Making Rorschach interpretation as good as it can be.
This article delineates six guidelines for enhancing the quality and utility of interpretations derived from the Rorschach inkblot method. These include (a) using all of the available structural, thematic, and behavioral data in arriving at interpretations; (b) focusing interpretive statements primarily on personality processes and drawing clinical conclusions and recommendations secondarily on the basis of identified personality processes; (c) addressing interpretations to both personality strengths and personality weaknesses to attend equally to adaptive capacities and maladaptive tendencies; (d) formulating and conveying interpretations at appropriate levels of certainty to distinguish clearly between probable fact and possible conjecture; (e) pursuing and expressing both nomothetic and idiographic implications of interpretations to the fullest possible extent, recognizing that personality is best described by considering both how people resemble and how they differ from each other; and (f) grounding the implications of interpretations in each respondent's cultural context to take adequate account of the mediation of cultural relativism between personality characteristics and their adaptive consequences.
Weiner
I B
IB
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, University of South Florida. iweiner@com1.med.usf.edu
D003466:Cultural Characteristics; D006801:Humans; D010551:Personality; D011594:Psychometrics; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012392:Rorschach Test / Q000592:standards*; D014481:United States