title: Prostate cancer staging: should MR imaging be used?--A decision analytic approach.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To determine the appropriate use of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for preoperative staging of prostate cancer.
  
  
  METHODS
  Literature review was performed by using the principles of evidence-based medicine and medical technology assessment. A decision analytic model was used to compare (a) the strategy that radical prostatectomy is performed on the basis of clinical staging with (b) the strategy that extracapsular disease detected at MR imaging contraindicates radical prostatectomy in patients who were considered surgical candidates on the basis of clinical staging.
  
  
  RESULTS
  After review of the literature, expert panel opinion did not recommend MR staging. No studies in which therapeutic efficacy was addressed were found. The decision analytic model indicated that the strategy including MR staging decreased costs (MR imaging, $10,568; radical prostatectomy, $11,669) and resulted in almost equal life expectancy (MR imaging, 12.59 years; radical prostatectomy, 12.60 years) and quality-adjusted life-years ([QALYs] MR imaging, 12.53; radical prostatectomy, 12.52). Results of sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the MR strategy was both more effective and less costly if the prior probability of extracapsular disease was at least 39% when considering QALY and 50% when considering unadjusted life expectancy.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  It is not yet conclusively determined whether preoperative MR staging is appropriate, but results of decision analysis suggest that MR staging is cost-effective for men with moderate or high prior probability of extracapsular disease.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, University Hospital Nijmegen, Geert Grooteplein zuid 18, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. G.Jager@rdiag.azn.nl
authors.forename: G J
authors.initials: GJ
authors.lastname: Jager
authors.forename: J L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Severens
authors.forename: J R
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Thornbury
authors.forename: J J
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: de La Rosette
authors.forename: S H
authors.initials: SH
authors.lastname: Ruijs
authors.forename: J O
authors.initials: JO
authors.lastname: Barentsz
mesh_terms: D000075202:Contraindications; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D003661:Decision Support Techniques; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D006801:Humans; D008017:Life Expectancy; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000191:economics; D008297:Male; D009367:Neoplasm Staging; D011336:Probability; D011467:Prostate / Q000473:pathology; D011468:Prostatectomy / Q000191:economics; D011471:Prostatic Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery; D019057:Quality-Adjusted Life Years; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013673:Technology Assessment, Biomedical