title: Measures of postural stability are not predictors of recovery from large postural disturbances in healthy older adults.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To determine, in healthy older adults, the relationship between postural steadiness, stability limits, and the ability to recover balance from three postural disturbances requiring anteriorly directed stepping responses.
  
  
  METHODS
  Analysis of multiple motor tasks in a cross-sectional sample of healthy older adults.
  
  
  METHODS
  A biomechanics research laboratory.
  
  
  METHODS
  Fifty women and 29 men aged 65 or older, all healthy, living in the community, participated in this study. Subjects were examined by a geriatrician to identify the presence of exclusionary factors.
  
  
  METHODS
  Anterior-posterior and medial-lateral excursion distances of the center of pressure during quiet standing (postural steadiness), static leaning (static stability limits), and dynamic swaying (dynamic stability limits) were determined from ground reaction forces measured by a strain gauge forceplate. Within the same group of subjects, the maximum angle of forward lean from which a subject could recover with a single step, the ability to recover balance in response to an accelerated support surface, and the ability to recover balance after being tripped were determined.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Recovery from the three types of postural disturbances were found to be statistically independent. The postural steadiness and the stability limit variables were only weakly correlated. Postural steadiness and stability limits were not related to the maximum recoverable angle of lean. The average medial-lateral center of pressure speed during the postural steadiness test was significantly slower for those who failed to recover after tripping than for the subjects who recovered successfully. However, a logistic regression model failed to achieve statistical significance, suggesting that the difference may not be functionally important. The anterior-posterior static stability limits were significantly larger for subjects who recovered successfully than for those who failed to recover during the accelerated support surface test. Although logistic regression suggested that a reduced anterior-posterior stability limit represents a risk factor for failure to recover during this task, only nine of 28 failures could be properly classified, thus diminishing the functional importance of this finding.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Because recovery following postural disturbances could not generally be predicted from measures of postural stability, these findings suggest that these measures of postural stability are of limited utility in identifying potential anteriorly directed fallers in healthy older adults.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Lerner Research Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio 44195, USA.
authors.forename: T M
authors.initials: TM
authors.lastname: Owings
authors.forename: M J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Pavol
authors.forename: K T
authors.initials: KT
authors.lastname: Foley
authors.forename: M D
authors.initials: MD
authors.lastname: Grabiner
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000886:Anthropometry / Q000379:methods*; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D005080:Exercise Test; D005260:Female; D005528:Foot / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D005684:Gait; D015577:Geriatric Assessment; D006801:Humans; D016015:Logistic Models; D008297:Male; D010808:Physical Examination / Q000379:methods*; D004856:Postural Balance; D011187:Posture; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D012016:Reference Values; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012307:Risk Factors; D013997:Time Factors