Correlation of vascular endothelial growth factor content with recurrences, survival, and first relapse site in primary node-positive breast carcinoma after adjuvant treatment.
OBJECTIVE
To determine the predictive value of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) for relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in primary node-positive breast cancer (NPBC) after adjuvant endocrine treatment or adjuvant chemotherapy.


METHODS
VEGF was quantitatively measured in tumor cytosols from 362 consecutive patients with primary NPBC using an enzyme immunoassay for human VEGF(165). Adjuvant treatment was given to all patients, either as endocrine therapy (n = 250) or chemotherapy (n = 112). The median follow-up time was 56 months.


RESULTS
Univariate analysis showed VEGF to be a significant predictor of RFS (P =.0289) and OS (P =.0004) in the total patient population and in patients who received adjuvant endocrine treatment (RFS, P =.0238; OS, P =.0121). In the group of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy, no significant difference was seen in RFS, but a difference was seen in OS (P =.0235). Patients with bone recurrences tended to have lower VEGF expression (median, 2.17 pg/microg DNA) than patients with visceral metastasis (4.41 pg/microg), brain metastasis (8.29 pg/microg), or soft tissue recurrences (3.16 pg/microg). Multivariate analysis showed nodal status (P =.0004), estrogen receptor (ER) status (P <.0001), and tumor size (P =.0085) to be independent predictors of RFS. VEGF was found to be an independent predictor of OS (P =.0170; relative risk [RR] = 1.82), as were ER (P <.0001; RR = 5.19) and nodal status (P =.0002; RR = 2.58). For patients receiving adjuvant endocrine treatment, multivariate analysis showed VEGF content to be an independent predictor of OS (P =.0420; RR = 1.90) but not of RFS.


CONCLUSIONS
The results suggest that VEGF(165) content in tumor cytosols is a predictor of RFS and OS in primary NPBC. VEGF content might also predict outcome after adjuvant endocrine treatment, but further studies in a prospective setting with homologous treatments are required.
Linderholm
B
B
Departments of Oncology and Clinical Chemistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. barbro.linderholm@onkologi.umu.se
Grankvist
K
K
Wilking
N
N
Johansson
M
M
Tavelin
B
B
Henriksson
R
R
D000368:Aged; D018931:Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D000971:Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D014408:Biomarkers, Tumor / Q000032:analysis*; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000473:pathology; D003600:Cytosol / Q000737:chemistry; D018572:Disease-Free Survival; D016228:Endothelial Growth Factors / Q000032:analysis*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008198:Lymph Nodes / Q000473:pathology*; D008207:Lymphatic Metastasis; D008222:Lymphokines / Q000032:analysis*; D008875:Middle Aged; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011379:Prognosis; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D042461:Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; D042442:Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors
D018931:Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; D014408:Biomarkers, Tumor; D016228:Endothelial Growth Factors; D008222:Lymphokines; C467484:VEGFA protein, human; D042461:Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; D042442:Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors