title: [Prioritizing suspected diagnosis of both brain and abdominal injuries--is it a problem?].
abstract: Current guidelines for management of suspected head and abdominal injuries are based on retrospective studies like that of Wisner & al, Following a recent review in this journal by Y. Kluger & al, which was based on non-Israeli data, we decided to define the current status at our trauma center. We compare our data of 18 months of hospital admissions for acute trauma in which head CTs were done with those of 5 articles advocating specific protocols for decisions in pre-laparotomy diagnosis. In the 861 cumulated cases, compared with the 800 of Wisner & al, craniotomy was required in 15% vs 7% (p < 0.05); laparotomy was much less frequent, 2.7% vs 12.9% (p < 0.05). The chance of finding a case requiring both craniotomy and laparotomy was 1 in 300. As the clinical condition of multiple trauma involving the head and abdomen is becoming less frequent and includes diverse situations, a comprehensive algorithm might be inaccurate. Good clinical judgment of the clinician and teamwork are therefore preferable.
authors.affiliation: Dept. of Neurosurgery and Trauma Unit, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa.
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Levi
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Michaelson
mesh_terms: D000007:Abdominal Injuries / Q000145:classification / Q000628:therapy*; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001930:Brain Injuries / Q000145:classification / Q000628:therapy*; D006259:Craniocerebral Trauma / Q000145:classification / Q000628:therapy*; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D012189:Retrospective Studies