title: Complementary medicine: legal status of the non-licensed provider in the USA.
abstract: European providers of complementary medicine may be surprised by the formal structures which their US counterparts face. A major hurdle to holistic practice in the USA is the statutory prohibition against the unlicensed practice of medicine. State statutes define 'medicine' broadly, creating a legal risk for unlicensed providers of holistic healthcare, as well as for licensed providers whose services are deemed to exceed their legislatively authorized scope of practice and cross into 'diagnosis' and 'treatment' of disease. This paper does not address scope of practice; rather, it focuses on the legal status of non-licensed (or 'unenfranchised') providers. For these providers, seeking occupational licensure will provide some protection against medical practice acts, as well as opportunity to elevate professional competence and prestige. However, many holistic providers prefer to remain outside the regulatory scheme. Mandatory licensure, title licensure and registration offer means of upgrading professional status and achieving state sanction for professional practice.
authors.affiliation: Chapman University School of Law, Anaheim, California 92660, USA.
authors.forename: M H
authors.initials: MH
authors.lastname: Cohen
mesh_terms: D000529:Complementary Therapies / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006282:Health Personnel / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D016365:Liability, Legal; D008004:Licensure / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D012926:Social Control, Formal / Q000379:methods; D013219:State Government; D014481:United States