Thirty categorization results in search of a model.
One category structure dominated in the shift toward exemplar-based theories of categorization. Given the theoretical burden on this category structure, the authors reanalyzed 30 of its uses over 20 years in 8 articles. The authors suggest 4 conclusions. (a) This category structure may encourage exemplar-memorization processes because of its poor structure, the learning difficulties it causes, and its small, memorizable exemplar sets. Its results may only generalize narrowly. (b) Exemplar models have an advantage in fitting these 30 data sets only because they reproduce a performance advantage for training items. Other models fit equally well if granted this capacity. (c) A simpler exemplar process than assumed by exemplar models suffices to explain these data sets. (d) An important qualitative result predicted by exemplar theory is not found overall and possibly should not even be expected. The authors conclude that the data produced by this category structure do not clearly support exemplar theory.
Smith
J D
JD
Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Buffalo 14260, USA. psysmith@acsu.buffalo.edu
Minda
J P
JP
D003210:Concept Formation; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D005795:Generalization, Stimulus; D006801:Humans; D011939:Mental Recall; D008960:Models, Psychological; D011340:Problem Solving