Response of broiler chickens to microbial phytase supplementation as influenced by dietary phytic acid and non-phytate phosphorous levels. II. Effects on apparent metabolisable energy, nutrient digestibility and nutrient retention.
1. Male broilers (n=900) were fed on wheat-sorghum-soyabean meal based diets containing 3 concentrations of phytic acid (10.4, 13.2 and 15.7 g/kg; equivalent to 2.9, 3.7 and 4.4 g/kg phytate P), 2 concentrations of non-phytate (or available) phosphorus (2.3 and 4.5 g/kg) and 3 concentrations of microbial phytase (0, 400 and 800 FTU/kg) from day 7 to 25 post-hatch. The dietary concentrations of phytic acid were manipulated by the inclusion of rice pollards. All diets contained celite (20 g/kg) as a source of acid-insoluble ash. 2. The apparent metabolisable energy (AME) concentrations of the diets were determined using a classical total collection procedure during the 3rd week of the trial. On d 25, digesta from the terminal ileum were collected and analysed for phosphorus, nitrogen and amino acids. Nutrient digestibilities were calculated using acid-insoluble ash as the indigestible marker. 2. Ileal digestibilities of nitrogen and essential amino acids were negatively influenced by increasing dietary levels of phytic acid but these negative effects were overcome by the addition of phytase. 3. Supplemental phytase increased AME, ileal digestibilities of phosphorus, nitrogen and amino acids and the retention of dry matter, phosphorus and nitrogen in broilers. There were no differences in the phytase responses between additions of 400 and 800 FTU/kg. 4. The responses in all variables, except AME, were greater in low non-phytate phosphorus diets. 5. In the case of AME, the response to added phytase was greater in adequate non-phytate phosphorus diets. Supplemental phytase increased AME values from 13.36 to 13.54 MJ/kg dry matter in low non-phytate phosphorus diets and from 12.66 to 13.38 MJ/kg dry matter in adequate non-phytate phosphorus diets.
Ravindran
V
V
Department of Animal Science, University of Sydney, Camden, Australia. V.Ravindran@massey.ac.nz
Cabahug
S
S
Ravindra
G
G
Selle
P H
PH
Bryden
W L
WL
D010832:6-Phytase / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000378:metabolism*; D000596:Amino Acids / Q000032:analysis; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D000818:Animals; D002645:Chickens / Q000378:metabolism*; D002852:Chromatography, Ion Exchange / Q000662:veterinary; D019587:Dietary Supplements; D004063:Digestion; D004435:Eating; D004734:Energy Metabolism / Q000502:physiology*; D005243:Feces / Q000737:chemistry; D007082:Ileum / Q000737:chemistry; D016014:Linear Models; D008297:Male; D009584:Nitrogen / Q000032:analysis; D010758:Phosphorus / Q000032:analysis / Q000378:metabolism; D010833:Phytic Acid / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism*
D000596:Amino Acids; D010758:Phosphorus; D010833:Phytic Acid; D010832:6-Phytase; D009584:Nitrogen