Support for a theory of memory for event duration must distinguish between test-trial ambiguity and actual memory loss.
Staddon and Higa's (1999) trace-strength theory of timing and memory for event duration can account for pigeons' bias to "choose short" when retention intervals are introduced and to "choose long" when, following training with a fixed retention interval, retention intervals are shortened. However, it does not account for the failure of pigeons to choose short when the intertrial interval is distinct from the retention interval. That finding suggests that stimulus generalization (or ambiguity) between the intertrial interval and the retention interval may result in an effect that has been attributed to memory loss. Such artifacts must be eliminated before a theory of memory for event duration can be adequately tested.
Zentall
T R
TR
Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40506, USA. zentall@pop.uky.edu
D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology; D010856:Columbidae; D003216:Conditioning, Operant / Q000502:physiology; D004193:Discrimination Learning / Q000502:physiology; D008568:Memory / Q000502:physiology*; D011582:Psychological Theory; D013997:Time Factors; D013998:Time Perception / Q000502:physiology