Summation between nearby motion signals and facilitative/inhibitory interactions between distant motion signals.
To explain the finding that motion assimilation was dominant between nearby motion signals while motion contrast between distant ones, a center-surround antagonistic mechanism was proposed [Nawrot & Sekuler (1990). Vision Research, 30, 1439-1451]. However, motion assimilation occurred not only between nearby signals but also between distant ones, suggesting the existence of a center-surround non-antagonistic mechanism [Ido. Ohtani & Ejima (1997). Vision Research, 37, 1565-1574]. The present study was designed to provide direct evidence for the non-antagonistic mechanism, and to examine further the motion interactions which operate in different spatial scales. The nature of motion interaction between the test and the inducer was examined by varying the size, the number of frames, the frame duration and the inter-frame displacement of random-dot kinematograms. The results were consistent with the notion that there are three types of interactions in human motion processing; one is a summation process effective within nearby regions, and the other two are facilitative and inhibitory induction processes operating over larger spatial scales. Analysis of the results in terms of the Fourier components suggests that the facilitative and the inhibitory induction processes may be sensitive, respectively to the lower and the higher temporal frequency components of the stimulus.
Ido
K
K
Institute for Science of Labour, Kawasaki, Japan.
Ohtani
Y
Y
Ejima
Y
Y
D006801:Humans; D009039:Motion Perception; D009903:Optical Illusions; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D011601:Psychophysics