The next $120,000: a case study to illustrate analysis of alternative farm investments in fixed assets.
Dairy scientists specializing in the area of farm management are increasingly involved in analysis of farm investments in fixed assets. There have been instances where the wrong procedures were used to assess investments in fixed assets, leading to erroneous and possibly disastrous conclusions. A detailed case study of a dairy farm facing the decision of where best to invest an unexpected $120,000 windfall is used to illustrate the various facets of financial analysis. Indicators of profitability, liquidity, solvency, repayment capacity, and financial efficiency are explained and applied to the farm case to produce a detailed analysis of the current financial position of the firm. Long-range budgets of four alternate investment options and their impact on all financial indicators are presented. The four options are: 1) to pay down debt, 2) to purchase an additional 100 cows, 3) to install automatic milk yield recording in the parlor, and 4) to build new heifer facilities. All four investments are profitable. Therefore, an analysis limited to profitability indicators would conclude that any of the four options is a good investment. However, liquidity and financial efficiency issues showed that the option of purchasing 100 cows is far superior to the three others. We conclude that a complete and thorough financial analysis is required to evaluate the impact of long-run investments in fixed assets.
St-Pierre
N R
NR
Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210, USA. st-pierre.8@OSU.edu
Shoemaker
D
D
Jones
L R
LR
D000818:Animals; D002417:Cattle; D003612:Dairying / Q000191:economics* / Q000379:methods; D005260:Female; D006799:Housing, Animal; D007449:Investments; D007774:Lactation; D008892:Milk / Q000191:economics; D011996:Records