title: Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: a meta-analytic review and test of two theories.
abstract: A meta-analysis of 28 studies examined support for the Theory of Cooperation and Competition (M. Deutsch, 1973) and Dual Concern Theory (D. G. Pruitt & J. Z. Rubin, 1986). Effects of social motive (prosocial vs. egoistic) and resistance to yielding (high vs. low vs. unknown) on contenting, problem solving, and joint outcomes were examined. Consistent with Dual Concern Theory, results showed that negotiators were less contentious, engaged in more problem solving, and achieved higher joint outcomes when they had a prosocial rather than egoistic motive, but only when resistance to yielding was high (or unknown) rather than low. The authors also explored the moderating effects of study characteristics and found effects for participation inducement (class exercise, participant pool), for publication status, and for treatment of no-agreement dyads.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands. ao_dedreu@macmail.psy.uva.nl
authors.forename: C K
authors.initials: CK
authors.lastname: De Dreu
authors.forename: L R
authors.initials: LR
authors.lastname: Weingart
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Kwon
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D009042:Motivation; D017008:Negotiating; D011340:Problem Solving; D011582:Psychological Theory; D012919:Social Behavior