title: Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial.
abstract: Although classic open surgery is simple, expeditious, and effective, it has some drawbacks, including wound sepsis, delayed recovery, operative difficulties, and possibility of unnecessary appendectomies for false appendicitis. The aim of this study was to assess the applicability and safety of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in a prospectively randomized trial. Seventy nonselective patients with suspected appendicitis were randomized to laparoscopic (n = 35, 17 male) or open appendectomy (n = 35, 15 male) and operated on an emergency basis. Operative findings, operating time, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay were compared. We found that LA is associated with a shorter hospital stay, fewer postoperative complications, and better diagnostic accuracy, and it is recommended as the procedure of choice for the diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis.
authors.affiliation: Department of General Surgery, Numune Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
authors.forename: M M
authors.initials: MM
authors.lastname: Ozmen
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Zülfikaroğlu
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Tanik
authors.forename: I T
authors.initials: IT
authors.lastname: Kale
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001062:Appendectomy / Q000379:methods*; D001064:Appendicitis / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000601:surgery; D004630:Emergencies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy; D007902:Length of Stay / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D008297:Male; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000453:epidemiology; D011446:Prospective Studies