title: Changing the site of delivery of thrombolytic treatment for acute myocardial infarction from the coronary care unit to the emergency department greatly reduces door to needle time.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To quantify the change in door to needle time when delivery of thrombolytic treatment of acute myocardial infarction was changed from the coronary care unit to the emergency department.
  
  
  METHODS
  A comparative observational study using prospectively collected data.
  
  
  METHODS
  Coronary care unit and emergency department of an Australian teaching hospital.
  
  
  METHODS
  89 patients receiving thrombolysis in coronary care unit between June 1994 and January 1996, and 100 patients treated in the emergency department between April 1997 and May 1998.
  
  
  METHODS
  From April 1997, by agreement between cardiology and emergency medicine, all patients with acute myocardial infarction receiving thrombolysis were treated by emergency physicians in the emergency department.
  
  
  METHODS
  Door to needle time measured from time of arrival at the hospital to start of thrombolysis. Other outcomes included pain to needle time and mortality.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Median door to needle times were less for patients treated in the emergency department than in the coronary care unit (37 minutes, 95% confidence interval (CI) 33 to 44 v 80 minutes, 95% CI 70 to 89, respectively; p < 0.0001). Door to needle time was under 60 minutes in 83% of emergency department patients and 26% of coronary care unit patients (57% difference, 95% CI 45% to 69%; p < 0.0001). Median pain to needle time was less for emergency department patients than for coronary care unit patients (161 minutes, 95% CI 142 to 177 v 195 minutes, 95% CI 180 to 209; p = 0.004); times of less than 90 minutes occurred in 18% of emergency department patients v 1% of coronary care unit patients (17% difference, 95% CI 9% to 25%; p < 0.05). Overall mortality was similar in patients treated in the emergency department and the coronary care unit.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  With a collaborative interdepartmental approach, thrombolytic treatment of acute myocardial infarction was more rapid in the emergency department, without compromising patient safety. This should improve the outcome in patients with infarcts treated with thrombolytic agents.
authors.affiliation: Department of Emergency Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Perth, Australia.
authors.forename: C T
authors.initials: CT
authors.lastname: Hourigan
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Mountain
authors.forename: P E
authors.initials: PE
authors.lastname: Langton
authors.forename: I G
authors.initials: IG
authors.lastname: Jacobs
authors.forename: I R
authors.initials: IR
authors.lastname: Rogers
authors.forename: G A
authors.initials: GA
authors.lastname: Jelinek
authors.forename: P L
authors.initials: PL
authors.lastname: Thompson
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001315:Australia; D016507:Cardiology Service, Hospital / Q000458:organization & administration*; D004636:Emergency Service, Hospital / Q000458:organization & administration*; D005260:Female; D006784:Hospitals, Teaching; D006801:Humans; D015274:Interdepartmental Relations; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009203:Myocardial Infarction / Q000188:drug therapy*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D015912:Thrombolytic Therapy / Q000379:methods*; D013997:Time Factors; D017748:Time Management; D016896:Treatment Outcome