Monaural and binaural loudness measures in cochlear implant users with contralateral residual hearing.
OBJECTIVE
The aim was to measure the loudness of monaural and binaural stimuli in a group of cochlear implant users who had residual hearing in the nonimplanted ear, and to consider the implications of these measures for a binaural fitting consisting of a hearing aid and an implant in opposite ears. Three independent hypotheses were addressed: that the shapes of the electric and acoustic loudness growth functions would be similar, although the dynamic ranges would differ; that standard implant and hearing aid fittings would result in substantial loudness mismatches between the acoustic and electric signals; and that loudness summation would occur for binaural combinations of electric and acoustic signals.


METHODS
A modified version of the "Loudness Growth in 1/2-Octave Bands" method (Allen, Hall, & Jeng, 1990) was used to measure loudness growth for each ear of nine subjects. At the time of the experiment, the subject group included all implant users in Melbourne and Denver who were available for research and who also had sufficient residual hearing to use a hearing aid in the nonimplanted ear. Five acoustic frequencies and five electrodes were measured for each subject. The same subjects also estimated the loudness of a set of stimuli including monaural and binaural signals chosen to cover the loudness range from very soft to loud.


RESULTS
The shapes of the averaged loudness growth functions were similar in impaired and electrically stimulated ears, although the shapes of iso-loudness curves were quite different in the two ears, and dynamic ranges varied considerably. Calculations based on the psychophysical data demonstrated that standard fitting procedures for cochlear implants and hearing aids lead to a complex pattern of loudness differences between the ears. A substantial amount of loudness summation was observed for the binaural stimuli, with most summation occurring when the acoustic and electric components were of equal loudness. This is consistent with observations for subjects with normal hearing and subjects with bilaterally impaired hearing.


CONCLUSIONS
These experiments provide data on which criteria and methods for the binaural fitting of cochlear implants and hearing aids may be based. It is unlikely that standard monaural fitting methods for cochlear implants and hearing aids will result in balanced loudness between the two ears across a reasonably broad range of frequencies and levels. It is also likely that output levels of both devices will need to be reduced relative to a monaural fitting to compensate for the binaural summation of loudness in some listeners.
Blamey
P J
PJ
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Dooley
G J
GJ
James
C J
CJ
Parisi
E S
ES
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001309:Auditory Threshold / Q000502:physiology; D019929:Cochlear Implantation; D003054:Cochlear Implants; D006310:Hearing Aids; D006801:Humans; D008144:Loudness Perception / Q000502:physiology; D008875:Middle Aged