title: Comparison of necrotoxigenic Escherichia coli isolates from farm animals and from humans.
abstract: Necrotoxigenic Escherichia coli (NTEC) isolated from animals and humans can belong to the same serogroups/types and produce or carry the genes coding for fimbrial and afimbrial adhesins of the same family, P, S, F17, and/or AFA, raising the question of a potential zoonotic source of human infection. The main purpose of this study was to compare 239 NTEC1 strains (45 from cattle, 65 from humans and 129 from piglets) and 98 NTEC2 strains from cattle, using a uniform and standardized typing scheme. The O serogroups and the biotypes recognized amongst NTEC1 and NTEC2 strains were quite varied, although some were more frequently observed (serogroups O2, O4, O6, O8, O18, O78, and O83 and biotypes 1, 2, 5, 6, and 9). Hybridization, results with gene probes for the P family (PAP probe), S family (SFA probe), AFA family (AFA probe), F17 family (F17 probe) of fimbrial and afimbrial adhesins, could differentiate most NTEC1 strains, which are PAP-, SFA- and/or AFA-positive, from NTEC2 strains, which are mainly F17- and/or AFA-positive, but were of no help in differentiating between NTEC1 strains from cattle, humans, and piglets. All but seven (98%) NTEC1 and NTEC2 strains were serum resistant, 199 (59%) produced an aerobactin, and colicin (I, V, or unidentified) was produced by 22-34% of them. On the other hand, more than 90% of the NTEC1 strains were haemolytic on sheep blood agar compared with only 40% of the NTEC2 strains. Production of a classical haemolysin, active on sheep erythrocytes, and hybridization with the PAP probe were associated in a majority of NTEC1 strains (63-81%), but very rarely in NTEC2 strains (3%). Production of enterohaemolysin and hybridization with the PAP probe were much less frequently associated in NTEC strains (1-9%). It was thus possible neither to completely differentiate NTEC1 strains from cattle, humans, and pigs, nor to define a signature for the NTEC strains. Necrotoxigenic E. coli must still be identified on the basis of the production of the Cytotoxic Necrotizing Factors 1 or 2 (or of their encoding genes) and complete differentiation of NTEC1 strains from cattle, humans, and piglets, use additionnal methods.
authors.affiliation: Chaire de Bactériologie et de Pathologie Bactérienne, Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Liège, Campus du Sart Tilman, Belgium. jg.mainil@ulg.ac.be
authors.forename: J G
authors.initials: JG
authors.lastname: Mainil
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Jacquemin
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Pohl
authors.forename: J M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Fairbrother
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Ansuini
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Le Bouguénec
authors.forename: H J
authors.initials: HJ
authors.lastname: Ball
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: De Rycke
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Oswald
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002417:Cattle; D004926:Escherichia coli / Q000145:classification / Q000302:isolation & purification* / Q000472:pathogenicity; D005838:Genotype; D006460:Hemolysin Proteins / Q000378:metabolism; D006801:Humans; D010641:Phenotype; D012703:Serotyping; D013552:Swine
chemical_list: D006460:Hemolysin Proteins