title: Digital cataract photography.
abstract: This study compares the cost effectiveness of two methods of grading cataract changes in the Australian population. The conventional film-based method has comparatively low set-up costs, but is more subjective in its assessment and more reliant on manpower, while the digital method has high set-up costs, but the results are more objective and available more quickly using fewer people. By a careful assessment of all the costs involved it is possible to estimate how many participants need to be recruited to a study in order to make the digital method cost effective.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Australia. joss@cera.unimelb.edu.au
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Dimock
authors.forename: L D
authors.initials: LD
authors.lastname: Robman
authors.forename: C A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: McCarty
authors.forename: H R
authors.initials: HR
authors.lastname: Taylor
mesh_terms: D001315:Australia; D002386:Cataract / Q000175:diagnosis*; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Q000191:economics*; D010781:Photography / Q000191:economics* / Q000379:methods*