Comparison of the RPHA and EIA techniques for the detection of HBs antigen among pregnant Thai women.
Five hundred serum samples obtained from pregnant women attending an antenatal clinic in Bangkok were tested for HBsAg by reverse passive hemagglutination assay (RPHA) and enzyme immunoassay (EIA). It was found that 21 (4.2%) and 28 (5.6%) of the sera were positive by RPHA and EIA, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the RPHA were 75% and 100%, respectively, when using EIA as the standard method. The RPHA positive predictive value was 100% and the negative predictive value was 98.5%. Accuracy was 98.6%. This study showed that the RPHA was simple and required inexpensive equipment, making it suitable for mass screening. However, the possibility of false negative readings due to low levels of HBsAg should be kept in mind, especially in the blood transfusion practice.
Nathalang
O
O
Department of Pathology, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand.
Arnutti
P
P
Wansumrith
N
N
Sriphaisal
T
T
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006386:Hemagglutination Tests; D006514:Hepatitis B Surface Antigens / Q000097:blood*; D006801:Humans; D007124:Immunoenzyme Techniques; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011247:Pregnancy / Q000097:blood*; D013785:Thailand
D006514:Hepatitis B Surface Antigens