title: Semi-automated flow cytometric analysis of CD34-expressing hematopoietic cells in peripheral blood progenitor cell apheresis products.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The measurement of CD34+ cells is the most important step in the quality control of peripheral blood progenitor cell apheresis products. For this purpose, flow cytometry is applied. Recently, a new test kit has been introduced for the enumeration of CD34-expressing cells, in combination with software support for semi-automation of data acquisition and analysis.
  
  
  METHODS
  This study evaluated the ProCOUNT kit. Ninety samples obtained from peripheral blood progenitor cell apheresis products from 39 patients with hemato-oncologic diseases were analyzed. For data acquisition and analysis, ProCOUNT software was used. Data comparison was performed with parallel measurements according to the International Society for Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering (ISHAGE) guidelines and the German reference protocol for analysis of CD34-expressing cells.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Correlation of the German and ISHAGE techniques was excellent (r2 = 0.99). The initial correlation coefficient of ProCOUNT analysis with the German protocol was r2 = 0.89. In 21 (23.3%) of 90 ProCOUNT analyses, a warning message was encountered from the ProCOUNT software. Following manual reevaluation of these data with CellQUEST software, a correlation of r2 = 0.96 with the German protocol and r2 = 0.97 with the ISHAGE analyses was obtained. ANOVA testing revealed significant differences between ProCOUNT and ISHAGE techniques (p<0.05) and between ProCOUNT and the German protocol (p<0.05). No statistically significant difference between ISHAGE and German protocol was observed (p = 0.19).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The ProCOUNT kit and software for semi-automated data acquisition and analysis represents a further step toward standardization of CD34 cell quantitation in peripheral blood progenitor cell apheresis products. However, the occurrence of software warnings is high, and analysis or data reevaluation by experienced staff is still mandatory. Therefore, currently there is no definite advantage of the kit and software over the existing guidelines for CD34+ analysis in peripheral blood progenitor cell grafts.
authors.affiliation: Department of Transfusion Medicine/Transplantation Immunology, the Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. gutensohn@uke.uni-hamburg.de
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Gutensohn
authors.forename: I
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Carrero
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Krueger
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Kroeger
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Schäfer
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Luedemann
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Kuehnl
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D018952:Antigens, CD34 / Q000097:blood*; D001781:Blood Component Removal; D005260:Female; D005434:Flow Cytometry / Q000379:methods*; D019650:Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization; D018380:Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; D006412:Hematopoietic Stem Cells / Q000166:cytology* / Q000276:immunology*; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012984:Software
chemical_list: D018952:Antigens, CD34