title: The role of competing demands in the treatment provided primary care patients with major depression.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To examine whether competing demands explain the appearance of inadequate primary care depression treatment observed at a single visit.
  
  
  METHODS
  A cross-sectional patient survey.
  
  
  METHODS
  Two hundred forty patients with 5 or more symptoms of depression seeing 12 physicians in 6 primary care practices, representing 77.4% of the depressed patients identified through 2-stage screening of more than 11,000 primary care attenders.
  
  
  METHODS
  In patients with elevated depressive symptoms, discussing depression as a possible diagnosis in untreated patients, and changing depression management in treated patients.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Physicians and patients discussed depression in 46 (47.9%) of 96 untreated patients; physicians changed depression treatment recommendations in 87 (60.4%) of 144 treated patients with current symptoms. Chronic physical comorbidity decreased the odds that physicians and untreated patients discussed depression as a possible diagnosis (odds ratio = 0.66, P = .01). New problems decreased the odds that treatment recommendations would be changed in treated patients who remained depressed (odds ratio = 0.39, P = .05). Physicians and untreated patients were more likely to discuss depression as a possible diagnosis if patients reported antidepressant medication was acceptable (odds ratio = 4.57, P = .01) and less likely to discuss depression if patients reported specialty care counseling was acceptable (odds ratio = 0.33, P = .05).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The attention depression gets during a given medical visit is less associated with the severity of the patient's depressive symptoms than with the number or recency of other problems the patient has. If competing demands provide ongoing barriers to depression treatment, interventions will be needed to assure that patients with chronic physical problems receive high-quality mental health care in the primary care setting.
authors.affiliation: Centers for Mental Healthcare Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, USA. kmrost@stlnet.com
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Rost
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Nutting
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Smith
authors.forename: J C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Coyne
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Cooper-Patrick
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Rubenstein
mesh_terms: D000928:Antidepressive Agents / Q000627:therapeutic use; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D003866:Depressive Disorder / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000188:drug therapy*; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D005260:Female; D006301:Health Services Needs and Demand; D006801:Humans; D016015:Logistic Models; D008297:Male; D010342:Patient Acceptance of Health Care; D011320:Primary Health Care / Q000592:standards*; D014481:United States
chemical_list: D000928:Antidepressive Agents