Clinical education in two-year colleges: cost-benefit issues.
Allied health program directors and administrators need to be aware of the costs and benefits of their clinical training programs to assure continued availability of training facilities for students. In a pilot study, program directors and administrators who are members of the National Network of Health Career Programs in Two-year Colleges (NN2) were surveyed concerning items to include in a cost-benefit-analysis tool, intangible and tangible costs and benefits of clinical education programs, and evaluation of a tool to analyze costs and benefits. Surveys were sent to 138 NN2 members, with 58 responding. Clinical sites were primarily in independent hospitals or health care systems. Most programs had preceptor-to-student ratios of 1:1-1:2, with few students being paid for clinical work. The respondents identified costs as staff time, materials and supplies, equipment, and others. Benefits were orientation and recruitment savings; increased professionalism, job satisfaction, and work quality of staff; ability to maintain and upgrade staff skills and knowledge; and student assistance with clinical coverage. Few programs were required to perform cost analysis. Allied health clinical education programs continue to depend on the willingness of health care facilities to accept students for clinical training.
Jones
B
B
Allied Health Division, Bossier Parish Community College, LA 71111, USA. bjones@bpcc.cc.la.us
Murtaugh
M
M
Durkin
Z A
ZA
Bolden
M C
MC
Majewski
T
T
D000488:Allied Health Personnel / Q000193:education*; D015510:Clinical Medicine / Q000193:education; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D006801:Humans; D010865:Pilot Projects; D012576:Schools, Health Occupations / Q000191:economics*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014481:United States