Experiences and satisfaction with providing methotrexate-induced abortions among US providers.
OBJECTIVE
This study examined the acceptability of and experiences with methotrexate as an abortifacient among health care providers in the United States.


METHODS
Seventy-six telephone interviews were conducted with providers (28% physicians, 13% midlevel providers, 29% administrators, and 30% counselors/other medical staff) of methotrexate-induced abortions during May and June of 1997. We examined provider satisfaction and several key operational issues relative to medical abortion, including: time spent with patients and staffing, training, and space needs.


RESULTS
The majority of providers agreed that overall, more time was spent with methotrexate than with surgical abortion patients. Most agreed that the number of staff needed was the same for both methods, and that methotrexate required less office space. There were differing views on whether methotrexate required more, an equal amount of, or less training than surgical. Overall, providers were satisfied with methotrexate as an abortifacient.


CONCLUSIONS
These data suggest that as knowledge of the method spreads, more providers will add this technique to their services.
Harvey
S M
SM
Center for the Study of Women in Society, University of Oregon, Eugene, USA.
Beckman
L J
LJ
Satre
S J
SJ
D000020:Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D000028:Abortion, Induced / Q000379:methods*; D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D019538:Health Care Surveys; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006282:Health Personnel; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008727:Methotrexate / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D010561:Personnel Staffing and Scheduling; D011247:Pregnancy; D011361:Professional Competence; D014481:United States
D000020:Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal; D008727:Methotrexate