The likelihood approach to compare populations: a study on DNA evidence and pitfalls of intuitions.
The paper follows on from earlier work [Taroni F and Aitken CGG. Probabilistic reasoning in the law, Part 1: assessment of probabilities and explanation of the value of DNA evidence. Science & Justice 1998; 38: 165-177]. Different explanations of the value of DNA evidence were presented to students from two schools of forensic science and to members of fifteen laboratories all around the world. The responses were divided into two groups; those which came from a school or laboratory identified as Bayesian and those which came from a school or laboratory identified as non-Bayesian. The paper analyses these responses using a likelihood approach. This approach is more consistent with a Bayesian analysis than one based on a frequentist approach, as was reported by Taroni F and Aitken CGG. [Probabilistic reasoning in the law, Part 1: assessment of probabilities and explanation of the value of DNA evidence] in Science & Justice 1998.
Taroni
F
F
Institut Universitaire de Médecine légale, Université de Lausanne, Switzerland.
Aitken
C G
CG
D001499:Bayes Theorem; D016172:DNA Fingerprinting / Q000379:methods*; D005554:Forensic Medicine / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D016013:Likelihood Functions; D011336:Probability