Gene-environment interactions and the affected-sib-pair designs.
In genetic mapping of complex traits, the affected-sib-pair method (ASP) and the transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) are two methods of choice. The major appeal of both ASP and TDT is that they do not require the knowledge of mode of inheritance underlying the trait in question. The relative ease and economy for data collection also is the reason for their popularity. The basic idea of the ASP is to identify genes or chromosomal regions through identifying genetic similarity based on phenotypical similarity. TDT, on the other hand, detects susceptibility genes through detecting unusual transmission patterns in families. Since phenotypic similarity can also be caused by environmental similarity, we investigate how the presence of gene-environment interaction (GEI) affects the power of both methods. For a simple one-locus-one-risk-factor model, our results indicate that, in the presence of GEI, methods developed based on marginal penetrance functions (i.e. ignoring the risk factor) can give spurious results. The triangular restriction on allele-sharing probability may no longer be valid. If the environment effect is strong, using exposure-discordant affected sib pairs may have advantage over other designs. Above all, a genetic model involving both genetic and environmental factors behaves differently from a single-locus genetic model.
Guo
S W
SW
The M. McGee National Research Center for Juvenile Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53226-0509, USA. swguo@mcw.edu
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D002874:Chromosome Mapping; D004777:Environment; D005796:Genes; D030342:Genetic Diseases, Inborn / Q000235:genetics; D006801:Humans; D008957:Models, Genetic; D015233:Models, Statistical; D012307:Risk Factors