title: Comparison of two exploratory data analysis methods for fMRI: fuzzy clustering vs. principal component analysis.
abstract: Exploratory data-driven methods such as Fuzzy clustering analysis (FCA) and Principal component analysis (PCA) may be considered as hypothesis-generating procedures that are complementary to the hypothesis-led statistical inferential methods in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Here, a comparison between FCA and PCA is presented in a systematic fMRI study, with MR data acquired under the null condition, i.e., no activation, with different noise contributions and simulated, varying "activation." The contrast-to-noise (CNR) ratio ranged between 1-10. We found that if fMRI data are corrupted by scanner noise only, FCA and PCA show comparable performance. In the presence of other sources of signal variation (e.g., physiological noise), FCA outperforms PCA in the entire CNR range of interest in fMRI, particularly for low CNR values. The comparison method that we introduced may be used to assess other exploratory approaches such as independent component analysis or neural network-based techniques.
authors.affiliation: Institute for Biodiagnostics, National Research Council Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba.
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Baumgartner
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Ryner
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Richter
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Summers
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Jarmasz
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Somorjai
mesh_terms: D001921:Brain / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D016000:Cluster Analysis; D001330:Electronic Data Processing / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D019047:Phantoms, Imaging