title: Randomised comparison of Burch colposuspension versus anterior colporrhaphy in women with stress urinary incontinence and anterior vaginal wall prolapse.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare the Burch colposuspension and the anterior colporrhaphy in women with both stress urinary incontinence and advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse (cystocele).
  
  
  METHODS
  Prospective randomised study.
  
  
  METHODS
  Secondary referral centre, Urogynaecology Unit, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.
  
  
  METHODS
  Seventy-one women undergoing surgery for primary genuine stress incontinence and concurrent grade 2 or 3 cystocele (descending at or outside the vaginal introitus).
  
  
  METHODS
  Full urodynamic investigation performed pre-operatively and repeated six months after surgery. Clinical follow up continued for 8 to 17 years.
  
  
  METHODS
  Subjective (patient history) and objective (negative stress test result) cure of stress incontinence. Assessment of cystocele recurrence.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Thirty (86%) of the 35 evaluable women who had the Burch colposuspension and 17 (52%) of the 33 evaluable women who had the anterior colporrhaphy were subjectively cured (OR 5.6, 95% CI 1.6 to 21.6; P = 0.005). Objective cure rates were 74% (26 of 35) and 42% (14 of 33), respectively (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.3 to 12.5; P = 0.02). A recurrent cystocele of grade 2 or 3 with or without prolapse at other vaginal sites was recorded in 34% (12 of 35) and 3% (1 of 33) of women, respectively (OR 16.7, 95% CI 2.0 to 368.1; P = 0.003).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The Burch colposuspension was better in controlling stress incontinence but it lead to an unacceptable high rate of prolapse recurrence. The anterior colporrhaphy was more effective in restoring vaginal anatomy but it was accompanied by an unacceptable low cure rate of stress incontinence. Neither of the two operations is recommended for women who are suffering from a combination of stress incontinence and advanced cystocele.
authors.affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Milan, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy. emmecol@tin.net
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Colombo
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Vitobello
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Proietti
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Milani
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D013509:Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D007558:Italy; D008875:Middle Aged; D011446:Prospective Studies; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014550:Urinary Incontinence, Stress / Q000601:surgery*; D014596:Uterine Prolapse / Q000601:surgery*; D014623:Vaginal Diseases / Q000601:surgery*