title: Toxicological screening in trauma.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To determine the prevalence and patterns of alcohol and drug use in patients with major trauma.
  
  
  METHODS
  Consecutive trauma patient enrollment, 24 hours a day, was envisaged with anonymised patient data on gender, age band, and mechanism of injury collected. The study group had surplus plasma quantitatively analysed for ethanol concentration, and urine samples were initially screened, via immunoassay, for opiates, cannabinoids, amphetamines, benzodiazepines, cocaine, and methadone. Confirmation and specification of individual positive results was then performed using thin layer or gas-liquid chromatography. Drugs of treatment given in the resuscitation room, if subsequently detected in the urine samples, were excluded from the final results.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There were 116 eligible trauma patients assessed and treated in the resuscitation room over a six month period, of which 93 (80%) were enrolled. Altogether 27% of this trauma population had plasma ethanol concentrations greater than 80 mg/dl. There was a significantly higher prevalence of alcohol intoxication in the group not involved in a road traffic accident (RTA) compared with the group who were involved in a RTA. Initial screening of urine for drugs revealed a prevalence of 51%. After 12 exclusions due to iatrogenic administration of opiates, the final confirmed prevalence was 35% in this trauma population. The individual drug prevalence was 13% for cannabinoids, 11% for codeine, 8% for morphine, 6% for amphetamine, 6% for benzodiazepines, 3% for cocaine, 1% for dihydrocodeine, and 1% for methadone.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  There is a notable prevalence of drug and alcohol use in this British accident and emergency trauma population. A significantly higher prevalence for alcohol intoxication was found in the non-RTA group compared with the RTA group. The patterns of drug usage detected reflect local influences and less cocaine use is seen compared with American studies. The association between alcohol, drugs, and trauma, together with ethically acceptable methods of screening, are discussed.
authors.affiliation: Accident and Emergency Department, St James's University Hospital, Leeds.
authors.forename: T D
authors.initials: TD
authors.lastname: Carrigan
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Field
authors.forename: R N
authors.initials: RN
authors.lastname: Illingworth
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Gaffney
authors.forename: D W
authors.initials: DW
authors.lastname: Hamer
mesh_terms: D000058:Accidental Falls / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D000063:Accidents, Traffic / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D000328:Adult; D004638:Emergency Treatment / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000379:methods*; D009104:Multiple Trauma / Q000209:etiology*; D015995:Prevalence; D011446:Prospective Studies; D015813:Substance Abuse Detection / Q000379:methods; D019966:Substance-Related Disorders / Q000150:complications* / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000378:metabolism