title: Effects of scopolamine in comparison with apomorphine and phencyclidine on prepulse inhibition in rats.
abstract: The potential involvement of the muscarinic cholinergic system in the underlying mechanisms of prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex was evaluated in male Sprague-Dawley rats under conditions of varying dose, prepulse intensity, and interstimulus interval. The effects of scopolamine on prepulse inhibition were also directly compared with the effects observed using apomorphine and phencyclidine under the same test parameters. Scopolamine (0. 03-1.0 mg/kg) produced a significant dose-dependent decrease in prepulse inhibition, but had no effect on startle amplitude over the dose range tested. Apomorphine (0.03-1.0 mg/kg) and phencyclidine (0. 1-5.6 mg/kg) produced significant dose-dependent decreases in prepulse inhibition and changes in startle amplitude. The scopolamine-induced decrease in prepulse inhibition varied with prepulse intensity in that the changes produced by scopolamine became smaller in magnitude as the prepulse intensity was increased from 9 to 30 dB above background. On the other hand, apomorphine and phencyclidine decreased prepulse inhibition to approximately the same magnitude across all prepulse intensities tested. The observed decreases in prepulse inhibition produced by scopolamine, apomorphine, and phencyclidine were also dependent on interstimulus interval duration. Scopolamine produced marked decreases in prepulse inhibition at the 100- and 300-ms interstimulus interval durations, but had little or no effect on prepulse inhibition at the 30- and 1000-ms interstimulus interval durations. In contrast, apomorphine decreased prepulse inhibition across all interstimulus interval durations while phencyclidine decreased prepulse inhibition across the 30- to 300-ms interstimulus interval durations. The present findings support the hypothesis that the muscarinic cholinergic system, like the dopaminergic and glutamatergic systems, is directly involved in the mechanisms of prepulse inhibition. However, these three neurotransmitter systems appear to modulate different aspects of prepulse inhibition.
authors.affiliation: Program of Medical Neurobiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, IN, USA. jones_carie_k@lilly.com
authors.forename: C K
authors.initials: CK
authors.lastname: Jones
authors.forename: H E
authors.initials: HE
authors.lastname: Shannon
mesh_terms: D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000818:Animals; D001058:Apomorphine / Q000494:pharmacology*; D018491:Dopamine Agonists / Q000494:pharmacology*; D004305:Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; D018691:Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists / Q000494:pharmacology*; D008297:Male; D018727:Muscarinic Antagonists / Q000494:pharmacology*; D010622:Phencyclidine / Q000494:pharmacology*; D051381:Rats; D017207:Rats, Sprague-Dawley; D013216:Reflex, Startle / Q000187:drug effects*; D012601:Scopolamine / Q000494:pharmacology*
chemical_list: D018491:Dopamine Agonists; D018691:Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists; D018727:Muscarinic Antagonists; D012601:Scopolamine; D010622:Phencyclidine; D001058:Apomorphine