title: Comparison of sampling methods for monomer and polyisocyanates of 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate during spray finishing operations.
abstract: A comparison study of isocyanate sampling methods for 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI) monomer and HDI-based polyisocyanates was conducted in spray painting environments. This study compared the performance of the Iso-chek sampler against existing and proposed National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) monitoring methods for HDI-based isocyanates. Six methods for monitoring HDI monomer and polyisocyanate levels were compared. Fifty-eight sampling sets were collected during spray painting of aircraft and aircraft parts at four U.S. Air Force bases. Impinger and cassette samplers were mounted side-by-side on a mannequin located in paint overspray areas. For HDI monomer sampling results, there were no significant differences between NIOSH 5521, NIOSH 5522, OSHA 42, MAP (the proposed NIOSH method), and the Iso-Chek. For HDI-based polyisocyanates, NIOSH 5522, NIOSH 5521, Iso-Chek, and the Total Aerosol Mass Method (TAMM) were significantly different from one another. There was no significant difference between MAP and the NIOSH 5522 polyisocyanate sampling results. This study suggests the Iso-Chek and MAP sampling methods compare favorably with established methods for monitoring in HDI spray painting environments and the Total Aerosol Mass Method provides a reasonable upper boundary for estimating HDI polyisocyanate concentrations. The results also reemphasize aerosol sampling physics and sampler geometries must be carefully considered and appropriate samplers used when measuring exposures in spray paint environments where particulates are of the inhalable size.
authors.affiliation: Institute for Environment, Safety and Occupational Health Risk Analysis, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas, USA.
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: England
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Key-Schwartz
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Lesage
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Carlton
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Streicher
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Song
mesh_terms: D000395:Air Pollutants, Occupational / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000032:analysis* / Q000737:chemistry; D003485:Cyanates / Q000032:analysis* / Q000737:chemistry; D004784:Environmental Monitoring / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D008889:Military Personnel; D009314:National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. / Q000592:standards; D010150:Paint; D011140:Polyurethanes / Q000032:analysis*; D011336:Probability; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D012997:Solvents / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000737:chemistry; D014481:United States; D014489:United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration; D017132:Workplace
chemical_list: D000395:Air Pollutants, Occupational; D003485:Cyanates; D011140:Polyurethanes; D012997:Solvents