The effect of knee angle on the external validity of isometric measures of lower body neuromuscular function.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of varying knee angle (120 degrees and 90 degrees) on the external validity of an isometric leg press test with reference to vertical jump performance. Isometric peak force (PF120 and PF90), rate of force development (RFD120 and RFD90), and maximum height reached with a squat jump and counter-movement jump were measured in 14 males. Although RFD120 was significantly correlated with squat jump and counter-movement jump performance (r = 0.71 and 0.69), and the correlations with PF120 approached statistical significance (r = 0.53 and 0.50), neither PF90 nor RFD90 was significantly related to vertical jump performance. Furthermore, although both RFD120 and PF120 were significantly different between the best five and the worst five jumpers, RFD90 and PF90 did not differentiate between individuals' vertical jump performance. We conclude that the choice of joint angle affects the external validity of isometric strength testing. Based on our results, we recommend accurate control of biomechanical specificity and assessment at different angles to find the position at which isometric strength testing is most comfortable.
Marcora
S
S
School of Sport, Health and Exercise Sciences, University of Wales Bangor, Gwynedd, UK. pep402@bangor.ac.uk
Miller
M K
MK
D000328:Adult; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D016552:Ergometry; D006801:Humans; D007537:Isometric Contraction / Q000502:physiology*; D007719:Knee Joint / Q000502:physiology*; D007866:Leg / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D018482:Muscle, Skeletal / Q000502:physiology; D012016:Reference Values; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D013177:Sports / Q000502:physiology*; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D014891:Weight Lifting