Ovarian ablation for early breast cancer.
BACKGROUND
Among women with early breast cancer, the effects of ovarian ablation on recurrence and death have been assessed by several randomised trials that now have long follow-up.


OBJECTIVE
In this report, the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group present their third 5-yearly systematic overview (meta-analysis), now with 15 years' follow-up.


METHODS
Trial identification procedures for the EBCTCG overviews have been described elsewhere. See under "EBCTCG" in the Breast Cancer Collaborative Review Group module.


METHODS
All properly randomised trials that began recruiting before 1990 which compared the ablation or suppression of ovarian function, sometimes with the addition of prednisone, versus no such adjuvant treatment for women with operable breast cancer. In practice, all the trials that can be reviewed here began before 1980, and all involved surgical or therapeutic ablation.


METHODS
In 1995, information was sought on each patient in any randomised trial of ovarian ablation or suppression versus control that began before 1990. Data were obtained for 12 of the 13 studies that assessed ovarian ablation by irradiation or surgery, all of which began before 1980, but not for the four studies that assessed ovarian suppression by drugs, all of which began after 1985. Menopausal status was not consistently defined across trials; therefore, the main analyses are limited to women aged under 50 (rather than "premenopausal") when randomised. Oestrogen receptors were measured only in the trials of ablation plus cytotoxic chemotherapy versus the same chemotherapy alone.


RESULTS
Among 2102 women aged under 50 when randomised, most of whom would have been premenopausal at diagnosis, 1130 deaths and an additional 153 recurrences were reported. 15-year survival was highly significantly improved among those allocated ovarian ablation (52.4 vs 46.1%, 6.3 [SD 2.3] fewer deaths per 100 women, logrank 2p=0.001), as was recurrence-free survival (45.0 vs 39.0%, 2p=0.0007). The numbers of events were too small for any subgroup analyses to be reliable. The benefit was, however, significant both for those with ("node positive") and for those without ("node negative") axillary spread when diagnosed. In the trials of ablation plus cytotoxic chemotherapy versus the same chemotherapy alone, the benefit appeared smaller (even for women with oestrogen receptors detected on the primary tumour) than in the trials in the absence of chemotherapy (where the observed survival improvements were about six per 100 node-negative women and 12 per 100 node-positive women). Among 1354 women aged 50 or over when randomised, most of whom would have been perimenopausal or postmenopausal, there was only a non-significant improvement in survival and recurrence-free survival.


CONCLUSIONS
In women aged under 50 with early breast cancer, ablation of functioning ovaries significantly improves long-term survival, at least in the absence of chemotherapy. Further randomised evidence is needed on the additional effects of ovarian ablation in the presence of other adjuvant treatments, and to assess the relevance of hormone-receptor measurements.
D018931:Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000628:therapy*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D015201:Meta-Analysis as Topic; D009376:Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent / Q000628:therapy*; D010052:Ovariectomy; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
D018931:Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal