title: Comparison of the in vitro holding strengths of conical and cylindrical pedicle screws in a fully inserted setting and backed out 180 degrees.
abstract: Previous investigations have suggested that conical and cylindrical pedicle screws have comparable holding strengths. So far, the remaining performance in screws turned back or loose as a result of other reasons has not been determined. Twenty-four cadaveric spines from 6- to 8-week-old calves were examined. After bone mineral density was determined, four pedicle screws (two conical and two cylindrical screws) were inserted. The screws were fully inserted and half of them turned back 180 degrees. Twenty-four axial pullout and 24 cyclic loading tests with subsequent pullout tests were conducted. The pullout strengths of conical screws turned back 180 degrees are significantly smaller (1.8 kN) than those of cylindrical screws (4.3 kN). After cyclic loading, the displacement of conical screws is significantly greater (6.9 mm) than that of cylindrical screws (4.7 mm). Pedicle screws, especially conical ones, need to be placed to a correct depth, and they should not have to be backed out.
authors.affiliation: AO Research Institute, Davos, Switzerland.
authors.forename: C A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Lill
authors.forename: U
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Schlegel
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Wahl
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Schneider
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D001863:Bone Screws; D002417:Cattle; D007405:Intervertebral Disc Displacement / Q000601:surgery*; D008954:Models, Biological; D013123:Spinal Fusion; D013131:Spine / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D016474:Weight-Bearing / Q000502:physiology