard.
authors.affiliation: IGTW-Fachrichtung Gesundheit, Universität Hamburg.
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Schlömer
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D009729:Nursing; D015399:Nursing Research; D010506:Periodicals as Topic; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D012196:Review Literature as Topic
vernacular_title: RCTs und systematic reviews in der Pflegeliteratur: Ein Vergleich zwischen deutscher und internationaler Pflegeforschung.