Respiratory comfort and breathing pattern during volume proportional assist ventilation and pressure support ventilation: a study on volunteers with artificially reduced compliance.
OBJECTIVE
To assess respiratory comfort and associated breathing pattern during volume assist (VA) as a component of proportional assist ventilation and during pressure support ventilation (PSV).


METHODS
Prospective, double-blind, interventional study.


METHODS
Laboratory.


METHODS
A total of 15 healthy volunteers (11 females, 4 males) aged 21-31 yrs.


METHODS
Decreased respiratory system compliance was simulated by banding of the thorax and abdomen. Volunteers breathed via a mouthpiece with VA and PSV each applied at two levels (VA, 8 cm H2O/L and 12 cm H2O/L; PSV, 10 cm H2O and 15 cm H2O) using a positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cm H2O throughout. The study was subdivided into two parts. In Part 1, volunteers breathed three times with each of the four settings for 2 mins in random order. In Part 2, the first breath effects of multiple, randomly applied mode, and level shifts were studied.


RESULTS
In Part 1, the volunteers were asked to estimate respiratory comfort in comparison with normal breathing using a visual analog scale. In Part 2, they were asked to estimate the change of respiratory comfort as increased, decreased, or unchanged immediately after a mode shift. Concomitantly, the respiratory pattern (change) was characterized with continuously measured tidal volume, respiratory rate, pressure, and gas flow. Respiratory comfort during VA was higher than during PSV. The higher support level was less important during VA but had a major negative influence on comfort during PSV. Both modes differed with respect to the associated breathing pattern. Variability of breathing was higher during VA than during PSV (Part 1). Changes in respiratory variables were associated with changes in respiratory comfort (Part 2).


CONCLUSIONS
For volunteers breathing with artificially reduced respiratory system compliance, respiratory comfort is higher with VA than with PSV. This is probably caused by a better adaptation of the ventilatory support to the volunteer's need with VA.
Mols
G
G
Section of Experimental Anesthesiology, the University of Freiburg, Germany.
von Ungern-Sternberg
B
B
Rohr
E
E
Haberthür
C
C
Geiger
K
K
Guttmann
J
J
D000328:Adult; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008170:Lung Compliance / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012119:Respiration; D012121:Respiration, Artificial