title: On perceived conflicts between religion and science: the role of fundamentalism and right-wing authoritarianism.
abstract: Volunteers from fundamentalist churches and a Psychology of Religion class (N = 77) completed Altemeyer and Hunsberger's 1992 Fundamentalism Scale, Altemeyer's 1988 Right-wing Authoritarianism Scale, and answered questions about science, religion, and their relationship. Scores on the scales were highly positively correlated. Neither orientation correlated with seeing science as improving life, and both correlated with being troubled by newer developments in science such as organ transplants or genetic engineering. Partial correlations showed that both orientations favored religious beliefs over scientific data when there was a perceived conflict. Three subscales of right-wing authoritarianism clarified how authoritarianism correlated with other measures, thereby supporting a multidimensional conceptualization of right-wing authoritarianism.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti 48197, USA. Psy_Westman@online.emich.edu
authors.forename: A S
authors.initials: AS
authors.lastname: Westman
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Willink
authors.forename: J W
authors.initials: JW
authors.lastname: McHoskey
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001318:Authoritarianism; D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010555:Personality Inventory; D012069:Religion and Psychology; D012586:Science