Interactions between red-billed oxpeckers, Buphagus erythrorhynchus, and domestic cattle, Bos taurus, in Zimbabwe.
Many apparent interspecific mutualisms are poorly understood. Although theory has focused on the various evolutionary problems peculiar to mutualism, especially the need to identify mechanisms that protect a mutualism from cheating or exploitation, there are relatively few quantified examples of how organisms actually interact. Oxpeckers are believed to benefit their mammalian hosts by reducing tick loads, an assumption based on the fact that the birds include ticks in their diet. I watched red-billed oxpeckers foraging on domestic cattle in the Limpopo Valley between August 1996 and September 1997. From focal watches of 41 individually colour-ringed oxpeckers, I found that birds fed mainly on wounds, in ears and by 'scissoring' with the bill (a distinctive feeding technique). Observable tick feeding represented a very small percentage of their foraging time. Based on oxpecker behaviour at feeding sites, blood from open wounds appeared to be the favoured food: oxpeckers displaced each other significantly more, and were significantly less likely to be deterred by the cows' attempts to remove them, when feeding on a wound than at other feeding sites. The preference for blood, the inability of cows to prevent oxpeckers feeding on blood and the relatively small amount of visible tick feeding suggest that, certainly for cattle, oxpeckers may not be beneficial. However, as cows have not coevolved with oxpeckers, these results may not be representative of oxpecker relations with native African mammalian hosts. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.
Weeks
P
Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge