The burden of mental disorders: a comparison of methods between the Australian burden of disease studies and the Global Burden of Disease study.
The national and Victorian burden of disease studies in Australia set out to examine critically the methods used in the Global Burden of Disease study to estimate the burden of mental disorders. The main differences include the use of a different set of disability weights allowing estimates in greater detail by level of severity, adjustments for comorbidity between mental disorders, a greater number of mental disorders measured, and modelling of substance use disorders, anxiety disorders and bipolar disorder as chronic conditions. Uniform age-weighting in the Australian studies produces considerably lower estimates of the burden due to mental disorders in comparison with age-weighted disability-adjusted life years. A lack of follow-up data on people with mental disorders who are identified in cross-sectional surveys poses the greatest challenge in determining the burden of mental disorders more accurately.
Vos
T
T
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra, Australia. Theo.vos@dhs.vic.gov.au
Mathers
C D
CD
D001315:Australia / Q000453:epidemiology; D017281:Cost of Illness; D004812:Epidemiologic Methods; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000145:classification / Q000191:economics / Q000453:epidemiology*