Falsifying serial and parallel parsing models: empirical conundrums and an overlooked paradigm.
When the human parser encounters a local structural ambiguity, are multiple structures pursued (parallel or breadth-first parsing), or just a single preferred structure (serial or depth-first parsing)? This note discusses four important classes of serial and parallel models: simple limited parallel, ranked limited parallel, deterministic serial with reanalysis, and probabilistic serial with reanalysis. It is argued that existing evidence is compatible only with probabilistic serial-reanalysis models, or ranked parallel models augmented with a reanalysis component. A new class of linguistic structures is introduced on which the behavior of serial and parallel parsers diverge the most radically: multiple local ambiguities are stacked to increase the number of viable alternatives in the ambiguous region from two to eight structures. This paradigm may provide the strongest test yet for parallel models.
Lewis
R L
RL
Department of Computer and Information Science, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210, USA. rick@cis.ohio-state.edu
D006801:Humans; D008037:Linguistics; D013067:Speech Perception / Q000502:physiology*