title: Recall accuracy and illusory memories: when more is less.
abstract: In two experiments it was revealed that manipulations that increased recall of studied list items also increased false recall of theme-related, critical nonpresented words. In Experiment 1 subjects listened to a series of short word lists, each containing items associatively related to a theme, while engaging in either semantic or nonsemantic processing. On an immediate free recall test semantic processors demonstrated greater correct recall as well as more illusory memories of critical nonpresented items than nonsemantic processors. In Experiment 2, the short study lists were combined to form longer lists that were presented either blocked by theme or in a random presentation order. Retention interval was also varied as participants were tested either immediately, one week after, or three weeks after the study phase. Presenting the target items in a blocked, as opposed to random, format increased recall accuracy, but this was at the expense of a higher intrusion rate for theme-consistent items. Interestingly, the level of false memories was not affected by retention interval even though typical decrements in the recall of study items were observed over time. The results of these experiments highlight the persistence of the false memory effect, as well as pointing to several factors, primarily semantic processing, that may lead to the creation of false memories. Interpretations are offered within the theoretical frameworks of source monitoring and fuzzy trace theory.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, SUNY at Cortland 13045, USA. TOGLIA@SNYCORVA.CORTLAND.EDU
authors.forename: M P
authors.initials: MP
authors.lastname: Toglia
authors.forename: J S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Neuschatz
authors.forename: K A
authors.initials: KA
authors.lastname: Goodwin
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D007088:Illusions / Q000523:psychology*; D011939:Mental Recall; D011581:Psychological Tests