title: Should we use a case-crossover design?
abstract: The first decade of experience with case-crossover studies has shown that the design applies best if the exposure is intermittent, the effect on risk is immediate and transient, and the outcome is abrupt. However, this design has been used to study single changes in exposure level, gradual effects on risk, and outcomes with insidious onsets. To estimate relative risk, the exposure frequency during a window just before outcome onset is compared with exposure frequencies during control times rather than in control persons. One or more control times are supplied by each of the cases themselves, to control for confounding by constant characteristics and self-confounding between the trigger's acute and chronic effects. This review of published case-crossover studies is designed to help the reader prepare a better research proposal by understanding triggers and deterrents, target person times, alternative study bases, crossover cohorts, induction times, effect and hazard periods, exposure windows, the exposure opportunity fallacy, a general likelihood formula, and control crossover analysis.
authors.affiliation: Epidemiology Department, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. malcolm.maclure@moh.hnet.bc.ca
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Maclure
authors.forename: M A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Mittleman
mesh_terms: D000208:Acute Disease; D016022:Case-Control Studies; D015984:Causality; D015986:Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic; D018592:Cross-Over Studies; D003625:Data Collection / Q000379:methods; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D006801:Humans; D009203:Myocardial Infarction / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000209:etiology*; D012306:Risk; D012494:Sampling Studies; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires / Q000592:standards; D013997:Time Factors