A comparison of 2 modern femoral cementing techniques: analysis by cement-bone interface pressure measurements, computerized image analysis, and static mechanical testing.
Modern cementing techniques aim to improve microinterlock and to reduce aseptic loosening. The Norwegian and Swedish Arthroplasty Registers have shown an increased risk of revision using reduced-viscosity cement. We have compared 2 modern cementing techniques using retrograde insertion of normal-viscosity and reduced-viscosity cements. Laboratory-simulated arthroplasty was performed in paired human femora. Performance was evaluated by measuring pressures generated during cementation, cement penetration, and shear strength of the prosthesis-cement and bone-cement interfaces. Large differences exist between these 2 modern techniques. Despite no statistical differences between the pressure measurements with the 2 techniques, greater penetration of reduced-viscosity cement was found proximally, with a trend toward increased penetration of the more viscous cement distally. Areas of greater cement penetration with reduced-viscosity cement proximally produced higher values of ultimate shear strength. Both techniques showed a progressive increase in the shear strength as the level of the section progressed toward the tip of the prosthesis. There is a trend with both techniques for the distal fixation to be stronger.
Reading
A D
AD
Department of Orthopaedics, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Scotland, United Kingdom.
McCaskie
A W
AW
Barnes
M R
MR
Gregg
P J
PJ
D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Q000379:methods*; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D001843:Bone Cements / Q000737:chemistry*; D002484:Cementation / Q000379:methods*; D005269:Femur / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000737:chemistry; D006622:Hip Prosthesis; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D012307:Risk Factors
D001843:Bone Cements