Developing specialty knowledge: the case of Australian critical care nursing.
The generation of new knowledge is important to the evolution of the nursing profession and its specialties and is a fundamental requirement for the development of the discipline. This study documents the growth of empirical knowledge in Australian critical care nursing by examining the research published in one critical care specialty journal and a second generalized nursing research journal between 1994 and 1998. The proportion of research published in the specialty journal increased from 25 to 69%, with almost one-half focusing on patient therapies and treatments. The proportion of research in the general journal was consistently high, approximately 80 to 90%, with one to two critical care research articles per year. Nurses were first authors on the vast majority of these research articles. Approximately half of the critical care research focused on patient care. The results support the claim that Australian critical care nurses are conducting research to promote best practice in patient care and are thus contributing to the development of the discipline of nursing.
Chaboyer
W
W
Faculty of Nursing and Health, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia. W.Chaboyer@mailbox.gu.edu.au
Dunn
S V
SV
Najman
J
J
D001315:Australia; D019985:Benchmarking; D003422:Critical Care; D006801:Humans; D019359:Knowledge; D015399:Nursing Research / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data* / Q000639:trends; D018802:Patient-Centered Care; D010687:Philosophy, Nursing; D017009:Professional Autonomy; D011643:Publishing / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data* / Q000639:trends; D013041:Specialties, Nursing / Q000458:organization & administration*