title: [Quantitative evaluation for scatter and attenuation correction in 99mTc SPECT--multicenter cooperation phantom study].
abstract: A multicenter cooperation phantom study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of a triple energy window scatter correction technique in combination with various attenuation correction methods for 99mTc single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging. Six centers participated in this research and the data obtained with seven SPECT instruments were analyzed. The phantom used in the experiment was a 20 x 10 cm cylinder filled with homogeneous 99mTc solution, containing two kinds of cold spots (cold rod phantoms). One had a water-filled cylinder 5.5 cm in diameter positioned 2.5 cm from the center. The other contained 6 water-filled cylinders of various sizes. Contrasts of cold regions were in the range from 74% to 120% (true 100%). Another phantom had the shape of a pie-chart divided into six chambers symmetrically positioned in a cylinder 20 cm in diameter and 10 cm in height. Each chamber had volume of 480 ml and contained homogeneous 99mTc solution of different concentrations. This phantom was used to test for linearity between the radio activity concentration and reconstructed count density (linearity phantom). The intercept of the regression line obtained from the linearity phantom was 8.4 kBq ml-1 without scatter correction and -6.8 kBq ml-1 with scatter correction. Contrast was in the range from 78% to 132% (true 100%). The mean relative error for the measured activity concentration was 4.9% +/- 3.5% (mean +/- sd).
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital.
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Shinohara
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Ogawa
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Nakagawara
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Tomiguchi
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Nakajima
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Iida
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Kumita
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Uehara
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Nishikawa
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Nishimura
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Yamamoto
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Honda
authors.forename: I
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Kuji
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Yamada
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Fukuda
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Kinoshita
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Inoue
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Hashimoto
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Ikegaya
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Takahashi
mesh_terms: D019047:Phantoms, Imaging; D019275:Radiopharmaceuticals; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013667:Technetium; D015899:Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods
chemical_list: D019275:Radiopharmaceuticals; D013667:Technetium