title: Effect of insemination of estrus-induced prepuberal gilts on ensuing reproductive performance and body weight.
abstract: Prepuberal gilts reared and managed to 85-90 kg live weight in a common system were allocated at random to one of three first-mating treatments in an experiment conducted over a period of more than 5 years. In two of the treatments, gilts received a single i.m. injection of 400 IU equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) and 200 IU human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) (PG600; Intervet) and were either inseminated 4 and 5 days later on a fixed-time basis regardless of oestrus (treatment A), or at the second oestrus following treatment (treatment B). The third group of gilts remained untreated and was inseminated on the first spontaneous oestrus (treatment C). Thereafter, all gilts were managed in the same way and those observed in oestrus were re-inseminated. Significantly more gilts returned to oestrus after the first service in treatment A (35%) than in treatment B and C (12 and 17%, respectively; P<0.01). Gilts farrowed to the first or repeat inseminations at a significantly younger age (P<0.01) in treatment A (304 days) than treatment B (324 days) and C (320 days). The age difference at farrowing remained in surviving gilts at the end of their third parity. The first farrowing performance of the gilts was significantly affected by treatment in terms of litter size at birth (A 7.0, B 8.4 and C 8.3 live piglets per gilt; P<0.01), litter size at weaning (A 6.2, B 7.2 and C 7.2 live piglets per gilt, P<0.05), and piglet birth weight (A 1.4, B 1.3 and C 1.3 kg; P<0.05) but piglet survival rate and weaning weight were not affected by treatment. The live weights of the gilts were significantly different between the treatments at first insemination (A 95.7, B 106.5 and C 109.2 kg; P<0.01) but not when the first litter was weaned (A 133.6, B 135.1 and C 136.6; P>0.05). After the first farrowing there were no differences between the treatments in terms of the survival rate, productive or reproductive performance of the gilts/sows and their offspring. Without conducting a detailed cost-benefit-calculation it was deduced that, from an economical point of view, differences between treatment A and treatments B and C are negligible because the savings associated with farrowing at a younger age on this treatment just about compensated for any additional costs associated with the treatment and the lower number of piglets born at the first farrowing.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Animal Husbandry and Genetics, University of Goettingen, Germany. wholtz@gwdg.de
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Holtz
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Schmidt-Baulain
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Welp
authors.forename: C K
authors.initials: CK
authors.lastname: Wallenhorst
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D000831:Animals, Newborn; D001724:Birth Weight; D001835:Body Weight; D006063:Chorionic Gonadotropin / Q000627:therapeutic use; D004971:Estrus / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D007315:Insemination, Artificial / Q000662:veterinary*; D008098:Litter Size; D008297:Male; D010060:Ovulation; D011247:Pregnancy; D011897:Random Allocation; D012098:Reproduction; D013552:Swine / Q000502:physiology*
chemical_list: D006063:Chorionic Gonadotropin