title: Clinical vs. sonographic estimate of birth weight in term parturients. A randomized clinical trial.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To determine the relative accuracy of clinical and sonographic birth weight estimation among term parturients (> or = 37 weeks) and to assess the performance of the two techniques in identifying newborns with weights of < 2,500 g vs. > or = 2,500 g or < 2,500 g vs. at least 4,000 g.
  
  
  METHODS
  The sample size for this randomized clinical trial was based on the assumption that 50% of clinical predictions are within 10% of birth weight. Thus, 700 parturients were necessary to show a difference of 10% with sonographic estimates (alpha = .05, beta = .02). Inclusion criteria were singletons with a reliable gestational age of > or = 37 weeks, admitted for delivery and with no known fetal anomalies. Physicians who were unaware of previous sonographic estimates obtained the estimates. Student t and chi 2 tests were used; relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to compare the two techniques' ability to differentiate between abnormal (birth weight < 2,500 g and > 4,000 g) and normal (2,500-3,999 g). P < .05 was considered significant.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Over 30 months, 758 term parturients were recruited; of them, 391 had clinical estimates and 367, sonographic. The two groups were similar in gestational age, prepregnancy and intrapartum body mass index, station of the presenting part, actual birth weight and frequency of newborns with weights < 2,500 g or > or = 4,000 g. Predictions based on clinical examination were significantly more likely to be within 10% of actual weight (58%) than those derived from ultrasound examination (32%; P < .0001; RR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.43, 1.69). The areas under the ROC curves indicated that both techniques had a similar ability to differentiate normally and abnormally grown fetuses (P > .05).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Among term parturients, clinical estimates had significantly higher accuracy than ones derived sonographically.
authors.affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Spartanburg Regional Medical Center, South Carolina 29303, USA.
authors.forename: N W
authors.initials: NW
authors.lastname: Hendrix
authors.forename: C S
authors.initials: CS
authors.lastname: Grady
authors.forename: S P
authors.initials: SP
authors.lastname: Chauhan
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001724:Birth Weight; D005314:Embryonic and Fetal Development; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007743:Labor, Obstetric; D010808:Physical Examination; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011247:Pregnancy; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D016216:Ultrasonography, Prenatal