[Memory tests in healthy elderly: age factors and norms].
The study aimed to assess the strength of age effects on both standard laboratory and ecological memory tests and the psychometric qualities of these tests. Furthermore, norm data are constructed. Memory performance was assessed in a random group of older adults (mean age 62 years, range 46-89) and a group of older adults having memory complaints who applied for memory training (mean age 63 years, range 45-85). Age effects were found on almost all memory tests, whether artificial laboratory or more ecological tests were used. Age effects remained generally present after correction for educational level. Retest reliabilities of the ecological memory tests did not differ systematically from those of standard laboratory tests. However, not all tests showed satisfactory retest reliabilities, this was even true for tests often used in clinical settings. For tests with retest reliabilities above r = .65 norms corrected for age and educational level were provided. The group of older adults having memory complaints performed on average better than the random group of older adults from the population. In the first group, higher performance thresholds should be employed in assessing whether memory performance is deviant.
Schmidt
I W
IW
Afdeling Neuropsychologie en Gerontologie, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. I.W.Schmidt@PPSW.RUG.NL
Berg
I J
IJ
Deelman
B G
BG
D000367:Age Factors; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D016022:Case-Control Studies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory; D008569:Memory Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000453:epidemiology; D008875:Middle Aged; D009426:Netherlands / Q000453:epidemiology; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests / Q000592:standards*; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011594:Psychometrics; D012016:Reference Values; D015203:Reproducibility of Results