title: Clinical cross-reactivity among foods of the Rosaceae family.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Foods from the Rosaceae botanical family have been increasingly reported as causes of allergic reaction. Patients frequently have positive skin tests or radioallergosorbent test results for multiple members of this botanical family.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  Our purpose was to investigate the clinical cross-reactivity assessed by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) of Rosaceae foods (apricot, almond, plum, strawberry, apple, peach, and pear).
  
  
  METHODS
  Thirty-four consecutive adult patients complaining of adverse reactions to Rosaceae were included in the study. Skin prick tests and CAP System (FEIA) were performed with Rosaceae foods in all patients. Clinical reactivity to Rosaceae was systematically evaluated by open food challenges (OFCs), unless there was a convincing history of a recent severe anaphylaxis. Positive reactions on OFCs were subsequently evaluated by DBPCFCs.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Twenty-six and 24 patients had positive skin prick tests and CAP FEIA with Rosaceae, respectively; from these 88% and 100% had positive tests with >/=2. No evidence of clinical reactivity was found in 66% percent of positive skin prick tests and 63% of positive specific IgE determinations to fruits. A total of 226 food challenges (including OFC and DBPCFC) were performed in the 28 patients with positive skin prick tests or CAP System FEIA. Of 182 initial OFCs carried out, 26 (14%) reactions were confirmed by DBPCFCs. Overall, 40 reactions were considered positive in 22 patients with positive skin tests or CAP FEIA. Thirty-eight reactions had been previously reported, the remaining two were detected by systematic challenges. Most reactions were caused by peach (22 patients), apple (6), and apricot (5). Ten patients (46%) were clinically allergic to peach and other Rosaceae.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Positive skin test and CAP System FEIA should not be taken as the only guide for multi-species dietary restrictions. Nevertheless, the potential clinical allergy to other Rosaceae should not be neglected. If the reported reaction is confirmed, current tolerance to other Rosaceae should be precisely established unless there has been ingestion without symptoms after the reaction.
authors.affiliation: Servicio de Alergia and the Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Rodriguez
authors.forename: J F
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Crespo
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Lopez-Rubio
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: De La Cruz-Bertolo
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Ferrando-Vivas
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Vives
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Daroca
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003429:Cross Reactions; D015180:Electrophoresis, Gel, Two-Dimensional; D005260:Female; D005512:Food Hypersensitivity / Q000276:immunology*; D005638:Fruit / Q000009:adverse effects*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D019685:Rosales / Q000276:immunology*; D012882:Skin Tests