title: Separate features versus one principle: comment on Shimaya (1997).
abstract: In his article "Perception of Complex Line Drawings," A. Shimaya (1997) proposed a quantitative theory that was designed to predict perceived segmentations and amodal completions of line drawings. Shimaya further evaluated the integrative approach of structural information theory (SIT; R. Van Lier, P. Van der Helm, & E. Leeuwenberg, 1994) to pattern interpretation. It is argued in this comment that Shimaya's evaluation of the SIT approach is based on a misconception of SITs basic assumptions and an inappropriate data analysis.
authors.affiliation: Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Leuven, The Netherlands. r.vanlier@nici.kun.nl
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Van Lier
mesh_terms: D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D006801:Humans; D007257:Information Theory; D008960:Models, Psychological; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual