title: Conventional versus endoscopic free gracilis muscle harvest.
abstract: Compared with conventional techniques, the endoscopically assisted harvest of free tissue has advantages such as minimal interference with cosmesis and reduced donor-site morbidity. However, the procedure also requires training and has an extensive learning period. In this series of 22 patients, the initial gracilis muscle flaps were harvested using a conventional method; the subsequent flaps were harvested with the aid of endoscopic instrumentation. Endoscopically assisted gracilis muscle harvest in 16 patients was compared with open method harvest in six patients. The endoscopically assisted group had an average incision length of 6.5 cm; that of the conventional group was 15.5 cm. There was one reexploration in the endoscopically assisted group, but all flaps were transferred successfully. Using this minimally invasive technique of vascular and muscular dissection, assisted by endoscopic instruments designed for distal muscle dissection and transection, the gracilis muscles can be harvested within 40 minutes. We consider endoscopically assisted harvest of free gracilis muscle to be safe, relatively simple, and cost-effective.
authors.affiliation: Trauma Center, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. ltrauma@adm.cgmh.com.tw
authors.forename: C H
authors.initials: CH
authors.lastname: Lin
authors.forename: F C
authors.initials: FC
authors.lastname: Wei
authors.forename: Y T
authors.initials: YT
authors.lastname: Lin
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D004724:Endoscopy; D005260:Female; D018409:Foot Injuries / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D007869:Leg Injuries / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D018482:Muscle, Skeletal / Q000637:transplantation; D013524:Surgical Flaps; D013525:Surgical Instruments; D016896:Treatment Outcome