A prospective randomized trial of day-stay only versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
BACKGROUND
Although the feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed as day surgery has been established, cost and recovery time have not previously been evaluated in a prospective comparative fashion.


METHODS
Patients were randomized to day stay only or overnight stay, and a nurse assessed the former postoperatively at home. All patients were reviewed weekly or as required if problems occurred. Costing comparisons were made between the two groups using Trendstar software.


RESULTS
A total of 131 patients were evaluated after randomization (60 day-stay only patients and 71 overnight-stay patients). A total of 18.3% of the day-stay patients required in-hospital admission for nausea, vomiting, or pain, or after conversion to open operation; 18.3% of the overnight group required an extended length of stay for similar reasons. After discharge, two day-stay and three overnight-stay patients required readmission, only one had a significant complication. The mean times to return to normal activity averaged 1.8 weeks (SE: 0.1 weeks) and 1.9 weeks (SE: 0.1 weeks) for day-stay and overnight-stay groups, respectively (P = 0.63), and costs of $2732 (SE: $76) compared to $2835 (SE $110), respectively (P = 0.94).


CONCLUSIONS
In the present randomized controlled study, day-stay management did not compromise postoperative patient outcome. In the setting of a major teaching hospital there was no cost advantage when compared to overnight-stay management.
Hollington
P
P
Department of Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. paul.hollington@flinders.edu.au
Toogood
G J
GJ
Padbury
R T
RT
D000556:Ambulatory Surgical Procedures / Q000191:economics*; D017081:Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic / Q000191:economics*; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D017558:Elective Surgical Procedures; D006801:Humans; D007902:Length of Stay / Q000191:economics*; D011446:Prospective Studies