title: Patients who want their family and physician to make resuscitation decisions for them: observations from SUPPORT and HELP. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Hospitalized Elderly Longitudinal Project.
abstract: To determine the extent to which older or seriously ill inpatients would prefer to have their family and physician make resuscitation decisions for them rather than having their own stated preferences followed if they were unable to decide themselves.
  
  
  
  Analysis of existing data from the Hospitalized Elderly Longitudinal Project (HELP) and the Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment (SUPPORT).
  
  
  
  Five teaching hospitals in the United States.
  
  
  
  2203 seriously ill adult inpatients (SUPPORT) and 1226 older inpatients (HELP) who expressed preferences about resuscitation and about advance decision-making.
  
  
  
  We used a logistic regression model to determine which factors predicted preferences for family and physician decision-making.
  
  
  
  Of the 513 HELP patients in this analysis, 363 (70.8%) would prefer to have their family and physician make resuscitation decisions for them whereas 29.2% would prefer to have their own stated preferences followed if they were to lose decision-making capacity. Of the 646 SUPPORT patients, 504 (78.0%) would prefer to have their family and physician decide and 22.0% would prefer to have their advance preferences followed. Independent predictors of preference for family and physician decision-making included not wanting to be resuscitated and having a surrogate decision-maker.
  
  
  
  Most inpatients who are older or have serious illnesses would not want their stated resuscitation preferences followed if they were to lose decision-making capacity. Most patients in both groups would prefer that their family and physician make resuscitation decisions for them. These results underscore the need to understand resuscitation preferences within a broader context of patient values.
authors.affiliation: Center to Improve Care of the Dying, George Washington University, Washington DC 20037, USA.
authors.forename: C M
authors.initials: CM
authors.lastname: Puchalski
authors.forename: Z
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Zhong
authors.forename: M M
authors.initials: MM
authors.lastname: Jacobs
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Fox
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Lynn
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Harrold
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Galanos
authors.forename: R S
authors.initials: RS
authors.lastname: Phillips
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Califf
authors.forename: J M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Teno
mesh_terms: D000203:Activities of Daily Living; D024362:Advance Directive Adherence; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D016887:Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation; D003657:Decision Making; D005190:Family; D005260:Female; D006760:Hospitalization; D006801:Humans; D016015:Logistic Models; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D008297:Male; D010344:Patient Advocacy; D010819:Physician's Role; D011379:Prognosis; D011788:Quality of Life; D016414:Resuscitation Orders; D014481:United States