title: Implant strategies during feeding: impact on carcass grades and consumer acceptability.
abstract: Anabolic growth promotants influence beef grade factors and Warner-Bratzler shear force of steaks. No study has assessed the consumer acceptability of beef derived from implanted cattle. This study determined beef carcass grades and consumer acceptability for cooked beef from unimplanted (control) cattle and from cattle implanted with one of seven different implant strategies (initial implant/implant at 59 d = Encore & Component T-S/no implant, Ralgro/Synovex Plus, Ralgro/Revalor-S, Revalor-S/Revalor-S, Revalor-S/no implant, no implant/Synovex Plus, and Synovex Plus/no implant). British crossbred steers (n = 448) were allocated randomly into one of eight pens for each of the control and seven treatment groups. Carcass quality and yield grade (n = 403) and Warner-Bratzler shear force (n = 298) data were collected by trained personnel. Twenty steaks per control or treatment group were selected randomly for use in consumer sensory evaluation. Steaks were evaluated by consumers for overall like, tenderness like, tenderness level, flavor like, flavor intensity, and juiciness level using 9-point, end-anchored hedonic scales. Control carcasses had smaller (P < .05) longissimus muscle areas than carcasses in all treatment groups except those receiving Encore & Component T S/no implant, Ralgro/Synovex Plus, or Revalor S/no implant. Control carcasses had higher (P < .05) marbling scores than carcasses in all treatment groups except those receiving Ralgro/Revalor-S or Encore & Component T-S/no implant. Steaks from control steers had lower (P < .05) Warner-Bratzler shear force values than steaks from steers given Revalor-S/no implant. Consumer ratings for tenderness like and tenderness level were influenced (P < .05) by implant strategy. Effects of implant strategy on overall like, flavor like, and flavor intensity approached significance (P = .07 to .09). Consumers rated steaks from unimplanted steers as more tender (tenderness level; P < .05) than steaks from all treatment groups except that involving Encore & Component T-S/no implant. Consumers rated steaks from unimplanted steers as more desirable (P < .05) for tenderness like than steaks from all treatments except those involving Encore & Component T-S/no implant or Revalor-S/no implant. Although use of implants in this study resulted in heavier hot carcass weights and larger ribeyes, some of the implant strategies reduced consumer preference of tenderness of steaks.
authors.affiliation: Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523-1171, USA.
authors.forename: D L
authors.initials: DL
authors.lastname: Roeber
authors.forename: R C
authors.initials: RC
authors.lastname: Cannell
authors.forename: K E
authors.initials: KE
authors.lastname: Belk
authors.forename: R K
authors.initials: RK
authors.lastname: Miller
authors.forename: J D
authors.initials: JD
authors.lastname: Tatum
authors.forename: G C
authors.initials: GC
authors.lastname: Smith
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000822:Animal Husbandry / Q000379:methods*; D000818:Animals; D002417:Cattle; D003258:Consumer Behavior; D003692:Delayed-Action Preparations; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D016018:Least-Squares Analysis; D008297:Male; D008460:Meat / Q000592:standards*; D008875:Middle Aged; D011786:Quality Control; D012923:Social Class
chemical_list: D003692:Delayed-Action Preparations