Mechanical properties of metallic stents: how do these properties influence the choice of stent for specific lesions?
OBJECTIVE
To assess selected balloon-expandable and self-expanding stents for radial force, flexibility, radio-opacity, and trackability, and to relate these physical characteristics to potential indications for placement.


METHODS
Force-strain curves were plotted for each stent and the force required to produce 50% luminal narrowing was recorded. The ability of the stent to show elastic recoil following deformation was also noted. Flexibility was measured by bending the stents against a force transducer and recording the force required per degree of flexion. Radio-opacity was measured by comparing each stent against a standard aluminum step wedge. Trackability was measured by testing the ability of the stent on its delivery system to track over angles of 90 degrees and 60 degrees.


RESULTS
The balloon-expandable stents showed greater radial strength and radio-opacity but, apart from the AVE Iliac Bridge stent, showed poorer flexibility and trackability. The self-expanding stents showed less radial force but were able to re-expand following deformity. They were generally more flexible and had better trackability but lower radio-opacity.


CONCLUSIONS
There is no stent which exhibits all the ideal properties required and therefore the interventionist will need to keep a range of stents available if all lesions are to be addressed.
Dyet
J F
JF
Department of Radiology, Royal Hull Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull Royal Infirmary, Anlaby Road, Hull HU3 2JZ, UK.
Watts
W G
WG
Ettles
D F
DF
Nicholson
A A
AA
D000497:Alloys; D002404:Catheterization; D002858:Chromium Alloys; D004867:Equipment Design; D006801:Humans; D018583:Pliability; D013193:Stainless Steel; D015607:Stents; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D013635:Tantalum; D013718:Tensile Strength
D000497:Alloys; D002858:Chromium Alloys; D013193:Stainless Steel; C013616:nitinol; D013635:Tantalum