Cassel Personality Disorder Study. Methodology and treatment effects.
BACKGROUND
The effectiveness of hospital-based treatment models for personality disorder is still uncertain.


OBJECTIVE
To compare effectiveness of two models of psychosocial intervention for personality disorder.


METHODS
Two samples of people with personality disorder allocated to a one-stage treatment model (in-patient treatment with no after care) and to a two-stage model (shorter in-patient admission followed by outreach therapy) are prospectively compared.


RESULTS
Subjects in the two-stage sample did significantly better on global assessment of mental health (according to the Global Assessment Score (GAS)) at 6 and 12 months and on social adjustment (according to the Social Adjustment Scale (SAS)) at 12 months. Significant differences in rates of reliable improvement on the GAS (43% v. 17%) and SAS (39% v. 15%) in favour of the two-stage condition were found at 12 months. Subjects with borderline personality disorder (BPD) allocated to the two-stage model improved significantly more than such patients in the one-stage model.


CONCLUSIONS
A long-term phased model which combines hospital-based and community-based strategies has advantages over a purely in-patient model for the treatment of BPD.
Cassel Hospital, Richmond, Surrey. marco@cassel.ftech.co.uk
M
M
Chiesa
P
P
Fonagy
D000328:Adult; D000553:Ambulatory Care; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007902:Length of Stay; D008297:Male; D010349:Patient Compliance; D010554:Personality Disorders / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000628:therapy*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011613:Psychotherapy / Q000379:methods*; D012107:Research Design; D012944:Social Support; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D006113:United Kingdom / Q000453:epidemiology