title: What is the "golden standard" for assessing population-based interventions?--problems of dilution bias.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To identify different types of dilution bias in population-based interventions and to suggest measures for handling these methodological problems.
  
  
  METHODS
  Literature review plus analysis of data from a population-based intervention against cardiovascular disease in a Swedish municipality.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The effects of an intervention on mortality and morbidity were much more diluted by non-intervening factors, dissemination to areas outside the intervention area, social diffusion, population mobility and time than by using intermediate outcome measures.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Theoretically, changes in scientifically well documented risk factors, for example, intermediate outcome measures, should be preferred to using morbidity or mortality as outcome measures.
authors.affiliation: Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Lindholm
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Rosén
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D015982:Bias; D002318:Cardiovascular Diseases / Q000401:mortality* / Q000628:therapy; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D013548:Sweden / Q000453:epidemiology; D016896:Treatment Outcome