title: GTR with three different types of membranes in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects: three-year results in sixty consecutive cases.
abstract: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical results at 3 years following treating intrabony periodontal defects with different nonresorbable and bioabsorbable membrane barriers. Sixty intrabony periodontal defects were treated according to the principles of guided tissue regeneration (GTR). Twenty pockets were treated with Gore Resolut, a bioabsorbable membrane; 20 were treated with Gore-Tex, a titanium-reinforced membrane; and 20 with nonresorbable Gore-Tex membrane (all manufactured by Gore Regenerative Technologies, Flagstaff, AZ). The therapeutic results were evaluated by assessing probing pocket depth (PPD), recession of the gingival margin (GR), and clinical attachment level (CAL) at baseline, at 1 and at 3 years after therapy. The postoperative phase was uneventful in all cases. At 1 year after surgery, the results showed a mean PPD reduction from 9.42 mm to 3.35 mm (p < 0.0001) with Resolut; from 10.30 mm to 4.00 with titanium-reinforced Gore-Tex (p < 0.0001); and from 8.40 mm to 3.73 mm (p < 0.0001) with Gore-Tex membranes. The mean GR increased from 1.92 mm to 3.70 mm (p < 0.001) with Resolut; from 0.47 mm to 2.85 mm (p < 0.0001) with titanium-reinforced Gore-Tex; and from 0.73 mm to 2.15 mm (p < 0.0001) with Gore-Tex membranes. The mean CAL changed from 11.35 mm to 6.92 mm (p < 0.001) with Resolut; from 10.78 mm to 6.85 mm (p < 0.0001) with titanium-reinforced Gore-Tex; and from 9.13 mm to 5.87 mm (p < 0.0001) with Gore-Tex membranes. The clinical results at 3 years were not significantly different when compared with the 1-year results (p > 0.05). No significant differences existed between the mean changes in PPD, GR, and CAL in the three different test groups. Furthermore, one tooth scheduled for extraction for periodontal and prosthodontic reasons was treated with Resolut. Histological analysis 6 months after treatment demonstrated the neoformation of a connective tissue attachment and of new alveolar bone. This additional evidence thus proved that treatment with bioabsorbable membranes according to GTR principles delivers not only clinical improvement, but also histological periodontal regeneration.
authors.affiliation: Department of Periodontology, Semmelweis University of Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Windisch
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Sculean
authors.forename: I
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Gera
mesh_terms: D001672:Biocompatible Materials / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D016557:Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D008567:Membranes, Artificial; D010518:Periodontitis / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D011138:Polytetrafluoroethylene / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D013536:Suture Techniques; D013997:Time Factors; D014025:Titanium; D014081:Tooth Extraction
chemical_list: D001672:Biocompatible Materials; D008567:Membranes, Artificial; D011138:Polytetrafluoroethylene; D014025:Titanium