Functional MRI at 1.5 tesla: a comparison of the blood oxygenation level-dependent signal and electrophysiology.
How well does the functional MRI (fMRI) signal reflect underlying electrophysiology? Despite the ubiquity of the technique, this question has yet to be adequately answered. Therefore, we have compared cortical maps generated based on the indirect blood oxygenation level-dependent signal of fMRI with maps from microelectrode recording techniques, which directly measure neural activity. Identical somatosensory stimuli were used in both sets of experiments in the same anesthetized macaque monkeys. Our results demonstrate that fMRI can be used to determine the topographic organization of cortical fields with 55% concordance to electrophysiological maps. The variance in the location of fMRI activation was greatest in the plane perpendicular to local vessels. An appreciation of the limitations of fMRI improves our ability to use it effectively to study cortical organization.
Center for Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, and Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
E A
EA
Disbrow
D A
DA
Slutsky
T P
TP
Roberts
L A
LA
Krubitzer
D000818:Animals; D001931:Brain Mapping / Q000379:methods*; D002560:Cerebrovascular Circulation; D004305:Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; D004594:Electrophysiology; D005145:Face / Q000502:physiology; D006225:Hand / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D008253:Macaca mulatta / Q000502:physiology*; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008839:Microelectrodes; D010100:Oxygen / Q000097:blood*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D013003:Somatosensory Cortex / Q000098:blood supply* / Q000502:physiology*
D010100:Oxygen