title: A comparison of a computer and pencil and paper assignment.
abstract: Colleges are challenged to provide students with diverse teaching-learning experiences. Educators who introduce new teaching-learning experiences must evaluate the outcomes of these experiences. Three faculty members instituted a new multimedia computer-based assignment for undergraduate nursing students enrolled in a pediatric clinical course and then evaluated their knowledge and satisfaction. Students were asked to design a computer program about peripherally inserted central catheters, and to complete tests and summaries. During two semesters, 45 students participated in the assignment. As compared to another group of students who were asked to participate in a pencil and paper independent study assignment, these students were more satisfied with their computer assignment. Students in both groups, however, produced thought-provoking work and improved their knowledge base about central catheters. In many ways, the results support the use of a computer assignment.
authors.affiliation: College of Nursing, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824, USA. cgibbons@pilot.msu.edu
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Gibbons
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Bachulis
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Allen
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D001292:Attitude to Computers; D003194:Computer-Assisted Instruction / Q000379:methods*; D004508:Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate / Q000379:methods*; D004521:Educational Measurement; D005181:Faculty, Nursing; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D019212:Multimedia; D015402:Nursing Education Research; D010371:Pediatric Nursing / Q000193:education; D015397:Program Evaluation; D013338:Students, Nursing / Q000523:psychology; D013663:Teaching / Q000379:methods*