Student voice in curriculum making.
Undergraduate student nurses (n = 117) were asked to reflect critically on their psychiatric clinical learning experience and identify strengths and weaknesses not only in the actions and behaviors of others, but also in their own. A questionnaire was specifically constructed to encourage the voicing of issues, concerns, actions, and behaviors that centered around the concept of quality in relation to four predetermined categories: clinical practice, clinical nursing staff, clinical facilitators, and students. Themes, inductively derived from the collected information within each category, were organized into clusters and then into frequency distributions to facilitate interpretation. The study generated information that should be useful in planning and supervising effective and mutually satisfying clinical practicums in any psychiatric context. Moreover, the responses gave voice to matters that otherwise may have gone unrecognized in the curriculum. The study confirms that student voice must become an integral part of the alternatives from which curriculum-making choice is made.
Thornton
R
R
School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Red Hill, Australia.
Chapman
H
H
D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D002983:Clinical Competence / Q000592:standards*; D003479:Curriculum; D003659:Decision Making, Organizational; D004508:Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate / Q000458:organization & administration*; D005181:Faculty, Nursing / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D017008:Negotiating; D015402:Nursing Education Research; D009741:Nursing Staff, Hospital / Q000523:psychology / Q000592:standards; D015397:Program Evaluation; D011568:Psychiatric Nursing / Q000193:education*; D013338:Students, Nursing / Q000523:psychology*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires