Quality of life and neurological illness: a review of the literature.
This article highlights some of the conceptual and methodological problems associated with quality of life (QoL) measurement in individuals with neurological illness. It is suggested that these problems have contributed to the underdeveloped status of QoL research in neurological settings. Many of the existing QoL measures that have been used, or show potential for use with individuals with neurological illness, are reviewed in terms of their theoretical basis, content, and practicality. A large proportion of these measures fail to meet adequate psychometric standards and/or have rarely been psychometrically tested. The confusion that surrounds adequate psychometric standards is discussed, and the dynamic nature of QoL is highlighted as a factor that requires further attention. Research addressing the discrepancies between proxy and patient ratings of patient QoL is also warranted. More focused research in these areas may contribute to a clearer understanding of how to assess QoL in individuals with neurological illness.
Murrell
R
R
School of Psychology, Roehampton Institute London, and Department of Clinical Psychology, Royal Hospital for Neuro-disability, Putney, United Kingdom.
D001927:Brain Diseases / Q000150:complications; D003072:Cognition Disorders / Q000209:etiology; D003147:Communication Disorders / Q000209:etiology; D005260:Female; D006304:Health Status; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011788:Quality of Life; D012725:Sexual Behavior / Q000523:psychology