Iliac occlusions: stenting or crossover grafting? An examination of patency and cost.
OBJECTIVE
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with stenting is perceived to be a less invasive and cheaper option for the treatment of iliac artery occlusion than surgical reconstruction. We have carried out a prospective observational study of all patients undergoing an iliac stent or femorofemoral crossover graft for iliac artery occlusion to assess the cost effectiveness of the two approaches in a district general hospital.


METHODS
Fifty-one patients underwent primary angioplasty with stenting and 87 patients crossover grafting. Patients were all assessed 2 months after their procedure and then at intervals over the following years.


RESULTS
In 13 cases, it was impossible to place the stent successfully. In a further 10 patients, major complications occurred which were mainly thromboembolic. Fifteen patients underwent crossover grafting after failure to insert a stent, or after stent occlusion. No major complications occurred following crossover grafting. The median length of stay following successful stenting was 1 day; the following crossover grafting was 4 days. The mean stay was higher in each group (2.5 and 5.8 days) and is a more accurate parameter for estimation of cost, which for iliac stenting is estimated at pound1912 versus pound3072 for crossover grafting. The mean additional cost of those patients sustaining complications after stenting was pound2481. On an <<<<intention to treat>>>> basis, patency following stent insertion at 6 months was 52%; patency after bypass was 100% (p <0.0001). If any complication occurs after stenting, the cost advantage of the procedure is lost. In those patients without complication, the initial cost benefit of iliac stenting is lost within 6 months, as patients require further intervention, usually as a crossover graft, when the stent occludes. Crossover grafting is a durable low-risk procedure.


CONCLUSIONS
We suggest that stenting of occluded iliac arteries should be reserved for those patients with limited life expectancy. Patients who are younger and fitter should be offered femorofemoral crossover grafting as a primary procedure until research enables identification of those patients who are most likely to maintain long-term patency after stenting.
Whatling
P J
PJ
Department of Surgery, Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading, U.K.
Gibson
M
M
Torrie
E P
EP
Magee
T R
TR
Galland
R B
RB
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000800:Angioplasty, Balloon / Q000191:economics; D001157:Arterial Occlusive Diseases / Q000191:economics / Q000601:surgery*; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D005260:Female; D005263:Femoral Artery / Q000601:surgery*; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D007083:Iliac Artery / Q000601:surgery*; D007511:Ischemia / Q000191:economics / Q000601:surgery*; D007866:Leg / Q000098:blood supply*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000191:economics; D012086:Reoperation; D015607:Stents / Q000191:economics