Physical-property comparison of a chairside- or laboratory-polymerized permanent soft-liner during 1 year.
OBJECTIVE
This investigation examined the influence of polymerization mode and water storage duration on the Shore A hardness, water sorption, resin solubility, and glass transition temperature of Permasoft, a commercial soft denture liner that is polymerized either chairside or in the laboratory.


METHODS
Specimen disks (31-mm diameter x 10 mm thick) and bars (44 x 8.5 x 1.2 mm) were polymerized following manufacturer's recommendations. The chairside polymerization process was simulated by pouring the mixed components into a mold and processing at 70 degrees C for 15 minutes under 2-psi pressure. Laboratory-polymerized specimens of the same dimensions were fabricated by processing under 500-psi pressure at 100 degrees C for 45 minutes. Specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 1, 7, and 30 days, and 6 and 12 months. Specimens were tested for Shore A hardness, water sorption, resin solubility, and glass transition temperature after the prescribed interval. To determine the effects of polymerization mode and storage time on material properties, a repeated-measures ANOVA (hardness data) and a two-way ANOVA (sorption and solubility data) with appropriate post-hoc tests were used.


RESULTS
Shore A hardness values increased from a low of 9.4 (+/- 0.5) units immediately after fabrication to a maximum of 15.9 (+/- 1.1) units after 1 year. Mode of polymerization did not influence hardness (p = .9851). Water-sorption values ranged from 4.2 (+/- 0.2%) of dry weight to 14.7 (+/- 2.5%) after 1 year. Resin solubility varied from 10.3 (+/- 0.6%) of preimmersion weight to 15.4 (+/- 1.1%), and immersion duration had no effect on solubility. In addition, after 1 year of storage, no difference in resin solubility or water sorption was found with respect to cure mode. The glass transition temperature for chairside-polymerized samples approximated -10 degrees C, while that for labpolymerized samples approximated -15 degrees C.


CONCLUSIONS
With regard to the material properties evaluated in this study, clinically processed Permasoft liner was equivalent to the laboratory-processed material.
Parr
G R
GR
Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Medical College of Georgia, School of Dentistry, Augusta 30912, USA.
Rueggeberg
F A
FA
D000042:Absorption; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D003822:Denture Liners; D004055:Differential Thermal Analysis; D004548:Elasticity; D006244:Hardness; D007754:Laboratories, Dental; D008422:Materials Testing; D008689:Methacrylates / Q000737:chemistry*; D019095:Point-of-Care Systems; D011108:Polymers / Q000737:chemistry; D012995:Solubility; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D014867:Water / Q000737:chemistry
D008689:Methacrylates; C098877:PermaSoft denture liner; D011108:Polymers; D014867:Water