title: Evaluation of error bounds on calcaneal speed of sound caused by surrounding soft tissue.
abstract: For absorptiometry measurements, soft tissue may have an impact on quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurements. In the present study, we focused primarily on the quantification of measurement error on speed of sound (SOS) caused by surrounding soft tissue. The relevant soft tissue parameters affecting the inherent SOS inaccuracies are thickness and sound velocity. To meet our goal, SOS measurements were taken at the right heel using a QUS imaging device in 21 healthy subjects. Site-matched measurements of soft tissue thickness (STT) and bone width were performed using magnetic resonance imaging of the heel. Several bone velocities were calculated either by accounting for bone width (SOSBW) only or by taking into account the exact path lengths of all major components traversed by ultrasound &lapr;V(b)). Given that soft tissue composition is difficult to determine in vivo, we chose to estimate lower and upper error bounds on bone velocity (V(b lower) and V(b upper)) by spanning the full range of available values in the literature. The mean BW was 30.7 +/- 2.7 mm and the mean medial and external STTs were 8.8 +/- 1.7 and 8.5 +/- 1.5 mm, respectively. Accounting for true BW only resulted in no significant difference between SOS (1533 +/- 37) and SOSBW (1531 +/- 33). By contrast, accounting for both true BW and surrounding soft tissue resulted in an increase in the calculated bone velocity and statistically significant differences between SOS and V(b upper) (1568 +/- 36) and V(b lower) (1542 +/- 34). Root mean square errors between SOS and the calculated velocities were 0.34, 2. 32, and 0.70% for SOSBW, V(b upper), and V(b lower), respectively. We report here measurement errors caused by soft tissue to be 3 to 20 times higher than the SOS short-term precision (SOS coefficient of variation of 0.1%). Our results suggest that inaccuracies in SOS measurement caused by overlying soft tissue cannot be neglected. Overlying soft tissues may influence outcomes of longitudinal studies, especially if variations in tissue thickness and composition occur during the longitudinal follow-up. A practical way of minimizing the measurement error could be to perform an adequate correction for the overlying soft tissue. However, ideally, this should require knowing both the thickness and sound velocity in soft tissue. One might preferably conduct experimental investigations that directly control soft tissue thickness and composition to resolve this problem.
authors.affiliation: Laboratoire d'Imagerie Paramétrique UMR 7623 CNRS-Université Paris VI, France. chappard@lip.bhdc.jussieu.fr
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Chappard
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Camus
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Lefebvre
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Guillot
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Bittoun
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Berger
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Laugier
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D015992:Body Mass Index; D002111:Calcaneus / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D003238:Connective Tissue / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D008297:Male; D015588:Observer Variation; D010024:Osteoporosis / Q000175:diagnosis; D012016:Reference Values; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D014463:Ultrasonography