Laboratory and field studies of an antigen capture ELISA for bluetongue virus.
An improved bluetongue antigen capture ELISA (BTACE) technique was evaluated for its ability to detect the full range of 24 bluetongue (BLU) serotypes. The BTACE detected all 24 serotypes in cell culture fluids, including eight serotypes where the representative strains originated from both Australia and also from the South African reference collection. The amount of infectious virus required to obtain a positive BTACE result varied between 100-1000 TCID50. This was approximately 10-fold more sensitive than the antigen capture test described previously (Hosseini, M., Hawkes, R.A., Kirkland, P.D., Dixon, R., 1998. J. Virol. Methods 75, 39-46.). The BTACE method was compared with conventional passage in cell culture to detect the presence of virus in the tissues of embryonated chicken eggs (ECEs) which had been inoculated intravenously with the blood of sheep and cattle infected experimentally with the eight Australian serotypes of BLU (1, 3, 9, 15, 16, 20, 21, and 23). The BTACE method was at least as sensitive as the conventional cell culture detecting virus in ECEs, obviating the need for prolonged cell culture passage to detect the virus. A comparison of the amount of antigen detected in different embryo tissues indicated that liver homogenates gave the highest positive to negative ratios in the BTACE and were selected as the specimen of choice. In studies of sheep infected with all 24 South African reference BLU serotypes this new BTACE was able to detect viraemia with all serotypes. Finally, the BTACE was validated in surveillance programs for BLU in both New South Wales, Australia and in Yunnan Province, People's Republic of China. Blood samples from sentinel cattle were inoculated into ECEs. Homogenised ECE livers were tested by BTACE and those positive were passaged subsequently in cell culture for virus isolation and identification. This protocol led to the efficient isolation of field isolates of many serotypes. The high sensitivity and broad reactivity of the method indicates that it should be valuable for BLU diagnosis and surveillance programs.
Hawkes
R A
RA
Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute, NSW Agriculture, Camden, Australia.
Kirkland
P D
PD
Sanders
D A
DA
Zhang
F
F
Li
Z
Z
Davis
R J
RJ
Zhang
N
N
D000818:Animals; D000911:Antibodies, Monoclonal; D000956:Antigens, Viral / Q000097:blood* / Q000276:immunology; D001315:Australia; D001820:Bluetongue virus / Q000276:immunology / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D002417:Cattle; D002418:Cattle Diseases / Q000097:blood / Q000276:immunology / Q000821:virology*; D002478:Cells, Cultured; D002642:Chick Embryo; D002681:China; D004797:Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay / Q000379:methods; D018571:Sentinel Surveillance; D012703:Serotyping; D012756:Sheep; D012757:Sheep Diseases / Q000097:blood / Q000276:immunology / Q000821:virology*; D013019:South Africa; D014766:Viremia / Q000097:blood / Q000276:immunology / Q000662:veterinary* / Q000821:virology
D000911:Antibodies, Monoclonal; D000956:Antigens, Viral