title: Our experience with the triple-V transareolar incision for augmentation mammaplasty.
abstract: There have been many important analyses of prosthesis selection, techniques of implantation, and subpectoral or subglandular pockets, but only a few studies comparing and discussing the different approaches. The best incision must achieve a good and simple approach to the retromammary location, subpectoral or subglandular, preserving the anatomy to maintain the nerves and vessels responsible for the sensitivity and blood supply of the breast and avoiding cutting the ductus, and it must result in an inconspicuous scar. This article reports the authors' experience with the last 100 consecutive patients operated on with the triple-V transareolar technique based on the original reported by Ely. Follow-up took place over more than 2 years. The authors discuss the advantages and disadvantages of different incision placements.
authors.affiliation: Unidad de Cirug¿ia Plastica, Est¿etica y Microcirug¿ia, Oviedo, Spain.
authors.forename: C P
authors.initials: CP
authors.lastname: Fernandez
authors.forename: F M
authors.initials: FM
authors.lastname: Lopez
authors.forename: P I
authors.initials: PI
authors.lastname: Burrieza
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001940:Breast / Q000601:surgery*; D019928:Breast Implantation / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans