title: Are there detectable differences in quality of care or outcome of depression across primary care providers?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The objective of this work was to determine whether there are detectable differences among primary care physicians in measures of quality of care or clinical outcome for depressed patients during the first 2 months of treatment with antidepressant medication.
  
  
  METHODS
  We studied 1,599 depressed primary care patients initiating antidepressant treatment from 63 family physicians in 4 primary care clinics of a staff-model health maintenance organization. Patients were interviewed 6 to 8 weeks after initiating antidepressant medication with a telephone structured interview that included the Structural Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Diagnoses (SCID). Automated databases of the HMO were used to examine 3 quality-of-care measures: (1) the percentage of patients who had a refill of their antidepressant by 6 weeks, (2) the percentage of patients who had a return visit by 3 weeks, and (3) the percentage of patients having a return visit by 6 weeks. The percentage of patients in each primary care physician panel who had > or =4 persistent DSM-IV depressive symptoms at 6 to 8 weeks was the main clinical outcome variable. To adjust for case-mix differences between physician panels, patient age, gender, and medical comorbidity were controlled for in the analyses. Two covariates were used to adjust for differences in patients' clinical severity: self-report of > or =2 prior depressive episodes and an SCID diagnosis of major depression during the patient's worst episode in the last 2 years. Physician age, gender, and part-time versus full-time practice were also used as covariates.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The wide observed range of variability in quality-of-care and clinical outcome measures by physician practice decreased markedly in the statistical model that controlled for patient-level covariates and differences in the number of patients seen per provider. We did not detect differences in physician practice for the percentage of patients who had a return visit by 3 or 6 weeks, the percentage of patients who had a refill of their antidepressant prescription by 6 weeks, or the percentage of patients with an adverse clinical outcome of depression.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We did not find important differences in measures of quality of care or patient outcomes by physician. These results may have implications for the use of physician profiling and other forms of physician report cards.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington Medical School, Seattle 98195, USA.
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Katon
authors.forename: C M
authors.initials: CM
authors.lastname: Rutter
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Lin
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Simon
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Von Korff
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Bush
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Walker
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Ludman
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D000928:Antidepressive Agents / Q000627:therapeutic use; D003866:Depressive Disorder / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000523:psychology; D005194:Family Practice / Q000592:standards*; D005260:Female; D006279:Health Maintenance Organizations; D006302:Health Services Research; D006801:Humans; D016015:Logistic Models; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care / Q000458:organization & administration*; D011320:Primary Health Care / Q000592:standards*; D011569:Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014861:Washington
chemical_list: D000928:Antidepressive Agents