title: The economics of laparoscopic antireflux operations compared with open surgery.
abstract: In Sweden laparoscopic antireflux surgery started in 1991, and within four years replaced the open procedure as the method of choice. It is, however, not yet settled which of the two techniques is most cost effective. To compare these two operations in economic terms we studied all reports up to September 1997 as well as the register in the epidemiological unit of the National Board of Health and Welfare (EpC). We found numerous reports on consecutive series of laparoscopic procedures, several non-randomised studies, and only one randomised prospective study comparing open and laparoscopic antireflux surgery. The few studies about the economics of antireflux surgery indicated that hospital costs were equal or less for the laparoscopic procedure. If one adds the costs from loss of production (sick leave) it will be an even more favourable outcome for the laparoscopic treatment. The figures from EpC showed that antireflux surgery is done infrequently in many surgical departments. This may have a substantial influence on the economic outcome as well as the effectiveness of antireflux surgery in Sweden. Few studies have compared open and laparoscopic methods from an economic perspective. As a tool for cost benefit analysis these reports are incomplete.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden.
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Sandbu
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Hallgren
mesh_terms: D013505:Digestive System Surgical Procedures / Q000191:economics*; D018662:Fundoplication / Q000191:economics* / Q000379:methods; D005764:Gastroesophageal Reflux / Q000191:economics / Q000601:surgery*; D017721:Hospital Costs; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000191:economics*; D007902:Length of Stay; D013548:Sweden