Perceived accessibility versus actual physical accessibility of healthcare facilities.
This study addressed how healthcare clinics perceive themselves in regard to accessibility for persons with spinal cord injuries (SCI). All 40 of the clinics surveyed reported that they were wheelchair accessible; however, there was significant variability in the number of sites that actually met the guidelines of the Americans with Disability Act. In general, a person using a wheelchair could enter the building, the examination room, and the bathroom. The majority of sites did not have an examination table that could be lowered to wheelchair level. Most reported limited experience in working with persons with (SCI), yet they claimed to be able to assist with difficult transfers. Only one site knew about autonomic dysreflexia. Problems of accessibility appeared to be seriously compounded by the clinics' perception of how they met physical accessibility guidelines without consideration of the actual needs of persons with SCI. This study addressed the perception of accessibility as reported by clinic managers versus actual accessibility in healthcare clinics in a Midwestern metropolitan area for persons using wheelchairs.
Sanchez
J
J
Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.
Byfield
G
G
Brown
T T
TT
LaFavor
K
K
Murphy
D
D
Laud
P
P
D001107:Architectural Accessibility / Q000592:standards*; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D001294:Attitude to Health; D006233:Persons with Disabilities / Q000523:psychology*; D019983:Guideline Adherence; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D006270:Health Facility Administrators / Q000523:psychology*; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D015146:Midwestern United States; D013119:Spinal Cord Injuries / Q000523:psychology*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014910:Wheelchairs