A commentary on the screened-Oseen, counterion-condensation formalism of polyion electrophoresis.
The use of linear theory, in particular, counterion condensation (CC) theory, in describing electrophoresis of polyelectrolyte chains, is criticized on several grounds. First, there are problems with CC theory in describing the equilibrium distribution of ions around polyelectrolytes. Second, CC theory is used to treat ion relaxation in a linear theory with respect to the polyion charge despite the fact that ion relaxation arises as a consequence of nonlinear charge effects. This nonlinearity has been well established by several investigators over the last 70 years for spherical, cylindrical, and arbitrarily shaped model polyions. Third, current use of CC theory ignores the electrophoretic hindrance as well as the ion relaxation for condensed counterions and only includes such interactions for uncondensed counterions. Because most of the condensed counterions lie outside the shear surface of the polyion (in the example of DNA), the assumption of ion condensation is artificial and unphysical. Fourth, the singular solution, based on a screened Oseen tensor, currently used in the above mentioned theories is simply wrong and fails to account for the incompressibility of the solvent. The actual singular solution, which has long been available, is discussed. In conclusion, it is pointed out that numerical alternatives based on classic electrophoresis theory (J.T.G. Overbeek, Kolloid-Beih, 1943, 54:287-364) are now available.
Allison
S A
SA
Department of Chemistry, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30303, USA. chesaa@panther.gsu.edu
Stigter
D
D
D001704:Biopolymers; D004247:DNA / Q000737:chemistry*; D004586:Electrophoresis; D007700:Kinetics; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D012997:Solvents
D001704:Biopolymers; D012997:Solvents; D004247:DNA