Effectiveness of two systems for transporting equine semen.
The storage and transport of cooled, liquid semen is an effective way of facilitating the use of desirable stallions for breeding mares located on distant farms. The Equitainer System is the most widely used transport container and it has been shown that it is possible to ship semen in this container and obtain good conception rates. However, the cost of Equitainers is high, and stud-farms that ship large quantities of semen have tended to rely on cheaper alternatives, even though little documentation exists concerning their reliability, especially under extreme temperature conditions. Two different containers for transporting equine semen (the Equitainer and a styrofoam box) were compared in their effectiveness at maintaining semen quality (i.e. sperm motility and plasma membrane integrity) during 24 h of storage. The transport containers were stored at 2 different environmental temperatures, i.e., room temperature (20 degrees C) and 37 degrees C. Thirty-seven ejaculates from 10 Standardbred stallions (3 to 6 samples per stallion) were examined. Sperm function and plasma membrane integrity were assessed using a Mika Motion Analyzer and a fluorescein stain (Calcein AM/Ethidium homodimer) in fresh diluted semen that had been stored for 24 h at room temperature (20 degrees C). Another 18 ejaculates from 5 stallions were examined using methods described above, but the transport boxes were kept at a high environmental temperature (37 degrees C). After storage at room temperature, there was no significant difference in total sperm motility and frequency of spermatozoa with an intact plasma membrane between the 2 types of transport boxes. A significant difference was seen in linear sperm motility, with the Equitainer being the better container. However, a significant difference was also seen in average path velocity, with the styrofoam box being the better container. After storage at 37 degrees C, the Equitaner maintained semen quality better. A significant difference was seen in total sperm motility, average path velocity, lateral head displacement and frequency of spermatozoa with an intact plasma membrane between the 2 types of transport boxes. Although, both transport containers were satisfactory when used under normal conditions. The Equitainer seemed superior under more extreme temperatures and during longer transport periods (> 24 to 30 h).
Malmgren
L
L
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center for Reproductive Biology, SLU, Uppsala, Sweden.
D000818:Animals; D002462:Cell Membrane / Q000502:physiology; D003080:Cold Temperature; D006736:Horses; D008297:Male; D012661:Semen; D012662:Semen Preservation; D013048:Specimen Handling / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D013081:Sperm Motility; D013094:Spermatozoa / Q000502:physiology / Q000648:ultrastructure