title: Comparison of osteopathic and allopathic medical Schools' support for primary care.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To contrast prevailing behaviors and attitudes relative to prJgiary care education and practice in osteopathic and allopathic medical schools.
  
  
  METHODS
  Descriptive study using confidential telephone interviews conducted in 1993-94. Analyses compared responses of osteopaths and allopaths, controlling for prJgiary care orientation.
  
  
  METHODS
  United States academic health centers.
  
  
  METHODS
  National stratified probability samples of first-year and fourth-year medical students, postgraduate year 2 residents, and clinical faculty in osteopathic and allopathic medical schools, a sample of allopathic deans, and a census of deans of osteopathic schools (n = 457 osteopaths; n = 2,045 allopaths).
  
  
  METHODS
  Survey items assessed personal characteristics, students' reasons for entering medicine, learners' prJgiary care educational experiences, community support for prJgiary care, and attitudes toward the clinical and academic competence of prJgiary care physicians.
  
  
  RESULTS
  PrJgiary care physicians composed a larger fraction of the faculty in osteopathic schools than in allopathic schools. Members of the osteopathic community were significantly more likely than their allopathic peers to describe themselves as socioemotionally oriented rather than technoscientifically oriented. Osteopathic learners were more likely than allopathic learners to have educational experiences in prJgiary care venues and with prJgiary care faculty, and to receive encouragement from faculty, including specialists, to enter prJgiary care. Attitudes toward the clinical and academic competence of prJgiary care physicians were consistently negative in both communities. Differences between communities were sustained after controlling for prJgiary care orientation.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In comparison with allopathic schools, the cultural practices and educational structures in osteopathic medical schools better support the production of prJgiary care physicians. However, there is a lack of alignment between attitudes and practices in the osteopathic community.
authors.affiliation: Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Helath Care, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
authors.forename: A S
authors.initials: AS
authors.lastname: Peters
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Clark-Chiarelli
authors.forename: S D
authors.initials: SD
authors.lastname: Block
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D002983:Clinical Competence; D003625:Data Collection; D004504:Education, Medical, Undergraduate / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D016015:Logistic Models; D008297:Male; D010021:Osteopathic Medicine / Q000193:education*; D011320:Primary Health Care / Q000706:statistics & numerical data* / Q000639:trends; D011336:Probability; D012494:Sampling Studies; D012577:Schools, Medical / Q000592:standards / Q000639:trends; D014481:United States