title: The postoperative spine.
abstract: During the last decade, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) mostly has replaced computed tomography for evaluation of spinal surgery patients. The inherent advantages of MRI are obvious for this particularly difficult field of imaging. With MRI, it is possible to demonstrate anatomic as well as pathological and iatrogenic changes in three different imaging planes and countless neighboring planes and to obtain a superior view of the complex postoperative situation regardless of the spinal level imaged. Soft-tissue masses in particular can be identified more readily and located within three-dimensional space. One of the major advantages is that the nature and histology of the mass can be estimated precisely using different MR sequences in combination with intravenous contrast media. The most important benefit may be demonstration of inflammatory and hemorrhagic masses in the early postoperative periods (with special emphasis on alterations visible in the spinal cord itself) as well as repair processes and ongoing degeneration in later stages. This visualization is possible even when their extent is limited. In the postoperative spine, the application of MRI was facilitated with the advent of new materials, such as titanium alloys, used for surgical instrumentation. These new materials limit the amount of artifacts visible on MR images. Earlier implants made of other metallic material prohibit the use of computed tomography in the spine. This article provides a brief overview of the progress in spinal surgery and focuses on the developments in MRI techniques during the last decade. Technical questions about imaging of spinal instrumentation are discussed. "Normal" postoperative findings needed for interpretation of pathologic conditions are also discussed. Finally, the most important frequently asked questions from referring surgeons that radiologists must be able to answer by MRI are presented.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, Osteology/MR, University of Vienna, Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Clinical and Experimental Radiology, Austria.
authors.forename: C B
authors.initials: CB
authors.lastname: Henk
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Brodner
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Grampp
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Breitenseher
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Thurnher
authors.forename: G H
authors.initials: GH
authors.lastname: Mostbeck
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Imhof
mesh_terms: D000497:Alloys; D016477:Artifacts; D003287:Contrast Media / Q000008:administration & dosage; D006801:Humans; D007089:Image Enhancement; D007275:Injections, Intravenous; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D009984:Orthopedic Fixation Devices; D011182:Postoperative Care; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D019106:Postoperative Hemorrhage / Q000175:diagnosis; D013116:Spinal Cord / Q000473:pathology; D013122:Spinal Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis; D013131:Spine / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D013166:Spondylitis / Q000175:diagnosis; D014025:Titanium; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed; D014945:Wound Healing
chemical_list: D000497:Alloys; D003287:Contrast Media; C031462:titanium alloy (TiAl6V4); D014025:Titanium