Experience with Barton button and peristomal breathing valve attachments for hands-free tracheoesophageal speech.
BACKGROUND
Tracheostoma breathing valves permit hands-free tracheoesophageal (TE) speech production; however, few laryngectomees routinely use them because of problems with attachment.


METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 45 TE speakers to determine the success rate and factors associated with successful breathing valve use based on attachment. All patients attempted to use a tracheostoma breathing valve with either a standard or customized peristomal housing, or a standard or customized Barton button. Device selection was based on inspection of the patient's neck and peristomal contour. Six to eight consecutive hours of attachment defined success.


RESULTS
Overall, 9% of subjects succeeded with any peristomal attachment as compared to 68% with either a standard (57%) or customized (85%) Barton button. Smooth stomal contour, a contiguous stomal lip, and correct button length were important for successful Barton button use.


CONCLUSIONS
Standard or customized Barton buttons offer excellent alternatives to peristomal housing attachments for hands-free TE speech in select patients.
Lewin
J S
JS
Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Box 69, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. jlewin@mdanderson.org
Lemon
J
J
Bishop-Leone
J K
JK
Leyk
S
S
Martin
J W
JW
Gillenwater
A M
AM
D004867:Equipment Design; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007822:Laryngeal Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D007825:Laryngectomy; D008297:Male; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D012119:Respiration; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013072:Speech, Esophageal / Q000295:instrumentation*; D054047:Surgical Stomas; D014139:Tracheostomy / Q000295:instrumentation*; D014832:Voice Disorders / Q000209:etiology / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D014833:Voice Quality