Evolution of the optimum bidirectional (+/- biphasic) wave for defibrillation.
Introduction of the asymmetric bidirectional (+/- biphasic) current waveform has made it possible to achieve ventricular defibrillation with less energy and current than are needed with a unidirectional (monophasic) waveform. The symmetrical bidirectional (sinusoidal) waveform was used for the first human-heart defibrillation. Subsequent studies employed the underdamped and overdamped sine waves, then the trapezoidal (monophasic) wave. Studies were then undertaken to investigate the benefit of adding a second identical and inverted wave; little success rewarded these efforts until it was discovered that the second inverted wave needed to be much less in amplitude to lower the threshold for defibrillation. However, there is no physiologic theory that explains the mechanism of action of the bidirectional wave, nor does any theory predict the optimum amplitude and time dimensions for the second inverted wave. The authors analyze the research that shows that the threshold defibrillation energy is lowest when the charge in the second, inverted phase is slightly more than a third of that in the first phase. An ion-flux, spatial-K+ summation hypothesis is presented that shows the effect on myocardial cells of adding the second inverted current pulse.
Geddes
L A
LA
Purdue University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1296, USA.
Havel
W
W
D000818:Animals; D017147:Defibrillators, Implantable / Q000266:history / Q000639:trends; D004553:Electric Conductivity / Q000627:therapeutic use; D004554:Electric Countershock / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D004566:Electrodes; D004867:Equipment Design; D049673:History, 20th Century; D006801:Humans; D008564:Membrane Potentials / Q000502:physiology; D009206:Myocardium / Q000378:metabolism*