title: Bladder-sparing treatment of invasive bladder cancer.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection is the standard treatment for patients with invasive bladder cancer. However, many alternative techniques to spare the bladder have been investigated.
  
  
  METHODS
  We review the experience reported in the literature on bladder-sparing techniques, including transurethral resection, chemotherapy, and radiation for muscle-invasive disease.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Most comparative studies indicate that local recurrence and survival outcomes for bladder-sparing approaches are inferior to those from radical cystectomy to control muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Although molecular biologic techniques may have the capacity to identify a subgroup who may benefit from a bladder-sparing approach, cystectomy is normally required for optimal results.
authors.affiliation: Division of Urology at the University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, 32610-0247, USA.
authors.forename: I
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Rivera
authors.forename: Z
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Wajsman
mesh_terms: D000970:Antineoplastic Agents / Q000627:therapeutic use; D003131:Combined Modality Therapy; D015653:Cystectomy / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D009361:Neoplasm Invasiveness; D011788:Quality of Life; D016019:Survival Analysis; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D001749:Urinary Bladder Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery / Q000628:therapy*
chemical_list: D000970:Antineoplastic Agents