title: Cardiac output measured by electric bioimpedance compared with the CO2 rebreathing technique at different exercise levels.
abstract: In the lower range of cardiac output (CO, up to 15 l min-1), we found an excellent agreement between CO measured by bioimpedance and carbon dioxide rebreathing techniques. CO estimated by bioimpedance was generally lower. The bioimpedance method had better reproducibility. Both methods seem valuable for non-invasive studies in healthy subjects at work.
authors.affiliation: Department of Clinical Physiology/Nuclear medicine, Herlev University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
authors.forename: T B
authors.initials: TB
authors.lastname: Christensen
authors.forename: B V
authors.initials: BV
authors.lastname: Jensen
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Hjerpe
authors.forename: I L
authors.initials: IL
authors.lastname: Kanstrup
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002245:Carbon Dioxide; D002302:Cardiac Output; D002307:Cardiography, Impedance / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D004562:Electrocardiography; D006339:Heart Rate; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D010100:Oxygen / Q000493:pharmacokinetics; D010101:Oxygen Consumption / Q000502:physiology; D005082:Physical Exertion / Q000502:physiology*; D012016:Reference Values; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D013318:Stroke Volume
chemical_list: D002245:Carbon Dioxide; D010100:Oxygen