title: Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To determine the false-negative rate in screening mammography, the capability of computer-aided detection (CAD) to identify these missed lesions, and whether or not CAD increases the radiologists' recall rate.
  
  
  METHODS
  All available screening mammograms that led to the detection of biopsy-proved cancer (n = 1,083) and the most recent corresponding prior mammograms (n = 427) were collected from 13 facilities. Panels of radiologists evaluated the retrospectively visible prior mammograms by means of blinded review. All mammograms were analyzed by a CAD system that marks features associated with cancer. The recall rates of 14 radiologists were prospectively measured before and after installation of the CAD system.
  
  
  RESULTS
  At retrospective review, 67% (286 of 427) of screening mammography-detected breast cancers were visible on the prior mammograms. At independent, blinded review by panels of radiologists, 27% (115 of 427) were interpreted as warranting recall on the basis of a statistical evaluation index; and the CAD system correctly marked 77% (89 of 115) of these cases. The original attending radiologists' sensitivity was 79% (427 of [427 + 115]). There was no statistically significant increase in the radiologists' recall rate when comparing the values before (8.3%) with those after (7.6%) installation of the CAD system.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The original attending radiologists had a false-negative rate of 21% (115 of [427 + 115]). CAD prompting could have potentially helped reduce this false-negative rate by 77% (89 of 115) without an increase in the recall rate.
authors.affiliation: Dept of Radiology, Univ of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
authors.forename: L J
authors.initials: LJ
authors.lastname: Warren Burhenne
authors.forename: S A
authors.initials: SA
authors.lastname: Wood
authors.forename: C J
authors.initials: CJ
authors.lastname: D'Orsi
authors.forename: S A
authors.initials: SA
authors.lastname: Feig
authors.forename: D B
authors.initials: DB
authors.lastname: Kopans
authors.forename: K F
authors.initials: KF
authors.lastname: O'Shaughnessy
authors.forename: E A
authors.initials: EA
authors.lastname: Sickles
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Tabar
authors.forename: C J
authors.initials: CJ
authors.lastname: Vyborny
authors.forename: R A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Castellino
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001706:Biopsy; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology; D017050:Episode of Care; D005188:False Negative Reactions; D005189:False Positive Reactions; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008327:Mammography / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D008403:Mass Screening; D008875:Middle Aged; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011857:Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; D011871:Radiology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D016037:Single-Blind Method