Aftereffects and the representation of stereoscopic surfaces.
The structure of human disparity representation is examined through (i) adaptation experiments and (ii) model simulations of the data. Section 3 presents results of adaptation experiments designed to illuminate the structure of human disparity representation. Section 4 presents model simulations of three different disparity representation schemes. In the experiments, participants adapted to a 0.133 cycle deg-1 sinusoidally corrugated surface with 10 min of arc peak-to-trough disparity. A flat test surface was briefly presented, in which the aftereffect surface was perceived. Adapt and test surfaces were placed on disparity pedestals and thus presented in front of or behind the plane of fixation. The adapt surface could be offset from the fixation plane by +/- 8 to 24 min of arc. The test surface could be offset from the fixation plane by +/- 8 to 48 min of arc. The depth aftereffect was measured in different disparity planes by a nulling method and 'topping-up' procedure. Aftereffect tuning functions were obtained whose bandwidths, magnitudes, and tuning depended on the disparity planes of both the adapt and test surfaces. These parameters were used to constrain the models tested in section 4. On the basis of the two studies, it is argued that the human stereoscopic system encodes spatial changes of disparity using channels localised within disparity planes. A localised disparity-gradient model of the human representation of disparity is proposed.
Lee
B
B
Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. B.Lee@edinburgh.ac.uk
D000223:Adaptation, Psychological; D005366:Figural Aftereffect; D006801:Humans; D008960:Models, Psychological; D011581:Psychological Tests; D015357:Vision Disparity