title: Beds, mattresses and cushions for pressure sore prevention and treatment.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To assess the effectiveness of pressure relieving beds, mattresses and cushions (support surfaces) in the prevention and treatment of pressure sores.
  
  
  METHODS
  Searches of 19 databases, hand searching of journals, conference proceedings, and bibliographies.
  
  
  METHODS
  Randomised controlled trials evaluating support surfaces for the prevention or treatment of pressure sores. There was no restriction on articles based on language or publication status.
  
  
  METHODS
  Data extraction and assessment of study quality was undertaken by two reviewers independently. Trials with similar patients, comparisons, and outcomes were pooled. Where pooling was inappropriate, trials are discussed in a narrative review.
  
  
  RESULTS
  
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  29 RCTs of support surfaces for pressure sore prevention were identified. Some high specification foam mattresses were more effective than 'standard' hospital foam mattresses in moderate-high risk patients. Pressure relieving mattresses in the operating theatre reduced the incidence of pressure sores post-operatively. The relative merits of alternating and constant low pressure, and of the different alternating pressure devices are unclear. Seat cushions and simple, constant low-pressure devices have not been adequately evaluated. Limited evidence suggests that low air loss beds reduce the incidence of pressure sores in intensive care.
  
  
  METHODS
  6 RCTs of support surfaces for pressure sore treatment were identified. There is good evidence that air-fluidised and low air loss beds improve healing rates. Seat cushions have not been adequately evaluated. 2 RCTs evaluated surfaces for both prevention and treatment in the same trial.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  PREVENTION - There is good evidence of the effectiveness of high specification foam over standard hospital foam, and pressure relief in the operating theatre. Treatment - There is good evidence of the effectiveness of air-fluidised and low air loss devices as treatments. Overall, however, it is impossible to determine the most effective surface for either prevention or treatment.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Evidence Based Nursing, Department of Health Studies, University of York, Genesis 6, York, UK, YO10 5DQ. nac2@york.ac.uk
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Cullum
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Deeks
authors.forename: T A
authors.initials: TA
authors.lastname: Sheldon
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Song
authors.forename: A W
authors.initials: AW
authors.lastname: Fletcher
mesh_terms: D001513:Beds / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D003668:Pressure Ulcer / Q000517:prevention & control* / Q000628:therapy*