[The comparison of conventional open cholecystectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy and minor-incision cholecystectomy].
To study the clinical value of minor incision for cholecystectomy, compared conventional open cholecystectomy (300 patients, group A), alparoscopic cholecytectomy (300 patients, group B), and minor-incision cholecystectomy (300 patients, group C) with regard to duration (day) of operation, amount of intraoperative bleeding, complications, time (day) of gastrointestinal function recovery, intravenous infusion, and expense and time (day) of hospitalization. The results showed that the operating time, amount of bleeding, duration of intravenous infusion, time of gastrointestinal function recovery and hospitalization in group A were significantly different from those in group B and C (P < 0.05), but the incidence in group A was lower than that in group B. The operating time, amount of intraoperative bleeding, and the time of gastrointestinal function recovery and intravenous infusion in group B were similar to those in group C, but there was a high rate of intraoperative and postoperative complication in group B (1.66%). There was no complication in group C (P < 0.05). Comparison of the effects among group A, B and C showed that it was superior in group C to those in group A and B.
Luo
K
K
Department of Surgery, Red Cross Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming.
Lin
S
S
Yang
Y
Y
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D016063:Blood Loss, Surgical; D001810:Blood Volume; D002763:Cholecystectomy / Q000379:methods*; D017081:Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic / Q000009:adverse effects; D002764:Cholecystitis / Q000601:surgery*; D002769:Cholelithiasis / Q000601:surgery*; D003135:Common Bile Duct / Q000293:injuries; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged