title: Further evaluation of low-ranked items in stimulus-choice preference assessments.
abstract: The generality of the findings reported by DeLeon, Iwata, and Roscoe (1997) was examined by conducting two stimulus-choice preference assessments, the second of which evaluated low-ranked items from the initial assessment. Results for the 2 participants suggested that supplementary assessments of low-ranked items may be useful for identifying a wider variety of reinforcing stimuli.
authors.affiliation: Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge 70803, USA.
authors.forename: C C
authors.initials: CC
authors.lastname: Taravella
authors.forename: D C
authors.initials: DC
authors.lastname: Lerman
authors.forename: S A
authors.initials: SA
authors.lastname: Contrucci
authors.forename: H S
authors.initials: HS
authors.lastname: Roane
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D001521:Behavior Therapy; D002648:Child; D002755:Choice Behavior; D004495:Education of Persons with Intellectual Disabilities; D006801:Humans; D008607:Intellectual Disability / Q000523:psychology* / Q000534:rehabilitation; D008297:Male; D009042:Motivation; D014040:Token Economy