A comparison of certain practice characteristics of dental anesthesiologists in Canada and the United States.
An existing database was used to compare aspects of dental anesthesiology practice of dental anesthesiologists in Canada (n = 32) and the United States (n = 123). Data focusing on percutaneous injuries were obtained through a mailed questionnaire that was returned anonymously. Respondents provided information on the treatment of patients under deep sedation or general anesthesia only. Eighty-one percent of Canadians and 61% of Americans returned the questionnaire. The vast majority (84%) of injuries reported were due to sharps associated with general dentistry compared with those associated with anesthesiology. Canadians were more likely to be operator-anesthetists (P < .01) and to experience a percutaneous injury (P < .01) than US practitioners. American practitioners were more likely to have a greater proportion of the caseload under the age of 20 (P < .02). No other significant differences were observed. These results illustrate a number of unique attributes of the practice of dental anesthesiology in these 2 countries.
Suljak
J P
JP
Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Haas
D A
DA
Leake
J L
JL
D000766:Anesthesia, Dental / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D000776:Anesthesiology; D002170:Canada / Q000453:epidemiology; D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D006801:Humans; D016602:Needlestick Injuries / Q000453:epidemiology*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014481:United States / Q000453:epidemiology; D000078329:Workforce; D016526:Workload