title: The causes and risk of stroke in patients with asymptomatic internal-carotid-artery stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The causes of stroke in patients with asymptomatic carotid-artery stenosis have not been carefully studied. Information about causes might influence decisions about the use of carotid endarterectomy in such patients.
  
  
  METHODS
  We studied patients with unilateral symptomatic carotid-artery stenosis and asymptomatic contralateral stenosis from 1988 to 1997. The causes, severity, risk, and predictors of stroke in the territory of the asymptomatic artery were examined and quantified.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The risk of stroke at five years after study entry in a total of 1820 patients increased with the severity of stenosis. Among 1604 patients with stenosis of less than 60 percent of the luminal diameter, the risk of a first stroke was 8.0 percent (1.6 percent annually), as compared with 16.2 percent (3.2 percent annually) among 216 patients with 60 to 99 percent stenosis. In the group with 60 to 99 percent stenosis, the five-year risk of stroke in the territory of a large artery was 9.9 percent, that of lacunar stroke was 6.0 percent, and that of cardioembolic stroke 2.1 percent. Some patients had more than one stroke of more than one cause. In the territory of an asymptomatic occluded artery (as was identified in 86 patients), the annualized risk of stroke was 1.9 percent. Strokes with different causes had different risk factors. The risk factors for large-artery stroke were silent brain infarction, a history of diabetes, and a higher degree of stenosis; for cardioembolic stroke, a history of myocardial infarction or angina and hypertension; for lacunar stroke, age of 75 years or older, hypertension, diabetes, and a higher degree of stenosis.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The risk of stroke among patients with asymptomatic carotid-artery stenosis is relatively low. Forty-five percent of strokes in patients with asymptomatic stenosis of 60 to 99 percent are attributable to lacunes or cardioembolism. These observations have implications for the use of endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients. Without analysis of the risk of stroke according to cause, the absolute benefit associated with endarterectomy may be overestimated.
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Sciences, University of Florence, Italy.
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Inzitari
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Eliasziw
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Gates
authors.forename: B L
authors.initials: BL
authors.lastname: Sharpe
authors.forename: R K
authors.initials: RK
authors.lastname: Chan
authors.forename: H E
authors.initials: HE
authors.lastname: Meldrum
authors.forename: H J
authors.initials: HJ
authors.lastname: Barnett
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D016893:Carotid Stenosis / Q000145:classification / Q000150:complications* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000601:surgery; D015984:Causality; D016894:Endarterectomy, Carotid; D005260:Female; D006331:Heart Diseases / Q000150:complications; D006801:Humans; D020767:Intracranial Thrombosis / Q000150:complications; D008297:Male; D016016:Proportional Hazards Models; D011859:Radiography; D012307:Risk Factors; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D020521:Stroke / Q000145:classification / Q000209:etiology*; D013923:Thromboembolism / Q000150:complications*; D013927:Thrombosis / Q000150:complications