Difficulties with anonymous shortlisting of medical school applications and its effects on candidates with non-European names: prospective cohort study.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the feasibility of anonymous shortlisting of applications for medical school and its effect on those with non-European names.


METHODS
Prospective cohort study.


METHODS
Leeds school of medicine, United Kingdom.


METHODS
2047 applications for 1998 entry from the United Kingdom and the European Union.


METHODS
Deletion of all references to name and nationality from the application form.


METHODS
Scoring by two admissions tutors at shortlisting.


RESULTS
Deleting names was cumbersome as some were repeated up to 15 times. Anonymising application forms was ineffective as one admissions tutor was able to identify nearly 50% of candidates classed as being from an ethnic minority group. Although scores were lower for applicants with non-European names, anonymity did not improve scores. Applicants with non-European names who were identified as such by tutors were significantly less likely to drop marks in one particular non-academic area (the career insight component) than their European counterparts.


CONCLUSIONS
There was no evidence of benefit to candidates with non-European names of attempting to blind assessment. Anonymising application forms cannot be recommended.
Lumb
A B
AB
School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Worsley Medical and Dental Building, Leeds LS2 9NL. medal@leeds.ac.uk
Vail
A
A
D015331:Cohort Studies; D005006:Ethnicity; D006801:Humans; D009275:Names; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012570:School Admission Criteria; D012577:Schools, Medical; D006113:United Kingdom