Revisional Surgery for Failed Gastric Restrictive Procedures for Morbid Obesity.
As part of the Adelaide Obesity Surgery Study, we have reviewed all patients who have undergone revisional surgery. Of the 31 0 trial patients, 63 (20%) had revisions 1-69 (median 32) months following their original surgery-30% of all 105 gastrogastrostomy (GG) operations, 22% of 106 gastroplasty (GP) procedures, and 9% of 99 gastric bypasses (GB). Failure was due to stomal dilatation, 11% of all trial patients (71% of GG revisions), stomal stenosis, 6% (52% of GP revisions) and staple dehiscence, 4%. There was no mortality and a low hospital morbidity. Long-term success was only 23% (follow-up at least 3 years) and was achieved at considerable expense (3 reversals, 10 further revisions, 44 endoscopic procedures). Revisional surgery was successful in 45% of patients with stomal dilatation or dehiscence but in only 17% with stenosis. Overall, the most successful operation was revision of, or conversion to, gastric bypass (58% success rate), compared with gastroplasty (24%) and gastrogastrostomy (25%). Our long-term results following revisional surgery were disappointing, particularly for stenosis, and most failures followed revision to GG or GP. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is the procedure of choice when considering revision.
Hunter
R
Flinders Medical Centre, Royal Adelaide Hospital and The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia 5042 Australia.
Watts
JM
Dunstan
R
Elmslie
R
O' Brien P
Slavotinek
A
Walsh
J