title: Further assessment of the dietary lysine requirement of finishing gilts.
abstract: A cooperative research study involving 635 gilts was conducted at eight research stations to further estimate the lysine requirement of finishing gilts. Dietary crude protein levels of the five dietary treatments ranged from 16.0 to 24.4% with calculated lysine levels of .80, .95, 1.10, 1.25, or 1.40%. Each station contributed a minimum of two replicate pens of pigs per treatment. Average initial and final weights were 53.6 and 116.4 kg, respectively. At the end of the experimental period, pigs were killed and hot carcass weight, 10th-rib fat depth, and longissimus muscle area were measured. Carcass fat-free lean percentage and fat-free lean gain were estimated from these data. Daily lysine intakes averaged 21.8, 25.9, 30.5, 34.3, and 37.8 g/d for the five treatment groups, respectively. Increasing the dietary lysine from .80 to .95% numerically increased weight gain and gain:feed, but these increases were not maintained at higher levels of dietary lysine. Overall, rate and efficiency of gain decreased (cubic, P < .01) with increasing dietary lysine. Carcasses were leaner at the two higher levels of dietary lysine as evidenced by reduced 10th rib backfat (linear, P < .01), increased longissimus area (quadratic, P < .04), and increased percentage of estimated fat-free lean (linear, P < .01). Carcass fat-free lean gain was not influenced by dietary lysine except for a small numerical improvement (P < .11) at the .95% level of dietary lysine that paralleled the improvement in body weight gain. The results indicate that the dietary lysine requirement of finishing gilts with a mean carcass fat-free lean growth rate of 306 g/d from 54 to 116 kg body weight is probably no higher than .80% of the diet to achieve maximum rate and efficiency of body weight gain and carcass lean growth rate. The results also indicate that higher dietary lysine levels may increase carcass leanness in finishing gilts, possibly due to reduced intake of NE. Whether this response is due to the effects of lysine alone, protein (i.e., other amino acids), or soybean meal is unknown.
authors.affiliation: Dept. of Anim. Sci., Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN 47907-1151, USA. tcline@ansc.purdue.edu
authors.forename: T R
authors.initials: TR
authors.lastname: Cline
authors.forename: G L
authors.initials: GL
authors.lastname: Cromwell
authors.forename: T D
authors.initials: TD
authors.lastname: Crenshaw
authors.forename: R C
authors.initials: RC
authors.lastname: Ewan
authors.forename: C R
authors.initials: CR
authors.lastname: Hamilton
authors.forename: A J
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Lewis
authors.forename: D C
authors.initials: DC
authors.lastname: Mahan
authors.forename: L L
authors.initials: LL
authors.lastname: Southern
mesh_terms: D000824:Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena; D000818:Animals; D004044:Dietary Proteins / Q000378:metabolism; D005260:Female; D008239:Lysine / Q000502:physiology*; D009751:Nutritional Requirements; D013025:Glycine max; D013552:Swine / Q000254:growth & development*; D003313:Zea mays
chemical_list: D004044:Dietary Proteins; D008239:Lysine