Comparison of NIOSH noise criteria and OSHA hearing conservation criteria.
BACKGROUND
This study was conducted to compare noise exposure measurements based on the recently revised noise exposure criteria recommended by the U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and the current U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Hearing Conservation Amendment to the occupational noise standard.


METHODS
Daily 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) personal noise exposures were obtained for 61 workers using dosimeters set simultaneously to the NIOSH and OSHA Hearing Conservation Amendment (OSHA-HCA) criteria. A variety of work groups with the potential for noise exposure were evaluated as a part of this investigation.


RESULTS
Noise dose based on the NIOSH criteria was higher than the corresponding OSHA-HCA noise dose with differences in noise exposures measured under the two criteria equal to 6.6 dBA. Should the new NIOSH recommendation on noise measurement be adopted as standard, the number of workers to be enrolled in a hearing loss prevention program was estimated to increase by 2. 7-fold from 23% to 75% of the study population.


CONCLUSIONS
The results of this study indicate that if the NIOSH criteria are to be adopted as an OSHA standard, there is likely to be a substantial increase in the number of workers in hearing conservation programs.
Sriwattanatamma
P
P
Esso Singapore Pte. Ltd.
Breysse
P
P
D000162:Acoustics / Q000295:instrumentation; D004430:Ear Protective Devices; D004784:Environmental Monitoring; D006317:Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced / Q000517:prevention & control*; D006801:Humans; D016014:Linear Models; D009314:National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S.; D009622:Noise / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000517:prevention & control; D016273:Occupational Exposure; D012307:Risk Factors; D013997:Time Factors; D014481:United States; D014489:United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration