Effects of different reproduction techniques: AI MOET or IVP, on health and welfare of bovine offspring.
Since the introduction of in vitro production (IVP) of bovine and sheep pre-implantation embryos, increased birth weights and other deviations of IVP calves and lambs compared with AI or MOET offspring have been reported. Study 1 of the present paper, a comparison between AI, MOET and IVP (co-culture/serum) calves with respect to calf and calving characteristics in large-scale field conditions, confirms these reports. In addition, it is shown that MOET calves tend towards higher birth weights and have significantly longer gestations and more difficult calvings than AI calves. It is presently unknown if the effect of IVP is also observed later in life. In this paper, data on reproduction characteristics of bovine IVP co-culture/serum offspring are presented. Semen production--and non return data of one year old IVP bulls and superovulation-, AI- and OPU/IVP results of one year old IVP heifers are compared with those of one year old AI and MOET animals producing semen or embryos in the same time period. So far, there are no indications that the use of IVP is reflected in deviate reproduction characteristics of bovine IVP offspring. It has been suggested that use of co-culture cells and serum during in vitro culture of bovine (and sheep) embryos may partially explain the increased birth weights and other deviations of bovine and sheep IVP offspring. Deletion of these factors in semi-defined culture media, e.g. Synthetic Oviductal Fluid (SOF), could result in more normal offspring. Study 2 investigates this hypothesis in both field conditions (Study 2a, comparing AI, IVP co-culture/serum and IVP SOF calves) and in semi-standardized conditions (Study 2b, comparing MOET, IVP co-culture/serum and IVP SOF calves at one herd). In Study 2a, although IVP SOF calves showed (non-significant) shorter gestations, easier calvings and lower percentages of perinatal mortality and congenital malformations than IVP co-culture calves, birth weights were not decreased. In Study 2b however, the difference between IVP co-culture and IVP SOF calves in birth weight and ease of calving was significant (P < 0.05), IVP SOF calves resembling MOET calves more. IVP calves differed significantly from MOET calves with respect to several physiological parameters, such as blood oxygen saturation level, heart beat frequency and some measures of the heart. In addition, in Study 2b, recipients receiving an IVP SOF embryo showed a more regular return to estrus than those receiving an IVP co-culture embryo. From Study 2 it can be concluded that using a semi-defined medium for in vitro culture (SOF) may improve characteristics of IVP calves born.
van Wagtendonk-de Leeuw
A M
AM
Holland Genetics, R&D, Arnhem, The Netherlands. wagtendonkj@cr-delta.nl
Mullaart
E
E
de Roos
A P
AP
Merton
J S
JS
den Daas
J H
JH
Kemp
B
B
de Ruigh
L
L
D000818:Animals; D001724:Birth Weight; D002417:Cattle / Q000502:physiology*; D046508:Culture Techniques; D004624:Embryo Transfer / Q000662:veterinary; D004622:Embryo, Mammalian / Q000502:physiology*; D005314:Embryonic and Fetal Development; D005260:Female; D005865:Gestational Age; D007315:Insemination, Artificial / Q000662:veterinary*; D011247:Pregnancy; D011297:Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects; D012099:Reproductive Techniques / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000662:veterinary*